HC takes serious note of non-filing of report

Excelsior Correspondent

Srinagar, June 17: High Court has warned authorities for not filing the report by an Expert Committee on aspects relating to the Russian Poplar trees.
Hearing a Public Interest Litigation, the Division Bench of Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul warned the authorities after Additional Advocate General Aseem Sawhney said that he has received oral instructions that the needful has been done by the General Administration Department.
“It is truly unfortunate that we have not been informed about what is the ‘needful’ which is done,” the court said, adding “In case the action taken report is not filed before us before the next date of hearing, we shall be constrained to take a strict view of the matter and pass punitive orders against the authorities concerned”. The case has been listed for fruiter consideration on June 23.
Last month, Additional Advocate General Amit Gupta had informed the court that the General Administration Department has taken a view on the report submitted by the Expert Committee and the same stands forwarded to the Department of Law and the Forest Department for compliance.
“Neither report of Expert Committee nor the decision taken thereon has been placed before us,” the court had said previously and sought the same.
The panel was formed following the court’s order on April 10 last, directing the Chief Secretary to constitute it to examine the impact of the pollen and fluff from the poplar trees and the desirability of felling poplar trees amid coronavirus pandemic.
The court had passed the orders days after almost all Deputy Commissioners in Kashmir ordered axing of the “female” poplar trees.
“Significantly a grave error is pointed out which is to the effect that female poplar trees have been directed by the authorities to be felled on account of the pollen generated by them. This by itself is a basic mistake,” the court had observed.
”The two reports brought to our notice refer to views of several experts doubting the correctness of the statement that the fluff generated by the poplars could be effecting respiratory diseases or would impact spread of the COVID-19 infection,” the court had observed. It had directed that the Committee would examine all aspects relating to the matter.