The eviction of the Nedous Hotel in Gulmarg by the Gulmarg Development Authority marks a significant legal and administrative milestone. It brings to a close a long-drawn saga over nearly 100 kanals of prime public land that had remained under unauthorised occupation for nearly four decades. While this development is being seen as a success of the rule of law, it also highlights the chronic inefficiencies and deep-rooted inertia in governance mechanisms in Jammu and Kashmir. The question that looms large is: why did it take 40 years for successive Governments to act on an expired lease? The lease for Nedous Hotel-a heritage property with historical and sentimental significance-officially ended in 1985. However, the property continued to operate under private control without any formal agreement or payment of lease rent, effectively converting public land into a private estate. It wasn’t until 2015 that the Government of Jammu and Kashmir finally rejected the renewal application. And yet, even after a formal rejection, it took another ten years, two court verdicts, and the involvement of top officials to physically take possession of the land.
Such prolonged delays in enforcing lease terms and recovering Government land illustrate a serious systemic failure. For four decades, almost 98 kanals and 11 marlas of land-nestled in one of India’s most sought-after tourist locations-generated negligible or no revenue for the State. The value of this land is immense, both commercially and strategically. Gulmarg, being a premier tourist destination with HC strictures of no new construction, commands high real estate value, and the potential revenue from such a property, if leased transparently and competitively, could have significantly supported local development and infrastructure. What makes this case even more troubling is the implicit suggestion of political patronage and elite capture. The Nedous family’s long-standing legacy in Gulmarg and their social and political ties-including marital relations with influential figures-may have served as a shield against any meaningful enforcement action over the years. It is a matter that demands serious introspection and, possibly, investigation.
The High Court and Supreme Court have now made the legal position abundantly clear, terming the hotel’s continued occupation as unauthorised. This landmark judgement has opened a clear pathway for the Government to reclaim other expired leases in Gulmarg and beyond. The Nedous eviction should therefore not be seen as the end, but rather the beginning of a much-needed corrective campaign. The situation in Gulmarg reflects a broader pattern across many tourist hotspots in Jammu and Kashmir. Numerous hotels, resorts, and commercial establishments continue to operate on expired leases. In light of recent High Court directives prohibiting fresh constructions in eco-sensitive zones, the commercial value of existing structures has skyrocketed. Many of these properties, which sit on Government land, are goldmines waiting to be unlocked for the public good-if the administration shows the will. The Government now has an unprecedented opportunity. The momentum created by the Nedous Hotel case should be swiftly followed up with a comprehensive audit of all such properties in Gulmarg, Pahalgam, Sonamarg, and other major tourist hubs. Immediate steps must be taken to repossess land wherever lease agreements have expired or where terms have been violated.
Once possession is secured, the next logical step must be an open, transparent, and preferably international auction for fresh leases. This would not only ensure maximum revenue generation but also attract quality investment in the tourism sector. Such auctions must be conducted with stringent conditions to preserve the ecological balance and heritage value of these regions.
The eviction of the Nedous Hotel is indeed a symbolic victory. But unless it triggers a broader reform and enforcement movement, its significance will remain limited. The authorities must now act decisively and uniformly-irrespective of legacy, lineage, or linkages-to restore public control over public assets.
