EDITORIAL

Miles to go: We
can't rest yet

The Economic Survey presented in the ongoing session of the legislature candidly lists the challenges facing the State. Almost every sector needs serious attention. Few will disagree, for instance, with the assessment: "One of the important reasons for lower growth is that investment did not increase in line with available investible resources. The problem of rural distress that has surfaced is grounded in reality." About education and health, the Survey says: "We are lagging behind our commitments." "The social indicators also show disturbing gender gaps and rural-urban differences." So far the employment situation is concerned it has been described as "a serious problem." There is increase in employment in unorganised sector in response to growth. However, "there is a contraction in opportunities in the organised sector which is the choice sector of new entrants in labour force for employment." A rather grim picture is painted on the irrigation front: "The State has not been able to exploit irrigation potential of Indus, Jhelum and Chinab rivers to optimum level. There could be an improvement in this area if storage facilities are developed to permissible limit. Half of the Culturable Command Area (CCA) could not be exploited for agriculture operations because Punjab Government has not completed the Thein Dam and the Shahpur Kandi Barrage despite an agreement between the two states." A sort of revelation is that there is no legislation in the State for inducting the public-private partnership system. Tourism is one of the mainstays of our economic. ..more

Has Musharraf lost credibility ?
MEN, MATTERS & MEMORIES

By M L Kotru

Suddenly no one seems to trust President Pervez Musharraf anymore. Not even those who used to swear by his integrity, his unfailing ‘‘commitment’’ and his presumed infalibility. Time was when many of his ilk envied him, his proximity to Kings, Presidents and Prime Ministers. There. . ..more

Waiting for a new messiah

By K.V.S. Ramasarma

Any right thinking person today would be depressed the way the world is moving. One is at a loss to understand whether the world is moving forward or backward. No issue or political system seems to work. Monarchy outlived its life, feudalism not only failed but made its arch-rival Marxism stronger. ...more.

MP Govt under pressure

By L.S. Herdenia

Never in the Parliamentary history of our country has one heard a Minister accusing his own ministerial colleagues of indulging in corruption. But Madhya Pradesh was recently witness to such an unprecedented incident. The occasion was the informal meeting of select top leaders of the Bharatiya Janata Party at Sanchi near Bhopal. The object was to analyse the causes of the party's defeat in the recent by-elections and also to chalk out the ..more

EDITORIAL

Miles to go: We
can't rest yet

The Economic Survey presented in the ongoing session of the legislature candidly lists the challenges facing the State. Almost every sector needs serious attention. Few will disagree, for instance, with the assessment: "One of the important reasons for lower growth is that investment did not increase in line with available investible resources. The problem of rural distress that has surfaced is grounded in reality." About education and health, the Survey says: "We are lagging behind our commitments." "The social indicators also show disturbing gender gaps and rural-urban differences." So far the employment situation is concerned it has been described as "a serious problem." There is increase in employment in unorganised sector in response to growth. However, "there is a contraction in opportunities in the organised sector which is the choice sector of new entrants in labour force for employment." A rather grim picture is painted on the irrigation front: "The State has not been able to exploit irrigation potential of Indus, Jhelum and Chinab rivers to optimum level. There could be an improvement in this area if storage facilities are developed to permissible limit. Half of the Culturable Command Area (CCA) could not be exploited for agriculture operations because Punjab Government has not completed the Thein Dam and the Shahpur Kandi Barrage despite an agreement between the two states." A sort of revelation is that there is no legislation in the State for inducting the public-private partnership system. Tourism is one of the mainstays of our economic. The Survey identifies it yet another area of concern. It is only too well known that it has not been exploited fully because of the prevailing scenario in the State. There is a critical appraisal of horticulture. "Horticulture Technology Mission Programme,' the Survey notes, "has not yielded the desired dividends as envisaged for the Sector because the scheme has been implemented only in the penultimate years of the 10th Plan and every inputs needs an incubation period for giving results. Besides, the missing links in convergence and synergy among parallel programmes in the field of horticulture development could not be bridged to achieve horizontal and vertical integration." Farmers are not able to earn remunerative prices as the connectivity to their fields is not available to the desired extent. Their participation in credit-linked plans is also not in accordance with expectations. Total bank credits constitute only 48.80 per cent compared to the corresponding all-India figure of 71.80 per cent.

