Justice For Life

B L Saraf
Benjamin Disraeli ,  speaking in House of  Commons  in 1851, said   “Justice  is  truth  in action.”   For  us  the  Truth  at the moment is that  most  people in J&K are   desperate and helpless.  Made so, essentially, by their earthly  masters and  partly by the  elements in Nature. Our High Court   seems  to have recognised this truth.  The way  it is dealing with the after effects of the recent flood fury in the State and is  trying to come to the rescue of the devastated population, meaning of  the  Disraeli’s  words comes  alive in flesh and blood. In the sensitivity shown and humane approach adopted  by the Honourable Court   we have  a glimpse of a rare   aspect of    justice delivery system revealing  itself.  Justice is,  indeed,  on roll.
Call it judicial activism. A welcome development,  by all means.  Though  we have seen it in  2005, also. Rather than  making a sufferer of the floods to wait in a long queue to claim compensation  from various  state or non -state organisations,  payable under law and then come to the courts, doors have been,  rather peremptorily, thrown open to the new avenues’ of judicial redressal.  Jeremy Bentham must be   pleasantly smiling in   the  grave  as his Dog’s law Theory is getting reversed, which, rather, detested the entry of law after the even had occurred. A concern  for  the cause of  justice is well and truly discernible. This is quite  in contrast with the concerns that are being voiced in some quarters about the delays  in disposal of cases  and cost of obtaining justice.
Floods have taken lives in thousands, made life miserable  for lacs of the people, degraded the quality of life  and denied opportunities of healthcare, safe drinking water and fresh air to the multitude of people. Basic human rights of the citizen have come under the debris. In this situation, the benign intervention of the honourable High Court is very appropriate and timely. Moreover,  it  is indicative of   its concern to protect basic human rights of the living person and , at the same time,  shows that Court is alive to its Constitutional  mandate. In the minds of those affected by the calamity, the move of the Court makes a favourable impression. Particularly so,  when they contrast it with the lethargy, indolence and criminal negligence of the  political executive of  State  which got  manifested   in the wake of   humongous tragedy.
In order to mitigate the distress  of the affected, the Court has jettisoned the  “adversarial” attitude and adopted “quest for justice” approach.  Match   making   between law and justice  is on.
Law may be a  legislative  act ,  but it will mean nothing unless made functional. Here, we see  law functioning. It is heartening to note that in this endeavour senior lawyers, mtoo, have  chipped  in  with their  legal acumen and vast professional experience. Their  role, as such, has  also  to be acknowledged .
Prompt and appropriate action initiated by the High Court under the leadership of  the Chief Justice, should answer those cynics who often criticize judiciary for usurping the domain of legislature and the executive. It is true that in a democracy the legislature and executive are said  to reflect the aspirations and needs of the people as they are elected for the purpose ;  hence,  are expected  to come to their aid  in crisis. But often we see dereliction of duty on their part: invariably their decisions  or inactions  are influenced by their chances at the  hustings. In this  situation  any further delay in providing relief to the needy would defeat  their  inalienable  basic right.  After  all, human rights are for the living .      “Inalienable  rights  can never be enjoyed posthumously” says  Ralph  Binnche-1950 Noble Prize winner for peace.
The State legal  Services  Authority  has also stepped in, with a vigour and matching  sensitivity, to  help the  distressed. The  effort  has, also, been appreciated    by the public.
This highly appreciated  judicial push, given by the  Honourable Chief Justice, to the relief  and rehabilitation measures for the flood sufferers has given   hope of speedy  relief  to   the thousands of sufferers of other tragedies   whose compensation cases are still pending-like those who lost everything in  the Valley in 1990s  due to the militancy. More power to the  efforts  of the state  Judiciary !
(The author is Former  Principal  District & Sessions Judge)