The Army Chief has underlined a hard strategic reality: while the security situation in Jammu and Kashmir is firmly under control, India continues to face a complex and persistent threat environment on two active fronts-Pakistan and China. In this context, Operation Sindoor stands out not merely as a successful retaliatory strike after the Pahalgam terror attack, but as a defining demonstration of India’s evolved military preparedness, jointness and political-military resolve. Operation Sindoor showcased the maturity of India’s armed forces across all three wings-Army, Navy and Air Force-operating in close coordination. The precision strikes launched in the early hours of May 7, lasting just 22 minutes, had an outsized strategic impact. Terror infrastructure deep inside Pakistan and Pakistan-Occupied Jammu-Kashmir was incapacitated, more than a hundred terrorists were neutralised, and Pakistan’s ability to mount a coherent response was effectively paralysed. The speed, accuracy and scale of the operation created immediate confusion within Pakistan’s military establishment, exposing serious gaps in its command-and-control structures.
Most significantly, Operation Sindoor punctured Pakistan’s long-standing nuclear bluff. For decades, Islamabad has relied on nuclear rhetoric as a shield to continue sponsoring cross-border terrorism. The Indian response demonstrated that calibrated, high-impact conventional operations can be executed below the nuclear threshold, decisively and without hesitation. The fact that Pakistan’s Director General of Military Operations was compelled to call for a ceasefire after assessing Indian force movements-clearly visible through satellite intelligence-speaks volumes about the deterrent value of credible preparedness.
This outcome was not accidental. It was the result of years of doctrinal evolution, capability enhancement and political clarity. The seamless orchestration of land, air and maritime assets during Operation Sindoor reflects a shift from platform-centric warfare to network-centric, multi-domain operations. Response time, as Gen Dwivedi rightly emphasised, is now the key determinant in modern conflict. The Indian armed forces demonstrated their ability to think fast, strike deep and dominate escalation dynamics from the very outset.
Nevertheless, the challenge is far from over. Despite the extensive decimation of terror camps, intelligence assessments confirm that several such camps remain active across the LoC and the IB. This presents a precarious situation. Pakistan’s infrastructure of terror has not been dismantled in totality, and its intent remains hostile. However, the balance has decisively shifted. Indian forces are no longer reactive; they are anticipatory and prepared for any eventuality. The message is unambiguous: future misadventures will invite swift and disproportionate consequences.
Crucially, the lessons of Operation Sindoor are already being institutionalised. The raising of specialised formations-such as Bhairav light commando battalions, Shaktibaan regiments, Divyaastra artillery units and Ashni platoons-reflects a focus on agility, precision and niche capabilities. The long-pending approval for Integrated Battle Groups marks another major step towards enhancing combat readiness, enabling rapid mobilisation and integrated firepower along both western and northern fronts. Equally important is the move towards theatre commands. True jointness, where all three services are integrated from the very beginning of any escalation, is no longer a theoretical goal but an operational necessity. Theatre commands will ensure unity of command, optimal use of resources and faster decision-making-critical factors in conflicts that may unfold in hours rather than weeks.
On the northern front, India’s approach towards China combines firmness with engagement. While the situation along the Line of Actual Control remains stable, constant vigilance is essential. Talks, confidence-building measures and troop readjustments have helped prevent escalation, even as India maintains robust deployments and accelerates infrastructure development. Improved roads, bridges, and logistics networks across border areas have significantly enhanced mobility and sustainment, ensuring that preparedness is not confined to plans on paper.
The broader message to India’s adversaries is unmistakable. India today is not the same India as it was a decade ago. A proactive doctrine is firmly in place, backed by a strong political will and robust military capability. Any nefarious action-whether through terror proxies or conventional adventurism-will trigger a spontaneous, well-coordinated and forceful response. Preparedness is not just about defending borders; it is about shaping adversary behaviour. When all three wings of the armed forces operate as one, deterrence becomes credible and decisive. In an era of persistent threats, that preparedness is India’s strongest strategic asset.
Follow our WhatsApp channel