One notable observation of the Survey is: "The climatic and geographical conditions of the State undermined the stride towards economic independence and as such the high level of subsidies, packages and area-specific assistance provided under various sections have given poor dividends." There are in addition "threats from disasters and redressal for disaster management is another burden on the economy." The last remark speaks of the obvious. Natural calamities are extremely difficult to predict and can catch the Government by surprise resulting in the least anticipated heavy expenses in terms of carrying out repair and rehabilitation. However, the Government can well handle the other difficulties by prior planning and timely execution. That is why the Survey more than once asserts the necessity "to reverse the trend." It also seeks "concerted thought" as well as "concerted action" to get over hurdles on the way. It underlines the awareness that it is within the competence of an administrative apparatus to stem the ride and usher in overall prosperity. A look at just a few sectors will reveal how grim the situation is. Unemployment rate among educated unemployed is 8.3 per cent in rural areas and 9 per cent in urban areas whereas among the total youth it is 6.8 per cent and 14.7 per cent, respectively. In the field of education the Gross Enrolment Rate (GER) in classes from first to eight class is 74.45 per cent (against 93.54 per cent at national level), the teacher: student ratio at primary level is 1:34 against all-India figure of 1:46 and there is one college catering to educational requirements of every 2.12 lakh of population against 1.04 lakh in the country as a whole. There are as many as 4119 primary schools, 628 middle schools, 68 government high schools and 7 government higher secondary schools in the State that have no buildings. Moreover, 1474 primary school buildings are in dilapidated conditions. In the all-important tourism activity "fall of 29.51 per cent has occurred in the number of home tourists" in the captivating Kashmir region between 2005 and 2006. On the other hand, the foreigners' arrivals have gained by 1.68 per cent during this period. "The dampened growth," according to the Survey, "in Indian tourists, which has pushed down the overall number of tourists, was due to sporadic incidents of violence in 2005." The two positive aspects are pilgrim tourism particularly in this region and the constant step-in in the strength of sight-seers turning up in the trans-Himalayan territory of Leh. A lot, however, needs to be done in terms of building new infrastructure and strengthening the existing one.

We are not on the issue of mounting debts. It is a common knowledge that the State's internal revenue generation leaves much to be desired. Only recently we have highlighted in these columns the galloping arrears on account of non-payment of dues even by government departments in power sector alone. At least one finance minister in recent years has decried the tendency of going to New Delhi with a begging bowl every time there is a crisis. At the practical level we can come across several other experiences in real life that indicate that the economic scenario is far from satisfactory. A pittance of amount is being paid to qualified professionals form the public exchequer to keep them occupied. Despite their adverse effects the subsidies (as mentioned in the Survey also) and a tax-free budget become unavoidable. What does a government do when the people or a section of them are in serious trouble (like during the earthquake in October 2005)? We are at the same time in the grip of twin threats of corruption and terrorism. Having noted all this, however, we have to admit that we have come a long way during the last six decades. We still have miles to go and we should cover the distance before we rest.

Has Musharraf lost credibility ?
MEN, MATTERS & MEMORIES

By M L Kotru

Suddenly no one seems to trust President Pervez Musharraf anymore. Not even those who used to swear by his integrity, his unfailing ‘‘commitment’’ and his presumed infalibility. Time was when many of his ilk envied him, his proximity to Kings, Presidents and Prime Ministers. There were many in his own country who believed that he had put the country on the right track; helped its economic growth rate, given it a taste of free press, restored a semblance of order in a disorderly land. The Americans were happy with him, so was Tony Blair and Gordon Brown. Why, even the Saudi King saw him as a most dependable friend.

Then, suddenly, no one is willing to believe in him or all that he was supposed to have stood for. Things must have gone awfully wrong somewhere along the way for the General who shed his uniform to be accepted as a civilian President. Just imagine a twirp of a journalist daring to ask him if he had ‘‘blood on your hands’’ (the blood of Benazir Bhutto). Normally, the soldier's instinct in him should have tempted him to have the man picked up by the scruff of his neck, to be fed to his pet dogs. But no, it was beneath his dignity and the values he cherished to know better than that.

Forget the insolent journalist. You now have Dr Mohammad Al-Bardei, the IAEA boss, issuing some sort of an international red alert, warning the world community of the danger of Pakistan's nuclear arsenal falling into wrong hands. Musharraf's grip over Pakistan, the nuclear watchdog body chief clearly suggested, had weakened and the danger of the 40-odd nuclear warheads currently in the Pakistani arsenal slipping into reckless hands was real. The Americans too had lately come to fear the prospect of a weakened President Musharraf, unable to assert his authority. Not to mention the loss of his acceptability among the Pakistani civil society.

