The revelation that as many as 310 persons from the border district of Poonch are operating from Pakistan and PoJK to foment trouble is deeply disturbing. Terrorism, infiltration, narcotics smuggling, and radicalisation of youth are not standalone phenomena; they thrive only when supported by local networks and facilitators. The identification of these individuals underlines a harsh truth: without local support, terrorism and cross-border smuggling-be it of arms or drugs-cannot sustain themselves. That security agencies have been able to meticulously identify these elements after a comprehensive and painstaking exercise deserves appreciation. The fact that evidence has been gathered, lists prepared, and assets verified reflects a methodical and intelligence-driven approach rather than ad hoc action. This is particularly significant given that over 2,500 persons from Poonch are believed to have crossed over illegally in the past three decades, yet the role of 310 has clearly surfaced in active anti-national activities. This distinction is important to ensure that punitive action is targeted, lawful, and credible.
Much credit must go to the local police and intelligence agencies for moving decisively beyond identification to concrete action. The process of attaching properties, already initiated and set to expand in the coming weeks, sends a strong message that involvement in terrorism and its allied activities will carry tangible consequences. Financial and property seizures strike at the root of terror ecosystems by weakening their logistical and economic foundations. Such tough measures are not only justified but essential in the present security environment. What makes the situation even more tragic and perplexing is the geography and lived reality of Poonch and Rajouri. These are among the districts that bear the maximum brunt of Pakistani shelling and retaliation whenever Indo-Pak tensions escalate. Yet, despite this firsthand experience, some people from these very areas choose to align with Pakistan-sponsored terror groups, indulging in activities that ultimately devastate their own communities. This contradiction points to deeper issues of radicalisation, misinformation, and social influence that cannot be addressed by security measures alone.
While the law will inevitably catch up with those involved in anti-national acts, a purely coercive approach will not suffice. Civil society, community elders, religious leaders, and families must step forward to openly denounce such activities. Social boycott of those aiding terrorism, coupled with strong counter-radicalisation efforts, is imperative. Only a multi-pronged strategy can effectively nip this menace in the bud.
Follow our WhatsApp channel
