|
EDITORIAL It cant be easily believed that the social forestry project has gone topsy-turvy in our State. How can such a grave act of negligence take place? What makes it unpardonable is that social forestry is mostly an aided campaign to provide green cover to the barren areas in the State. On the whole, it has been widely hailed as one of the few highly successful activities in the country. Roadside plantations have been its unique and prominent feature. According to an in-depth analysis in this newspaper, it was actually the previous State Government that had decided to wind up the project describing it as a white elephant. At that time, the administration had veered around to the opinion that nurseries and other assets of social forestry . .....more If only Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf had understood this earlier, he could have been less hawkish. His journeys across the globe have made him wiser that Pakistans image is getting a severe knocking. Few trust that his country is serious about participating in the global war against terrorism. This is what his own impression has been. The General has been candid in sharing this view in his latest inter-action with a group of editors and senior journalists in Islamabad. It is too early to say that the man who had subverted the democratic order in his own country and ..more |
By Abhijit Patwardhan One hundred eighty six American servicemen have been killed in Iraq till 24 November. The body bags and the political costs of war in Iraq will cost President George W. Bush dearly. If one goes by opinion polls, his chances of re-election for the second term appear bleak. Angry young Muslim men ......more New
dimension to By Subhashis Mittra For long, a country known for its sylvan surroundings and a place for tourist attraction, Switzerland has now gone high up on India's international map with both countries forging a new dimension to the bilateral ties. The visit of Swiss President Pascal Couchepin to India saw signing of . .......more The
great Indian By Lt Col (Retd) Mukund Singh Jamwal It is election time once again with five states going to the polls shortly. This is also the time for psephologists of all hues to have their hay days. Dictionary defines ''Psephology as a study of electoral systems voting trends and behaviour.' A study of any system or trend can be carried out only after a particular system has been implemented or........more |
|||||||||
EDITORIAL It cant be easily believed that the social forestry project has gone topsy-turvy in our State. How can such a grave act of negligence take place? What makes it unpardonable is that social forestry is mostly an aided campaign to provide green cover to the barren areas in the State. On the whole, it has been widely hailed as one of the few highly successful activities in the country. Roadside plantations have been its unique and prominent feature. According to an in-depth analysis in this newspaper, it was actually the previous State Government that had decided to wind up the project describing it as a white elephant. At that time, the administration had veered around to the opinion that nurseries and other assets of social forestry should be shifted to the Department of Rural Development with the objective of eventually handing them over to the panchayats. Amazingly, a virtue was made out of a hasty and ill-conceived decision. This transfer was sought to be justified in the name of ensuring participation of the people at the grassroots level. If suspicion arises that there has been something more to it than what really meets the eye, it is not without any sound basis. Nothing seems to have been done in practical terms to carry out the decision. In fact, it appears that in a bid to eliminate one while elephant, the Government had ended up creating another. This is explained by the disclosure that about Rs 50 lakhs have been spent every month on the salary of the employees who have been left with no work in the social forestry project. This entirely avoidable burden on the State exchequer has been passed on to the present Government. Minister of State for Forests Puran Singh himself has admitted that a large number of employees have been without work for the last 18 months. This clearly means that a whopping sum of nearly Rs 9 crore must have already been paid to them for doing a sinecure job. This does not, however, absolve those at the helm of the ministry at this moment of the charge of having failed to set the house in order in time. Even at this stage there is no firm indication that the State Government has a concrete plan on hand. It has decided to undo the decision of the preceding regime and revive the programme. This in itself does not signal any positive or significant breakthrough. It is not possible to overlook the bitter reality that a good rainy season has passed without any appreciable improvement in the ground scenario. It is being said that Minister for Environment and Forests Ghulam Mohiuddin Sofi wants to infuse life into the project but is facing some bureaucratic hurdles in the process. Who will believe this? How can a minister worth his salt brook any such interference? Similarly, saying that Mr Sofis junior has asked the concerned project director to pull up his socks is not enough. Social forestry is one field in which the results cant be hidden from public view. Contrary to this, they are immediately visible on the ground. Those who have the requisite knowledge know that at times one has to bear with the unforeseen natural calamities that can play havoc. Occasionally, however, there have also been allegations of man-made disasters because of which such projects exist, survive and perish only in the official files. Such an inference needs to be avoided in the present case. If only Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf had understood this earlier, he could have been less hawkish. His journeys across the globe have made him wiser that Pakistans image is getting a severe knocking. Few trust that his country is serious about participating in the global war against terrorism. This is what his own impression has been. The General has been candid in sharing this view in his latest inter-action with a group of editors and senior journalists in Islamabad. It is too early to say that the man who had subverted the democratic order in his own country and given a boost to cross-border terrorism in our land is having a re-think. May be he is talking out of his own compulsions. He is worried, for instance, that Pakistan will lose a market of $ 1 billion if the European Union withdraws the trade concessions it has given trusting that the country wants to fight international extremism. He is also concerned that the perception that he himself is supporting terrorists is gaining widespread acceptance in the world. He has been shocked by what the Chinese leaders have told him during his recent visit to Beijing. The no-nonsense Chinese has informed the General that Pakistan has provided sanctuary to the extremists working against their interests. He has had no option but to comb the Pakistan areas bordering Afghanistan. He should spare no effort in tracing Al-Qaeda fugitives. If he does not do the job, the coalition forces will start bombing the tribal areas in his country. In fairness to him, the General has minced no words in identifying three areas of concern for Pakistan in the days ahead with religious extremism taking the No. 1 spot followed by provincial disharmony and political instability. Having noted all this, the General has not fought shy of projecting himself as the lone warrior in the shining armour. He has lamented that he is the sole person fighting against the extremists in Pakistan. He has expressed the wish that the others, who had equal if not more stake in a peaceful and progressive Pakistan, were also willing to fight the menace head on. Has the Pakistan President shed tears to evoke sympathy? Or is it that he is throwing dust in the eyes of his countrys intelligentsia? How does he expect the others in his country to back him when he has scotched their democratic aspirations? He has not only subverted a democratic order but had sent enough signals of having moved closer to doing a Zulfiqar Bhutto to Mr Nawaz Sharif. If he could not carry out his evil aim, it was only because of the timely global intervention. To get the others support, it is necessary to respect their sentiments. The entire opposition has been boycotting him in his countrys parliament because of the manner he has grabbed the top most. It is true that he has not been as crueler with the print media in Pakistan as his uniformed predecessors have been. That is why perhaps he can get some correct feedback. If the General really wants to overcome three extremely serious threats confronting his nation, which he has very rightly diagnosed, he should create conditions for the return of democracy in Pakistan. It does not do any credit to Pakistan that two of its former Prime Ministers have been per force staying in foreign countries. Should they be willing to come back, the General should welcome them with open arms instead of handing out threats to jail them. If Mr Sharif and Ms Benazir Bhutto have really indulged in the loot of public money, as is often alleged, they can be dealt with in accordance with the prescribed conduct in civilised societies. In any case in a democracy, people on their own find ways to deal with their corrupt leaders. The General should, therefore, revert to the order he has replaced. We sincerely believe that democracy is the best bet for Pakistan and peace in the sub-continent. |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||