NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court today dropped contempt proceedings against former Army Chief V K Singh after he unconditionally apologised and withdrew entire statements made by him towards judiciary relating to the verdict on his age row.
A visibly upset 63-year-old Singh was consoled after the proceeding by his counsel Ram Jethmalani, who on his behalf stated that the former army chief was withdrawing entire statement made by him concerning the judiciary and all other statements attributed to court in earlier interviews on the apex court’s February 10, 2012 decision on his age row.
A bench comprising justices R M Lodha and H L Gokhale noted that Singh, who was present in the courtroom, “tendered the apology at the earliest opportunity without contesting it on merits”.
“We accept the unqualified apology tendered by him and the contempt proceedings are accordingly dropped,” the bench said and observed that “repentence is a tool which condons all sort of misdemeanour and if the apology is coming from heart and that too from a senior advocate like Jethmalani, it (contempt proceedings) should not continue even for a second”.
The apex court had on October 1 issued notice to Singh after taking suo motu cognisance of his remarks against its order on his age row published on September 22, saying it prima facie amounts to “scandalising” and undermining the authority of the court.
Jethmalani said Singh was withdrawing the entire statement made by him on September 21 in English and Hindi concerning the judiciary to a news agency which was published a day after in a newspaper and all other statements attributed to court in earlier interviews relating to February 10, 2012 decision on age row.
Singh, who served the army for 42 years, had tendered an “unqualified apology” on November 18 to the Supreme Court for making certain remarks on its order on his age row, saying he had no intention to bring disrepute to the institution and judges, who are like “Demigods”.
Though the contempt proceeding against the former army chief was dropped, the bench during the 15 minutes hearing questioned him, saying though he was tendering an unqualified apology, he has been claiming that there has been erroneous reporting.
“Was there any erroneous reporting. If there was erroneous reporting then you should have taken a different course. If you say sorry, we will close down the case,” the bench said.
“Even in our order (February 10, 2012), we said government has higest regard for you,” the bench observed but took exception to his statement in the interview that “hostile lobbies were working on the Judges”.
The bench told Jethmalani “we are concerned with the majesty of the institution and you have assisted to hold its majesty rather than getting it in danger”.
The bench said there was no need to go further as Attorney General G E Vahanvati, who is assisting the court, also expressed his satisfaction over the development in view of the statement made by Jethmalani.
“Don’t enlarge the scope of this contempt proceeding,” the bench said while rejecting the plea of an advocate to make submission as an intervenor.
During the hearing, Jethmalani said he wanted to gift to the judges the autobiography of Singh– Courage and Conviction — which was published recently.
However, the judges, who said they would be “enlightened” to read the experience of the former army chief, politely declined the offer saying that they would ask the apex court library to the purchase the book.
“The library of this court will purchase the book. We will ask the librarian to buy the book. It is always enlightening to read the experience of a General,” the bench said. (AGENCIES)
Trending Now
E-Paper
Follow our WhatsApp channel