A substantial pension fraud amounting to an approximate loss of Rs 2 crore to the state exchequer, has been exposed within the Accountant General (AG) Office of the Jammu region. In response to this grave matter, authorities at the AG office have taken action by suspending an employee who allegedly colluded with two retired AG office employees and certain treasury staff members in utilising counterfeit signatures and dispatch numbers to process pension claims that were not legitimately entitled. It is noteworthy that similar instances of pension fraud have been reported in other regions of the Union Territory, particularly in Srinagar. Across these instances, a nearly identical methodology was consistently employed and regrettably went unchecked, even when it became evident. In certain cases, pensions were disbursed on behalf of deceased Government employees, illustrating the alarming extent of the issue.
The reported incidents are extremely grave, given the Accountant General’s office’s stewardship of a vast number of pension cases. It is profoundly perplexing, in this era of digital advancement, that an employee managed to deceive the system without initial detection. The conspicuous absence of rigorous checks and countermeasures within the AG office, allowing a staggering sum of over two crores to be surreptitiously siphoned off without immediate detection, demands rigorous self-examination. A majority of Government transactions, including pension disbursements, are typically conducted through the Direct Benefit Transfer mode, ensuring that funds are directly funnelled into the beneficiaries’ accounts. It is genuinely confounding how these employees circumvent these safeguards. Furthermore, considering that all bank accounts are tethered to Aadhaar and PAN numbers, it raises profound questions concerning the establishment of counterfeit bank accounts by these employees. The fact that one employee even resorted to forging the signature of a colleague to authorise pension disbursements underscores the imperative for heightened security protocols within the AG office. The AG office’s prompt reporting of the matter to the Jammu and Kashmir Police, who have astutely recommended the involvement of a central agency in the investigation, is indeed a prudent move. This central agency, through a meticulous inquiry, shall unearth the intricate modus operandi employed by these individuals.
The recurrence of similar fraudulent activities within the AG office in Srinagar suggests a systemic vulnerability within the pension office, susceptible to exploitation by employees well-versed in the inner workings of the AG office. It is incumbent upon the AG office to institute a rigorous mechanism for a comprehensive audit of their entire pension sanction and transfer system. Identifying and rectifying these inherent deficiencies is indispensable to preventing future instances of fraudulent misconduct. The complicity of retired AG office personnel and certain Treasury officials in this matter is an additional facet that warrants a proper inquiry. There appears to be a more extensive network at play, with multiple modules operating in distinct regions, all employing the same modus operandi to exploit vulnerabilities within the pension approval and distribution system facilitated by the AG office. Only a thorough investigation can reveal the intricate web of connections. The Government must regard these cases as exemplars of misconduct, and the culprits should face severe penalties to serve as a stern warning to other employees.
Even though Government employees enjoy substantial remuneration, it is demonstrable that human avarice knows no bounds, as borne out by this case. Organising extensive counselling sessions to enlighten employees about the dire consequences of engaging in such nefarious activities could serve as a constructive deterrent. In the interim, it would be judicious for the AG office to conduct a scrupulous revaluation of all pension cases, ensuring that no further spurious disbursements have been sanctioned. This incident serves as an emphatic reminder of the imperative for fortified safeguards and vigilant oversight within Government offices to safeguard public funds and uphold the sanctity of the system.
