EDITORIAL
Salahuddin?
Who?
If Muzaffarabad-based
Hizbul Mujahideen supremo Syed Salahuddin is a worried
man these days he can't be blamed. The leaders like him
are bound to be marginalised if New Delhi and Islamabad
stick to the course they have chosen for mutual welfare.
Already they are alarmed by the Pakistan spokesperson's
assertion disowning her country's claim to Jammu and
Kashmir. It is but natural for them to feel that their
sojourn in "Azad" Kashmir, as the
Pakistan-occupied territory is locally known, is short
lived. That is plausibly the reason why he has told a
television channel that Pakistan would not hand him over
to India. Is it a measure of his confidence or
nervousness? He has never hidden his aversion to the
policies being pursued by Pakistan President Pervez
Musharraf on the Kashmir issue. The only time he had felt
comfortable was when Pakistan rejected New Delhi's demand
for sending him back to this country. Islamabad said on
that occasion that it did not think that the HM chief was
a terrorist. Instead, it had proclaimed him as . .....more
My
father's daughter
Should I, after teas
and cakes and ices, have the strength to force the moment
to its crisis?" Nobel laureate T.S. Eliot's
couplet had come in handy for a daughter to express her
dilemma. She wondered how she would be able to face the
unavoidable fact of parting with her seriously ailing
father who had given so much love to her. Eliot's couplet
comes to mind on this occasion albeit in an entirely
different context. This is perhaps because the matter we
are about to discuss relates to a father and his
daughter. Both belong to Kupwara district and are in deep
trouble. The father in this .....more
|
|
HIV/AIDS
the legal envelope
By Kajal Bhardwaj
Recently,
media was abuzz with news of an orphanage in Gandhidham
in Gujarat's Kutch district removing two minor boys after
they tested positive for HIV. The head of the orphanage
claimed that the young boys posed a risk to the other
children in the orphanage. The young boys have lost their
mother to AIDS, their father suffers from mental illness
and no one else in their family is willing to look .....more
Parliamentary
Govt
and people's mights
By Babu Ram
The
Parliamentary form of Govt is not something new to the
Indian people. They have had village Panchayats, Sabhas
and Samities at the lowest rungs as Institutions of
Self-Rule Governance. The present form of Parliamentary
system of Govt is based on British and American pattern
largely saturated by moral and legal code . ......more
Catching
up with
corporate philanthropy
By Sankar Ray
Rather than
just tying ribbons, you should adver- tise the fact that
you are a good corporate citizen."
Dr. Vinay B
Nair, professor of finance at the Wharton School of
Management, in a recently concluded study with two
academics of the Columbia Business School, Raymond Fisman
and Geoffrey Heal, A Model for Corporate
Philanthropy", suggested albeit not so eloquently
that philanthropy for the corporate in more than a
tactic, perhaps on the .....more
|
EDITORIAL
Salahuddin? Who?
If Muzaffarabad-based
Hizbul Mujahideen supremo Syed Salahuddin is a worried
man these days he can't be blamed. The leaders like him
are bound to be marginalised if New Delhi and Islamabad
stick to the course they have chosen for mutual welfare.
Already they are alarmed by the Pakistan spokesperson's
assertion disowning her country's claim to Jammu and
Kashmir. It is but natural for them to feel that their
sojourn in "Azad" Kashmir, as the
Pakistan-occupied territory is locally known, is short
lived. That is plausibly the reason why he has told a
television channel that Pakistan would not hand him over
to India. Is it a measure of his confidence or
nervousness? He has never hidden his aversion to the
policies being pursued by Pakistan President Pervez
Musharraf on the Kashmir issue. The only time he had felt
comfortable was when Pakistan rejected New Delhi's demand
for sending him back to this country. Islamabad said on
that occasion that it did not think that the HM chief was
a terrorist. Instead, it had proclaimed him as "a
freedom fighter". That was some moment in his career
that has come and gone Now Mr Salahuddin (real name
Moulvi Yusuf Shah) has on his own reposed full faith in
the Pakistani leadership while flaunting his credentials
as a "Kashmiri citizen". To further buttress
his case he has criticised India for "manipulating
Pakistan's recommendations on Kashmir to suit its own
interests." He has said he is not "a foreign
element" in Pakistan and vowed to carry on the armed
struggle (in this part of the State). Apparently he has
not done his homework well. He needs to study recent
developments in Pakistan or elsewhere. He will realise
that a country may create war-mongers like him for its
temporary benefit but it takes not more than a second to
disown them when they become a liability. Who can deny
that Pakistan with the help of the United States had
raised Taliban to counter the Soviet influence in
Afghanistan? Presently Pakistan and the US have joined
hands to dismantle the evil structure that they had
together built. If one applies the same analogy one will
comprehend Pakistan's difficulty in simultaneously
talking peace and protecting those itching to sabotage
it. The General himself has admitted --- his subsequent
face-saving denials notwithstanding --- that his country
has handed over Al Qaeda activities to the US for a
fabulous price.
