EDITORIAL

Be a sport

Can there be any development more thrilling than the report that cricket ties between India and Pakistan will be restored shortly? If all goes well — and it seems it will — an Indian team will play in the neighbouring country in February or March next year. According to Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) president Jagmohan Dalmiya this will be a full-fledged tour. The Indian team will most likely proceed to Pakistan soon after its return from an already scheduled programme in Australia and takes a short break. On the other side, it is equally heartening that the Pakistan Cricket.........more

Much ado about nothing

Not very long ago, a section of the media had mistaken a new recruit in the secessionist camp as veteran leader Syed Ali Shah Geelani and would give him coverage much more than what he had hardly deserved. His name was Syed Saleem Geelani. Having moved around among top leaders, Mr Saleem Geelani now appears to have picked up the tricks of the political game. There is nothing, however, to suggest that he has gained in any status or has done something remarkable to merit a reckonable independent profile. The report, therefore, that he has become president of Democratic Freedom Party (DFP) by removing Mr Shabir Ahmad Shah should not cause more than a ripple in the.. . .....more

Musharraf using US to
kill anti-Osama groups

By B Raman

When an Army unit is having an encounter with a com-bined group of Arab, Afghan and Pakistani terrorists, do you know of bullets, hand-grenades and rockets which would kill only the Arabs and spare the Afghans and . ........more

Ozone hole growing alarmingly

By G. V. Joshi

Ozone, a gas, whose molecule contains three atoms of oxygen, was first discovered in 1839 by German scientist Christian Friedrich Schonbein. It is pale blue, relatively unstable gas. The name ozone is derived from the Greek word 'ozein' which means, "to smell". This is also called trioxygen......more

Modi loses credibility amgost Gujarat Hindus too

By Allabaksh

Despite all the protests and noises being made by the BJP and its entire Sangh Parivar about a 'conspiracy' to defame Gujarat, reports from the state do not suggest that the Narendra Modi administration has particularly distinguished itself in ensuring dispensation of justice and fair play as well as safety of the minority community........more

EDITORIAL

Be a sport

Can there be any development more thrilling than the report that cricket ties between India and Pakistan will be restored shortly? If all goes well — and it seems it will — an Indian team will play in the neighbouring country in February or March next year. According to Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) president Jagmohan Dalmiya this will be a full-fledged tour. The Indian team will most likely proceed to Pakistan soon after its return from an already scheduled programme in Australia and takes a short break. On the other side, it is equally heartening that the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) is very enthusiastic about resuming the exchange of teams between the two countries. Without any delay on its part, the PCB has already chalked out a tentative schedule of the India-Pakistan series at home; the proposed itinerary includes as many as three Tests and no less than seven one-day internationals. Nobody will disagree with PCB chief executive Rameez Raja when he says that ‘people want to see India-Pakistan matches’. Not unnaturally, therefore, the PCB is looking forward to pay a return visit in 2005. Regrettably, a war-like hysteria shuts what can be the most fruitful and healthy activity in the sub-continent. India and Pakistan are not just merely neighbours but also two of the world’s greatest sport nations at least so far as the team events like cricket and hockey are concerned. If only the game is played in the spirit of the game, as wisely counselled by Jawaharlal Nehru at the inaugural ceremony of the Asian Games in New Delhi immediately after the Partition, there is a possibility that the bilateral relations between the two neighbours would show a marked improvement.

Unfortunately, what does adversely hit the sporting relati‘ons is the misplaced emphasis on nationalism. Matches are treated like do-or-die wars. National flags are frantically and fanatically waved in public galleries as if one is on a battle front. Strangely, there is no attempt to remind the people that their such vulgar demonstration of enthusiasm for the country is contrary to the spirit of sport. Few care to remember why the Olympic Games have been conceived. The entire process of the birth, evolution and survival of the Olympics is meant to preserve the inherent goodness that prevails in human beings. The underlying idea is that the nations may go on spilling each other’s blood but there should always remain a ray of hope that their citizens will still keep meeting each other on playfields in search of lasting peace on the earth. This laudable objective has nearly been forgotten. Perhaps people of no country are immune from this base tendency to look upon the stadia as war theatres. In the case of India and Pakistan, the problem is worse because of the grim truth that tension during the last more than five decades has replaced their common past and heritage of thousands of years. How can one explain Pakistan Foreign Secretary (at that he was his country’s High Commissioner in New Delhi) Riaz Khokhar’s observation after Pakistan’s defeat at the hands of India in a quarter-final that ‘so far as he was concerned the final had already been played’. If responsible officials indulge in such reckless remarks, how can one expect the ordinary people to behave differently? On the home turf, we see the pugnacious Shiv Sena in Mumbai unnecessarily raising hue and cry whenever there is a proposal that Pakistan would play a match in India’s commercial capital which is also the Mecca of Indian cricket. Such childish conduct must be avoided at all costs.

