|
EDITORIAL If there is any Parliamentary constituency that will overawe an observer in terms of its diverse natural beauty and electoral composition as well as size it is Ladakh across the mighty Himalayas. If it has the highest desert on the earth it has also some of the most captivating lakes. It has Leh district dominated by the Buddhists and Kargil by Shia Muslims. At the same time Kargil has a predominantly-Buddhist Zanskar as one of its tehsils. For years the party in power in the State whether it was the National Conference under Bakshi Ghulam Mohammad which was in reality Jawaharlal Nehrus Congress in another name or the Congress itself, it continued to ensure that it alternatively fielded a Leh Buddhist and a Kargil ...more Should one believe Pakistan Foreign Secretary Riaz Khokhars clarification in Singapore that President Pervez Musharraf has not threatened to pull out of peace talks with India if the Kashmir dispute is not resolved within the next few months? Or should one trust what the Pakistan President himself has remarked on his own television network in Islamabad that he wants the progress on Kashmir by July-August when foreign ministers of the two countries are due to meet to review a series of talks. To quote Gen ....more |
Siachen
and Kargil By Maj Gen V K Madhok (retired) As the President Abdul Kalamex Scientific Advisor to the Raksha Mantri who headed the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) visited Siachen towards early Apr 2004, a number of issues concerning high altitude battle fields need reflection. Can the scientists replace or reduce manpower ........more By Aarti Each year road traffic injuries take the lives of 1.2 million men, women and children around the world and seriously injuring millions more. * World Health Organisation ..........more Urban slums untouched by health services By Excelsior Correspondent That slum dwellers in urban areas are often so health care-deprived, they inevitably have to go without the benefits of safe motherhood programmes. The slogan to provide health for all by 2010 is in Sync with the India Shining mantra. For those who crucially depend upon public health facilities the absence of quality integrated ..........more |
|||||||||||
EDITORIAL If there is any Parliamentary constituency that will overawe an observer in terms of its diverse natural beauty and electoral composition as well as size it is Ladakh across the mighty Himalayas. If it has the highest desert on the earth it has also some of the most captivating lakes. It has Leh district dominated by the Buddhists and Kargil by Shia Muslims. At the same time Kargil has a predominantly-Buddhist Zanskar as one of its tehsils. For years the party in power in the State whether it was the National Conference under Bakshi Ghulam Mohammad which was in reality Jawaharlal Nehrus Congress in another name or the Congress itself, it continued to ensure that it alternatively fielded a Leh Buddhist and a Kargil Shia in the Lok Sabha elections. This arrangement had worked satisfactorily till the Shias felt alarmed by the violent Buddhist campaign for a separate union territory status and backed an obscure independent candidate to defeat Congresss veteran leader P. Namgyal who is widely known for his integrity. There is hardly any doubt that even the National Conference had vigorously fuelled the Shias fears about the Buddhist domination and contributed to the defeat of Mr Namgyal who is presently a member of the State Legislative Council and is a known critic of the late Sheikh Abdullah and his successors. In the dramatically changed circumstances since then all political parties in Leh have dissolved their identities: they have formed the Ladakh Union Territory Front (LUTF) which has fielded Mr Thupstam Chhewang, Chief Executive Councillor of the Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Council (LAHDC) as its nominee for the Parliamentary seat. While he is likely to get the tacit support of the Peoples Democratic Party, the leader of the coalition government of which the LUTF is a part and the Congress of which he has been a member, the NC which has yet to decide on its nominee will oppose him. Mr Chhewangs main opponent will most probably be a Shia. His own personal secular credentials are unlikely to matter in view of the polarisation between the two dominating communities in the constituency. However, the fears expressed in a recent alarmist newspaper report that the tourists this season will be exposed to the clashes between the Buddhists and Shias in Ladakh are totally misplaced. There is no chance either of a filthy election campaign as has been mentioned in this report. It needs to be said that except for a brief spell in the eighties when the two communities had resorted to an ill-conceived social and economic blockade of each other the tourists have never been put to any inconvenience: they are almost invariably looked after extremely well because of their immense contribution to the districts economic prosperity. The differences between the two communities have not prevented them from meeting each other on social plain: there is realisation that theirs is more a battle for establishing political identity than anything else. Instead, a tourist may be exposed to the functioning of Indian democracy at its best during its trip to Leh and Zanskar in particular this season. It will be quite a revelation for a foreign tourist to see how the political contenders reach every nook and corner of what is the countrys largest Parliamentary constituency with low density of population. It is the only constituency that borders both Pakistan and China. Not unnaturally the countrys highest polling station at Pastan at an altitude of 17078 feet and the second highest at Hanfallo at an altitude of 16250 feet are its part. Some of its polling stations remain covered with snow throughout the year like, for instance, Ralakung, Phema Rangdum Juldoo, Tashi, Stongday, Shaday, Stak, Shun, Ralakung, Kargiak, Tangzay, Tasta, Yougar and Chah. It is a Shangri-la with democracy as its hallmark. Should one believe Pakistan Foreign Secretary Riaz Khokhars clarification in Singapore that President Pervez Musharraf has not threatened to pull out of peace talks with India if the Kashmir dispute is not resolved within the next few months? Or should one trust what the Pakistan President himself has remarked on his own television network in Islamabad that he wants the progress on Kashmir by July-August when foreign ministers of the two countries are due to meet to review a series of talks. To quote Gen Musharraf: The foreign ministers will meet in July-August... If we dont move forward, I am not in the process. What is this if not an ultimatum? Clearly Mr Khokhar has realised that such a theory can sell on a foreign soil only at the expense of his countrys image that has somewhat improved in the recent times. He has asserted that his President is deeply committed to the peace process and he has not said there should be a solution in six weeks or three weeks, he has not said anything of that nature. There is no ultimatum. Now comes yet another Pakistan statement this time by its Foreign Minister Khursheed Mahmud Kasuri who has stated in an interview that for the peace process to become irreversible the politicians should behave show statesmanship and solve the real problem of Jammu and Kashmir. A good diplomat doubtless, Mr Kasuri appears to have struck a fine balance between his President and Foreign Secretary! However, he should have realised that his double-edged remark is open to varying interpretations and was best avoided. Apparently he is not following his own advice in the wake of historic Islamabad declaration of January 6 that everybody should act and speak with restraint in the developing scenario. For its part External Affairs minister Yashwant Sinha has done well to advise Pakistan: Statements based on presumptions will not help the peace process started by Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee. His suggestion that the neighbouring country should refrain from making such assertions needs to be taken seriously lest they should act as a spoiler in the present feel-good environment in the sub-continent. Perhaps, as Deputy Prime Minister L.K. Advani has remarked, there is no cause for alarm for India as long as President Musharraf sticks to a course decided at the secretary-level meeting. Nevertheless the occasional utterances of President Musharraf and close associates do indicate that they tend to lose their nerve off and on. Why it should happen is not understandable. It will be a pity if they let the present peace efforts go awry. The current cricket series between the two countries in Pakistan has already brought to the fore the mutual bonhomie that has survived among the ordinary people on either side regardless of all the bitterness of the past. It has laid the strong foundation on which a glorious edifice of friendship can be built brick by brick. Why should all that the Pakistan leaders say and do is not aimed in that sensible direction? They have shown a lot of enthusiasm so far. Everything positive that has happened has been possible because of their cooperation. They need to keep acting with such wisdom and maturity: the least that is expected that they should not display frayed tempers that can create more irritants than those that already exist. |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||