For reasons of expediency
the countries have not fought shy of distancing
themselves from even their one-time heroes. A stunning
example in Pakistan is how it had left Choudhary Mohammad
Zafrulla Khan crestfallen while declaring his Ahmadiyya
set un-Islamic. Described by Jinnah as his son, late
Zafrulla Khan had fought his country's battles in the
United Nations Security Council. He was widely hailed for
his legal acumen. He was so hurt by Pakistan's decision
against Ahmadiyyas that, according to one version, he had
straightaway refused to take part in Jinnah's last rites.
Why should Pakistan
shelter Mr Salahuddin any more? It is for his own sake
that the HM boss reads the writing on the wall. The
developing scenario in the sub-continent leaves simply
one option for him. He must give up violence in his mind
and join the well-intentioned chorus for normalcy in the
region.
My father's daughter
Should I, after teas
and cakes and ices, have the strength to force the moment
to its crisis?" Nobel laureate T.S. Eliot's
couplet had come in handy for a daughter to express her
dilemma. She wondered how she would be able to face the
unavoidable fact of parting with her seriously ailing
father who had given so much love to her. Eliot's couplet
comes to mind on this occasion albeit in an entirely
different context. This is perhaps because the matter we
are about to discuss relates to a father and his
daughter. Both belong to Kupwara district and are in deep
trouble. The father in this case had showered her
affection by manipulating a false certificate to build a
case for her admission in a medical college under the
"reserved for backward area" category. It seems
that he had not equally treated all his daughters. Those
born from his first wife were evidently ignored and had
tipped off the authorities about his wrong-doing. The law
will certainly deal with him and the unworthy
beneficiary. Medical education has become one of the
topmost priorities. It is believed that it holds the key
to fame and wealth now that one and all are worried about
health. How else can one explain why the father had done
what he had by engineering a forgery in this example?
There are many who are out to exploit the popular urge
for becoming doctors. No less an organisation than the
Medical Council of India (MCI) has been worried in this
regard. It has cautioned aspiring students not to be
carried away by advertisements published by some
unscrupulous agencies luring them for medical sources in
the country and abroad. It has asked all state
governments and medical councils to take similar steps
for educating students at large. It has urged them to
stop "such institutes/entities/agents from offering
unapproved courses so that innocent Indian students are
not trapped into the false hope and dream of becoming a
doctor by misleading and deceptive advertisements."
For its part the MCI is very careful. It grants
"provisional registration to foreign degree holders
only after ascertaining that they have passed the
screening test and that these degrees are recognised in
the country where the college/university is
located."
Does the absence of
employment avenues drive the people to commit mischief? A
degree is the first step towards securing a job in the
traditional dispensation. According to the latest sample
surveys carried out by the National Sample Survey
Organisation (NSSO) "42 per cent of the population
are usually employed" in the country. The
unemployment rate for the youth (15 to 29 years) is 3.9
and 4.2 for men and women, respectively, in rural areas
and 8.8 and 14.9 for men and women in that order in urban
territories. The corresponding figures for the State are:
4.6, 3.2, 10.7 and 24.9. This should make clear why one
comes across a number of graduates and postgraduates
frantically looking for some work to earn a livelihood.
Private enterprise has yet to make an appreciable mark in
the State. Once it takes off the problem of idleness
should be addressed to a large extent. That does not
mean, however, that one should transgress the accepted
lines of conduct. It pays to stick to rules.
 |
HIV/AIDS
the legal envelope
By Kajal
Bhardwaj
Recently, media was
abuzz with news of an orphanage
in Gandhidham in Gujarat's Kutch
district removing two minor boys
after they tested positive for
HIV. The head of the orphanage
claimed that the young boys posed
a risk to the other children in
the orphanage. The young boys
have lost their mother to AIDS,
their father suffers from mental
illness and no one else in their
family is willing to look after
them. So these boys - aged six
and nine - barely recovered from
the grief of having lost a
parent, found themselves being
taken out of their family and put
in an unfamiliar orphanage, and
being thrown out of even that
place.
This story is
neither unusual nor is it new.
Across the country, Indians
living with HIV face neglect,
discrimination and violence.
