Anti-rape Bill: Stringent punishment for rapists, says Shinde

NEW DELHI :  Union Home Minister Sushil Kumar Shinde today moved the Criminal Law (Amendment) Bill, 2013,  in the Rajya Sabha, pointing out that harsher punishment will be meted in cases where the victim of sexual violence died  or lapsed into a vegetative coma.
Mr Shinde told members that harsh punishment of 20 years  jail had been proposed for those indulging in gangrape and  for repeated rape offenders. Acid attack victims for the first  time had been included under the provisions.
He referred to the national outrage over the December  16, 2012 gangrape incident involving a young Delhi woman and  said the Government had planned to introduce the legislation  on December 4 when the events overtook it.
Subsequently the Justice J S Verma committee had also  submitted its recommendations for incorporation in the Bill,  he added.
Initiating the debate on the Bill, Opposition BJP member
Maya Singh demanded that the Bill be implemented in toto as  women had lost sense of safety and security on the streets.
Noting the allocation of Rs 502 crore for setting up of  fast track courts in the country, she said the funds had become defunct in some states due to financial crunch.
The situation was even more difficult in rural areas, where women were forced into silence out of embarrasment. In most  cases there was no video recording of the trial, she lamented.
Prabha Thakur, Congress, thanked the Government for bringing the Bill with such alacrity. She preferred capital punishment  for those indulging in rape of minors.
Satish Chandra Misra of the BSP said a strong anti-rape Bill was the need of the hour to instil fear among criminals.
”Today people feel they can get away after committing  crimes like rape. This is because timely and strict action  is not taken against such criminals.
”For example, three months have passed since the  gangrape incident in Delhi and it is still not clear when the hearing in the case will begin,” Mr Misra said.
He welcomed the provisions in the Bill to punish those  indulging in disrobing and stalking.
T N Seema of the CPI-M expressed dissatisfaction at  the Bill’s provisions.
”Bill does not contain the substance of the Justice  Verma committee.
She said there were many cases of consensual sexual  activity in boys of age group between 16 and 18.
”Punishing these boys would be doing injustice,”  she said.
She also wanted to know why marital rape was not included  in the definition of rape.
She added that the Bill was silent on the incidents  of sexual abuse by people in political and social positions.
”Many such people managed to escape the law by dint of  their influence,” she said.
(AGENCIES)