The Kolkata court’s sentencing of Sanjay Roy to imprisonment till death for the heinous rape and murder of a postgraduate trainee doctor at RG Kar Medical College and Hospital has evoked mixed reactions across the nation. While some see the verdict as a step towards justice, others, including the victim’s grieving family, remain dissatisfied, citing leniency in the punishment and the possibility of a larger conspiracy behind the crime. This case has become emblematic of the broader issues, and it demands a closer examination of the judgement and its implications. On August 9, 2022, an on-duty doctor was brutally assaulted, raped, and murdered-an act that shocked the conscience of the nation and led to widespread protests demanding justice. The victim was not just a professional serving the public but a young woman whose life was tragically cut short in a place where she should have been safe. This incident underscored the vulnerability of women, even in professional and ostensibly secure environments, and reignited discussions on the urgent need for systemic reforms to ensure safety and accountability.
Sanjay Roy, a former civic volunteer with the Kolkata Police, was convicted under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including Sections 64 (rape), 66 (punishment for causing death), and 103(1) (murder). Judge Anirban Das, while delivering the verdict, emphasised that the crime, though heinous, did not meet the criteria of the “rarest of the rare” cases warranting the death penalty. Instead, Roy was sentenced to life imprisonment till death, along with fines under various charges. Judge’s interpretation-that the crime did not fall under this category-has sparked a fierce debate. For the victim’s family and many citizens, the brutal nature of the crime and its setting-a hospital where the victim was serving patients-makes it undeniably “rare” and deserving of the harshest punishment. The argument against the death penalty, often rooted in human rights and concerns about judicial error, must be balanced against the societal need for deterrence and justice in such egregious cases. This balance appears to be at the heart of the public’s dissatisfaction with the verdict.
Though investigated by CBI, the victim’s parents have raised serious allegations of a half-hearted investigation and the shielding of other potential culprits involved in the crime. These claims point to a troubling pattern of systemic failures that often plague high-profile cases in India. The victim’s family’s intent to move to a higher court highlights the need for appellate mechanisms to scrutinise and rectify potential shortcomings in the trial process.
The verdict has reignited conversations about the safety of women, especially in workplaces and public institutions. Despite numerous laws and policies aimed at protecting women, the ground reality remains grim. Crimes against women continue to rise, and justice often seems elusive or delayed. This case serves as a grim reminder that legislative frameworks must be complemented by robust implementation and societal change. Moreover, the case underscores the importance of accountability at multiple levels.
For society, this case is a stark reminder of the work that lies ahead in creating a safer, more equitable world for women. The tragedy at RG Kar Medical College should serve as a wake-up call.
Follow our WhatsApp channel