Sometimes we hear about it,
sometimes we don't. We heard
about the two children in Kerala
who were forced out of their
school when parents of other
students threatened to pull their
children out of school. We did
not read about the man who died
from AIDS and was refused burial
services; we did not hear about
the man who lost his job at a
privately owned factory after his
employers found out he was HIV+;
news channels did not interview
the pregnant woman living with
HIV who delivered her baby all by
herself isolated in a delivery
room with no help from doctors or
nurses.
All these situations
have occurred with unnerving
frequency in India in the last
few years despite government
policies that espouse a humane
response.
We know that there
are limited modes of HIV
transmission and even in those
the chances of acquiring
infection are limited. So why are
we facing an epidemic - an
epidemic that, despite seemingly
large programmes of information
and awareness, continues to
threaten millions of lives?
Twenty years into the HIV
epidemic in India, the likely
outcome of an HIV+ test is the
loss of jobs, denial of education
for children, refusal of
treatment in hospitals. Are we
surprised that people would
rather not get themselves tested
for HIV?
In what has been
called the 'feminisation' of the
epidemic, one in three persons
living with HIV in India is now a
woman. Women and girls find
themselves cut off from
traditional sources of health and
HIV prevention information -
schools, colleges, health
centres. The National Family
Health Survey of 1998-99
estimated that one-third of women
who had heard of AIDS did not
know any way of avoiding it and
women who were poor, illiterate,
belonged to a scheduled tribe or
were not regularly exposed to any
media were most likely not to
know any way of avoiding the
infection. In a more recent study
by the National Council for
Applied Economic Research, 40 per
cent of women reported little say
in when and how they had sex and
in getting their partners to use
condoms.
And in all this, law
has played its own role in
perpetuating vulnerability to HIV
and not offering any redress for
the discrimination, neglect and
violence faced by persons living
with HIV. The law has failed to
help because there is a lack of
clarity on the legal redressal
options available to HIV+
persons, particularly in the
private sector, which is not
covered by the constitutional
guarantee of equality.
Laws that
criminalise sex workers,
injecting drug users and men who
have sex with men have repeatedly
disrupted health services
launched by the government
itself! Unequal marriage,
property, custody and maintenance
laws keep women trapped in
discriminatory and violent
marriages - violence that is at
times condoned by India's
criminal laws, which continue to
enshrine a colonial marital rape
exemption; it is a distinction
irreconcilable with our
constitutional guarantees of
equality, life and health.
India needs a
clearly articulated legal
response in these unjustifiable
circumstances. The need for
legislation on HIV has led to a
unique government and civil
society initiative to draft just
such a law. A three-year process
of intensive research and
extensive consultation will soon
see the introduction of the
HIV/AIDS Bill 2006 in Parliament.
At present, the Bill is being
considered by the Ministry of
Health and the National AIDS
Control Organisation. The health
minister, in fact, recently
announced that the Bill will be
introduced in the 2007 budget
session of Parliament. Drafted by
the Lawyers Collective HIV/AIDS
Unit (LCHAU) - in consultation
with the government, persons
living with HIV, vulnerable
groups, healthcare providers,
women, children and young
persons, NGOs working on HIV and
trade unions - this Bill embodies
principles of human rights and
seeks to establish a humane and
egalitarian legal regime to
support India's prevention,
treatment, care and support
efforts vis-à-vis the epidemic.
The HIV/AIDS Bill
2006 addresses issues of
discrimination in employment,
healthcare, education and other
settings, informed consent for
testing, treatment and research,
confidentiality and access to
treatment. Importantly, it also
provides for a safe working
environment for healthcare
workers, protection for risk
reduction programmes (like
targeted interventions with
vulnerable groups), special
provisions for women, children
and young persons, and provides
for innovative grievance
redressal mechanisms.
The recognition of
rights is complimented with
provisions for the practical
realisation of these rights - an
issue that was highlighted by the
consultations. As one young
participant said, "After my
father died, I have been working
at a coconut shop to take care of
my two sisters and myself. Our
house is in our father's name.
He has a bank
account with some money, which we
wanted to use to repair the
house. But the bank won't let us
take out the money saying we are
minors so our signatures are not
valid. We have no other family or
relatives to help us." The
Bill, accordingly, recognises the
guardianship of older siblings
for purposes such as admission to
schools, operating bank accounts
etc.
It also recognises
the right of children and young
persons to access healthcare
services and information in their
own right. This is particularly
important for street children and
those living on their own. It
also provides for protection of
inheritance and property rights
and recognises community-based
alternatives to
institutionalisation for
vulnerable and affected children.
Similarly, in many other spheres,
the Bill ensures access to
information and healthcare
services for marginalised
populations and for women and
girls.
