NIA Court rejects bail of member of HM

National Investigation Agency Takes Over Pahalgam Terror Attack Probe
National Investigation Agency Takes Over Pahalgam Terror Attack Probe

Excelsior Correspondent

JAMMU, Apr 22: Special Judge NIA Sandeep Gandotra today rejected the bail application of one Syed Irfan Ahmad who was alleged member of HM outfit.
The allegations against the accused are that he entered into a conspiracy with Devender Singh (Ex DySP) , Syed Naveed Mushtaq and Irfan Shafi Mir to wage war against the Government of India and also by offering his services by becoming the member of the banned terrorist organization HM vis-a-vis raising and transferring the funds, harbouring the active militants of HM, offer his support to the banned terrorist organization HM thereby actively becoming part of the terrorist activities of HM in Kashmir Valley.
In continuation to the conspiracy, he became a go-between the co-accused to facilitate the movement of two HM militants in Kashmir Valley from Srinagar to Jammu in the month of Feb 2019 with the commonly decided agenda to ex-filtrate accused Syed Naveed Mushtaq to Pakistan with the active assistance of HM leadership based in Pakistan as well as ISI and also during the instant intended visit also.
Special Judge NIA Sandeep Gandotra, after hearing Adv Moulvi Aijaz Ahmad for the applicant and Special PP S K Pathania appearing for the NIA, observed that there is a prima facie case against the accused/ applicant and many witnesses in the case, including material witnesses of forensic reports, bank managers, FSL experts and electronic data experts are yet to be examined. “In the humble opinion of this court, accused Syed Irfan Ahmad is not entitled to bail at this stage. The accused/applicant has been charged for serious offences involving death punishment and punishment upto life imprisonment and there are grave allegations against him. If the accused is enlarged on bail, there are chances of him winning over the witnesses of the prosecution and no witness will come against him because of fear and influence of accused persons in such cases and in militancy related cases nobody dare to come in the court to make statement against the accused,” he said. With these observations, the Court rejected the bail application.