And more frighteningly, Gen Kiyani, the man who succeeded Musharraf when he finally agreed to give up his Army Chief's baton, as the new Chief, has maintained deathly silence even as the castle that Musharraf had built over the past seven years of his military rule was crumbling. Gen. Kiyani, a former ISI chief, considered close to Musharraf and the Americans alike, is yet to reveal his hand even as the President goes ahead with his charade of a general election.

More worrying for Musharraf and the Americans is his failure to put the brakes on the rising tide of jihadist extremism. Suicide attacks by the extremists have become more of a routine and no longer are these confined to the tribal areas. The fatal attack on Benazir, preceded by the failed one in Karachi, was followed by a series of fresh assaults by the Jihadists in most other parts of the country. One is told that the suicide attackers are principally targetting the security forces and the police but that could only be a tactic, if true. The brazen broad daylight attack outside the Lahore High Court, where protesting lawyers were due to congregate for an anti-Musharraf demonstration, left 26 policemen dead, not to mention several civilian casualties including some lawyers as well.

The upsurge in suicide attacks and the growing Talibanis of the country has led many Pakistani analysts to question Musharraf's ability to stem the tide. The more uncharitable of them accuse him of even colluding with the radicals. They accuse him of having encouraged men like Maulana Fazlullah, the pro-Taliban mastermind of the turbulence in Swat, and Baitullah Mehsud, whom Musharraf has now accused of having spreadheaded the killing of Benazir, offering them a peace treaty and an unknown amount of money. That was when Mehsud's men had captured some 200 Army troops. Both Fazlullah and Mehsud have denied any links to the Bhutto killing.

Fazlullah has gone on record to say that ‘‘we have nothing to do with her (Benazir), and her family members know the killers well’’, Fazlullah, also known as the ‘‘FM Maulana’’ for sermons delivered from his illegal radio station, has nevertheless admitted that ‘‘a lot of suicide bombers’’ are ready to launch attacks on selected targets across the country. Baitullah is even more determined to use his West Waziristan base to pursue the Taliban-Al Qaeda agenda of which the cornerstone remains, apart from Talibanization of Pakistan, the liquidation of NATO presence in Afghanistan. The two Taliban leaders continue to see Musharraf as an American stooge willing to do the bidding of his ‘‘American masters’’. Musharraf for his part is willing to counter these charges by issuing a warning to the Americans that should they attempt a unilateral attack on Pakistani territory bordering Afghanistan in pursuit of the Taliban and Al Qaeda leadership he would deem it as an attack on Pakistan. Only he knows what he means by that.

For the record he has also had it said on behalf of his Government that Pakistan would not accept ‘‘conditional US aid under any circumstances’’. Having already received about 14 billion dollars during the last five years as aid to combat terrorism in his part of the world Musharraf has now notified that Pakistan believes that any conditions imposed on ‘‘the very important relationship’’ between it and the US would not be beneficial to their ties. ‘‘In Pakistan decisions won't be taken because somebody demands them. They will be taken according to our own laws and conditions in the country.’’

Brave talk indeed from a man who is suspect in the eyes of his own people as much as he in the US. But then you must remember the Commando in Mr Pervez Musharraf, the General who was forced out of his soldier's uniform, he, like the leopard, can't change his spots, not even in what many would perceive to be a mortal combat.

So Musharraf goes on pushing his luck; an American - prodded reconciliation with Benazir, her house arrest in her home after surviving the first assault on her the day she returned from exile to Karachi and her eventual assassination in Rawalpindi with the General ‘‘identifying’’ the killers even as his troopers were washing up (literally) all the forensic evidence at the site of the suicide attack; Nawaz Sharif sent back into exile, not allowed to leave the Islamabad Airport and again allowed to return home under Saudi American pressure but only to be told he would not be permitted to contest the elections. Musharraf expects that would give this version of the Muslim League (Q) headed by the Chaudhry brothers, the Punjabi, big-time zamindars, a head-start.

Yet, with all the bandobast he and his coterie may have made to rig the Feb 18 election, the retired General is already finding ways to revive old ghosts with George Bush and his lame duck administration in mind. With the pro-American Benazir out of the way what if her successors in the PPP didn't play ball; what if a Nawaz Sharif-led Muslim League were to gain ascendancy in the crucial Punjab province and thence in the National Assembly, the same Sharif who is presumed to be in cahoots with Islamic radicals? Well, Musharraf himself provided the answer; they would have to impeach him and if they tried he would in case go. The worry here is that the Pakistani people, the civil society in particular, are not averse to Musharraf departing from the scene. The worry again will be if Musharraf were to depart from the scene he would leave behind him a Pakistan in total chaos with the radical Talibanist tails up in a country that has known anything but instability ever since the death of the Father of the Pakistani nation, Mohammad Ali Jinnah.

