The prolonged shutdown of 91 Government websites in Jammu and Kashmir since May this year is not just a technical lapse-it is a governance failure with far-reaching implications. In an era when Governments across the globe are embracing digital platforms to deliver services, improve transparency, and foster citizen engagement, the extended inaccessibility of key portals in J&K has exposed deep systemic flaws in administrative accountability and cybersecurity management. These websites were rendered non-functional because they lacked the mandatory “Safe to Host” certification. The security audit, meant to safeguard portals against cyber threats, was either not conducted or not renewed by several departments. While cybersecurity protocols must be enforced, the absence of parallel contingency mechanisms to ensure service continuity has left citizens stranded, undermining the very foundation of digital governance.
Government websites are not symbolic appendages-they are functional lifelines. Citizens rely on them for accessing welfare schemes, recruitment notifications, tender details, tax and utility payments, grievance redressal, and a range of essential public services. Their prolonged unavailability has forced citizens to revert to outdated manual processes, where available, or worse, to face complete denial of services. The result is widespread frustration, delays in service delivery, and erosion of public trust in administrative efficiency. For a region where geography and weather often limit physical access to Government offices, digital exclusion translates into governance paralysis. The economic and administrative fallout of this outage is equally grave. Many departments depend on online platforms for revenue collection, whether through taxes, fees, or utility bills. Disruption in these channels not only affects departmental cash flows but also hampers the larger fiscal planning. Developmental projects, fund disbursements, and policy execution risk are being delayed due to the breakdown of digital workflows. Moreover, the Government loses access to real-time data that is critical for monitoring schemes and evaluating performance. The blackout, therefore, compromises governance not only at the citizen interface but also at the backend of planning and execution.
Such lapses not only betray administrative negligence but also damage the credibility of the institutions expected to guide others. Repeated circulars from the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology and the General Administration Department had made annual security audits mandatory, with warnings of shutdowns for non-compliance. That departments chose to ignore these directives signals a dangerous culture of inertia and a lack of accountability in treating digital infrastructure as a governance priority. At the same time, the Government cannot afford to view cybersecurity and service delivery as mutually exclusive goals. Indeed, websites need to be secure and resilient against the growing wave of cyber threats, ranging from ransomware to data breaches. But this cannot come at the cost of prolonged unavailability. Security protocols must be pursued in tandem with assured uptime, not as a trade-off.
There are several lessons the administration must urgently draw. Accountability mechanisms must be strengthened. A centralised compliance dashboard monitored at the Chief Secretary’s level should track the audit status of all departmental websites in real time. Transparency in this process will both deter negligence and allow timely interventions. Cyber hygiene cannot be treated as a seasonal concern; it must be institutionalised into the DNA of governance.
Equally important is interdepartmental cooperation. Departments that have successfully cleared audits must support those lagging behind. Working in silos delays compliance and perpetuates inefficiency. A collaborative task force approach, guided by the IT Department and NIC, can accelerate the process. There must be a time-bound, mission-mode approach to restore services. Citizens should not pay the price for administrative failures. Interim arrangements such as alternative portals, mobile apps, or public information centres should have been set up to cushion the impact of outages. That such stopgaps were not even considered reveals a lack of empathy towards public inconvenience. Cybersecurity protocols must be strictly followed, but they cannot become an excuse for administrative paralysis. The shutdown of over 90 Government websites is more than a wake-up call-it is a reminder that in the digital era, governance is only as strong as its online backbone.
Follow our WhatsApp channel
