Story
of Musharraf's 'love'
TALES OF TRAVESTY
By Dr.
Jitendra Singh
Anybody who goes through
Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf's
recently published autobiography "In
the line of fire'' is bound to end up
with the conclusion that this man was
always nursing a crush for one or the
other girl or woman till atleast as long
he entered into a formal wedlock with
wife Sheeba. The shrewd General has
cleverly avoided dwelling on his
post-marital or extra-marital conquests.
Now there is nothing new
or exciting about these accounts.
However, what one fails to understand is
what precisely the author wishes to
achieve by narrating details about what
he rightly or wrongly describes as his
love affairs. Is the General turned
politician trying to don the apparently
self-confessional mantle of Mahatma
Gandhi's ''My Experiments with truth''
and thus trying to prove that he has
nothing to hide and that he is ready to
share every little detail of his personal
life? Or, is he trying to project himself
as an eternal romantic whose unsuccessful
forays spell poetry? In both the cases,
the General is far from being convincing.
Unlike Gandhi, Musharraf lets out only
those little bits of his personal life
which suit him and conveniently sleeps
over all that would not show him in a
flattering vein. And, neither does
Musharraf come out as a romantic because
his self-confessed fondness for the women
he came in contact qualifies neither as a
feeling of serious love nor as of an act
of light flirtation.
Perhaps Mr. Pervez
Musharraf is inspired by the famous love
accounts of some of his predecessor
politicians from the subcontinent and
could not resist attempting some ''soft''
supplementation to his politically loaded
dry narration. But, if that be the case,
again the General's socalled love affairs
come out as poor caricatures in the
background of some widely written affairs
like for example the mutually
self-effacing relationship shared by
Jawaharlal Nehru and Lady Edwina
Mountbatten or Zulfikar Ali Bhutto's
unrequited feeling for actress Nargis.
To dwell on Musharraf's
controversial political views in the book
would go beyond the purview of this brief
write-up. But one wonders whether the
General has in any way succeeded
achieving his unspoken objective of
seeking legitimacy with Pakistani masses
and the Pak military junta on the one
hand and on the other hand with his
patrons in Washington and whether his
self-styled romantic portrayals help in
furthering his designs. Between the
lines, nevertheless, the book
inadvertently exposes the intrinsic
personality of the author who comes forth
as a man of ordinary human traits who has
rather done remarkably well for himself
in life by exploiting to his advantage
Pakistan's vulnerable social-political
system.
Even though the
autobiography ''In the Line of Fire'' may
make some quick buck, sooner than later
the astute General is bound to realise
that the story of his young age love
initiatives has ended as unrewarded as
the initiatives themselves. To the common
reader, the inference is that young
Pervez was perpetually inconsistent with
his pursuits which he gave up on flimsy
grounds like in one case his family moved
out of the girl's neighbourhood and in
another case the girl's family moved out
to the then East Pakistan. To be more
charitable, Umapathy could rather
sum it up gracefully for the Hon'ble
President with a philosophical retreat ''
Kabhi Dag-Magai Kashti, Kabhi Kho Gaya
Kinaara!''.
Guerrilla
warfare
By Fazal
Mehmood
The Army Chief General J J
Singh has deputed Brigadier B K Ponwal,
who was the Chief Instructor at the
Jungle Warfare School (CIJWS) of the Army
in Mizoram to the Jungle Terrorism and
Jungle Warfare College at Kanker in
Chhattisgarh. Brigadier Ponwal is a 1971
war veteran and has seen
counter-insurgency operations in Punjab
and Assam. He was in-charge of the joint
Indo-US troop training.
The need for such a school
was felt after the Chhattisgarh
government sent 120 policemen to train at
the Counter Insurgency and Jungle Warfare
School (CIJWS) at Vairengte in Mizoram in
2004.
The institute has asked the
government for 5,000 AK-47s, multi-barrel
grenade launchers and helicopters to
fight Maoists or Naxalites, who have
established complete control over nine
states stretching from Bihar to
Maharashtra.
