MUMBAI, Sep 8:
RDX cannot be used as a powder to kill mosquitoes and flies, the Special TADA court here observed while awarding death sentence to Tahir Merchant and Firoz Abdul Rashid Khan and life term to gangster Abu Salem in the 1993 Mumbai serial blasts case.
Noting that the accused had knowledge about the crime, the court yesterday said “it cannot be assumed that AK-56 rifles were being distributed in schools in Bombay as toys.”
The Special TADA court yesterday awarded death sentence to Merchant and Khan in the case but Salem escaped the noose and was handed down life imprisonment due to a provision in the Extradition Act.
Besides Salem, the court sentenced Karimullah Khan to life imprisonment, while awarding 10 years in jail to the fifth convict, Riyaz Siddiqui.
“It is necessary to mention that RDX cannot be used as a powder to kill mosquitoes and flies and it cannot be assumed that AK 56 rifles were being distributed in schools in Bombay as toys. The accused had knowledge about the offence,” Special TADA court Judge G A Sanap said in his judgement.
It is necessary to note that the conspirators and the perpetrators of the crime rejoiced at its success and when it came to face the consequences they were getting justice, the court observed in the 2,100-page judgement.
The court also observed that the punishment must be proportionate to the depravity and gravity of crime.
It would be necessary to make a mention of the worldwide scenario and menace of terrorism. It was pertinent to note that a case related to terrorism could not be treated at par with other offences.
“Offences and offenders of terrorism need to be dealt with sternly. Further generations need to be saved from the menace of terrorism,” judge Sanap observed.
A lenient view in such cases can weaken the fight and collective efforts to combat terrorism, the court said.
The court had in June convicted six persons, including prime accused Mustafa Dossa and Salem, 24 years after the blasts left 257 people dead in Mumbai.
It, however, let off accused Abdul Quayyum for want of evidence.
The court also imposed a fine totalling Rs 27.09 lakh on the five accused. Firoz was fined Rs 4.75 lakh, Karimullah Rs 8.88 lakh, Tahir Rs 4.85 lakh, Salem Rs 8.51 lakh and Siddiqui Rs 10,000.
Salem, a notorious gangster considered close to fugitive mob boss Dawood Ibrahim, escaped death sentence as the Extradition Act bars India from seeking capital punishment for an accused extradited from a country where the practice is not in force.
Before Salem’s extradition in 2004 following his arrest in 2002 in Portugal, India had assured Lisbon that he would not be awarded capital punishment, if convicted in the case.
This was the second stage of trial in the case.
All the seven accused were facing multiple charges, including criminal conspiracy, waging war against Government of India and murder.
The court, in its June 16 ruling convicting six accused, held that the prosecution had proved that Salem was one of the main conspirators, and he delivered three AK-56 rifles and ammunition and hand grenades to actor Sanjay Dutt (convicted under Arms Act in the earlier phase of the trial).
The trial of Salem, Dossa, Karimullah, Firoz, Siddiqui, Merchant and Quayyum was separated from the main case as they were arrested after the first set of trial had already started.
Dossa died of cardiac arrest at J J Hospital in Mumbai, shortly after being convicted on June 28.
The court had held that Tahir was among the main conspirators.
“The role of Tahir in conspiracy is prominent. He is one of the initiators of the conspiracy,” the court said in its ruling on June 16.
The court also held that the prosecution proved that Firoz was a “prominent and trusted” member of the Dossa gang, and participated in all the landings of weapons effected by Dossa brothers in Raigad district.
On the victims’ compensation, the court said that 257 people died and 718 suffered grievous injuries while some had become disabled.
“The victims in the Bombay blasts case, deceased and injured/disabled are entitled to get compensation as per the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code and the victim compensation scheme of Government of Maharashtra,” observed judge Sanap. (PTI)
Trending Now
E-Paper
Follow our WhatsApp channel