School Books’ Subversion
The Jammu and Kashmir administration's decision to suspend eight officials of the School Education Department, blacklist two sets of authors and publishers, and withdraw two books from Government school libraries is, on the face of it, prompt and firm action....
The Jammu and Kashmir administration's decision to suspend eight officials of the School Education Department, blacklist two sets of authors and publishers, and withdraw two books from Government school libraries is, on the face of it, prompt and firm action. But the episode it responds to is far more troubling than the swiftness of the action suggests. That books allegedly glorifying separatists and men convicted of terrorism could travel through an official procurement chain - past sub-committees of experts, past supervisory officers, past an entire departmental hierarchy - and land on the shelves of Government schools across Jammu, Ramban, Udhampur and Baramulla is not a clerical slip. It is a systemic failure that demands far more scrutiny than a 30-day inquiry can deliver.
Consider the series of events unfolding. Two books of the same title by two separate sets of authors, brought out by two separate publishers - one in Jammu, one in Delhi - apparently carrying similar content eulogising the same cast of separatist figures, arrived in the same procurement cycle and were cleared by the same selection process. Coincidence strains credulity here. Were these two unconnected editorial choices reaching the same troubling conclusion, or something more coordinated? More disquieting still are reports that one of these titles was first published as far back as 2017. If the same glorification of figures such as Maqbool Bhat, Hashim Qureshi, Masarat Alam or Syed Ali Shah Geelani existed in that earlier edition, then the question is not simply how this book slipped through a selection committee in 2026 - it is why no one in the intervening years, whether in the intelligence apparatus, academia or civil society, ever flagged it. A book in circulation for the better part of a decade, apparently unchallenged, is a far graver indictment of institutional vigilance than a single lapse by an eight-member committee.
That committee itself deserves scrutiny. Drawn from different educational institutions and entrusted with vetting appropriate material for hundreds of schools, its members appear, on the Government's own admission, to have engaged in "serious negligence, dereliction of duty and lack of proper due diligence" and not to have read what they were approving. In any jurisdiction, this would be worrying. In Jammu and Kashmir, a region that has endured cross-border terrorism for four decades and subversion in various forms since Independence, it borders on the reckless. White-collar subversion is hardly a new phenomenon here - the region has seen Government employees, including teachers, terminated for links to separatist activity. Departments handling curriculum and content ought to have been operating with heightened, not diminished, vigilance.
The stakes extend beyond the classroom. Material of this nature, once it enters the public record of a Government-sanctioned publication, becomes ready ammunition for hostile propaganda on international platforms. Pakistan's diplomatic apparatus has often misrepresented Jammu and Kashmir; handing it officially procured schoolbooks glorifying men convicted of murder and hijacking would be a gift it need not have manufactured itself.
Against this backdrop, suspension of the eight officials, however necessary, cannot be mistaken for accountability. Suspension is an administrative pause, not a punishment, and blacklisting two publishers is a preventive gesture, not a reckoning. If negligence of this scale is established, those responsible should face prosecution under appropriate laws, not merely departmental censure. Equally, the conspiracy angle - if any coordination between the two publishing houses is found - must be fully unearthed rather than left to speculation.
The Government would also do well to treat this as a warning rather than an isolated embarrassment. A comprehensive audit of every book supplied to Government and school libraries across the Union Territory, not just the two flagged, is now unavoidable. Proactive vetting, not reactive withdrawal after public outrage, must become the norm. It should not have taken a press conference by the Opposition and protests by organisations such as the BJP and JKPF to trigger action that ought to have happened before a single copy left the printer. This episode has rattled ordinary, nationalist-minded citizens who trust their children's textbooks to reflect and reinforce constitutional values, not undermine them. Another subversive plot stands exposed. Restoring the trust will require political consensus across party lines, institutional introspection, and exemplary punishment for those found responsible.
