Maj Gen Sanjeev Dogra (Retd)
sanjeev662006@gmail.com
India is officially one of the fastest growing large economies in the world. The headlines are impressive. Roads are being built. Airports are expanding. Digital payments have changed daily life. Infrastructure has visibly improved. Yet, beneath this growth story, there is a quiet unease. The rupee remains under pressure. Foreign investors have pulled out large sums from Indian equities. Too many educated young people are still searching for secure and dignified work. The stock market feels expensive and uncertain. And the common man keeps asking a simple question that no headline can answer: if the economy is doing so well, why does my life still feel so precarious?
This is not a contradiction. It is a signal. And it is the most important signal we have.
The numbers are not lying. But they are not telling the whole truth either. Economics teaches us a simple lesson that politics often resists: everything has a cost, because everything can be used somewhere else. A rupee spent on one scheme cannot be spent on another. Land used for one factory cannot be used for a hospital. And a young person’s five years spent chasing one competitive exam cannot be recovered. The moment a country forgets this arithmetic, treating resources as if they were infinite, it begins spending its future while calling it its present.
Take welfare, for example. Protecting the vulnerable is not just good politics. It is sound statecraft. Kautilya understood this clearly: the stability of the state rests on the wellbeing of its people. Food support, direct benefit transfers, and health coverage are not generosity. They are the floor below which no civilised state allows its citizens to fall. But floors are meant to stand on, not to live on permanently. When welfare stops being a bridge and becomes a destination, it quietly transforms from compassion into dependency. And once that happens, the political incentive to move people out evaporates, because the queue itself becomes a voter base.
Infrastructure makes the same promise with different packaging. A new highway from Jammu to Katra is genuinely useful. But the road itself does not create prosperity. It creates the possibility of prosperity. What actually creates prosperity is what happens along the road: the hotels that open, the local produce that finds new markets, the cold storage that stops farmers from watching their crop rot. Infrastructure is the skeleton. Without the muscle of human capability and local enterprise, it remains a very elegant skeleton doing very little.
This distinction between growth and livelihood is one India must hold in plain sight. Gross domestic product can grow on the back of large infrastructure spending, financial services, and high end consumption. But a young graduate in Udhampur does not live inside GDP. He lives inside opportunity. His question is simple. Where is the job? Government vacancies are few. Corporate hiring is selective. So he waits, moving from one coaching centre to another, and the years that should have been his most productive quietly become his most suspended. Every year a capable young person spends in this limbo is a year their energy produces nothing for the economy. Multiply that by millions, and you begin to understand why India’s demographic dividend has not yet converted cleanly into economic advantage.
Then there is the rupee. When it weakens, it tells you things that no press release will ever say. Currency pressure is not the problem. It is the symptom. A falling rupee reflects a persistent trade imbalance and a manufacturing base that is not yet deep enough to offset what we buy from the rest of the world. India imports too much of what it should be producing: electronics, energy, components, critical technologies. Each import creates a permanent structural demand for dollars. Atmanirbhar Bharat is the right instinct. But an instinct needs to become an industrial programme with specific targets, honest accountability, and the patience to wait for results that take years, not quarters. Patriotism is an excellent starting point. It is a poor substitute for policy.
The money flowing in and out of Indian markets adds another layer. Foreign Direct Investment is patient money. It builds factories, brings technology, creates jobs, and believes in the long story. Foreign Portfolio Investment is different. It enters when returns look attractive and exits the moment risk rises. When large sums leave Indian equities, it does not mean India has failed. It means sophisticated investors are asking hard questions about whether India’s growth story is backed by real productivity or by optimism with a good marketing team. The stock market, meanwhile, is not the economy. A rising index can reflect genuine confidence, or it can reflect excess liquidity looking for a home. True economic strength announces itself differently: in rising wages, expanding small businesses, growing exports, and households secure enough to plan five years ahead.
Beneath all of this runs something that resists quantification but holds everything together. Trust. Businesses invest when they trust that rules will not change arbitrarily. Young people take risks when they trust that opportunity is real. Households spend when they trust that their future income will hold. Trust is built slowly through consistent policy, fair taxation, reliable data, and the quiet daily evidence that the system is not working against ordinary people. When trust weakens, money becomes cautious. And cautious money does not build nations.
The Indian economy is not in crisis. But it is sending signals, and signals are worth reading before they become emergencies. Headline growth must translate into household confidence. Infrastructure must become employment. Welfare must build capability rather than sustain dependency. The rupee’s stability must come from what India exports, not only from what the Reserve Bank defends. Atmanirbharta must move from a slogan on hoardings to actual supply chains running through actual factories.
Jammu is a good place to think about all of this, because Jammu has never had the luxury of abstractions. This region understands scarcity, resilience, and what it means to build something meaningful under difficult conditions. It also understands that security is not only military. It is economic. Jobs for youth. Industry for towns. Income for farmers. Skills for students who deserve a future they do not have to leave home to find.
The real test of India’s economy will not come when we overtake Germany in aggregate size. It will come when a young person in Kathua or Rajouri or Poonch feels, without needing to be told by a Government advertisement, that the future is not somewhere far away, but here, within reach. India does not merely need to grow fast. It needs to grow deep. Growth must flow from the stock exchange to the shop floor, from the expressway to the village lane, from the budget speech to the household kitchen. That is the economy worth building. That is the economy worth defending.
Follow our WhatsApp channel
