“Progressives” at it again

B L Saraf
For  the  libertarians who train guns  on    the Modi    Government  and   the   fellows  of  Award  Wapsi  tribe,  catch  phrase is “pause and examine”.  For them   it  has  become a  cliché  to find untenable   and imaginary reasons  to cry   hoarse  and  denounce  the  present  Government  as  intolerant. Reams have been   written  to   expose their  selective outrage. However,  it doesn’t  occur to  these  ‘conscience keepers ‘that, in fact, it is  they  who  look intolerant  by  refusing to attend  the  Bangalore Literary Fest: simply  on the pretext that the chief organizer has expressed views  on  the award return  specter  which are not  to their  liking.
For a change, it is time  for us to “pause and examine  “motives of these ‘progressives’  and  the destabilizing  role some of them played  whenever a Government with a nationalistic outlook came to the helm at the Centre.
Recall   times  of 1977  when  Janata  Party Government   came to rule India,  after the disastrous  period of  emergency declared by Indira Gandhi, in 1975, had come to an end.  Janata Party was  an amalgam of various parties like Congress O ,  Swatantra  Party,  Jana Sangh ( now BJP) SSP, PSP and other smaller out fits,  formed to challenge  the authoritarian  streak  in   Indira Gandhi.  This was not to the liking of   the  fellow  travelers. So, before the Government could run its course,  a  demolition brigade   was activated from within. Socialist  Madhu Limaye  was   chosen to do the job. He  was taken  on   a  “progressive   pilgrimage´” to the Mecca of Communism –Moscow.  Having a refresher course  on   the  perils  of “Double Membership”,   Limaye, who  earlier  had   no  compunction in cohabitating with Jana Sangh, in 1967, to form  Samyukht  Vidayak  Dal ( SVD)  governments in UP and other Hindi speaking states   after the collapse of Congress,  saw   many  faults  in  simultaneous  member ship  of two parties, and  started a campaign against  what he and  the other fellow travelers called  a curse of “Double Membership”. The   assault was   on  Jana Sangh, whose members had an open association with RSS ,  but  the intended target was  the Janata Party. Short was fired at an important constituent  like  Jana Sangh   but,  in reality,  it was  aimed  at  the dismemberment  of  the Government lead by Morarji Dessai.  The Government was   an eyesore to  the forces who never felt comfortable with the idea of a nationalist Government at the centre.
The  idiosyncrasies  of  PM Dessai , ambitions of some of the constituents, inept  handling  of  Indira Gandhi by the Home Minister Charan  Singh,  machinations of the  socialists and the deft planning of Sanjay Gandhi ensured  a  premature fall of the   Dessai  Government and  subsequent disintegration of   the  Janata Party.
The same  shouting brigade, brought up on the   so called progressive Government’s  patronage, went hammer and tongs against earlier NDA Government lead by A B  Vajpayee.
The   communists and the so called progressives have bitten  dust world over.  But  we   still  have some remnants of the species.  They  may  have shrunk in numbers and become irrelevant,  but they still retain their  mischief value. The so called  progressives and the liberals have a grouse  that with Narendra Modi  coming   on the national scene  the Hindu identity has become central to being Indian. PM   Narendra  Modi’s   emphasis on Yoga, Ayurveda  and describing Holy Gita as an invaluable Book  to be  gifted   to the heads of Government, who host  him,   is   to these liberals   “prioritizing  narratives  that connects India’s past to its current – nation – sate identity, and    marginalizing  interpretations  giving primacy to  secularism .” Which,    they  feel,  is  unacceptable  to them.  That  is why  we see a procession of  suddenly awakened    and conscience bitten award  wapsi  ‘ liberals’.
Well , one may like it  or not the fact is that India is inhabited by the people   80%  of whom  are  Hindus . It is a different matter  that it doesn’t show of  in the matters of governance. Because, Government is  conducted under a Constitution which is secular, both, in letter and the  spirit . Given  demographic composition of the country , pervading influence  of the  majority  community on the social aspect of state’s  functioning cannot be  completely avoided. Care  ,however,  must be taken that it does  not adversely  impinge upon the religious affairs of other countrymen.  Even a   self  pro claimed  agnostic, Jawahar  Lal Nehru couldn’t escape  the  over bearing influence of Hindu tradition,  when he had  willed that after his death  a portion of  the  ashes should be immersed    in   Sangam   Allabad,  where rivers Ganga, Yamuna  and unseen  Triveni   have a confluence.
The pallbearers of  secularism  and liberty  in India  must    know that USA is a democratic and a liberal country whose  people  loath  to see a non- Protestant as their President. Moreover, the President elect  has to  take  oath on Bible, administered by a Christian  High Priest ,  before he or  she  enters the  office.  Then follows a official service in a Church to set the presidency under way. The   practice , however,  makes  US no less  a  liberal or secular state. That is bound to happen  because   America is country of more Christians than people of other faiths. Remember,  we  have, once  our  own, Bobby  Jindal flaunting  Christianity, his adopted faith , in full public  gaze  just to gain legitimacy for  a  contest to the  highest  executive   post  in America.
(The author is former Principal District &Sessions Judge)
feedbackexcelsior@gmail.com

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here