Australia
wheat mission to Iraq to leave this week
SYDNEY,
Feb 21: The Australian Government's high
level delegation to Iraq to save one of its
biggest wheat markets is expected to leave around
the weekend, just ahead of Baghdad's plans to
sign new contracts next week.
The mission will
leave after Australian monopoly wheat exporter
AWB Ltd.'s <AWB.AX> holds its Thursday
annual meeting, which will be headed by the
group's executive chairman, Brendan Stewart, a
Government source said today.
Stewart is
expected to travel to Iraq on the mission,
despite calls by private traders hoping to export
to Iraq that AWB be excluded.
Private Australian
traders are lining up to sell wheat to Iraq after
the Australian Government convinced AWB to
suspend its veto power over private sales if
necessary for Australia to win sales.
Iraq said earlier
this month it would suspend business dealings
with AWB until after a Government-appointed
inquiry into alleged kickbacks to the former
Government of Saddam Hussein is concluded. The
inquiry is due to report by March 31 on whether
AWB broke any Australian laws.
A U.N. Report last
year alleged that AWB paid up to 222 million
dollars in kickbacks to Saddam's regime through
the now-defunct United Nations oil-for-food
programme, which allowed Iraq to export limited
amounts of oil as an exception to sanctions to
pay for imported food.
The Iraqi Grain
Board told Reuters in Baghdad yesterday that it
planned to buy wheat from Canadian, German and
U.S. Suppliers and would sign contracts next
week.
Khalil Assi, head
of the Iraqi Grain Board, said Iraq could also
buy Australian wheat from firms other than AWB.
Private Australian
traders are keen to sell to Iraq, but supplies of
available Australian wheat are limited because of
previous purchases by AWB for its national export
pool.
The Iraqi Grain
Board cancelled a 1 million tonne tender for US
wheat earlier this month, complaining that prices
offered were too high at 190 dollars to 200
dollars per tonne.
Iraq is one of the
largest wheat import markets in the world, and
Australian silos are brimming with wheat for
export markets after a bumper harvest completed
last month. (AGENCIES)

Ovarian
cancer survival influenced by MD specialty
NEW
YORK, Feb 21: The survival rate of women with
ovarian cancer is improved when surgery is
performed by a gynecologic oncologist rather than
by a general gynecologist, according to the
findings of a new study.
The results also
indicate that gynecologic cancer specialists
(oncologist) are more likely to follow surgical
guidelines for cancer surgery and are more likely
to completely remove the tumor.
The findings are
based on a study of 512 women from the
Netherlands who were diagnosed with ovarian
cancer between 1994 and 1997. The subjects
included 184 whose surgery was performed by a
gynecologic oncologist and 328 who were operated
on by a general gynecologist.
The five-year
survival rate was higher for patients treated by
a gynecologic oncologist, senior author Dr Ate G
J Van der Zee, from the University Medical Center
Groningen, and colleagues note.
In patients
treated by gynecologic oncologists, 5-year
survival rates for less advanced cancers was 86
percent and for more advanced cancers was 21 per
cent. The corresponding rates for patients
treated by general gynecologists were
significantly lower, at 70 per cent and 13 per
cent.
When other factors
that can influence patient outcome were
considered, researchers found that the overall
risk of death was reduced by 21 per cent and the
risk of death among patients younger than 75
years of age was reduced by 29 per cent if a
gynecologic oncologist performed the surgery.
As noted,
gynecologic oncologists adhered to surgical
guidelines more often than did general
gynecologists. For example, in patients with
stage I-II disease, 55 percent of gynecologic
oncologists followed guidelines compared with 33
percent of general gynecologists.
In patients with
stage III disease, complete tumor removal was
achieved by gynecologic oncologists more often
than by general gynecologists.
''Specific
surgical training appeared to be important,
because a surgeon's patient volume alone had no
effect on survival,'' the authors point out in
the medical journal Cancer.
''These results
imply that every patient who has suspected
ovarian carcinoma deserves to undergo surgery
performed by a gynecologic oncologist,'' the
authors conclude. (AGENCIES)