Thus, the Bill
envisages a detailed and
carefully planned strategy to
address the HIV epidemic through
an extensive prevention, care,
treatment and support programme
that entails:
* widely
disseminated and easily
accessible IEC (information,
education, communication);
* an accountable and
accessible government response;
* access to
healthcare services and
treatment, and;
* the protection and
promotion of the rights of
persons living with/affected by
HIV/AIDS.
Ultimately, the
vision of the Bill is to create a
strategy to tackle the HIV
epidemic where every person is a
stakeholder, every voice is
included and no one is left
behind. hopes to create a
strategy that will at the end of
the day strengthen our public
health system and help the
epidemic emerge from the
underground, so that HIV/AIDS is
no longer a synonym for fear,
neglect, discrimination and
violence but for empowerment,
compassion, united action and
triumph. (WFS)
|
|
 |
Parliamentary
Govt and people's mights
By
Babu Ram
The
Parliamentary form of
Govt is not something new
to the Indian people.
They have had village
Panchayats, Sabhas and
Samities at the lowest
rungs as Institutions of
Self-Rule Governance. The
present form of
Parliamentary system of
Govt is based on British
and American pattern
largely saturated by
moral and legal code of
conduct. Democratic
Governments whether
Parliamentary or
Presidential are instinct
with human ethos and
values. They are
representative Govts of
the people who can change
them by their
ballot &
other than bullet
whenever they find their
elected Govt as non or
mal-functional and not
responsive to Public
problems and difficulties
and their welfare e.g
Insecurity of life,
property and earning
their livelihood or acute
and abnormal rise in
prices and rates! Thus
obviously a democratic
State and its democratic
Govt is bound to be
morally and legally
atuned to the welfare of
the people
administratively,
socially, economically,
culturally etc. The State
has thus to ensure
adequate rule of law
without fear and favour,
a regime of foolproof
internal and external
security and impartial
admn. of Justice. It has
also to provide for
social order ensuring
Justice social, economic
and political. On the
economic front the State
is to secure provision of
avenues of earning,
production, distribution,
fiscal, taxation, non
exploitation of workers,
women, children by
Industries, lessessing
disparities of Income,
equal wages for equal
work, social utilities
& service, education,
Medical and hygienic,
pollution control and
development of economy by
Industrialisation,
modernisation of
Agriculture, forestry,
fruit, herb and
floriculture maintaining
cordial foreign affairs
and augmenting and
updating development of
our offence and defence
etc. Notably the
criterion for Judgment of
a welfare state lies in
the regime of democratic
rights, liberties and
their legal protection
under the constitution of
the demcoratic state. Let
us examine our
entitlement to
Rights
viz-a-viz our
obligations. Our Rights
are not absolute. We have
to respect others equal
rational rights also.
hights can be restricted
in the interests of the
State to prevent their
misuse and deteriorating
into unlimited. liberty,
while exercising our
rights we have not to
infringe upon others
equal rights guaranteed
by constitution and as
being apt, legally,
Judicially and
constitutionally.
Moreover
rights are not shorn of
corresponding
responsibilities. There
are fundamental
obligations to be met so
as to enjoy our rights.
These are (i) To abide by
the constitution (2) To
uphold and protect the
sovereignty, unity and
Integrity of India (3) To
defend the country and to
promote communal harmony
and common brotherhood
and safeguard public
property and abjure
violence etc. Further
constitutional provision
of legal enforcement of
fundamental rights makes
them effective and
meaningful. Rights are
not licences to do as one
pleases. They are
restrained by law
enforcing Agencies,
Police and Judiciary so
as to prevent Lawlessness
and thus to maintain the
civilised functioning of
society and the Govt for
the peace, progress and
prosperity of the people
and the State. In sum and
substance the first and
foremost fundamental
Right
of all the rights is the
Right to
life or
Right to
Live.
This
right gives sanctity to
not harming life of
others even eschewing
Brutality to
Animals Under
State Laws! Morally,
legally and Religiously
there is the binding
obligation to treat
others life as sacred as
ones own ! He who
deprives others of their
lives or attempts to do
so with frightening
misery to dependants has
no right to his own life
legally and legitimately
and such brutes need to
be brought to book
deterrently.
|
|
|
|

Catching
up with corporate philanthropy
By Sankar
Ray
Rather than just
tying ribbons, you should adver-
tise the fact that you are a good
corporate citizen."
