|
EDITORIAL All's well that ends well. It is a time-tested phrase. The problem in Pakistan, however, is that the curtain has not yet been finally rung down on the latest political drama. From a distance the elections held on February 18 appear to be free and fair. Not entirely unexpectedly President Pervez Musharraf and the Pakistan Muslim league (Q) stand defeated. It is also not surprising that the Pakistan People's Party (PPP) and the PML (N) have done remarkably well in their strongholds of Sindh and Punjab, respectively. The Muttahida Majlis-i-Amal (MAM) and the Awami National Party (ANP) too have given good performances at their respective levels. In normal circumstances the exit of Mr Musharraf from the highest civilian post should have been regarded as a formality. It is because of his track record against ......more It is all right to make and figure in a movie Chak de India that pleads the cause of hockey, a national sport. However, when it comes to spending and making money one has to go by the game that wins personal glory. Is that not the message that emanates from the multi-score "sale" of cricket stars playing in the Indian Premier League (IPL)? Pictures of film stars --- Shahrukh Khan and Priety Zinta --- have been beamed into millions of houses by television channels as being among those bidding for the Dhonis of the world. They have rubbed shoulders with industrialists. Clearly they don't want to miss their share of spotlight. What shoul......more |
|
By Arun Nehru There are positives and negatives in every situation and I think the year 2008 will present us with many a political positives and I think we can see this with the emergence of Barack Obama in the USA [favorite to win the Democratic nomination] from Hilary Clinton and may well be the next President as the Republican party struggles with the negative impact of the war in ....more By Vijayveer Vikram Singh The world for a while has gone unipolar, but this state of imbalance will not last long. Sooner or a little later, the second power pole is bound to emerge. Where exactly it will, should be a matter of interest to us, especia........more Employment scenario in J&K State By M L Gupta The Govt services continue to be the 1st preference of job aspirants as it provide social status, job security, least accountability, price index linked salaries and host of other perks like LTC, pensionary benefits generous leave calender and paid holidays. However govt has limitation particularly that of J&K State which is spending 4500 crores annually on salaries of its employees whereas it is hardly generating 1200 crores by way of taxes etc; besides taking away a large chunk of govt funds which .....more |
||||
EDITORIAL All's well that ends well. It is a time-tested phrase. The problem in Pakistan, however, is that the curtain has not yet been finally rung down on the latest political drama. From a distance the elections held on February 18 appear to be free and fair. Not entirely unexpectedly President Pervez Musharraf and the Pakistan Muslim league (Q) stand defeated. It is also not surprising that the Pakistan People's Party (PPP) and the PML (N) have done remarkably well in their strongholds of Sindh and Punjab, respectively. The Muttahida Majlis-i-Amal (MAM) and the Awami National Party (ANP) too have given good performances at their respective levels. In normal circumstances the exit of Mr Musharraf from the highest civilian post should have been regarded as a formality. It is because of his track record against democracy and two former Prime Ministers. The PML (N) has said more than once that it would seek his impeachment. There are some who argue that the Pakistan President was beaten even before the first vote was cast. It was when the King's party which is a euphemism for the PML (Q) had declared that it would distance itself from Mr Musharraf's pro-America policies if voted to power. What else did a pronouncement like this indicate if not a cry of desperation? The PML (Q) had held on to Mr Musharraf's apron string in all his roles starting with that of an army general who subverted democracy in his first major stroke. How could it hope to gain legitimacy by suddenly deciding to change its colours? In comparison Mr Musharraf emerges in a somewhat better light. At least he has stood by his words at different stages even though whatever he has spoken at times can't be music to everyone's ears. It can't be denied that he has made amends by facilitating the return of the popular role. He has also released his stranglehold over his armed forces. Apparently he hopes that his western allies especially the United States will stand by him just in case his opponents on the home turf decide to settle a score with him. It would be futile to argue that the US has no role in our neighbourhood. It has roped in Pakistan in what it has trumpeted up as a global war against terrorism. It has acknowledged Mr Musharraf's wholehearted support to its mission to smoke out Osama bin Laden. The US has, moreover, brokered peace between Mr Musharraf and Ms Benazir Bhutto. Its hand is equally visible behind Saudi Arabia's decision to persuade Mr Musharraf to facilitate Mr Nawaz Sharif's homecoming. These can be reasons enough for Mr Musharraf to believe that the US will not let him down now or ever. One wonders, however, whether he understands that the US's prime interest has been to work with a democratic Pakistan to overcome the embarrassment caused first by his uniform and then his perverted version of democracy. Having achieved its objective it would like to strengthen the new dispensation. If it continues to find Mr Musharraf useful in the process it may go along with him. Otherwise it may drop him like a hot potato. Where will that leave Mr Musharraf? He has already lost control over armed forces which have so far been described as the single largest party in Pakistan. He has invited isolation from those sections of the political class that matter at this stage. His current discomfiture is a lesson for those rulers who think that democracy is a sham and then go on to treat their own countrymen with utter contempt. One hopes that Pakistan's new governing apparatus (it is most likely to be a coalition with the PPP in the forefront and the PML-N as a chief ally) will display a culture of tolerance and spare Mr Musharraf any ignominy. Since democracy has repeatedly been a casualty in our neighbouring country its key functionaries have not developed virtues like mutual respect. How else can one explain the judicial hanging of one of its main political leaders? How else can one describe the phenomenon of two of its former Prime Ministers being forced to live in exile? It will indeed be a pity were Pakistan to subject yet another of its head of the state to the same or worse fate. It is clear that even today Pakistan does not have a nationally accepted leader. Anywhere else in the democratic world the killing of a leader (Ms Bhutto in this instance) in a terrorist action would have swayed the masses in every nook and corner. In Pakistan instead the sympathy wave is frozen at the borders of her traditional area of influence. Sindh has overwhelmingly voted for her party but not the other three provinces of Pakistan which have shown incredible indifference. There are in addition running duels between the political parties over almost all issues. One can't gloss over the fact that one of the PML-N's poll planks has been the restoration of the judiciary. The PPP, on the other hand, wants to go slow in this regard. This is a point of dispute between them at this juncture. How do they resolve it in their new-found bonhomie? It is not for nothing that some observers in Pakistan are already talking of a snap poll being round the corner. One should welcome that. Democracy may lead to churning that Pakistan badly requires for lasting stability. It is all right to make and figure in a movie Chak de India that pleads the cause of hockey, a national sport. However, when it comes to spending and making money one has to go by the game that wins personal glory. Is that not the message that emanates from the multi-score "sale" of cricket stars playing in the Indian Premier League (IPL)? Pictures of film stars --- Shahrukh Khan and Priety Zinta --- have been beamed into millions of houses by television channels as being among those bidding for the Dhonis of the world. They have rubbed shoulders with industrialists. Clearly they don't want to miss their share of spotlight. What should ordinary citizens make out of it? They ought to understand that all that they see on screen is not true. Their movie gods actually betray their emotions for the sole purpose of filling in their personal coffers. They show their actual colours in real life. It is for anyone to notice that there is a world of difference between Chak de India and chak de cricket. Do we have to name the hero of Chak de India?
|
||||||