Jodhaa...controversy
frivolous litigation
affecting creativity
NEW DELHI, Feb 8: As the period film
Jodhaa Akbar gets mired into
controversy with a Rajput organisation
calling for its ban alleging distortion
of historical facts, trade analysts see
it as a case of frivolous objections and
litigations stalling a films
release in India.
Directed
by Ashutosh Gowarikar, who also directed
the Oscar-nominated Lagaan,
Jodhaa Akbar, based on a love
story between Mughal Emperor Akbar and
his beautiful Queen Jodhabai, is in the
throes of controversy just a week ahead
of its worldwide release, with the the
Rajput Karni Sena calling for a ban on
the film across the country for its
distortion of history.
In a
series of press statements issued in
various parts of the country over the
last week, the Rajput Karni Sena
threatened not to allow the screening of
Jodhaa Akbar in India,
especially in theatres in Rajasthan.
"Jodhaa
Akbar is an example of a film distorting
historical facts under the garb of
magnificent production values and
elaborate sets.
"Showing
Akbar and Jodhabai as husband and wife,
when in reality
Jodhabai
was the wife of Akbars son
Jahangir, not only constitutes a careless
tampering with history by filmmaker
Ashutosh Gowarikar but also a gross
violation of Indian traditions and social
values," chief patron of the Rajput
Karni Sena Lokendra Singh Kalvi said.
Calling
for an unconditional apology from the
filmmaker, Kalvi demanded that the Censor
Board ban the film for its distortion of
history.
Kalvi said
he had met Information and Broadcasting
Minister Priya Ranjan Dasmunshi and
demanded that Jodhaa Akbar be
banned for its tampering of historical
facts.
Further,
he said the distributor of the film in
Rajasthan had decided not to release the
film in the theatres in the state keeping
in view the hurt that it has caused to
the sentiments of people in the state.
"The
film will not release in Rajasthan
theatres. Further, we have urged the
exhibitors of the nearly 4000 theatres
across the country, which are to screen
the film, not screen it,"Kalvi
added.
Infact,
Kalvi said the Rajput Sena had sent
flowers to the distributors of the film
in various areas to urge them not to
release the film as it distorts Indian
history.
Trade
analysts, however, see the Rajput Sena
threat to stall the release of
Jodhaa Akbar as a dangerous
trend, whereby any small organisation or
individual can succeed in stalling the
release of what is for the filmmakers a
"labour of love" by simply
obtaining an injunction from a court.
The maker
of pathbreaking films like
Baghban and Babul
Ravi Chopra said, "Such frivolous
protests are thoroughly condemnable. I
feel that once a film has been cleared by
the Censor Board and given a Censor
Certificate, stalling the release of a
film under pressure from what are clearly
vested interests is a deplorable trend
and needs to be checked."
Analysts
in the film trade as well as those in
film circles, feel that the
"unnecessary controversy"
generated around the film by the Rajpur
Karni Sena is another example of
organisations with vested interests
trying to stall the release of the film
by approaching courts or the Censor Board
or pressurising distributors not to
release the film in their respective
territories.
In this
regard, trade analysts point out that
there are apparently various incidents
wherein people have approached courts as
little as one day before the theatrical
release of a film and sought an order
injuncting its release on frivolous
grounds.
Though
courts have been found to have exercised
caution in some instances and allowed the
producer to make a representation before
them, there are also various instances
where injunctions appear to have been
granted to parties purely based on
speculative or frivolous claims by such
parties.
In the
recent past, films like
Water, Rang De
Basanti, Fanaa and
Aaja Nachle have been
targetted by certain sections in society
on frivolous grounds, leading to either
their ban in some territories or a delay
in their release.
Two years
ago, the release of Rakeysh Mehras
Rang De Basanti was
postoponed by a few weeks after the
Indian Air Force and the Union Home
Ministry objected to their depiction in
the film. Some Air Force officers, who
watched the film, claimed that they were
shown in a bad light and demanded that
some portions be cut from the film, which
showed R Madhavan playing an Air Force
Pilot, who died of a MIG-21 crash and the
IAF was shown responsible for it. The
matter was sorted out only after the then
Defence Minister Pranab Mukherjee himself
saw the film at a special screening.
