US
initiates a move to get peacekeeping force into
Darfur
UNITED
NATIONS, Mar 6: The United States is spearheading a
new initiative to get a 26,000-strong
peacekeeping force on the ground in Sudan's
Darfur region, where the five-year conflict has
escalated and malnutrition is rising.
Ambassador Richard
Williamson, who took over in January as US
President George W Bush's special envoy to Sudan,
said countries that are "friends" of
the African Union-United Nations force would meet
today at UN headquarters for the first time to
start tackling obstacles to deployment of the
hybrid force known as UNAMID.
"Given the
humanitarian suffering, given the instability and
violence that's going on, it's way past time for
talk. We have to have action, including
accelerating deployment of UNAMID troops on the
ground," Williamson told reporters yesterday
after meeting Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon.
The AU-UN force is
authorised to have 26,000 troops and police, but
Ban said only about 7,500 military personnel and
1,500 police officers were in Darfur on January
31. He appealed to all countries that have
pledged troops to expedite their deployment --
and he reiterated an appeal for critically needed
helicopters.
At Sudan's
insistence, the UN Security Council agreed that
the force would be predominantly African. But the
Sudanese government has refused to approve
non-African units from Thailand, Nepal and Nordic
countries, which withdrew their offer.
Sudan's
Arab-dominated government has been accused of
unleashing the janjaweed militia of Arab nomads
to commit atrocities against Darfur's ethnic
African communities in the fight with rebel
groups. (AGENCIES)
US
should release India nuke deal answers - experts
WASHINGTON,
Mar 6:
Four US nonproliferation experts called on the
Bush administration to make public comments about
the US-India civil nuclear deal that it gave to
US lawmakers on condition they be kept secret.
The State
Department responded to congressional questions
about the deal and, after initially discussing
classifying the answers, gave them to a small
group of lawmakers on condition they not be
released, sources familiar with the matter said.
Critics of the
deal, which would give India access to US nuclear
fuel and equipment for the first time in three
decades even though New Delhi has tested nuclear
weapons and refused to join nonproliferation
agreements, demanded the State Department drop
what they called ''a virtual 'gag' order.''
The four
nonproliferation experts -- Daryl Kimball, Fred
McGoldrick, Henry Sokolski and Sharon Squassoni
-- made their appeal in a statement released
yesterday.
''The
administration's responses should be made
publicly available so that US and Indian
lawmakers and the public can evaluate whether the
draft US-Indian accord conforms to the terms and
conditions established by Congress,'' wrote
Kimball, executive director of the Arms Control
Association.
''The
administration's unwillingness to make their
answers more widely available suggests they have
something to hide from either US or Indian
legislators.''
The State
Department said the US-India civil nuclear
agreement complied fully with US law and the
administration had provided extensive briefings
to Congress on the matter, including public
testimony by top State Department officials.
''We've handled
answers to sensitive questions in an appropriate
way that responds to congressional concerns.
We're going to continue with that approach,''
State Department spokesman Tom Casey said.
'WINK AND A NOD'
Proponents argue
the deal will be the cornerstone of a new
strategic relationship between the two nations.
But some Indians
feel it infringes on their country's sovereignty,
while some nonproliferation advocates believe it
undermines the global system designed to prevent
the spread of nuclear weapons.
Jon Wolfsthal, a
nonproliferation expert at the CSIS think tank in
Washington, said it was possible the Bush
administration did not want to release its
answers for fear that they might make it harder
for the agreement to win approval in India.
''But even if that
is the case, it would raise concerns,'' Wolfsthal
said.
''We always get
into trouble when we get into secret agreements
or wink-and-a-nod agreements,'' he added. ''If
the Indian political system isn't willing to
support a deal that has certain restrictions,
then we shouldn't be getting into such an
agreement. It isn't sustainable.''
The deal is caught
up in Indian domestic politics, with the
communists who shore up the coalition government
led by the Congress party threatening to withdraw
support if it is pushed through.
Among other
things, members of the US Congress asked the
State Department to clarify whether Washington
would cut off nuclear trade with India if New
Delhi resumed nuclear testing.
The United States
is required to do so under US law but the
US-India civil nuclear cooperation deal does not
make this explicit. Rather, it gives either side
the right to terminate cooperation for any reason
with one year's notice.
There are growing
questions about whether the agreement can go
through before US President George W Bush leaves
office in January 2009.
