Environment
Ministry cant save tiger, PM should act: P
K
NEW
DELHI, Feb 13: The disclosure in the latest Tiger
Census that the number of the endangered animal
had come down to almost half since 2001 prompted
noted wildlife expert and former director of the
Project Tiger PK Sen to appeal to the Centre to
deal with the issue on a war-footing.
The Prime Minister
should call an urgent meeting of experts and ask
them to come out with an adequate respose to the
challenge, Mr Sen told UNI reacting to the Census
Report released yesterday.
Ms Sunita Narain,
Chairperson of the Tiger Task Force constituted
by the PMO in the wake of the Sariska crisis,
refused to say much except "we now have
figures, and should get our act together."
Mr Sen said
"The Ministry of Environment and Forests
cannot save the tiger. They dont have the
resources, knowledge and the technique to protect
and conserve the animal. The task should be taken
up at the PMO level."
He said the
disclosure that the number of tiger had come to
less than hundred had not come as a surprise, or
a disclosure, as the reality was known by all,
only it did not have any Government stamp.
When Project Tiger
was started in 1973, the number of the endangered
animal was 1800, and 35 years later now the
situation has worsened with the number coming
down to around 1500.
In Mr Sens
view it did not have much meaning to say that the
number had come down by half or one-third, as the
previous figure were based on a method which was
not very reliable.
He, however, said
it would be wrong to say that the previous method
used only pug marks, as except the camera trap,
it used all other evidence taken into account by
the new method. The difference was that the
exercise was carried out by the Wildlife
Institute of India which trained personnel for
the purpose, and the new method took into account
statistical variants, so the figures in the
latest Census could be more reliable, he said
"But the moot
point now is what to do. For that the issue
should be taken up at the level of the Prime
Minister, and at the war footing," he said.
The first and
foremost step should be to strengthen
anti-paoching measures to save the existing
tigers, and the second was to provide space to
the animal.
Mr Sen felt that
the Forest Rights Act promulagted this year would
deal death blow to the cause of tiger and the
wild life by helping the process of forest
degradation. (UNI)
Smoking accounts
for 20 pc of total deaths in men in India
NEW
DELHI, Feb 13: Projecting a higher risk factor for
Indians due to smoking than previously thought, a
new WHO study shows that it accounts for five per
cent of total deaths in women and 20 per cent in
men in the country.
Tobacco is
responsible for one in five of all male deaths
and one in 20 of all female deaths in the
country, the study A Nationally
Representative Case-Control Study of Smoking and
Death in India said.
Claiming to be the
first nationally representative study of smoking
in India as a whole, it said in India smoking
kills mainly through tuberculosis.
Of the 1,363
deaths due to tuberculosis studied among women,
13 per cent had smoked, while in men, out of the
3,119 deaths studied, 66 per cent had smoked.
"This is
comparable to United Kingdom and China where lung
cancer and cardio-vascular diseases are the major
killers due to smoking," said Dr Pradeep
Jha, author of the study.
Comparing again to
China, Jha said while nine per cent of Chinese
have quit smoking, only two per cent have done so
in India.
"Stopping
smoking works-but only two per cent of adults
have quit in India, and often only after falling
ill," he said.
In another major
finding, the report showed that over half of
smoking deaths are in illiterate adults.
It further goes on
to show that smoking kills equally in all parts
of the country and 70 per cent of smoking deaths
are in middle age.
The study is
probably the first of its kind which gives
extensive information about women smokers in the
country.
Though the
percentage of women smokers in India is lesser
than than that of men, the habit kills more
females in this country, the study to be
published by the New England Journal of Medicine
said.
It showed that
there is an eight-year gap in life of women who
smoke and those who do not. For men, the figure
is a six year gap for bidi smokers
and 10 years for cigarette smokers.
Contrary to what
is generally known, bidis are less harmful than
cigarettes. "Probably because of the less
tobacco content in each bidi as compared to a
cigarette, it has been found that the former are
responsible for lesser number of deaths that the
latter," Jha said.
Also the overall
risks of smoking are roughly the same in the
eastern and western countries.
The study predicts
one million deaths per year for smokers in India
from 2010 onwards.
"This study
will give us another tool to advocate tobacco
control," Poonam Singh of the World Health
Organisation said.
The study was
conducted by 900 non-medical staff who monitored
11 lakh homes for three years from 2001-03. The
data has been taken from the Samples Registration
System and 6,671 areas were randomly chosen
across the country. (PTI)
Former IA flight
purser seeks hefty compensation
NEW
DELHI, Feb 13: Youll be mistaken as a
hijacker, Indian Airlines told flight purser
Victor Joynath De while asking him to snip off
his handlebar moustache in 1998.
When he refused to
trim his moustache which he considers his
"pride", 62-year-old Victor was forced
to take compulsory retirement as an assistant
manager of Indian Airlines, now Air India, in
2001.
Now, he is seeking
a hefty compensation for all the "trauma and
mental agony" he has undergone for a decade.
"It should be in lakhs," Victor said
over telephone from his hometown Kolkata, but was
unwilling to specify the figure.
"If Sikhs are
allowed to keep beard, why cant I sport a
moustache? This is a discrepancy in the service
manual. I had the moustache when I joined the
service as a flight steward in 1968.
"I was born
in Kolkata but brought up in Benaras where
sporting a moustache is a matter of pride and
respect. I cant compromise with my pride
whatever it comes to. I have complete faith in
judiciary," he said, hoping to come out
victorious against his former employer.
Victors case
is currently with the Supreme Court which has
expressed surprise over the airlines
action.
"How can a
person with a moustache be removed? This is a
democratic country," the apex court
observed, while issuing notices to the central
government and Air India whose own mascot,
Maharaja, is a proud owner of a handlebar
moustache.
In fact, when
Victor had initially objected to the
airlines directive, he was
"stunned" by the response: "You
will be mistaken for a hijacker with such a huge
and repulsive moustache."
The story dates
back to December 1998 when Indian Airlines cited
its manual on crew conduct and general obligation
to discipline the "errant" steward. The
company asked him to neatly trim the moustache or
risk action.
The manual
specifies a grooming code for cabin crew. Among
others, it requires stewards, except Sikhs, to
maintain a cleanshaven demeanour. Those who
sported a moustache were required to keep it
trimmed. Sideburns were a strict no-no.
Though copies of
the manual were circulated to all cabin crew
members, Victor ignored it and continued to twirl
his moustache, inviting action. On January 15,
1999, he was grounded, resulting in a cut in
flying allowances.
In fact, he had
moved the Calcutta High Court immediately after
his compulsory retirement. Initially, a single
bench judge had quashed Indian Airlines
order. But, subsequently a division bench of the
same court upheld the companys decision.
But, Victor
refused to give in and challenged the decision in
the Supreme Court with a hope that at least the
countrys highest court would come to his
rescue.
He claimed that
the secret to his long legal battle was constant
encouragement from his family-his wife Chanda De,
a former Air Hostess and his son Lionel currently
pursuing a degree in engineering at Manipal
University. "They are my inspiration and
have been very supportive."
Asked whether he
had thought of going for an out of court
settlement, Victor said the management had
earlier refused to do so. "That is why I
moved the court."
"I have
already spent Rs 10 lakh as legal costs,"
rued Victor but is determined to fight it out.
"I have not committed any crime to be
penalised like this." (PTI)
|