Excelsior Correspondent
SRINAGAR, Jan 23: The Group of Concerned Citizens (GCC) J&K, has expressed serious apprehensions on the veracity and viability of amendments to Unified Building Bye-Laws governing development in the two capital cities of Srinagar and Jammu and other Urban areas in the UT.
The Amendments notified vide S.O. 304 Dt 01–12–2025 envisage far-reaching restructuring of “development controls relating to height, bulk, coverage, and setbacks” in any building activity .
The GCC has submitted a memorandum to Chief Minister Omar Abdullah asserting that the amendments were materially different from the draft proposal notified for public comment in July ,2024 . ” The new Rules have suddenly sprung up in a departure from the mandatory consultative sequence required for a subordinate legislation of this magnitude and run foul of the statutory Master Plan without a formal Plan Amendment”, reads the memorandum.
GCC believes that the new Rules have the effect of substituting executive notification for instruments of statutory planning and set a bad precedent that tends to weaken the integrity of rule-based urban governance.
The Group has questioned the very rationale of new rules which , it fears, may only cause institutionalised urban degradation instead of orderly densification. “Diluted setbacks and increased bulk will compromise light, ventilation, fire and emergency access, and place additional pressure on water supply, sewerage, drainage, and road networks already under severe stress. In cities and towns characterised by narrow streets, vulnerability to floods, seismic risk, and heritage neighbourhoods, regulatory ambiguity poses direct risks to safety , environment quotient , and quality of life,” observes the GCC.
Urging the Government to demonstrate due respect for statutory primacy and larger public interest, GCC has made a fervent appeal to place SO 304 in abeyance and order its comprehensive review by a committee headed by Chief Secretary, with representation from concerned departments and consultation with independent experts and stakeholders.
“We hope such a review would restore procedural legitimacy, reduce legal vulnerability, and ensure that any revision of building controls is aligned with statutory plans and the ecological and infrastructural capacity of cities and towns. Fragility of our capital cities in particular leaves little room for regulatory shortcuts,” said GCC.
Follow our WhatsApp channel
