Haneef may seek
compensation: lawyer
SYDNEY,
Mar 16: Indian doctor Mohammed Haneef, who
was falsely implicated in a failed UK terror
plot, might seek ompensation from the Australian
government, his lawyer Peter Russo said.
Mr Russo yesterday
said a law firm with expertise in compensation
bids had been appointed to investigate seeking
restitution for Dr Haneef over his treatment by
authorities last year, the Sydney Morning Herald
reported.
Dr Haneef was
employed as a registrar at the Gold Coast
Hospital when he was arrested in July last year
at the Brisbane Airport after his mobile phone
SIM card was linked to car bomb plot in London
and Glasgow.
He was held for 12
days before being charged with recklessly giving
support to a terrorist organisation.
The Federal
Government last week appointed former NSW Supreme
Court judge John Clarke, to head the inquiry into
the bungled terrorism case and to report by
September 30.
Former immigration
minister Kevin Andrews has agreed to co-operate
with the inquiry.
(UNI)
G20 backs
climate fight, argues over industry caps
MAKUHARI,
JAPAN, Mar 16: A grouping of the world's top
greenhouse gas emitters today backed UN-led
efforts to forge a global pact to fight climate
change but disagreed on a sectoral approach to
curb emissions from industry.
G20 nations
ranging from top carbon emitters the United
States and China to big developing economies
Brazil, Indonesia and South Africa held three
days of talks near Tokyo to discuss ways to
tackle rapidly rising emissions.
''It's not so much
these two groups are at loggerheads with each
other, they are also thinking of how they can
cooperate collectively,'' Halldor Thorgeirsson of
the UN Climate Change Secretariat told Reuters.
The developing
world is demanding rich states do more to curb
their own emissions and help poorer countries pay
for clean technology.
Both sides managed
to bridge differences in Bali last December to
launch two years of talks on a pact that binds
all nations to emissions curbs to replace the
Kyoto Protocol.
''The whole debate
on climate change is moving away from just being
an issue of targets to being an issue of how to
reduce emissions,'' said Thorgeirsson, who was
pleased with the G20 talks that were billed as a
dialogue, not a negotiation.
''This is a very
good sign that the good spirit of Bali will
prevail in Bangkok as well,'' he said, referring
to the March 31-April 4 meeting in the Thai
capital, the first U.N.-led climate meeting of
nations that backed the ''Bali roadmap''.
But some G20
members and delegates voiced concern over Japan's
proposal for sectoral caps for polluting
industries.
Japan wants top
greenhouse gas emitting nations to assign
near-term emissions targets for each industrial
sector which, added up, would then form a
national target.
But it was unclear
if this target was mandatory or voluntary and
developing nations said the scheme needed to take
into account their individual circumstances.
''It is clear that
developed and developing countries are still far
apart on sectoral approaches,'' South African
Environment Minister Marthinus van Schalkwyk told
Reuters.
DIFFERENCES
Slovenia, which
holds the rotating presidency of the European
Union, was more guarded.
''We all agree
that a sectoral approach is needed,'' said Andrej
Kranjc of Solvenia's Ministry of the Environment
and Spatial Planning.
''Only this
Japanese proposal is a little different from the
understanding of others, including the European
Union. Let's say it has potential, we all agree
on that.''
Indonesia called
for more funding and the transfer of clean energy
technology. Otherwise a sectoral approach would
not work.
''The goal is the
same for developed and developing countries, but
there are big differences in thinking,'' said
Japanese Trade Minister Akira Amari.
The talks in
Chiba, near Tokyo, also sparked a row over big
developing nations being labelled ''major
emitters'', a term US officials used at the
gathering.
South Africa,
Indonesia, India and Brazil told the meeting they
objected to the label since on a per-capita
basis, their carbon emissions were a fraction of
the roughly 24 tonnes of carbon dioxide
equivalent produced by the average American.
Developing nations
also called for more clarity on the funding and
management of schemes to pay for clean energy
technology projects in their countries.
Van Schalkwyk said
yesterday it was crucial developing nations had
greater involvement in the management of clean
technology funds, particularly recently announced
funds to be managed by the World Bank with money
from Japan, the United States and Britain.
About 190 nations
agreed in Bali to try to find a replacement for
the Kyoto Protocol by the end of 2009. Under the
Bali roadmap, all nations would be obligated to
curb carbon emissions under Kyoto's successor
from 2013.
Kyoto first phase
ends in 2012 and binds only rich nations to
emissions curbs.
But rapidly rising
emissions from developing nations means the pact
is no longer effective in trying to limit
dangerous climate change that scientists say will
cause rising sea levels and greater extremes of
droughts and floods.
(AGENCIES)
Further
glacier loss will be chaotic for India: UNEP
UNITED
NATIONS, Mar 16: Further shrinking of Himalyan
Glaciers can have dramatic consequence In India
disrupting everything from farming and power
generation to winter sports, the UN Environment
Programme has warned.
The UNEP in its
report yesterday stated that worlds
glaciers were shrinking at record rates and many
could disappear within decades. Data from 30
glaciers in nine mountain ranges indicated that
average rate of melting and thinning reached
record levels in 2006.
Further ice loss
could have dramatic consequences, particularly in
India, whose rivers were fed by Himalayan
glaciers, and the US west coast, which gets water
from glaciers in the Rocky Mountains and Sierra
Nevada.
