EDITORIAL
Miles
to go: We
can't rest yet
The Economic Survey
presented in the ongoing session of the legislature
candidly lists the challenges facing the State. Almost
every sector needs serious attention. Few will disagree,
for instance, with the assessment: "One of the
important reasons for lower growth is that investment did
not increase in line with available investible resources.
The problem of rural distress that has surfaced is
grounded in reality." About education and health,
the Survey says: "We are lagging behind our
commitments." "The social indicators also show
disturbing gender gaps and rural-urban differences."
So far the employment situation is concerned it has been
described as "a serious problem." There is
increase in employment in unorganised sector in response
to growth. However, "there is a contraction in
opportunities in the organised sector which is the choice
sector of new entrants in labour force for
employment." A rather grim picture is painted on the
irrigation front: "The State has not been able to
exploit irrigation potential of Indus, Jhelum and Chinab
rivers to optimum level. There could be an improvement in
this area if storage facilities are developed to
permissible limit. Half of the Culturable Command Area
(CCA) could not be exploited for agriculture operations
because Punjab Government has not completed the Thein Dam
and the Shahpur Kandi Barrage despite an agreement
between the two states." A sort of revelation is
that there is no legislation in the State for inducting
the public-private partnership system. Tourism is one of
the mainstays of our economic. ..more
|
|
Has
Musharraf lost credibility ?
MEN, MATTERS & MEMORIES
By M L Kotru
Suddenly no
one seems to trust President Pervez Musharraf anymore.
Not even those who used to swear by his integrity, his
unfailing commitment and his
presumed infalibility. Time was when many of his ilk
envied him, his proximity to Kings, Presidents and Prime
Ministers. There. . ..more
Waiting
for a new messiah
By K.V.S. Ramasarma
Any right
thinking person today would be depressed the way the
world is moving. One is at a loss to understand whether
the world is moving forward or backward. No issue or
political system seems to work. Monarchy outlived its
life, feudalism not only failed but made its arch-rival
Marxism stronger. ...more.
MP
Govt under pressure
By L.S. Herdenia
Never in the
Parliamentary history of our country has one heard a
Minister accusing his own ministerial colleagues of
indulging in corruption. But Madhya Pradesh was recently
witness to such an unprecedented incident. The occasion
was the informal meeting of select top leaders of the
Bharatiya Janata Party at Sanchi near Bhopal. The object
was to analyse the causes of the party's defeat in the
recent by-elections and also to chalk out the ..more
|
EDITORIAL
Miles to go: We
can't rest yet
The Economic Survey
presented in the ongoing session of the legislature
candidly lists the challenges facing the State. Almost
every sector needs serious attention. Few will disagree,
for instance, with the assessment: "One of the
important reasons for lower growth is that investment did
not increase in line with available investible resources.
The problem of rural distress that has surfaced is
grounded in reality." About education and health,
the Survey says: "We are lagging behind our
commitments." "The social indicators also show
disturbing gender gaps and rural-urban differences."
So far the employment situation is concerned it has been
described as "a serious problem." There is
increase in employment in unorganised sector in response
to growth. However, "there is a contraction in
opportunities in the organised sector which is the choice
sector of new entrants in labour force for
employment." A rather grim picture is painted on the
irrigation front: "The State has not been able to
exploit irrigation potential of Indus, Jhelum and Chinab
rivers to optimum level. There could be an improvement in
this area if storage facilities are developed to
permissible limit. Half of the Culturable Command Area
(CCA) could not be exploited for agriculture operations
because Punjab Government has not completed the Thein Dam
and the Shahpur Kandi Barrage despite an agreement
between the two states." A sort of revelation is
that there is no legislation in the State for inducting
the public-private partnership system. Tourism is one of
the mainstays of our economic. The Survey identifies it
yet another area of concern. It is only too well known
that it has not been exploited fully because of the
prevailing scenario in the State. There is a critical
appraisal of horticulture. "Horticulture Technology
Mission Programme,' the Survey notes, "has not
yielded the desired dividends as envisaged for the Sector
because the scheme has been implemented only in the
penultimate years of the 10th Plan and every inputs needs
an incubation period for giving results. Besides, the
missing links in convergence and synergy among parallel
programmes in the field of horticulture development could
not be bridged to achieve horizontal and vertical
integration." Farmers are not able to earn
remunerative prices as the connectivity to their fields
is not available to the desired extent. Their
participation in credit-linked plans is also not in
accordance with expectations. Total bank credits
constitute only 48.80 per cent compared to the
corresponding all-India figure of 71.80 per cent.
