Mail

No development works in rural areas

Sir,

I take this opportunity to highlight the performance and the development work done by the coalition Government led by Mufti Mohd Sayeed. It would be correct to say that there is no significant development in rural areas. Before election, the leaders of the present Government made various promises with the public which have not been fulfilled yet.

Our representatives are not taking meaningful initiatives for the development work particularly in Jammu Province. Even the small roads, drains and lanes which are the basic needs of the people are not being made constructed. The electricity and water supply is not adequate with the result the people are suffering. After 55 years of Independence, we still find that the various roads particularly in the rural areas are almost in bad condition and the people are suffering very badly. May I ask the concerned authorities, what is the fun of independence which has not produced any fruits for the poor masses in the rural areas. We always say with pride that our 80 percent population is living in rural areas, but it is very painful to see that no significant development has been undertaken in the rural areas with the result India remains poor even today. If we shock to this, it reveals that leaders who have bad occupied the highest chairs in the country are responsible for all this. The leaders of the various political parties have been making promises with the poor masses before elections right from 1953 when the first election was conducted in our big democratic country, but sorry to say that nothing concrete has been done so far. The poor masses could not get basic facilities even after 55 years of independence, what more we can expect from the democratic Governments.

Yours etc...
D D Sharma
Thathar Jammu

Musharraf's dilemma

Sir,

For Pak President Musharraf, the religious fundamentalism has come full circle with the release of recent video-tape of Al-Qaeda's Supremo Osama-bin-Laden accusing him of betraying their cause for a handful of dollars. The religious fundamentalists were brought by Musharraf to the country's politics to side-line the mainstream political parties and secure a comfortable position for himself. He was following in the foot-steps of his predecessor General Zia-ul-Haq. General Zia was the first military dictator in Pakistan who turned to Islamic extremists to scuttle the politicians and engage India in Kashmir.

However, President Musharraf went a step further by befriending the Taliban and Al-Qaeda. He thought that such an alliance would give Pakistan 'strategic depth' in the event of a war with India and help him send across terrorists to Kashmir. He thought that a conflict was inevitable in view of his aggressive policies, which manifested itself in the Kargil intrusion. But it has all gone wrong. First, kargil proved to be a disaster as whole units of Pakistan's Northern Light Infantry were wiped out as deposed PM Nawaz Sharief has said. Now Al-Qaeda wants Pakistani Muslims to rise against the 'traitor', Musharraf.

With Musharraf's ambitions slowly becoming known to the nation that he would follow the dictates of his mentor the US for keeping himself in power at any cost. General Musharraf made his intentions public when he joined the latter in its fight against global terrorism. This made the fundamentalists and jihadis turned against him for fear of losing support from the Govt.

Musharraf did every thing to consolidate his power like holding the Referendum and becoming the President of the country almost unopposed. Then he amended the constitution and vested himself with the power of dismissing the elected PM and of dissolving the National Assembly, the country's Parliament. This is known as Legal Framework Order (LFO), against which the main stream political parties including the MMA (Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal), an alliance of religious parties are fighting and demanding its abrogation. He is holding the dual post of the President of the country and the army Chief which has caused concern in the minds of the politicians and the top army brass. There are demands from all quarters to relinquish one post, most probably that of the army chief.

Now that the much hyped 'strategic depth' has vanished with Indian PM peace initiative. The Taliban and the Al-Qaeda have made this strong foot-hold in the country with their master mind Osama-in-Laden believed to be in the country, much to the displeasure of the US.

In the given circumstances, Musharraf is all alone sitting in the seat of power. He can't trust anyone. Neither the army with whose help he managed to topple the democratically elected Govt. of Nawaz Sharief. The top brass of the Pak army has been calling the shot since the imposition of first material law in 1958. The army which has become a breeding ground of fundamentalism with General Zia's Islamization of it. He exploited the name of Islam and Jihad in order to perpetuate his rule. The country had to pay a very heavy price for his decision to join the Afghan war. The decision was influenced more by his personal requirement of legitimacy of his rule than the interest of the country. An exodus of more than 4 million refugees along with gun-running, drug-trafficking, religious and ethnic violence and drug addiction were some of the consequences that engulfed the entire country. All the top brass of the army became the warriors of Islam by hobnobbing with the Afghan war-lords, offering them all the protocol and facilities at State expenses. The legacy has been successfully carried forward by General Musharraf till recently.

He can't depend on the ISI either, which he uses systematically to further his designs against India. He also can't trust anti-American religious parties which have prospered because of his distrust of traditional political leaders like Nawaz Sharief and Benazir Bhutto.

Yours etc...
MD Ashraf Khan
37/9 S.JE, New Delhi-29

 

| home | state | national | business | editorial | advertisement | sports |
|
international | weather | mailbag | suggestions | search |
subscribe | send mail |