The social media outburst by Javed Ahmed Rana, Minister for Jal Shakti and a senior member of the Omar Abdullah Cabinet, has sent shockwaves through the corridors of power in Jammu and Kashmir. In an unprecedented move, Rana tagged the Education Minister Sakina Itoo and Chief Minister Omar Abdullah on X, expressing concern over alleged irregularities in the transfer of teachers in Poonch district. This public airing of grievances signals a brewing crisis within the administration. It highlights a systemic problem that has plagued the education sector for decades-opaque, unfair, and politically influenced transfer practices. The issue is neither new nor surprising. Education is one of the largest Government sectors in the Union Territory, with a massive workforce spread across thousands of schools, many of them located in remote and inaccessible areas. These schools were established to ensure that education reaches every child, irrespective of geography. However, the ground reality is grim: a large majority of teachers avoid postings in far-off or difficult terrains. Instead, they seek urban postings or, worse, specific schools of their choice within cities.
Over the years, a culture of favouritism, influence, and manipulation has deeply entrenched itself in the transfer process. Attachments and preferential postings for influential teachers have become the norm rather than the exception. While successive Governments have repeatedly announced measures to streamline transfers, these have remained hollow promises. The same story repeats itself year after year-guidelines are issued, deadlines are set, and review meetings are held, but implementation remains abysmal.
In the latest episode of Poonch, the allegations point to gross procedural lapses and policy violations. Rationalisation, which aims to maintain a balanced pupil-teacher ratio, seems to have been completely ignored. Ironically, some schools are left with more teachers than students, while others-especially those with a large student population-are functioning with a skeletal teaching staff. Such irrational transfers not only disrupt academic functioning but also raise serious questions about the competence and integrity of the system. This is particularly unacceptable in the digital age when the Government has access to comprehensive data on every teacher-their tenure history, current posting, and even performance indicators. Transfers are supposed to be processed through an online portal under a transparent system, where applications are verified, and only genuine cases are approved. Canvassing for transfers has been officially stopped. Yet, the fact that irregularities persist suggests either a deliberate circumvention of the system or collusion at multiple levels.
The roles of CEOs and ZEOs are critical in ensuring fair and rational transfers. They are tasked with balancing teacher deployment and preventing academic disruptions. However, expecting this from them seems an uphill task, as the present controversy indicates. If these officers are unable-or unwilling-to uphold the guidelines, accountability must be enforced. Unfortunately, such accountability has rarely been seen in the past, and the present case is no different so far.
What makes this controversy even more significant is the medium through which it surfaced. A senior minister using social media to highlight grievances against a colleague signals two things: either the conventional channels of governance have failed, or the issue is so deeply embedded that extraordinary steps were deemed necessary. Either way, this does not reflect well on the state of governance. The Government must act swiftly and decisively. A time-bound inquiry should be ordered into the allegations. If procedural lapses and violations are confirmed, strict departmental action should follow against those responsible. Simultaneously, immediate corrective measures must be taken to address the teacher shortage in schools with high student enrolment. Students cannot be allowed to suffer because of administrative negligence.
Looking ahead, the Education Department must embrace real-time monitoring and strict adherence to digital systems to eliminate human discretion. Good governance demands transparency, fairness, and accountability. When ministers resort to social media for redressal, it reflects a governance deficit that cannot be ignored. The credibility of the administration-and the future of thousands of students-depends on urgent corrective action. Timely intervention is the need of the hour.
Follow our WhatsApp channel