As someone who has always boasted of having more Pakistani friends than I have in Delhi, I find the scene across the border absolutely alarming. Forget me as a person, I do believe that not many Indians would want things in the neighbouring country to go out of control. Unfortunately the ruling establishment in the country appears to be more interested in preserving itself. To end, I quote a well-known Pakistani analyst who only last week, while summing up the prevailing situation in his country said: ‘‘The purpose of pointing out this (uncertainty in his country post-Benazir assassination) record is not to further inflame passions that have erupted since Benazir Bhutto's assassination. It is to point out to Pakistan's arrogant establishment that its credibility problem is deeply rooted and is of its own making. If it really wants to set things right, forget about clever statements and smart TV interviews. Repair the damage by facing and telling the truth’’. I for one do not trust Musharraf's capacity to face or tell the truth. He has too many skeletons to hide, credibility be blown.

 

Waiting for a new messiah

By K.V.S. Ramasarma

Any right thinking person today would be depressed the way the world is moving. One is at a loss to understand whether the world is moving forward or backward. No issue or political system seems to work. Monarchy outlived its life, feudalism not only failed but made its arch-rival Marxism stronger. Dictatorship is simply not possible in thepresent day world. Marxism which received strength from the failure of feudalism and its utopian propositions, collapsed in much shorter time than other isms. In the collapse of the Soviet Union classical cold war between two powerful political blocs has came to an end but created a free for all situations that had not been visualized by the perpetrators of the Soviet collapse and by Gorbachev, who led the demolition exercise. In the process the role model for communists all over the world has been lost.

China and Yugoslavia which sought to interpret Marxism to suit their local needs too are in a dire condition. While Yugoslavia broke into separate independent issues, China seems to have hit an ideological plateau after experimenting Marxism with Chinese characteristics, by injecting once much-hated capitalist methods into its Marxist Leninist- Maoist political system. After three decades of the experiment, it is today neither communist nor capitalist. This confusion is not to the liking of the people who now demand true democracy. Tianenmen violent incidents are only the tip of the iceberg. People in general want more democracy like people in Eastern Europe's former communist countries used to aspire before they jettisoned red rule. China is in a difficult fix. It can't for obvious reasons allow a multiple political party system as practiced in other real democracies to be introduced nor can it revert to proletarian dictatorship erasing whatever capitalist touch it allowed to the political and economic system. The result is that China has not been able to make any true progress either on the Communist lines or as a capitalist state. How long this ride in two boats will go on is difficult to predict since the demand for democracy is bound to escalate as living standards continue to rise.

But the tragedy is that even democracy as a political system appears to be tottering. The Eastern European states which enthusiastically dropped communism in the hope of enjoying democracy like West Germany and others, which they envies for long, discovered to their dismay that democracy is just about as bad as communism. While in a communist rule only one political party, its leaders and cadre became corrupt and arrogant with power, in democracy, the trend is multiplied by the number of political parties in the arena.

Consequently today no ism has a role model to follow. The communists all over the world had for many years projected the Soviet and Chinese models to the cadre and the people in general. They can't do that any more and that made them instantly marginal players in politics. Similarly, the US and Western Europe which proudly projected themselves as the models of democracy too can't shout any more loudly, thanks to their geo-political and strategic actions which are essentially meant to project their national interests and domination. They do not seem any more interested in strengthening the democratic spirit. Their blatant connivance with wretched dictatorships for strategic reasons has won them enormous bad name in nascent democracies. If the US and West have not condoned the military dictatorship and religious war cries in Pakistan, India and the other third world democracies would have been their staunch allies. But then Geo-political demands and economic pressures do not permit such altruistic approach. In the process democracy is taking a beating.

What is really disquieting is that this is happening at a time when new democracies like India are facing political problems with no viable solutions in sight. Their lot has become complex due to heterogeneity of their societies. If India is unable to introduce uniform civil code, it is only because it does not suit some sections of the Indian society. Making matters worse religious and caste frictions have made governance difficult. Misuse of action has become widespread and deep-rooted, making governance an unenviable task.

In any case governance has become an extremely difficult exercise in democracies. As population increases needs too rise steeply resulting in demands pilling up. A democratic government can't control population nor can it meet satisfactorily increasing demands, creating a futile ground for mass protests, violence and destruction of property, causing eventually political instability which in turn leads to disruption of economic activity. All that the governments could do is to make some effort to meet some demands and control public anger. Even this is becoming increasingly difficult. Faced with paucity of funds, any effort by a Government to devise new methods to meet the demands like the recently concluded Indo-US N-deal, are met by protests mainly from the communists, who are in a desperate search for a cause and a constituency to survive.