Last year,
the screening of the Aamir Khan-starrer
Fanaa was banned in Gujarat
by the state Government after the actor
made a statement supporting the agitation
of the Narmada Bachao Andolan
against the Sardar Sarovar Dam. The
non-release of the film in Rajasthan
entailed a loss of crores of rupees to
the producers of the film.
More
recently, Anil Mehtas Aaja
Nachle, the comeback film of 90s
diva Madhuri Dixit, was pulled off from
theatres in Uttar Pradesh after the
Mayawati Government in the state took
umbrage over some lyrics in the title
track of the which said "kahe Mochi
Bhi Kud Ko Sunar Hai". The release
became possible only after the producers
of the film, Yashraj tendered an
unconditional apology on the issue and
agreed to delete the objectionable lyrics
from the film.
Says Koman
Nahata, "The ban of
Fanaa by the Gujarat
Government and that of Aaja
Nachle by the Uttar Pradesh
Government raise a pertinent point: that
if it is so easy for anybody to obtain a
ban on a film, what is the need for a
certifying authority like the Central
Board of Film Certification."
Infact,
trade analysts wonder why all these
organisations, seeking a ban on a film,
are seen to surface just on the eve of
the films release when the
filmmaker has spend crores of rupees in
bringing the film to fruition.
For
example, Nahata says, in case of
Aaja Nachle, why did the
Uttar Pradesh Government not raise the
issue of casteism in the title track
before the films release.
"After
all, the title song of the film had been
playing on radio FM and satellite
channels for over a month before its
release on November 30," he added.
All this,
the trade analysts say, has caused a lot
of unease among Indian filmmakers who are
constantly apprehensive of any frivolous
or baseless allegation by an individual
or entity impacting the release of their
films at the last minute.
"There
appears to be a growing apprehension
amongst producers of Indian films in
respect of the apparent ease with which
individuals and entities are able to
approach the courts in various
jurisdictions across the country and seek
to obtain ex-parte orders of injunction
of the release of these producers
films," the sources added.
A direct
consequence of this trend is that an
increasing number of filmmakers today are
afraid of "pushing the
envelope" in the excercise of their
creative freedom and instead are content
to make films on "safe scripts"
or subjects.
Trade
analysts said the trend is also directly
impacting the creative content of films
as producers are increasingly becoming
"risk-averse" and prefer to
invest money in "safe" scripts
that do not push the envelope and do not
exercise the creative liberties that are
inherent to the business of filmmaking.
(UNI)
Kidney
racket kingpin to be produced in court on
Sunday
KATHMANDU, Feb 8: Dr Amit Kumar, the
alleged kingpin of Indias biggest
kidney transplant racket arrested
yesterday after a fortnight-long manhunt,
will be produced in a Nepalese court on
Sunday and charged with violating foreign
currency laws.
"As
today and tomorrow are holidays in Nepal,
Kumar will be produced in court on
Sunday," Deputy Inspector General
Ramesh Kumar Shrestha told reporters
here.
He said
the 40-year-old Indian doctor would be
charged with possessing undeclared
foreign currency.
Kumar told
waiting media that he was
"innocent" and being
"falsely implicated".
Police had
seized a bank draft for Indian rupees
936,000, and Euros 145,000 and USD 18,900
in cash from him during his arrest from
Hotel Wildlife Camp in Chitwan in
southern Nepal, 60 kms from the Indian
border.
Initial
reports of Nepalese media had said that
he was carrying USD 145,000 and a draft
of 936,000 Euros.
There were
conflicting reports whether Manish Singh,
who accompanied Kumar to the hotel, has
been apprehended or not. While Himalayan
Times claimed he had fled, Kantipur
online reported that he has been arrested
alongwith Kumar.
The news
portal reported that another person
escaped. There was no confirmation
whether he was a Nepali or an Indian, it
said.
A special
team of the Kathmandu police brought
Kumar, who is believed to have conducted
over 500 illegal operations in a decade,
from Chitwan to the capital this morning
covering 160 kms by road in a jeep.
He was
kept at Hanumandhoka police station and
interrogated by the police.
An
Interpol Red Corner Notice was issued
against the tainted doctor after the
massive racket with inter-state and
international ramifications came to light
on January 24.
