MUMBAI: He is born to veteran screenwriter Salim Khan and has superstar Salman Khan as his big brother, but Arbaaz says the stardom of his kin has not overshadowed his career.
The 50-year-old actor-director said getting recognised as Salman’s brother does not bother him and it only acts as an advantage.
“I don’t think (it has bothered me) ever. There are only advantages of being Salim Khan’s son, Salman Khan’s brother and coming from a known family,” Arbaaz said.
The actor said the fact that “I could never make it to the level that I should have was because I was under pressure or under the shadow of my father or brother. I think those are just excuses.”
Arbaaz said he is aware that there is a certain baggage of expectations when a person comes a famous family but he has taken it in his stride.
“There is a pressure. People look at you differently. But you’ve got to move on. I look at all that has happened to me because of my family as an advantage rather than disadvantage. It has more pros than cons.”
After an acting career of more than a decade, Arbaaz ventured into film production between 2009 and 2014. He took a sabbatical from acting as he produced films like “Dabangg”, “Dabangg 2” – which he also directed – and “Dolly Ki Doli”.
He, however, said acting is something he enjoys the most.
“For me, acting is something I am passionate about. I am someone who wants to be known for who I am. If I wanted to just make money, I would’ve chosen some other profession.
“I know there are insecurities in being an actor. There are certain compromises you need to make, but they are all worth it. The perks of being recognised are something else,” he said.
Arbaaz is currently awaiting the release of his next “Nirdosh”, in which he plays a cop investigating a murder.
The thriller, directed by Pradeep Rangwani and Subroto Paul, also features Manjari Fadnis, Ashmit Patel, Maheck Chahal and Mukul Dev.
“Nirdosh” is scheduled to be released on January 19. (AGENCIES)d to erase the traces of an, in this case, mock crime.
Researchers completed their series of trials in the form of a fourth test, in which a crime was re-enacted with the help of a doll’s house.
On the whole, they did not find any connection between watching forensic dramas and the ability to successfully avoid detection after committing a crime.
However, the male subjects in the fourth part of the experiment performed better than female subjects, and younger subjects better than older subjects while more highly educated subjects did better than less well educated study subjects.
Study subjects working in technical professions, primarily men, appear to have certain advantages when it comes to concealing crimes.
“We can now dispel certain of the myths that have been coursing through the media and other publications for the past 20 years because we are able to state with relative certainty that people who watch CSI are no better at covering their tracks than other people,” Baranowski said. (AGENCIES)
Follow our WhatsApp channel
