NEW DELHI, July 30: The Supreme Court on Wednesday told Justice Yashwant Varma that his conduct did not inspire confidence and also defended the CJI’s authority to act on any judicial misconduct saying he cannot be merely a “post office” but has certain duties to the nation.
It also asked Justice Varma, who is now a judge of the Allahabad High Court, why he chose to move the apex court after an in-house committee found him guilty of misconduct in the cash discovery row.
The top court was hearing Justice Varma’s plea seeking invalidation of a report by an in-house inquiry panel which found him guilty of misconduct in the cash discovery matter. The report indicted the judge over the discovery of a huge cache of burnt cash from his official residence during his tenure as a Delhi High Court judge.
Follow the Daily Excelsior channel on WhatsApp
The plea does not reveal Justice Varma’s identity and is titled, “XXX v. The Union of India”.
Posing sharp questions to the judge, the top court asked Justice Varma why he appeared before the in-house inquiry committee and did not challenge it then and there.
It told Justice Varma that he should have come earlier to the apex court against the panel’s report. A bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and A G Masih said the in-house process was put in place in 1999 and the chief justice of India (CJI) cannot be considered merely a post office.
“The Chief Justice of India is not supposed to be a post office only. He has certain duties to the nation as the leader of the judiciary. If material comes to him regarding misconduct, he is only to inform the president and the prime minister. Nothing more. (PTI)
Follow our WhatsApp channel
