The termination of 103 firemen by the Jammu and Kashmir Government after an ACB investigation is not merely an administrative action; it is a stark indictment of a recruitment system corroded by manipulation, collusion and impunity. The decision, though necessary, exposes a deeper malaise-one that has festered for over a decade and repeatedly betrayed the trust of thousands of aspiring youth. What makes this episode particularly shocking is its long and troubled history. The process to fill these posts began as far back as 2013. An examination conducted in 2016 was cancelled amid allegations of irregularities. The exercise was revived in 2018, only to meet the same fate. Yet instead of introspection and systemic correction, the authorities pressed on. A new tender was floated for conducting the examination, but inexplicably, the contract was awarded to an L2 agency instead of the L1 bidder-an aberration whose rationale remains known only to the department. Predictably, the 2020 examination too was marred by allegations of mass copying, manipulation and favouritism, culminating in an ACB probe.
The revelations that followed are damning. According to the investigation, question papers were set far beyond the comprehension level of candidates with the minimum prescribed qualification of 8th standard. Marks of candidates who had scored well below the cut-off-some as low as 11, 17 or 24-were fraudulently inflated to 90. Five real brothers from Budgam found their way into the select list, alongside multiple relatives of Fire & Emergency Services officials from the same localities. Such patterns are not coincidences; they are signatures of a rigged process. The ACB’s findings paint a picture where “everyone was washing hands in the stream of corruption.” Digital tampering, manipulation of OMR sheets, fabrication of scanned images and illegal alteration of merit lists were carried out with impunity. FIRs have been registered against members of the Departmental Recruitment Board, the Technical Committee, officials of the Fire & Emergency Services Department, the private agency involved, its main partner, and beneficiaries. Of the 106 candidates identified as illegally selected, 103 now stand terminated, while three had their appointments cancelled earlier for failing to complete formalities.
For years, meritorious and deserving candidates who cried foul were dismissed or ignored. The ACB’s conclusions have vindicated their allegations entirely. Yet this vindication comes at a steep cost: wasted years, shattered aspirations and deepened cynicism among the youth. Crucially, this is not an isolated incident. The 2022 Sub-Inspector recruitment scam, later busted by the CBI, revealed a similar nexus of officials, middlemen and beneficiaries. Arrests included a BSF Commandant whose sons were allegedly selected through a leaked paper. The pattern is unmistakable. Across departments and years, a network of “black sheep” collaborates to monetise recruitment, confident that the law’s grind is slow and consequences uncertain. By the time cases reach closure, many culprits retire with full pensionary benefits, while a new generation of manipulators takes their place.
This is where the present case assumes significance beyond the termination orders. While removing illegally appointed firemen was unavoidable, it addresses only the surface. The real test lies in the action taken against those who orchestrated the fraud. Without exemplary punishment-such as criminal convictions, recovery of illicit gains, dismissal from service, and denial of retirement benefits-the message will remain hollow. Terminations alone do not deter; accountability does. The stakes are high. Recruitment processes are the gateway through which youth engage with the state. When jobs are seen as commodities sold through money power, and favouritism, faith in governance erodes. The credibility of the Government and its recruiting agencies stands severely compromised. Each unresolved scam deepens alienation and fuels the perception that merit has little value.
If the Government is serious about reform, this scandal must be treated with utmost urgency and seriousness. Swift prosecution, transparent trials and time-bound conclusions are essential. Equally important is institutional reform-robust safeguards, independent oversight, technological checks and zero tolerance for deviations such as arbitrary tendering decisions. Ultimately, the handling of this case will set the tone for future recruitments in Jammu and Kashmir. The choice before the system is clear-and so are the consequences.
Follow our WhatsApp channel
