SC to
hear Ram Sethu case on April 15
NEW
DELHI, Mar 5: The Supreme Court today granted
time till April 15 to the petitioners, including
former Union Minister Subramanian Swamy, to
respond to the six-page affidavit on Ram Sethu
filed by the Centre.
Dr Swamy told the
bench, headed by Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan,
that he had received the copy of the affidavit
only yesterday and needed time to file rejoinder.
The Centre in its
affidavit had stated that there were no
scientific evidence available to prove that Ram
Sethu, also known as Adams Bridge, was
man-made.
The Government had
left it to the apex court to decide whether Ram
Sethu was man-made or a natural formation.
The Centre had
also prayed to the court to vacate the stay
against the demolition of Ram Sethu.
The Centre,
keeping in view the General Elections and fearing
backlash from the majority community in the
country, had also said that it was a matter of
faith of millions of Hindus across the globe, who
believed that Ram Sethu was constructed by Lord
Rama to invade Sri Lanka with the help of his
vanar sena in order to free his wife
Sita from the captivity of Demon King Ravana.
Petitioners are
seeking declaration from the apex court that Ram
Sethu is a monument of national heritage and
cannot be destroyed.
The Centre had to
withdraw its earlier affidavit in view of the
huge public outcry against the statement made in
the affidavit, questioning the very existence of
characters and events mentioned in the Ramayana.
(UNI)
Kashmir
Singh spends time at his village
NANGAL
CHORAN, HOSHIARPUR, Mar 5: Reunited with his family
after being 35 years in Pakistan jails, Kashmir
Singh today spent time with his relatives and
friends at his village, which has undergone a
"total change" since he left in 1973.
"Pind Da
Naksha Hi Badal Gaya Hai (the village has
undergone a total change. Whether it is economic
situation of the people, infrastructure in the
form of roads and houses, living style or
thinking, everything seems to have changed in 35
years," he said.
"It will take
time for me to adjust to the changed
atmosphere," he said, adding he was
delighted to be in the midst of his near and dear
ones.
The 67-year-old
Singh has been flooded with people from near and
distant places since the time he arrived from
Pakistan last evening.
Singh, father of
three, said "my family has also seen
addition in the form of two daughters-in-law, a
son-in-law and five grand children.
"I met my two
daughters-in-law Sukhwinder Kaur and Manjit Kaur
for the first time since the marriages of all the
three children took place in my absence,"
Kashmir said. He would be meeting his son-in-law
also for the first time.
Singh said he was
grateful to his wife for having brought up his
children single handedly in his absence. "We
will commence a new life," he said and hoped
that good times would continue for them and same
would come to other families, whose relatives are
lodged in Pakistan jails.
The family had a
small land holding in early seventies, which they
had to sell to make a living during Singhs
imprisonment in Pakistan.
Asked if he would
like to visit Pakistan again despite having spent
the prime of his youth in jails there, he said he
would certainly like to go. "I would
specially like to thank Pakistan Human Rights
Minister Ansar Burney for all his efforts which
made my release possible," he said.
Singh said he
would spend a couple of days in his village here
after which he would go to Chandigarh.
He frequently uses
Pakistan salutations, including
Inshallaha during his conversations.
(PTI)
Bhagat
Singh statue to be installed in Parliament
NEW
DELHI, Mar 5: An 18-feet bronze statue of Shahid
Bhagat Singh will be installed in Parliament
House complex in August this year as a tribute to
the great martyr.
Making the
announcement in the Lok Sabha, Speaker Somnath
Chatterjee said, "There has been a long
pending demand for a statue of Shahid Bhagat
Singh to be installed in Parliament House. The
Joint Committee on Installation of Portraits and
Statues of national leaders had accepted the
proposal."
Renowned sculptor
Ram V Sutar will create the statue and its cost
would be borne by the Lok Sabha Secretiariat, he
said. (UNI)
Blind
man recruited as teacher, not allowed to teach
KENDRAPARA,
ORISSA, Mar 5: The Orissa Human Rights Commission
has issued a show cause notice to the Kendrapara
administration after a visually challenged
para-teacher who was recruited by a Government
primary school was not allowed to teach.
Ranjeet Ranjan was
recruited as a para-teacher by the
Telengana-Basanta Nodal primary school on August
8, 2007 as one per cent of jobs were reserved for
the visually impaired.
In a petition to
the state Human Rights Commission, a section of
villagers complained that the right of livelihood
of the physically challenged was being abused
flagrantly.
A group of
villagers led by the village Education Committee
had locked the school building to protest the
appointment of a blind man as a para-teacher, the
petition said.
Nayak, who hails
from Pattamundai region, was shaken as the School
and Mass Education Department did not come to his
rescue.
The human rights
commission issued the show cause notice a week
ago. (PTI)
SC
begins final hearing on Venugopals petition
NEW
DELHI, Mar 5: The Supreme Court today commenced
the final hearing on a petition filed by noted
cardiologist P Venugopal challenging his removal
as AIIMS Director following the Centres
decision to fix 65 years as the upper age limit
for the post.
Senior advocate
Arun Jaitely, who opened the argument on behalf
of Venugopal, alleged that an amendment to the
AIIMS Act was brought about by the Centre with
the sole purpose of removing the distinguished
cardiologist.
"The
amendment to the AIIMS Act pertaining to fixation
of upper age for the Director at 65 is
discriminatory against the distinguished
cardiologist and needs to be quashed,"
Jaitely said before a Bench headed by Justice
Tarun Chatterjee.
He contended that
the Act was illegal as the High Court had in
March last year okayed his continuance in the
post. While the matter was pending in the apex
court, the Centre brought about an amendment to
the Act, abruptly ending his services, he
alleged.
The case came up
before the apex court after a tussle between
Venugopal and Health Minister Ambumani Ramadoss
over the control of the prestigious institution.
Earlier, on
December 3 last, the apex court had expressed
displeasure over the removal of the Director and
described it as "unfortunate".
"Why was such
a reputed person humiliated in this way,"
the Court had asked while questioning the motive
behind bringing about an amendment to the AIIMS
Act when Venugopals tenure as Director was
coming to an end after six months.
The Court,
however, had expressed "difficulty" in
staying the operation of the law passed by
Parliament.
The Centre, on the
other hand, had defended the legislation saying
that malice could not be attributed to Parliament
for making the law as it was a policy and not
discrimination against any individual.
The Government had
further contended that it was merely addressing
the directive of the High Court for removing the
ambiguity in the appointment of AIIMS Director by
making a statute. (PTI)
|