|
EDITORIAL Confusion
beyond Only recently we had in
these columns urged the young and talented leaders of Leh
that they should remain together. This was when the
cracks had first appeared in the Ladakh Union Territory
Front (LUTF) in the wake of the move of one of its
influential sections to revive the local unit of the
Congress. It is much evident that the situation is
showing no signs of improvement. The LUTF is presently in
|
By Joginder Singh A CRPF constable, recruited in 2003 and posted in Jammu and Kashmir, was absent from the roll call in November this year. Absence from duty is a serious lapse in para military forces. Absence can mean anything right from plain negligence to running away or mixing with criminal elements; even ....more By Prof K L Bhalla According to Sages ''The primary object of education is liberation from ego and ignorance''. Ego gives rise to all problems in individual and society. All wars were the result of ignorance of a person whether he is Duryodhan or Hitler. At present all conflicts and quarrels arise because the basic aim of education is ignored. It is held in Yoga Vasishtha ......more By S. V. Vaidyanathan Only economic growth can take India out of poverty. In recent times, there has been a lot of discussion on how to increase the GDP growth rate. Rightly so, as in the 1970s and the 1980s by growing at a snails pace India lost a great opportunity and allowed many countries to get ahead of it. Many economists are talking of a growth rate of 7-8 per cent, significantly more than the 4-5 per cent one used to hear till a few years ago. The finance minister is also betting on growth. Many of his deficit projections are ....more |
|||||||
EDITORIAL Confusion beyond Only recently we had in these columns urged the young and talented leaders of Leh that they should remain together. This was when the cracks had first appeared in the Ladakh Union Territory Front (LUTF) in the wake of the move of one of its influential sections to revive the local unit of the Congress. It is much evident that the situation is showing no signs of improvement. The LUTF is presently in the midst of turmoil which, to put it mildly, is completely avoidable. The reopening of the Congress office without even informing the LUTF leaders is casting its dark shadow on the fabled Buddhist unity in the trans-Himalayan district. Reliable reports indicate that those who don't agree with the decision to renew the multi-party politics have decided to keep the LUTF's identity alive as a unified political force. On the other hand, the persons behind the renewal of the Congress want that the LUTF should remain a common forum although chiefly as a non-political body to pursue the objective of winning a UT status for Ladakh. According to this line of thinking the LUTF's existence should not prevent political parties from professing their different ideologies. The pro-LUTF forces, however, can't help but notice that with each of its constituents moving in separate directions it would be an umbrella with plenty of holes. They are understandably angry that they have been bypassed so far. Should the Congress and the LUTF pursue their own agendas there is no doubt that both would come to harm in terms of popular support in the district. This is a practical reality. Their parting of ways will also not be without a touch of irony. For, the Congress and the dominant LUTF leadership have been one so far both in the Congress (till its branch was dissolved to become part of the LUTF) and the once-hyperactive Ladakh Buddhist Association to carry out their combined struggle for the UT status. It was because of their accord that they had been able to achieve initial success in terms of having a body called the Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Council (LAHDC) for local governance. According to credible reports reaching here, the LUTF leadership is so anguished that it has already held a formal meeting in Leh vowing to stay in political business. LUTF chief Chering Dorjay, formerly a Congress member of the State Assembly, highly regarded Ladakh MP Thupstan Chhawang (who himself was a leading light of the Congress) and Thiksay Rimpoche (a formidable religious figure who has severed his long association with the National Conference) are among those who attended the get-together that has badly shaken the pro-revival Congress camp. Prima facie it is clear that two developments are responsible for causing ripples in Leh politics: the LUTF's decision to join the coalition government in the State and the return of the Congress to power at the Centre. They have provided fuel for individual egos and ambitions. Recounting the past events briefly will lead to a better understanding of the prevailing scenario. Just before the Assembly polls in 2002, there was a surprise announcement in Leh that all political parties (barring the Bharatiya Janata Party) were closing their shops to form the LUTF which alone would contest the polls. Two parties suffered instantly because of this. One was the Congress that had already set up its senior leader P. Namgyal and Chering Dorjay as contestants for two seats in the district but had to beat a hasty retreat and withdraw them; the other was the National Conference whose ministers gave up their job. Expectedly the LUTF won both the seats unopposed. Its one winner Rigzin Jora became a minister in the Mufti Government and is currently holding the Cabinet rank. Gradually Mr Namgyal came back into the race with the help of both the LUTF and the Congress that backed the case of its old warhorse for being made a member of the Legislative Council. He is back in the Congress with a bang and is carrying out a party task in Sikkim these days. In sharp contrast, Mr Dorjay who was first denied the right to defend his Leh seat had the knife further turned in his wounds when as the LUTF chairman (he was abroad) he was overlooked and the Congress office was unlocked in his absence. In fact not only he but also almost all senior leaders who included Mr Namgyal, Mr Chhawang and Mr Tsering Samphel (he was made ad hoc chief of the revived unit), were caught by surprise by the timing of the announcement of reviving the district Congress. What have the sponsors of the resurrection drama gained? Clearly nothing except that it has brought into open the feud between Mr Jora, who is believed to have triggered the revival, and Mr Dorjay. Evidently Mr Jora has the full support of Mr Rigzin Spalbar, Chief Executive Councillor of the LAHDC. It is unfortunate that the same 'boys' should be exposed to the charge of harming a wider and well-intentioned cause that they have championed it all through. Having been partners in a united fight for well over a decade all of them should have known the virtues of swimming together. They can't be unaware that a weakened LUTF will only damage the Congress and the Congress without the LUTF will lose one of its strongholds. By their actions they have willy-nilly conveyed a signal to the leaders of other political parties as well that they should give preference to their personal and partisan interests over everything else. How can the former NC ministers be blamed for thinking that they have been taken for a ride in the name of the LUTF and that they will do well to resume their party activity? Why should the other outfits like the People's Democratic Party not fish in the troubled waters of the Indus and plan establishing a unit in Leh in order to expand their base? Will the Bharatiya Janata Party, which had kept off the LUTF right from the start, not find justification for having taken the right decision at the right time now that it has escaped the embarrassment caused to the LUTF and its constituents at this juncture? Fortunately, there is still time for the Leh leaders to patch up. They have not irreparably broken their bridges as some like Mr Namgyal and Mr Chhawang have access to both the camps. What is surprisingly is the silence being observed by the Congress high command. Is it that it is unaware of the facts? Or, is it that it is being kept in the dark? Or has just it shut its eyes with the hope that the confusion not of its making will go on its own? On our part we are concerned that there is tension in a sensitive region in which the majority of leaders have always shown exemplary solidarity in the worst of periods. One can make allowance for diverse opinions motivated by principles but not for those guided by one-upmanship. |
||||||||
|
||||||||