Docs
more apt to pen headache script for women
NEW
YORK, Feb 21: Women are more likely to consult
their doctor about headaches or migraine, and are
more likely to come away with a prescription to
treat the problem than are men, according to a
study conducted in the UK.
Headache,
including migraine, is one of the top 10 reasons
for consulting a doctor and is the most common
neurological symptom encountered by family
doctors and neurologists, Dr Martin Gulliford
from King's College London and colleagues report
in the Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and
Psychiatry.
Over a 9-year
period in 253 general practices across the UK,
there were 570,795 patient-visits for headache
made by 413,221 individuals aged 15 or older, the
report indicates.
Women were almost
three times more likely than men to see their
doctor about headache symptoms, and rates for
both sexes were highest among people 15 to 24
years old. Visits to the doctor because of
headache decreased with age.
During the 9-year
study period, doctors wrote a total of 189,065
prescriptions for specific anti-migraine drugs,
Gulliford and colleagues report. These drugs were
prescribed to about one in three women and to one
in four men.
Middle-aged women
between 45 and 54 years were most apt to leave
the doctor's office with a prescription for an
anti-migraine medication, according to the
report. In men, prescribing patterns varied
little with age.
Six percent of
headache patients were referred for tests or for
specialist care, and men were more likely than
women to be referred.
Over half of these
referrals were to neurologists -- something to
think about, the authors say, noting that in the
neurologist workforce in the UK is roughly one
tenth of that in other Western countries.
''Given this lack
of capacity, headache referrals compete with
other conditions for scarce resources,''
Gulliford and colleagues write. (AGENCIES)

"Ties
can spread superbugs," UK doctors told
LONDON,
Feb 21: Doctors should stop wearing ties
and traditional white coats to work because they
might be responsible for spreading deadly
hospital superbugs, according to a report.
The British
Medical Association (BMA), which represents
three-quarters of the country's doctors, said
yesterday ties performed no beneficial function
in treating patients and, as they were rarely
washed, were a potential bug haven.
In Britain alone,
up to 5,000 people every year are killed by
hospital infections such as MRSA
(methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus),
costing the state-funded National Health Service
as much as 1 billion pounds a year, the BMA said.
Washing hands
properly was the most important action medical
staff could take to help stop the spread of the
so-called superbugs.
However other
steps, such as doctors abandoning ties and other
''functionless'' clothing, could also help
minimise the risk, said Peter Maguire, deputy
chairman of the BMA's board of science.
''Hand-washing,
wearing clothes that minimise the spread of
infection such as clean, closely woven cotton,
and stopping wearing ... Functionless clothing
such as ties will make a huge difference,''
Maguire added. (AGENCIES)

US
removing documents from public access: NYTimes
WASHINGTON,
Feb 21: US intelligence agencies have been
secretly removing from public access at the
National Archives thousands of historical
documents that were available for years, The New
York Times reported.
The restoration of
classified status to more than 55,000 previously
declassified pages began in 1999, when the CIA
and five other agencies objected to what they saw
as a hasty release of sensitive information after
a 1995 declassification order signed by President
Bill Clinton, the Times said yesterday on its Web
site.
The secret program
accelerated after the Bush administration took
office and especially after the Sept. 11 attacks,
according to archives records, the paper said.
It came to light
after intelligence historian Matthew Aid noticed
dozens of documents he had copied years ago had
been withdrawn from the archives' open shelves,
the Times said.
Under existing
guidelines, Government documents are supposed to
be declassified after 25 years unless there is a
particular reason to keep them secret.
Some historians
say the program is removing material that can do
no conceivable harm to national security and note
that some of the documents have been published by
the Government, the Times said.
Critics say it is
part of a marked trend toward greater secrecy
under the Bush administration, which has
increased the pace of classifying documents,
slowed declassification and discouraged the
release of some material under the Freedom of
Information Act, the paper said. (AGENCIES)
|