To take effect, it
must clear three hurdles.
India must reach
an agreement with the International Atomic Energy
Agency to place its civilian nuclear reactors
under UN safeguards and it must get clearance
from the 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group that
governs global civilian nuclear trade.
After those steps,
the deal must secure final approval from the US
Congress, where it enjoys bipartisan support but
where the November 4 election leaves little time
to pass it. (AGENCIES)
Mums
make better football coaches than dads
LONDON,
Mar 6:
Looking for a football coach? Go to your mom as
they make better football coaches than dads for
being naturals at motivating children.
According to a
study, mothers can get the best out of young
footballers through years of being unpaid
teachers, nurses, counsellors and
disciplinarians.
''I agree that
many of the qualities I have as a mother are
totally relevant to coaching youngsters,'' The
Daily Mirror quoted rising football star Theo
Walcott's mother Lynn as saying.
World Cup hero Sir
Geoff Hurst also believes mothers bring out the
best in young players. ''Mums know how to engage
children, how to speak their language and how to
motivate them,'' he said. (UNI)
Marital
split is still a costly thing for mothers: Study
LONDON,
Mar 6: No matter how much we talk about
equal rights to women, the bitter reality is that
marital split is still an expensive affair for
mothers.
Women who separate
from their partners are recovering faster from
the collapse in income that they experience after
a marital split, but that in all is a costly
affair for them, a study reveals.
The Institute for
Social and Economic Research at Essex University,
UK has found that separating mothers and their
children are still experiencing far worse
financial circumstances than their departing
partners.
The study, based
on annual interviews with 5,500 British
households found most women with children never
totally recovered from the financial effects of
the split. Five years on, their incomes were on
average still 10 per cent below pre-split levels.
"The average
short-term income loss for childless separating
women has remained fairly constant over the last
15 years. Gender remains a good predictor of
whether an adults income rises or falls
after experiencing a marital split, Professor
Stephen Jenkins, director of the institute said.
The average
decline in a mothers income between 1991
and 1997, was 30 per cent after splitting from a
partner, comparing spending power in the years
before and after the break-up. But between 1998
and 2004, the figure was 12 per cent. The
researchers measured the income of the
mothers household after adjusting for the
number of adults and children living in it.
But the mothers
are recovering faster from financial meltdown as
they are more likely to get a job and are more
likely to qualify for support from the state to
make the job worth doing,the Guardian reported.
Those who had a
job in the year after the split and kept it for
the next five years came close to restoring their
income to pre-split levels. Those who did not
have a job and did not find a new partner
remained much worse off.
(UNI)
Shivaratri
festival attracts Indians
KATHMANDU,
Mar 6:
Hindus from Nepal and India are offering prayers
in Pashupatinath Temple in Kathmandu today on the
occasion of Mahashivratri festival.
Devotees started
visiting the temple early today, which is
expecting more than 350,000 devotees, including
about 3000 sadhus mostly from India, the
officials of the Pashupati Development Trust
said.
A large number of
Hindus from India have come to the temple this
year. Mr VP Krishnan of Tamil Nadu said,
"This is one of the greatest festivals of
the Hindus and we are bound to fulfill our
religious duties by visiting Pashupatinath
temple."
Mrs Shivani Singh
from Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh said, "I have
been visiting the temple regularly for the last
15 years."
Pashupati is the
name of lord Shiva. The Mahashivratri festival is
celebrated every year on the 14th day in the
Krishna Paksha of the month of Falgun in the
Hindu Calendar.
Meanwhile,
there was a long queue of devotees in the
Pashupatinath temple, stretching to more than a
kilometer.
Security has
been tightened in the area as some people pelted
stones on suspended King Gyanendra after the
devotees were stopped from worshipping.
The officials
said the devotees would be given time to worship
at the temple even during the visit of the senior
officials.
Gyanendra has
now been barred from even giving alms and
offerings to the Sadhus.
"From
this year, the countrys monarchs would not
be allowed to present alms and offerings to
hermits and ascetics - called sadhus, naga babas,
jogis, shramans on various occasions - who come
on a pilgrimage to Pashupatinath Temple in
Kathmandu from all over the nation and India to
celebrate the Mahashivaratri festival,"
Nepalnews reported today.
Pashupatinath
Temples Guthi Sansthan would distribute the
alms and offering to the Sadhus on behalf of the
Government. (UNI)
|