The most severe
loss had till now been recorded at Norways
Breidalblikkbrea glacier, which shrank 3.1m. On
average, glaciers shrank by 1.5m. "The
figures are part of what appears to be an
accelerating trend with no apparent end in
sight," said Wilfried Haeberli, director of
the World Glacier Monitoring Service, which
conducted the study.
Professor Haeberli
said between 1980 and 1999 glaciers lost an
average of 0.3m of ice a year. But since 2000 the
average loss has increased to about 0.5m.
UNEPs
director Achim Steiner urged Governments to agree
stricter targets for emissions reductions.
(UNI)
Par resolution
enough to restore sacked judges: Ex-SC Justices
ISLAMABAD,
Mar 16: Eight former judges of
Pakistans Supreme Court-including three
Chief Justices-have said "a simple
resolution" in Parliament will be enough to
reinstate the Judges sacked by President Pervez
Musharraf during last years emergency rule.
"A simple
resolution in the National Assembly (lower house
of Parliament) reflecting the intention of the
peoples representatives to deny affirmation
to the purported amendments would provide more
than sufficient backing for the executive to do
the needful," the former Judges said in a
joint statement.
"The removal
of Judges, which was admittedly unconstitutional
being in defiance of Article 209 of the
Constitution, could not be validated by the
unilateral act of one individual through the so
called introduction of Article 270-AAA and
purported amendments to 270-C in the Constitution
nor could it be validated by the Supreme
Court," they said.
Musharrafs
legal aides, including Attorney General Malik
Qayyum, have insisted that the Presidents
actions during the emergency, including the
sacking of the Judges, can be reversed only
through a constitutional amendment passed by a
two-thirds majority in Parliament.
But the former
Judges said: "Since Article 270-AAA and
270-C (2) have not been adopted by two-thirds
majority of Parliament, they are not part of the
Constitution."
"The power to
make permanent amendment in the Constitution does
not vest with the President. Nor can any court
confer such a power, particularly a bench
appointed through an unconstitutional instrument
and acting in defiance of order dated November 3
passed by the Supreme Court established under the
Constitution," the ex-Judges said.
The statement was
signed by former Chief Justices Ajmal Mian,
Sajjad Ali Shah and Saiduzzaman Siddiqui Nasir
and former judges Aslam Zahid, Kamal Mansour
Alam, Fakhruddin G Ebrahim, Deedar Hussain Shah
and Mamoon Qazi.
The former Judges
said no "principle of state necessity"
allowed an individual to "make permanent
changes in the supreme law".
"Even if an
individualised power to amend were to be
conceded, such power can only be (made) available
during the period of deviation/emergency and,
upon restoration of the Constitution, the power
to make changes as well as the effects thereof
stand completely effaced unless duly indemnified
by the parliament."
The statement
recalled that amendments introduced in the
Constitution by Gen Ziaul Haq in 1985 and by Gen
Pervez Musharraf in 2002 had become part of the
Constitution only after they were adopted by a
two-thirds majority in Parliament. (PTI)
Men, women and
the secrets of skin colour
LONDON,
Mar 16: Have you ever wondered why men are
attracted to fair-complexioned females while
women prefer the dark and brooding types? Well,
the attraction is driven by preferences based on
moral assumptions, says a study.
Researchers have
found that men are subconsciously attracted to
fairer skin due to its association with purity,
innocence, modesty and goodness, while women feel
that darker complexions are associated with sex,
virility and danger.
"What the
research shows is that our aesthetic preferences
operate to reflect moral preferences. Within our
cultures, we have a set of ideals about how women
should look and behave.
"Lightness
and darkness have particular meanings attached to
them and we subconsciously relate those moral
preferences to women," The
Independent quoted the studys lead
author Dr Shyon Baumann of Toronto University as
saying.
The researchers
came to the conclusion after they analysed over
2,000 advertising photographs of men and women.
They found that the skin of white women was 15.2
per cent lighter than the skin of white males
while the skin of black women 11.1 per cent was
lighter than the skin of black men.
According to the
researchers, many judgements about beauty are
made at a conscious level, such as about leg
length, height, weight and the shape of the nose
as well as the mouth. "In contrast, other
physical attractiveness ideals, including
complexion... Are made at the subconscious
level."
When the
researchers analysed adverts featuring white
women only, they found that females with darkest
complexions were more likely to be in an advanced
state of undress. They were also more likely to
have a bared midriff, and only they are shown
with bared feet or are implied to be totally
nude.
The
darkest-complexioned women in this group were
also likely to be provocatively dressed, wearing
underwear or similar clothing. Women with the
lightest complexion are more likely to be
conservatively dressed and portrayed as friendly,
happy and honest.
According to the
researchers, the scale of the differences between
male and female skin colour selected for their
attractiveness is too big to be explained by pure
biology.
"I contend
the complexion findings should be understood as a
product of deeply rooted and enduring cultural
values. My argument to explain the findings has
two key features.
"First, it is
based on the meanings that lightness and darkness
have in our culture. Second, it highlights the
links between moral and aesthetic judgements.
Physical lightness and darkness are aesthetic
characteristics that... Exemplify the link
between aesthetic and moral judgements.
"On average,
fair complexions in women are the dominant
aesthetic ideal as sexual modesty and
conventional femininity are the dominant
behavioural ideal for women," Dr Baumann
said. (PTI)
|