MELBOURNE: The most common type of collisions involving motorcycles may result from the driver’s inattentional blindness – the failure to notice an unexpected object in plain sight, a study has found.
The disproportionately high number of motorcycle-related traffic accidents may be linked to the way the human brain processes – or fails to process – information, according to researchers from Australian National University (ANU).
The study, published in the journal Human Factors, may explain the prevalence of looked-but-failed-to-see (LBFTS) crashes.
LBFTS crashes are particularly troublesome because, despite clear conditions and the lack of other hazards or distractions, drivers will look in the direction of the oncoming motorcycle – and in some cases appear to look directly at the motorcycle – but still pull out into its path, researchers said.
“When we are driving, there is a huge amount of sensory information that our brain must deal with. We can’t attend to everything, because this would consume enormous cognitive resources and take too much time,” said Kristen Pammer, associate dean of science at ANU.
“So our brain has to decide what information is most important. The frequency of LBFTS crashes suggests to us a connection with how the brain filters out information,” Pammer said.
The researchers recruited 56 adults and asked them to examine a series of photographs depicting routine driving situations taken from the driver’s perspective.
The respondents were to determine whether the image represented a safe or unsafe driving environment.
In the final photograph, the researchers manipulated the image to include an unexpected object, either a motorcycle or a taxi, and asked participants if they noticed either object.
Although 48 per cent of all participants reported that they did not notice any additional object, they were significantly less likely to detect the motorcycle (65 per cent) than to notice the taxi (31 per cent).
Further evidence that inattentional blindness could be present was revealed in the results of a survey administered before the experiment, the purpose of which was to gauge participants’ overall perception of each vehicle in the photos.
Although they believed a motorcycle was just as likely to be on the road as a taxi, they thought they would be far less likely to notice the motorcycle.
The study highlights the need to encourage drivers to be more motorcycle-aware. Training programmes could be required for all novice drivers.
“Motorcycles appear to be very low on the priority list for the brain when it is filtering information,” Pammer said.
“By putting motorcyclists higher on the brain ‘radar’ of the driver, hopefully drivers will be more likely to see them. In the meantime, we need to be more vigilant, more active, and more conscious when driving,” she said. (AGENCIES)