Dynastic politics

Sir,
In the words of Ibrahim Lincoln “ Democrcy is by the people, of the people and for the people”.   This  concept gave rise to political system  and parties which  finally represent the voice of the  people in the democratic dispensation.
Of course different shades of people come forward and  make a political party based on their ideologies and convictions.
If we  take into account the  world political scenario  we  find that in the west,  major  political parties revolve around  issues for survival.  We in the east though borrowed this lofty  concept  of democracy failed to borrow  its  spirit.
The political parties were survive more  on political clan and personality  cults than on issues and resultantly remain  on the mercy of a particular person and its clan for survival.
That’s why in our subcontinent when  father dies, son or daughter is immediately anointed ignoring the fact whether  he or  she has that very charisma, experience and merit.
Only by virtue of being son or daughter of a particular political personality, he or she gets  imposed upon the partymen and the people.  Even over those who may have toiled in building  the   party from  scratch.
In recent past the anoinments of Bilawal Zardari Bhutto in Pakistan and  Rahul Ghandi in India  are  stark examples to buttress my view point.  Age of both these  political parties outmarches much to the age of  these novices in politics.  But purely on acount of lineage got their political anoinments in these  parties  having many more political stalwarts as compared to them  who are  much more meritorious  and experienced and have given  their best to the party.
Time has shown that both these imposed political leaders  have  failed to put any tangible  mark On the  political spectrum,   rather have brought the  graph of the   party  down in their respective countries.
Fact remains  that  on the this touch stone  BJP  has shown a remarkable   edge over other political  parties  which  is devoid of  any  dynastic politics and even a common  man  who once  happened to be  a “” Chaiwala “”  became the  prime minister of the  country.   Rest they all revolve  around father- son  or father-daughter politics.
In our State too we have got two regional political parties and both are  based on dynastic politics  i.e   Abdullah clan  and  Mufti clan.
If  PDP  has to show democratic  canons  in true spirit and to distinguish it from its arch political  rival  NC  which ofcourse is deeply based on dynastic politics ,  then its high time for  PDP  to stop glamorising  Mehbooba Mufti only  and pave way for anoinment of any other stalwart of the  party to lead the show.  Such a lofty act wil not only strengthen the democratic values but will also encourage  a common man to participate in politics and aspire to touch  heights in  political  ladder  which till date is taken as a mirage by him.  Moreover, it  will  distinguish PDP from other political parties for following the democratic values in true spirit.  It will certainly prove a boon for the party in the days to come.
Lets  hope  political sanity will  perevail over PDP   and usher in foundation of new democratic era in the state    based   on genuine participation of people,    merit,  capability, experience and political charisma rather than  on  already invogue  trend  of caste and clan.
Yours etc….
Khurshid Bismil
Thanna Mandi