One notable observation of
the Survey is: "The climatic and geographical
conditions of the State undermined the stride towards
economic independence and as such the high level of
subsidies, packages and area-specific assistance provided
under various sections have given poor dividends."
There are in addition "threats from disasters and
redressal for disaster management is another burden on
the economy." The last remark speaks of the obvious.
Natural calamities are extremely difficult to predict and
can catch the Government by surprise resulting in the
least anticipated heavy expenses in terms of carrying out
repair and rehabilitation. However, the Government can
well handle the other difficulties by prior planning and
timely execution. That is why the Survey more than once
asserts the necessity "to reverse the trend."
It also seeks "concerted thought" as well as
"concerted action" to get over hurdles on the
way. It underlines the awareness that it is within the
competence of an administrative apparatus to stem the
ride and usher in overall prosperity. A look at just a
few sectors will reveal how grim the situation is.
Unemployment rate among educated unemployed is 8.3 per
cent in rural areas and 9 per cent in urban areas whereas
among the total youth it is 6.8 per cent and 14.7 per
cent, respectively. In the field of education the Gross
Enrolment Rate (GER) in classes from first to eight class
is 74.45 per cent (against 93.54 per cent at national
level), the teacher: student ratio at primary level is
1:34 against all-India figure of 1:46 and there is one
college catering to educational requirements of every
2.12 lakh of population against 1.04 lakh in the country
as a whole. There are as many as 4119 primary schools,
628 middle schools, 68 government high schools and 7
government higher secondary schools in the State that
have no buildings. Moreover, 1474 primary school
buildings are in dilapidated conditions. In the
all-important tourism activity "fall of 29.51 per
cent has occurred in the number of home tourists" in
the captivating Kashmir region between 2005 and 2006. On
the other hand, the foreigners' arrivals have gained by
1.68 per cent during this period. "The dampened
growth," according to the Survey, "in Indian
tourists, which has pushed down the overall number of
tourists, was due to sporadic incidents of violence in
2005." The two positive aspects are pilgrim tourism
particularly in this region and the constant step-in in
the strength of sight-seers turning up in the
trans-Himalayan territory of Leh. A lot, however, needs
to be done in terms of building new infrastructure and
strengthening the existing one.
We are not on the issue of
mounting debts. It is a common knowledge that the State's
internal revenue generation leaves much to be desired.
Only recently we have highlighted in these columns the
galloping arrears on account of non-payment of dues even
by government departments in power sector alone. At least
one finance minister in recent years has decried the
tendency of going to New Delhi with a begging bowl every
time there is a crisis. At the practical level we can
come across several other experiences in real life that
indicate that the economic scenario is far from
satisfactory. A pittance of amount is being paid to
qualified professionals form the public exchequer to keep
them occupied. Despite their adverse effects the
subsidies (as mentioned in the Survey also) and a
tax-free budget become unavoidable. What does a
government do when the people or a section of them are in
serious trouble (like during the earthquake in October
2005)? We are at the same time in the grip of twin
threats of corruption and terrorism. Having noted all
this, however, we have to admit that we have come a long
way during the last six decades. We still have miles to
go and we should cover the distance before we rest.

|
Has
Musharraf lost credibility ?
MEN, MATTERS & MEMORIES
By M L
Kotru
Suddenly no one
seems to trust President Pervez
Musharraf anymore. Not even those
who used to swear by his
integrity, his unfailing
commitment
and his presumed infalibility.
Time was when many of his ilk
envied him, his proximity to
Kings, Presidents and Prime
Ministers. There were many in his
own country who believed that he
had put the country on the right
track; helped its economic growth
rate, given it a taste of free
press, restored a semblance of
order in a disorderly land. The
Americans were happy with him, so
was Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.
Why, even the Saudi King saw him
as a most dependable friend.
