Vijay Hashia
iamvhashia@gmail.com
Books are intellectual treasures. They challenge assumptions, broaden understanding and expand the boundaries of our world. Yet some books written by political leaders, senior bureaucrats or military commanders have become an eye of storm because of authors’ personal experience, inside stories of governance as they reveal institutional tensions or challenge official narratives. When such memoirs touch upon sensitive national security, historical memory, or party leadership, they cease to be mere recollections of the past. Instead they become flashpoints, sparking intense debates and widespread public controversies.
The recent controversy surrounding former Army Chief General M. M. Naravane’s memoir, “Four Stars of Destiny,” reportedly, reflects on his tenure during a period of national security challenge of the 2020 Ladakh standoff with China. Allegations by the opposition that the Army was left without clear political direction from the Prime Minister during the crisis heightened the sensitivity of the issue, turning it into an intensely charged political controversy.
When opposition members and the LoP referred to an article in the magazine Caravan, that discussed excerpts from this unpublished memoir, the ruling party objected, arguing that quoting an “unpublished” and “un-cleared” manuscript violated parliamentary norms. The Government maintained that, without mandatory Ministry of Defence clearance, the book “does not officially exist.” This procedural objection triggered sharp exchanges and accusations of suppressing transparency on China-related issues by the opposition. However, the publishers Penguin Random House India (PRHI) officially clarified that the memoir of the former Army Chief has not been published. Former Chief of Army Staff, General Naravane also seconded Penguin’s statement on social media adding, “this is the status of the book,” effectively validating that it has neither been published nor officially released.
What makes the former COAS’s episode particularly striking is that it led to the disruption of parliamentary proceedings for several days. During this period, even the Prime Minister was prevented from speaking on the motion of thanks to the President’s address as repeated adjournments were forced by the opposition. Even women members of the opposition advanced towards the treasury benches, raising slogans and holding banners, turning the controversy over the memoir into a full scale parliamentary confrontation.
Historically, such memoir-related storms are not new. India has repeatedly witnessed similar uproars when insiders, whether military commanders or senior politicians or bureaucrats write accounts that question official positions or unsettle established narratives.
Military memoirs, in particular, have often caused unease. A precedent is of a former COAS Gen V. K. Singh’s memoir “Courage and Conviction,” (2013-14), candidly depicted legal battle with the Government over his date of birth and alleged bureaucratic interference in military matters. Though the book did not cause a formal parliamentary standstill, it generated substantial political debate and media attention, exposing internal tussle between the armed forces and civilian leadership and raised uncomfortable questions about how senior officers are treated within the system.
A much earlier instance of civil-military friction can also be traced to Admiral Vishnu Bhagwat’s dismissal in 1998. Although not centered on a single book at first, his later public statements and writings provoked parliamentary debate about civilian supremacy and institutional autonomy.
Another instance is that of General Stanley McChrystal, after being relieved of command in Afghanistan, wrote his memoir “My Share of the Task,” in 2013. The book offered a frank account of the Afghan war and included critical reflections on the Obama administration’s handling of the conflict. Given the sensitivity of the subject, the manuscript underwent extensive Pentagon vetting to ensure that no classified information was disclosed. Several portions were reportedly redacted. This reflects, even the established democracies impose institutional safeguards on military memoirs when national security is involved.
Political memoirs, too, have created storms of furore and controversy. One of the most dramatic examples is Jaswant Singh’s “Jinnah: India-Partition-Independence,” (2009). Singh, a senior BJP leader and former cabinet minister, presented a relatively sympathetic interpretation of Muhammad Ali Jinnah and argued that the causes of partition were more complex than commonly portrayed. His reassessment challenged deeply held nationalist beliefs. The reaction was immediate that he was expelled from his party. Gujarat banned the book temporarily, and Parliament saw intense debate over patriotism and historical interpretation.
Similarly, K. Natwar Singh’s memoir “One Life is Not Enough” (2014) stirred controversy by offering critical observations about the Congress leadership, including the Gandhi family. As a former External Affairs Minister and insider, his account carried credibility and provoked sharp political responses. Party leaders defended themselves publicly, while opponents used the book as ammunition. Although not formally banned, it generated a prolonged political and media storm, showing how memoirs can become tools in partisan battles.
A more sensational example is M. O. Mathai’s “Reminiscences of the Nehru Age,” (1978). Mathai, reveals controversial details about the personal and political lives of top Congress leaders. The book caused immense uproar in Parliament and the press. Many considered it a scandalous, while others viewed it as an insider’s candid record of history. Regardless of perspective, the book demonstrated that memoirs exposing elite circles can embarrass Governments and provoke legislative outrage.
Beyond memoirs, historical and biographical works have also triggered debate. James W. Laine’s “Shivaji: Hindu King in Islamic India,” (2003) provoked protests and bans due to its interpretation of the Maratha ruler. Javier Moro’s “The Red Sari,” a biography of Sonia Gandhi, faced legal threats and political objections. Though not all of these works produced formal parliamentary disruptions and debates, each entered political discourse because they touched upon sensitive identities or powerful figures.
When examined in detail, these cases reveal a clear pattern. Books provoke controversy when they challenge three areas: national security, historical memory, and party leadership. Military memoirs like those of former Generals Naravane and V. K. Singh raise concerns about confidentiality and defence policy. Historical reinterpretations like Jaswant Singh’s work unsettle established narratives of the nation. Political memoirs by Natwar Singh or Mathai threaten reputations within ruling elites. In each case, the written word becomes a form of political intervention.
These episodes reveal the enduring political force of books, more than narrative events; they question authority, unsettle Governments, and provoke parliamentary reckoning. In a democracy as diverse and contested as India, such tensions are inevitable. From personal revelations to historical reinterpretations and military reflections, memoirs demonstrate, the pen remains a challenge to power, continually testing the resilience of the republic.
Follow our WhatsApp channel