They control 92,000 sq km
from Gadchhiroli in Maharashtra to
Abujmarh in Chhattisgrah. Even the prime
minister, Dr. Manmohan Singh, at the
chief ministers' conference in the
Capital admitted that 160 districts
across the country are slipping out of
government control. He reiterated that
the Maoist problem has assumed
proportions bigger than militancy in
J&K and insurgency in the Northeast
due to its sheer spread and organised
linkages. In view of the deteriorating
law and order situation in Chhattisgarh
the Union home minister, Shivaraj Patil,
sought the help of Mr KPS Gill, the
former director general of Punjab Police,
who was responsible for terminating
insurgency in the border state.
The first lesson taught to
policemen here is to throw away their
1940s musket-rifles and pick up AK-47s.
Even SLRs are out of the syllabi because
they are non-functional in active combat
situations.
During their five-week
course at the college, policemen are
given rigorous training in guerrilla
warfare. The training camp, spread over
40-acres, has no buildings, just 40
tents. Trainees here live in the open in
the dense jungles of Bastar and learn to
kill king-cobras for dinner.
Official estimates peg the
armed Maoist cadres at about 10,000, and
over-ground workers to be around 45,000.
Security experts say the numbers are much
higher. What lends Maoists a deadly edge
is the fact that they are armed with
modern weaponry - AK-47s, IEDS
(improvised explosive devices), INSAS
rifles and SLRS. Last year, they claimed
as many as 700 lives. That's more deaths
than in Jammu and Kashmir and the
Northeast put together. It's just been
nine months in 2006, but the Naxals have
already killed 176 persons, including
security personnel and civilians.
How did things come to this
pass? One reason is that, since law and
order is a state subject, the Centre's
all along tried to keep its role minimal
- stepping in only to supervise and help
with additional forces and finances. And
though the government roots for popular
'uprisings' against Maoists, security and
intelligence experts are critical of such
government-backed vigilante groups like
the Salwa Judum (SJ), which has had a
controversial run ever since it was set
up in Chhattisgarh last year. The critics
think that the tribals who form the SJ
are being used as cannon fodder and
becoming targets of the Maoists. The
adivasis are only being forced into a
spiral of messy violence.
The home ministry has asked
the Chhattisgarh government to stop the
SJ till it can consolidate the group and
arm them better. However, if the SJ
experiment succeeds there, then it will
be replicated elsewhere. Meanwhile, the
Naxal affected states have also been
asked to fill the vacancies in their
police force. Chhattisgarh has 4,000
such, while Bihar has as many as 20,000.
There is equal scepticism
over the suggestion of a coordinated
approach among states. A joint task force
between two states to catch one thug like
Veerappan failed.
Finally, police from one
state succeeded in killing him only by
keeping their plans secret from the
other. How does the government expect
nine states to work together? The
solution, according to him, is for the
Centre to have a greater role in tackling
the problem - gathering more intelligence
and providing better service condition to
the state police force engaged in
fighting the Naxal menace.
If the Maoists are allowed a
free run for any longer period it will
have a debilitating country-wide impact
as insurgent plan to set up commands in
other states of the Union, which will
mean more violence not only in the
country side but even in urban centres.
Economic development of the
Naxal infected region should be accorded
top priority as to wean away the youth
joining insurgents. This job should be
directly controlled by a panel of experts
who should periodically report to the
Union home ministry. Needless to
emphasise that economic deprivation
drives people to militancy; and the
tribal population in the country is the
poorest amongst the poor. INAV
Child
abuse
By Sweta
Patwardhan
The government has banned
the child labour without any impact. The
Child labour Act only bans child labour
in specific industries and has actually
helped put more children to work rather
than get them out of it.
There are alarming
statistics to prove this. While official
figures put the number of working
children at 1.7 crore, according to child
rights activists, the actual figure is 20
crore, of which 20 lakh work in hazardous
environments, namely mines and factories.
And less than half of India's 43 crore
children go to school. If Article 21-A of
the Constitution talks of providing free
and compulsory education for children
below the age of 14, how can this coexist
with child labour?