Then, suddenly, no
one is willing to believe in him
or all that he was supposed to
have stood for. Things must have
gone awfully wrong somewhere
along the way for the General who
shed his uniform to be accepted
as a civilian President. Just
imagine a twirp of a journalist
daring to ask him if he had
blood on your
hands (the blood of
Benazir Bhutto). Normally, the
soldier's instinct in him should
have tempted him to have the man
picked up by the scruff of his
neck, to be fed to his pet dogs.
But no, it was beneath his
dignity and the values he
cherished to know better than
that.
Forget the insolent
journalist. You now have Dr
Mohammad Al-Bardei, the IAEA
boss, issuing some sort of an
international red alert, warning
the world community of the danger
of Pakistan's nuclear arsenal
falling into wrong hands.
Musharraf's grip over Pakistan,
the nuclear watchdog body chief
clearly suggested, had weakened
and the danger of the 40-odd
nuclear warheads currently in the
Pakistani arsenal slipping into
reckless hands was real. The
Americans too had lately come to
fear the prospect of a weakened
President Musharraf, unable to
assert his authority. Not to
mention the loss of his
acceptability among the Pakistani
civil society.
And more
frighteningly, Gen Kiyani, the
man who succeeded Musharraf when
he finally agreed to give up his
Army Chief's baton, as the new
Chief, has maintained deathly
silence even as the castle that
Musharraf had built over the past
seven years of his military rule
was crumbling. Gen. Kiyani, a
former ISI chief, considered
close to Musharraf and the
Americans alike, is yet to reveal
his hand even as the President
goes ahead with his charade of a
general election.
More worrying for
Musharraf and the Americans is
his failure to put the brakes on
the rising tide of jihadist
extremism. Suicide attacks by the
extremists have become more of a
routine and no longer are these
confined to the tribal areas. The
fatal attack on Benazir, preceded
by the failed one in Karachi, was
followed by a series of fresh
assaults by the Jihadists in most
other parts of the country. One
is told that the suicide
attackers are principally
targetting the security forces
and the police but that could
only be a tactic, if true. The
brazen broad daylight attack
outside the Lahore High Court,
where protesting lawyers were due
to congregate for an
anti-Musharraf demonstration,
left 26 policemen dead, not to
mention several civilian
casualties including some lawyers
as well.
The upsurge in
suicide attacks and the growing
Talibanis of the country has led
many Pakistani analysts to
question Musharraf's ability to
stem the tide. The more
uncharitable of them accuse him
of even colluding with the
radicals. They accuse him of
having encouraged men like
Maulana Fazlullah, the
pro-Taliban mastermind of the
turbulence in Swat, and Baitullah
Mehsud, whom Musharraf has now
accused of having spreadheaded
the killing of Benazir, offering
them a peace treaty and an
unknown amount of money. That was
when Mehsud's men had captured
some 200 Army troops. Both
Fazlullah and Mehsud have denied
any links to the Bhutto killing.
Fazlullah has gone
on record to say that
we have nothing to do
with her (Benazir), and her
family members know the killers
well, Fazlullah, also
known as the FM
Maulana for sermons
delivered from his illegal radio
station, has nevertheless
admitted that a lot
of suicide bombers
are ready to launch attacks on
selected targets across the
country. Baitullah is even more
determined to use his West
Waziristan base to pursue the
Taliban-Al Qaeda agenda of which
the cornerstone remains, apart
from Talibanization of Pakistan,
the liquidation of NATO presence
in Afghanistan. The two Taliban
leaders continue to see Musharraf
as an American stooge willing to
do the bidding of his
American
masters. Musharraf
for his part is willing to
counter these charges by issuing
a warning to the Americans that
should they attempt a unilateral
attack on Pakistani territory
bordering Afghanistan in pursuit
of the Taliban and Al Qaeda
leadership he would deem it as an
attack on Pakistan. Only he knows
what he means by that.
For the record he
has also had it said on behalf of
his Government that Pakistan
would not accept
conditional US aid
under any
circumstances. Having
already received about 14 billion
dollars during the last five
years as aid to combat terrorism
in his part of the world
Musharraf has now notified that
Pakistan believes that any
conditions imposed on
the very important
relationship between
it and the US would not be
beneficial to their ties.