A classic example of the dilemmas of governance is provided by Andhra Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh. In the last general elections, the Congress Government in Andhra Pradesh which had concentrated on urban areas, lost the rural vote. In Madhya Pradesh where the Congress was in power, the reverse happened.

The problem is people ask for freedom when they have bread, and bread if they have freedom. As time passes people all over the world are not willing to strike a balance between the two essentials. Nor are they willing to check their demands by voluntary action, like family planning. The result is that no present political system or ism appears suitable for governance. This makes future not just bleak, but frightening. Is the time ripe for a new Messiah?-CNF

 

MP Govt under pressure

By L.S. Herdenia

Never in the Parliamentary history of our country has one heard a Minister accusing his own ministerial colleagues of indulging in corruption.

But Madhya Pradesh was recently witness to such an unprecedented incident. The occasion was the informal meeting of select top leaders of the Bharatiya Janata Party at Sanchi near Bhopal. The object was to analyse the causes of the party's defeat in the recent by-elections and also to chalk out the strategy for the Assembly elections, due in December this year.

Prior to the Sanchi conclave, grassroots workers of the party had gathered at Gwalior to discuss the state of affairs in the party and also to draw up the future course of action. At that conclave, serious charges of corruption were hurled at the ministers and party legislators.

But what happened at Sanchi came as a shock even to the critics of BJP. At Sanchi, of all persons, Home Minister Himmat Kothari came out with the allegation that many ministers were involved in corruption. As the allegation was made by the Home Minister, hardly anyone could question its authenticity. After all, the Home Minister controls the official machinery that gathers Intelligence about the activities of senior politicians. There is every reason to believe that information about the corrupt practices of the ministers must have been supplied by the Intelligence department.

Mr. Kothari told the Sanchi meet that many ministers and some others were involved neck-deep in corruption. He pointed out that what angered the common workers was their (ministers') suddenly-acquired wealth. Seeing ministers in possession of a fleet of luxury cars caused resentment among the workers and also made them question as to how these people had amassed such wealth. Unfortunately, he said, today there was no leader like (late) Mr. Kushabhau Thakre who used to warn such persons of the consequences of their practices.

Besides Mr. Kothari, some other senior leaders also made similar allegations. They included former minister and Rajya Sabha member LN Sharma and former Lok Sabha member Krishna Murari Moghe. Mr. Sharma went to extent of blaming the Chief Minister Shivraj Singh Chauhan for not keeping the bureaucracy under control.

What made the issue more serious was that the charge of corruption was made by the Home Minister, who commands all sources of information. While at Sanchi, senior leaders made charges of corruption, at Gwalior it were the grassroots workers who raised a storm over the corruption among the ministers. The Gwalior meet was attended by the chairpersons of the party "mandals", district presidents and state-level office bearers. As per party sources, the trouble started when party President Rajnath Singh, who presided over the meet, asked the office-bearers if their voice was being heard in the party and in the Government. This at once triggered off a deluge of complaints. The resentment of the party office-bearers and workers came to the fore and they protested loudly and vociferously for being ignored. They said that their recommendations were rarely entertained. They shouted in chorus that there was rampant corruption in the Government; the bureaucracy was uncontrolled and corrupt. They also alleged that the only activity the ministers were engaged in was minting money. The anger was so intense that at one time, almost everyone present was on his feet and virtually abusing the ministers. The furore lasted for over half an hour, obviously upsetting Rajnath Singh and forcing him to intervene several times to pacify the angry workers.

A local newspaper wrote that the uproar at the meet was indicative of the degree of resentment and anger among the workers.

Besides corruption, the BJP workers also accused the ministers of not performing their duties properly. They said that the ministers in charge of districts did not attend party meetings. They did not have time for the workers. They warned that speeches alone would not help the party win the elections and that what was needed was performance.

After the shock of the Gwalior and Sanchi meets, the BJP has started a damage-control exercise. Reports have appeared in the media saying that the present MLAs would be denied tickets. The reports -- obviously planted -- are aimed at serving the twin purposes of warning the MLAs and soothing the frayed nerves of party workers. On the administrative side, the Chief Minister has warned the officials, particularly those posted in the districts, to "rise to my expectations or be ready to lose their posts". He issued this warning during a video-conference with the district collectors on January 11. How much effect the twin measures will have remains to be seen. (IPA)



|
home | state | national | business | editorial | advertisement | sports |
|
international | weather | mailbag | suggestions | search |
subscribe | send mail |