Dr. Vinay B Nair,
professor of finance at the
Wharton School of Management, in
a recently concluded study with
two academics of the Columbia
Business School, Raymond Fisman
and Geoffrey Heal, A Model for
Corporate Philanthropy",
suggested albeit not so
eloquently that philanthropy for
the corporate in more than a
tactic, perhaps on the borderline
of strategy since "
Corporate philanthropy and
profits are positively related
only in industries with high
advertising intensity and high
competition". Nair must be
having in mind the welfare
strategy of Mircrosoft
Corporation that has a global
funding network through the Bill
& Melinda Gates Foundation to
fight against AIDS and other
diseases to which tens of
millions are fatally exposes such
as acute diarrheal illness,
pneumonia and allied respiratory
disorders and malaria. The BMGF
has allocated US Dollar 500
million to combat HIV/AIDS and
the major portion of this will go
to developing and under-developed
countries.
To date, this is not
for smaller corporations,
especially in the IT and
IT-related service industries
which have a low advertising
budget. For computer chips and
business-to-business services ,
Philanthropy and profits have
still "a negative
association", according to
the NRI academic and his
co-researchers. But it may not
last long.
But corporate
bigwigs are in their parochial
groove. As their motto is profit
like Andrew Undshaft in George
Bernard Shaw's Major Barbara
(" I am a millionaire and
that is my religion of still
believes"). Nair notes too,
"Corporate giving is a waste
of Shareholders' money".
Corporate
philanthropy has nothing to do
with the outdated mindset of
India's industrial tycoons of
yesteryears who were
philanthropically conceited by
incurring crores of rupees in
investment for constructing
temples or churches.
Unfortunately, this happened
today also In West Bengal, an
industrialist took over two works
of India's oldest paper
manufacturing company during the
1980s and the 1990s that went
into the red. But instead of
nursing these units to health, he
constructed a temple inside the
works while disposing off plant
and machinery. In Jamshedpur, the
management of a sick cable
manufacturing company too built a
temple within the factory
premises.
Whether these
temple-wallahs can still be
characterized as investors is a
big question as their proximity
to swindlers is increasingly more
than implicit.
Time was when
Jamshedji Tata devoted intently
for setting up the Indian
Institute of Science and Jamnalal
Bazaz liberally funded indigenous
research in science during the
colonial era. To do-day's
corporate world they are becoming
useless curios to today's
entrepreneurs in India.
But the
fast-progressing companies such
as Infosys, Reliance twins and
TCS ought to stretch their
business perspective out to a
longer-term frame by going the
Gates way. The generous and
good-citizen face helps a
forward-looking management send
message across to what the famous
Polish economist Michael Kalecki
defined as "intermediate
Strata" in probably the
fastest-feasible way.
A survey in the
Economist, cities Nair in another
paper, covering 135 executives
and 65 investors, found that
among the business community,
corporate social responsibility
or CSR is a new concept in its
lexicon, "a significant
theme". Nearly four-fifths
who responded to the sample study
agree that CSR would emerge as a
centrality to investment
decisions in the near future.
"Doing well by doing
good", is a "familiar
motto in the business community,
which acknowledges that the
motivation to 'do good' is at
least partly self-serving.
There is no denying
that consumers in India and
developing countries alike will
gravitate towards products and
services that maintain "high
ethical standards." The
target right now are the
affluent-in-the-making sections
in the intermediate strata that
comprise the target of FMCG
companies. In the West, the
concept of 'fair trade' is
picking up very fast as part of
the stringent anti-pollution and
health standards. Economics like
India, China and Pakistan may not
lag much behind the West. "
Buying fair trade coffee, for
instance, might give caffeine
lovers a sense of global
connectedness as they fuel their
daily habit. Likewise, 'Made in
the USA' labels may alert
customers that a garment states
the Wharton School periodical
Knowledge Wharton.
Proponents of
aggressive corporate philanthropy
do not buy prescriptions of the
late Milton Friedman, the
philosopher of globalization,
dished out by the World Bank,
International Monetary Fund and
WTO. The Chicago School guru
wanted companies to lower their
profits to help consumers make
charitable donations. Gates and
the like instead want direct
philanthropy as that would ensure
high and prestigious dividend in
the long-run through enhanced
goodwill. Shareholders may
grumble but there lies precisely
the role of the management in
convincing the shareholders to
give up short-term obsession with
pay-back mentality.
Nair and his two US
colleagues infer that Charitable
spending helps investors
"convince consumers that a
company and its products are
trustworthy". Indeed, trust
factors help marketing almost
directly, when consumers need to
be educated Promotion to
pollution-free natural products
find a catalyst in trust factor.
Corporate philanthropy is
effective there, specially
"where a firm's image is
important to consumers"
-CNF
|
|
|
|