In Pakistan decisions
won't be taken because somebody
demands them. They will be taken
according to our own laws and
conditions in the
country.
Brave talk indeed
from a man who is suspect in the
eyes of his own people as much as
he in the US. But then you must
remember the Commando in Mr
Pervez Musharraf, the General who
was forced out of his soldier's
uniform, he, like the leopard,
can't change his spots, not even
in what many would perceive to be
a mortal combat.
So Musharraf goes on
pushing his luck; an American -
prodded reconciliation with
Benazir, her house arrest in her
home after surviving the first
assault on her the day she
returned from exile to Karachi
and her eventual assassination in
Rawalpindi with the General
identifying
the killers even as his troopers
were washing up (literally) all
the forensic evidence at the site
of the suicide attack; Nawaz
Sharif sent back into exile, not
allowed to leave the Islamabad
Airport and again allowed to
return home under Saudi American
pressure but only to be told he
would not be permitted to contest
the elections. Musharraf expects
that would give this version of
the Muslim League (Q) headed by
the Chaudhry brothers, the
Punjabi, big-time zamindars, a
head-start.
Yet, with all the
bandobast he and his coterie may
have made to rig the Feb 18
election, the retired General is
already finding ways to revive
old ghosts with George Bush and
his lame duck administration in
mind. With the pro-American
Benazir out of the way what if
her successors in the PPP didn't
play ball; what if a Nawaz
Sharif-led Muslim League were to
gain ascendancy in the crucial
Punjab province and thence in the
National Assembly, the same
Sharif who is presumed to be in
cahoots with Islamic radicals?
Well, Musharraf himself provided
the answer; they would have to
impeach him and if they tried he
would in case go. The worry here
is that the Pakistani people, the
civil society in particular, are
not averse to Musharraf departing
from the scene. The worry again
will be if Musharraf were to
depart from the scene he would
leave behind him a Pakistan in
total chaos with the radical
Talibanist tails up in a country
that has known anything but
instability ever since the death
of the Father of the Pakistani
nation, Mohammad Ali Jinnah.
As someone who has
always boasted of having more
Pakistani friends than I have in
Delhi, I find the scene across
the border absolutely alarming.
Forget me as a person, I do
believe that not many Indians
would want things in the
neighbouring country to go out of
control. Unfortunately the ruling
establishment in the country
appears to be more interested in
preserving itself. To end, I
quote a well-known Pakistani
analyst who only last week, while
summing up the prevailing
situation in his country said:
The purpose of
pointing out this (uncertainty in
his country post-Benazir
assassination) record is not to
further inflame passions that
have erupted since Benazir
Bhutto's assassination. It is to
point out to Pakistan's arrogant
establishment that its
credibility problem is deeply
rooted and is of its own making.
If it really wants to set things
right, forget about clever
statements and smart TV
interviews. Repair the damage by
facing and telling the
truth. I for one do
not trust Musharraf's capacity to
face or tell the truth. He has
too many skeletons to hide,
credibility be blown.
|
|

|
Waiting
for a new messiah
By
K.V.S. Ramasarma
Any
right thinking person
today would be depressed
the way the world is
moving. One is at a loss
to understand whether the
world is moving forward
or backward. No issue or
political system seems to
work. Monarchy outlived
its life, feudalism not
only failed but made its
arch-rival Marxism
stronger. Dictatorship is
simply not possible in
thepresent day world.
Marxism which received
strength from the failure
of feudalism and its
utopian propositions,
collapsed in much shorter
time than other isms. In
the collapse of the
Soviet Union classical
cold war between two
powerful political blocs
has came to an end but
created a free for all
situations that had not
been visualized by the
perpetrators of the
Soviet collapse and by
Gorbachev, who led the
demolition exercise. In
the process the role
model for communists all
over the world has been
lost.
China
and Yugoslavia which
sought to interpret
Marxism to suit their
local needs too are in a
dire condition. While
Yugoslavia broke into
separate independent
issues, China seems to
have hit an ideological
plateau after
experimenting Marxism
with Chinese
characteristics, by
injecting once much-hated
capitalist methods into
its Marxist Leninist-
Maoist political system.
