Mail

Budh Singh

Sir,

One of the injustices done to Jammu by the rulers of the State after independence is their refusal to recognise the role of the region and its leaders in the freedom movement of the country.

An outstanding illustration of the attitude-perhaps more due to ignorance than bias is non-recognition of the founder of the political movement in the State and its tallest leader in Jammu, Mahatma Budh Singh. Even Sheikh Abdullah used to call him as his spiritual father. For he started a secular political party in Jammu 14 years before the National Conference was born in Kashmir.

What shocked me further was the fact that a road named after Mahatma Budh Singh reluctantly by the previous Chief Minister was renamed as MLA Hostel Road on the eve of recent Durbar move.

I express my thanks to the Deputy Chief Minister, who took notice of my decision to start a satyagrah against what I considered denigration of the freedom movement in Jammu and its leader. He has, in a letter to me, conveyed full agreement of the State Government with my demand to restore the original name of the road. In response to his request, I have decided to postpone any action in the matter.

I am also grateful to leaders of various parties and eminent persons who have offered support to my demand.

As a freedom fighter and senior most political activist still in public life, I would not remain quiet over any attempt, intentional or unintentional, to down grade the freedom movement in Jammu.

Yours etc...
Balraj Puri
Jammu.

Saudi snub for Pakistan

Sir,

The Foreign Minister of Saudi Arabia Saud-al-Faisal showed remarkable political sagacity on Sunday befitting a leader of this great Kingdom when the refused to back Pakistani official propaganda against India accusing it of persecuting its Muslims. During his Press conference in Islamabad, a Pakistani journalist asked him a motivated question in an attempt to draw him into condemning India for this alleged persecution.

The questioner asked him his views on what he called atrocities on Muslims in general and Kashmiris in particular in India. Whoever in the Government asked this journalist to ask this question must be feeling very foolish because the reply came as an announcement of Saudi disapproval of Islamabad's campaign of vilification against India. In fact it sounded like a policy statement of the Saudi Government.

In his reply, Prince al-Faisal made three clear observations. One, he said, "I would hate to think of the Muslims in India as a minority coming from a country that had less Muslims, these Muslims are not scattered in the wind. They are people with substance. They are people with courage and with enough of that courage to stand up for their interests by themselves and not to wait for the help of others." He further said the Indian Muslims did not need the help of Saudi Arabia or Pakistan. This observation of the Foreign Minister of the most influential Muslim country less than 48 hours of the 10th summit of the Organisation of Islamic Conference in Malaysia, where Gen. Pervez Musharraf and his Foreign Minister Khurshid Mehmud Kasuri had succeeded in getting a Kashmir-related resolution passed, could be a notice to Islamabad not to take Muslim countries' support in its problems with India for granted.

Two, the Saudi Foreign Minister's observation that he thought "a wise leadership from Pervez Musharraf in seeing peaceful settlement with India is the right way to go", sounds like his advice to Islamabad to avoid the route of cross-border terrorism for a settlement with India. Gen. Musharraf has more than once claimed that he could order the stop of militancy in Kashmir if India agreed to talk to him. This is his clear admission of involvement in the acts of terrorism in Kashmir. The Saudi Government is alarmed by the recent rash of terrorist activities in the Kingdom and is also terribly embarrassed when it is mentioned among the countries from where terrorists and coming. Saudi Arabia, like the whole world, is aware that Pakistan continues to be the breeding ground of terrorism despite its support of the United States led campaign against global terrorism. The world is now realising that Pakistan wants to keep on patronising terrorist in the name of what it calls freedom movement in Kashmir.

Three, there was another very important indication the Saudi Foreign Minister gave. He treated Kashmir as an issue between India and Pakistan. This want against Pakistan's efforts to project Kashmir in the OIC summit in Malaysia as an issue for the Muslim Umma. This is something, which frustrates Pakistan. Javed Jabbar, who advises the Musharraf Government on propaganda, sounded very upset when he told a PTV panel in March this year that "it is very said that brotherly country Malaysia described Kashmir as a bilateral issue between India and Pakistan at the time of Non-Aligned meeting".

The OIC's resolutions on Kashmir really do not satisfy Pakistan because; as Mr. Jabbar complained Muslim countries do not give any importance to Kashmir in their radio and TV programmes. There are others in Pakistan who deplores that those countries who support Islamabad's plea for talks with India do not support its (Islamabad's) stand on Kashmir.

Saudi Arabian Foreign Minister Al Faisal had accompanied the Crown Prince Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz, who arrived in Islamabad on Saturday for a two-day visit of Pakistan. That should lend more weightage to what Prince Faisal had to say. And that should provide some food for thought to policy makers in Islamabad.

Yours etc...
D R Ahuja
N-83, Greater Kailash Part-I,
New Delhi-110048

 

| home | state | national | business | editorial | advertisement | sports |
|
international | weather | mailbag | suggestions | search |
subscribe | send mail |