The government has been
celebrating Children's Day on November 14
for the last 41- years with children film
festivals and other tokenisms. But the
story of the Indian child has been
unfolding more and more like the pages of
a horror story.
Child labour is but one of
the problems for areas likes Manipur.
Monti Ahanthem, director, institute for
Research and Social Development, Imphal,
points to trafficking of young girls as
another assault on childhood. "Each
year some 40 girls disappear from
Manipur. Not a single girl has ever
returned. And amid the chaos of a
conflict zone, there is little the
community can do to prevent their
exodus."
Another area child activists
grapple with in conflict zones is care of
HIV-positive orphans whose parents have
died of AIDS. Ahanthem acknowledges the
problem is his state. "With a measly
Rs 9 per child allocated for children in
institutional care, there is no special
institutional care for HIV-positive
children in the state," he says.
J&K too, with its history of
militancy, has "virtually no
infrastructure for institutional
care" for its over 1,20,000 orphans,
80,000 of whom are from the Valley, as
Rauf Muhammad, an activist from Srinagar,
says.
Children in conflict zones,
as both Rauf and Ahanthem point out, also
fall prey to the army and militant groups
who use them as workers or carriers. Or
worse, as spies. "The lure of petty
cash, coupled with the easy availability
of drugs, is enough to attract them, many
of whom become addicts," says
Ahanthem. Rauf states that in J&K,
"there are several cases of young
boys falling into the trap of the army or
the various militant outfits". He
cites the example of a Kashmiri youth
who's been detained since 1993 in Tihar
jail. "He was booked under TADA, and
family members say he was just 14 when
the army picked him up." While the
Juvenile Justice Act very clearly states
that children cannot be put behind bars,
it is not applicable in J&K. With no
help from the law, Rauf's been persuading
imams in J&K to spread awareness of
child rights through their regular
discourses.
Ahanthem and Rauf were among
the dozens of people working in the field
of child rights, who were in Delhi
recently to attend the National
Consultation on Justice For Children,
organised by voluntary organisation CRY.
The conference also highlighted the
loopholes in laws that are supposed to
protect and enforce child rights. As
advocate Mahrukh Addenwala observed,
"Child rights in not a soft issue.
Money is made out of children and that's
why laws are constantly being challenged
at every step."
Speaking of laws, Tamali Sen
Gupta of the Human Rights and Legal
Awareness Society points out that despite
India ratifying the UN Convention on the
Rights of the Child in 1992, which makes
it mandatory for states to take
affirmative action in protecting children
from all forms of exploitation and abuse,
Indian laws are inadequate to define,
identify and punish offences against
children, or to protect them against
sexual abuse. Ironically, the Juvenile
Justice Act 2000 deals primarily with
children in conflict with the law and
their rehabilitation, and makes no
attempt to identify the sexual abuse
children are subjected to.
This when India has - by
conservative estimates - 4-5 lakh child
prostitutes. A large number of them are
brought from Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu
and Manipur, and put to work in Mumbai,
Delhi and Goa. About 44,000 children are
reported missing in India every year as
per NHRC-UNIFEM Action Research data and
trafficking in women and children in
India 2002-2003. Of these, some 11,000
children continue to remain untraced.
Most end up in brothels. These grim
statistics, however, have provoked
grossly inadequate punitive action. Over
the five-year block period of 1997-2001,
only 65,602 persons were arrested under
the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act.
Traffickers, transporters, brothel
owners, clients and other such exploiters
are largely untouched by the law, as
prosecution is negligible, says Tamali.
Almost all countries have
laws in tune with a modern conception of
child rights. The UK's Sexual Offences
Act 2003 deals comprehensively with child
rights, and offers them strong protection
against exploitation and abuse. The US
has several laws relating to offences
against children. Sri Lanka, Thailand and
Malaysia have adopted specific
legislation to protect and enforce child
rights. Is India going to continue to
tackle its growing problem of child
rights with syrupy platitudes and token
ceremonies? INAV
|