After three decades of
the experiment, it is
today neither communist
nor capitalist. This
confusion is not to the
liking of the people who
now demand true
democracy. Tianenmen
violent incidents are
only the tip of the
iceberg. People in
general want more
democracy like people in
Eastern Europe's former
communist countries used
to aspire before they
jettisoned red rule.
China is in a difficult
fix. It can't for obvious
reasons allow a multiple
political party system as
practiced in other real
democracies to be
introduced nor can it
revert to proletarian
dictatorship erasing
whatever capitalist touch
it allowed to the
political and economic
system. The result is
that China has not been
able to make any true
progress either on the
Communist lines or as a
capitalist state. How
long this ride in two
boats will go on is
difficult to predict
since the demand for
democracy is bound to
escalate as living
standards continue to
rise.
But
the tragedy is that even
democracy as a political
system appears to be
tottering. The Eastern
European states which
enthusiastically dropped
communism in the hope of
enjoying democracy like
West Germany and others,
which they envies for
long, discovered to their
dismay that democracy is
just about as bad as
communism. While in a
communist rule only one
political party, its
leaders and cadre became
corrupt and arrogant with
power, in democracy, the
trend is multiplied by
the number of political
parties in the arena.
Consequently
today no ism has a role
model to follow. The
communists all over the
world had for many years
projected the Soviet and
Chinese models to the
cadre and the people in
general. They can't do
that any more and that
made them instantly
marginal players in
politics. Similarly, the
US and Western Europe
which proudly projected
themselves as the models
of democracy too can't
shout any more loudly,
thanks to their
geo-political and
strategic actions which
are essentially meant to
project their national
interests and domination.
They do not seem any more
interested in
strengthening the
democratic spirit. Their
blatant connivance with
wretched dictatorships
for strategic reasons has
won them enormous bad
name in nascent
democracies. If the US
and West have not
condoned the military
dictatorship and
religious war cries in
Pakistan, India and the
other third world
democracies would have
been their staunch
allies. But then
Geo-political demands and
economic pressures do not
permit such altruistic
approach. In the process
democracy is taking a
beating.
What
is really disquieting is
that this is happening at
a time when new
democracies like India
are facing political
problems with no viable
solutions in sight. Their
lot has become complex
due to heterogeneity of
their societies. If India
is unable to introduce
uniform civil code, it is
only because it does not
suit some sections of the
Indian society. Making
matters worse religious
and caste frictions have
made governance
difficult. Misuse of
action has become
widespread and
deep-rooted, making
governance an unenviable
task.
In
any case governance has
become an extremely
difficult exercise in
democracies. As
population increases
needs too rise steeply
resulting in demands
pilling up. A democratic
government can't control
population nor can it
meet satisfactorily
increasing demands,
creating a futile ground
for mass protests,
violence and destruction
of property, causing
eventually political
instability which in turn
leads to disruption of
economic activity. All
that the governments
could do is to make some
effort to meet some
demands and control
public anger. Even this
is becoming increasingly
difficult. Faced with
paucity of funds, any
effort by a Government to
devise new methods to
meet the demands like the
recently concluded
Indo-US N-deal, are met
by protests mainly from
the communists, who are
in a desperate search for
a cause and a
constituency to survive.
A
classic example of the
dilemmas of governance is
provided by Andhra
Pradesh and Madhya
Pradesh. In the last
general elections, the
Congress Government in
Andhra Pradesh which had
concentrated on urban
areas, lost the rural
vote. In Madhya Pradesh
where the Congress was in
power, the reverse
happened.
The
problem is people ask for
freedom when they have
bread, and bread if they
have freedom. As time
passes people all over
the world are not willing
to strike a balance
between the two
essentials. Nor are they
willing to check their
demands by voluntary
action, like family
planning. The result is
that no present political
system or ism appears
suitable for governance.
This makes future not
just bleak, but
frightening. Is the time
ripe for a new Messiah?-CNF
|
|
|
|
MP
Govt under pressure
By
L.S. Herdenia
Never
in the Parliamentary
history of our country
has one heard a Minister
accusing his own
ministerial colleagues of
indulging in corruption.
