The word ‘Mankading’ has negative connotation, bowlers not at fault: Karthik

Abu Dhabi : Senior India wicketkeeper-batsman and Kolkata Knight Riders captain Dinesh Karthik finds it extremely unfair that the legendary Vinoo Mankad’s name is used in a negative manner for a dismissal which is absolutely legal.
Mankad, during the 1948 Tour of Australia, ran opposition batsman Bill Brown out at the non-striker’s end after he backed up too far despite repeated warnings. The Australian media outraged over it and called it “Mankading” even though Sir Don Bradman found the dismissal to be perfectly legal.
“There are two issues I have with this ‘Mankad’ run out. First is the implementation of it. Second is the name ‘Mankad’ run out,” Karthik was quoted as saying by ‘cricketnext’ website.
“All the way from Don Bradman to Sunil Gavaskar, everyone has said it’s completely within the rules. The ICC and MCC have also taken a stand that it is okay. So I don’t see the reason why bowlers or any team that does it is looked at in a negative way.
“The person who did it first time was Vinoo Mankad. Interestingly, he was alert enough to do that dismissal. But more importantly, nobody remembers the batsman who got run out. It was Bill Brown,” he pointed out.
Karthik’s comments have significance because of Delhi Capitals coach Ricky Ponting’s recent comments that he would have a chat with Ravichandran Ashwin and advise him that the dismissal is against the ‘Spirit of the Game’ referring to the India spinner running out of Jos Buttler during the last edition.
Karthik said the dismissal should not be called ‘Mankading’, especially when the ICC and MCC call it just a run out.
“If Mankad was the first person who did that run out, Bill Brown was the first person who got run out for being silly and walking out of the crease. Why is it that people remember Mankad and not Brown?” he asked.
“Why can’t it be called anything to do with Bill Brown? He (Mankad) followed the rules and did it. The ICC and MCC call it a run out. So the name Mankad shouldn’t be used in a negative connotation,” he asserted.
Karthik also suggested that the TV umpire should be called in to check whether the batsman is backing up too far and if so then that particular run should be disallowed.
“If this is done just like a run out consistently, then obviously the batsmen will be even more careful and stop doing it.
“But because it is not encouraged and looked at in a negative way, and people are doubted morally, the bowlers, the captains and the teams are scared of doing it more for the repercussions that anything else,” he said.
“Now there is technology for checking no balls. So use the camera, check if the non-striker leaves the crease early. Every time a batsman backs up early, all runs should be disallowed. Only a wicket should stand.” (AGENCIES)


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here