Kumar, who
had checked into Room No 6 of the Hotel,
60 km from Raxaul in UP on the border,
was sporting a cap and had noticed a news
item about him in English daily
Himalayan Times which he had
cut.
Suspicious
over his action, the hotel receptionist
is said to have tipped off the police
about his presence and he was picked up
in a joint operation by Interpols
Nepal unit and local police.
Last week
Interpol issued notices for the arrest of
Kumar and his brother after the racket
was busted in Gurgaon saying the two are
the "subject of national arrest
warrants for illegal transplanting of
kidneys, cheating and criminal
conspiracy."
"It
is believed that during the past eight
years around 500 people were forcibly
operated on and their kidneys
transplanted to foreign patients in a
secret operating theatre," Interpol
said.
Six people
have been arrested in India over the
scandal. (PTI)
SC
refuses urgent hearing of
MNS-derecognition plead
NEW DELHI, Feb 8: The Supreme Court
today refused to grant urgent hearing to
a petition seeking derecognition of the
Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS), headed
by Raj Thackeray, for launching a tirade
against North Indians living in
Maharashtra.
A bench
comprising Justice K G Balakrishnan and
Justice R V Raveendran told the
petitioner Arvind Shukla that there was
no urgency in the matter and it was
coming up for hearing on February 22.
The
petitioner had demanded appropriate legal
action against Thackeray for making
inflammatory speeches leading to violence
against North Indians , particularly
those from Bihar and Uttar Pradesh.
The
petitioner had also sought directions to
the Election Commission to withdraw
recognition of the MNS. Shukla has also
prayed to the court to direct the Centre
to intervene and ensure safety of North
Indians living in Maharashtra. (UNI)
Haryana
is on top in e-readiness among major
states
PANCHKULA, Feb 8: From 15th in 2003, to
11th in 2004, to 9th in 2005 Haryana has
steadily risen up the ranks of
e-readiness in the country to now take
its position on the top among major
states on the e-readiness index according
to the latest e-readiness report compiled
by the National Council of Applied
Economic Research.
The
report released by Union Communication
and Information Technology Minister, A.
Raja, at the inaugural session of the
two-day 11th National Conference on
e-Governance at Panchkula, near here, on
Thursday, is the fourth in the series of
such reports compiled since 2003 to rank
the states and UTs according to their
levels of e-readiness. Haryana is next
only to Delhi and Chandigarh,
Revealing
this here today, Haryana Financial
Commissioner and Principal Secretary,
Electronics and IT, P K Chaudhery, said
the report had measured the e-Readiness
of the states in terms of their ability
to participate in the increasingly
networked world.
Three
main quantitative and qualitative
indicators have been used in the
exercise: the environment that promotes
the spread and usage of information and
communication technology (ICT); the
readiness of different stake holders of
the economy (the Government-both the
initiatives of the Central Government and
the response of the State Governments,
businesses, and the individual) to use
ICT; and the degree of usage of ICT by
the three stake holders.
Under
these indicators, Haryana ranks second in
terms of environment among the six states
in level 1, second in readiness among the
three states in level 1 and seventh among
the 14 states in level 2 of the usage
index. None of the states has qualified
for level 1 in the usage index.
Chaudhery
said unlike on previous occasions, the
e-Readiness Report 2006 has been compiled
on the basis of a more comprehensively
designed questionnaire, including in it
some more relevant variables alongwith
appropriate consistency. Explaining
e-Readiness, he said it can be considered
as the ability to pursue value creation
opportunities facilitated by ICT.
Therefore, it is not simply a matter of
number of computers, websites, Internet
service providers, internet connections,
telephones and mobiles in the state, but
also the ability of readiness to use
technology skillfully at the level of the
individual, business and the Government.
Dwelling in details into the indicators,
Chaudhery said environment relates to
conditions prevailing in the state like
infrastructure and policies external to
the players involved in making
e-Governance effective. Readiness deals
with those characteristics of the players
that enable them to respond to an
environment that is enabling.
Qualification or training of individuals
in IT is an example of readiness. Usage,
on the other hand, is the actual usage of
IT given a conducive environment and
positive state of readiness, he added.
He,
however, clarified that the methodology
used in compilation of the report does
not make absolute comparisons of the
three components of e-Readiness, and only
provides relative positions of states as
the indices indicate relative positioning
of states. (PTI)
|