But
Madhya Pradesh was
recently witness to such
an unprecedented
incident. The occasion
was the informal meeting
of select top leaders of
the Bharatiya Janata
Party at Sanchi near
Bhopal. The object was to
analyse the causes of the
party's defeat in the
recent by-elections and
also to chalk out the
strategy for the Assembly
elections, due in
December this year.
Prior
to the Sanchi conclave,
grassroots workers of the
party had gathered at
Gwalior to discuss the
state of affairs in the
party and also to draw up
the future course of
action. At that conclave,
serious charges of
corruption were hurled at
the ministers and party
legislators.
But
what happened at Sanchi
came as a shock even to
the critics of BJP. At
Sanchi, of all persons,
Home Minister Himmat
Kothari came out with the
allegation that many
ministers were involved
in corruption. As the
allegation was made by
the Home Minister, hardly
anyone could question its
authenticity. After all,
the Home Minister
controls the official
machinery that gathers
Intelligence about the
activities of senior
politicians. There is
every reason to believe
that information about
the corrupt practices of
the ministers must have
been supplied by the
Intelligence department.
Mr.
Kothari told the Sanchi
meet that many ministers
and some others were
involved neck-deep in
corruption. He pointed
out that what angered the
common workers was their
(ministers')
suddenly-acquired wealth.
Seeing ministers in
possession of a fleet of
luxury cars caused
resentment among the
workers and also made
them question as to how
these people had amassed
such wealth.
Unfortunately, he said,
today there was no leader
like (late) Mr. Kushabhau
Thakre who used to warn
such persons of the
consequences of their
practices.
Besides
Mr. Kothari, some other
senior leaders also made
similar allegations. They
included former minister
and Rajya Sabha member LN
Sharma and former Lok
Sabha member Krishna
Murari Moghe. Mr. Sharma
went to extent of blaming
the Chief Minister
Shivraj Singh Chauhan for
not keeping the
bureaucracy under
control.
What
made the issue more
serious was that the
charge of corruption was
made by the Home
Minister, who commands
all sources of
information. While at
Sanchi, senior leaders
made charges of
corruption, at Gwalior it
were the grassroots
workers who raised a
storm over the corruption
among the ministers. The
Gwalior meet was attended
by the chairpersons of
the party
"mandals",
district presidents and
state-level office
bearers. As per party
sources, the trouble
started when party
President Rajnath Singh,
who presided over the
meet, asked the
office-bearers if their
voice was being heard in
the party and in the
Government. This at once
triggered off a deluge of
complaints. The
resentment of the party
office-bearers and
workers came to the fore
and they protested loudly
and vociferously for
being ignored. They said
that their
recommendations were
rarely entertained. They
shouted in chorus that
there was rampant
corruption in the
Government; the
bureaucracy was
uncontrolled and corrupt.
They also alleged that
the only activity the
ministers were engaged in
was minting money. The
anger was so intense that
at one time, almost
everyone present was on
his feet and virtually
abusing the ministers.
The furore lasted for
over half an hour,
obviously upsetting
Rajnath Singh and forcing
him to intervene several
times to pacify the angry
workers.
A
local newspaper wrote
that the uproar at the
meet was indicative of
the degree of resentment
and anger among the
workers.
Besides
corruption, the BJP
workers also accused the
ministers of not
performing their duties
properly. They said that
the ministers in charge
of districts did not
attend party meetings.
They did not have time
for the workers. They
warned that speeches
alone would not help the
party win the elections
and that what was needed
was performance.
After
the shock of the Gwalior
and Sanchi meets, the BJP
has started a
damage-control exercise.
Reports have appeared in
the media saying that the
present MLAs would be
denied tickets. The
reports -- obviously
planted -- are aimed at
serving the twin purposes
of warning the MLAs and
soothing the frayed
nerves of party workers.
On the administrative
side, the Chief Minister
has warned the officials,
particularly those posted
in the districts, to
"rise to my
expectations or be ready
to lose their
posts". He issued
this warning during a
video-conference with the
district collectors on
January 11. How much
effect the twin measures
will have remains to be
seen. (IPA)
|
|
|
|
|
|