What must be remembered is that by carrying their rivalry to playing arenas, both India and Pakistan have already lost heavily. Their present standard in hockey is not the same thing as it was in the past when it was just glorious. Had they been together in at least this sphere, they would have prevented the European nations from changing rules of the game to suit their own interests. Dazzled by penalty-corner specialists of India and Pakistan, the other countries had got together to force the International Hockey Federation (IHF) to impose restrictions adversely affecting the style and expertise of players of the sub-continent. The two neighbours should, therefore, make the most of the resumption of their sport ties. Indian cricket team’s visit to Pakistan after more than a decade will, indeed, be a historic event. It is definitely a positive development. Let’s hope and pray that this does become a reality. If possible, the display of national flags in playfields must be banned during the matches between India and Pakistan. The people should enjoy the sport in the spirit in which it is played and should rejoice in the glory of the best performers. Only then there is a chance that they will rediscover themselves with the most beneficial results for our mighty sub-continent as a whole.

Much ado about nothing

Not very long ago, a section of the media had mistaken a new recruit in the secessionist camp as veteran leader Syed Ali Shah Geelani and would give him coverage much more than what he had hardly deserved. His name was Syed Saleem Geelani. Having moved around among top leaders, Mr Saleem Geelani now appears to have picked up the tricks of the political game. There is nothing, however, to suggest that he has gained in any status or has done something remarkable to merit a reckonable independent profile. The report, therefore, that he has become president of Democratic Freedom Party (DFP) by removing Mr Shabir Ahmad Shah should not cause more than a ripple in the Jhelum. There is no comparison at all between the two. Mr Shah has spent the best part of his life in jail. Moreover, he has displayed wisdom and maturity to work for communal harmony and stronger inter-regional bonds in J&K. He is one of the most widely and easily recognisable leaders of the State. His failure, however, has been his inability to translate public sympathy and support for him into a wide organisational base. He just does not appear to know how to build a loyal team. Two of his closest associates, Mr Firdous Sayeed alias Babar Badar and Mr Nayeem Khan, both known for their organisational skills, have moved away from him. A leading light of People’s League, one of the pro-Pakistan outfits in the State, Mr Shah had parted company to set up DFP as a statewide body. His party has never been put to any serious popularity test. Nevertheless, there is no denying the fact that in a personal capacity Mr Shah continues to get the attention he has earned. There is unlikely to be any change in this position even after the so-called split.

What can’t be ignored, however, is that the developments in DFP, howsoever insignificant they may have been, are in keeping with the general trend seen in the recent months. The open split in the multi-party Hurriyat Conference has been followed by a sharp division in almost all of its constituents down the line. So far only Jammu-Kashmir Liberation Front and Jamaat-e-Islami (J&K) have escaped any irreparable damage. There was an intra-party struggle in JeI with the real Mr Geelani taking an independent line which appears to have prevailed restoring peace in the organisation. So far as smaller parties are concerned, it will be interesting to watch their eventual fate in the days to come now that they are divided and sub-divided.

Musharraf using US to kill anti-Osama groups

By B Raman

When an Army unit is having an encounter with a com-bined group of Arab, Afghan and Pakistani terrorists, do you know of bullets, hand-grenades and rockets which would kill only the Arabs and spare the Afghans and Pakistanis?

Well, Pakistan apparently has them, if reports about its high-profile hunt for the dregs of the Al Qaeda and the Taliban in the Waziristan area of the Federally-Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) are to be believed. Let us begin from the very beginning.

It has been a well-known secret in the tribal belt of Pakistan and Afghanistan that many of the hit and run attacks on the American and Afghan troops in Southern and Eastern Afghanistan are being launched from sanctuaries in the Waziristan area. Pakistani troops deployed on the Pakistan-Afghan border to prevent cross-border terrorism into Afghan territory, have actually been providing covering fire to these raiders to facilitate their terrorist strikes in Afghan territory just as they do to cross-border terrorists operating in Indian territory.

Since the beginning of this year the young officers of the US troops deployed in Afghan territory have been itching to cross over into Waziristan in exercise of their right of hot pursuit and wipe out the terrorists and their sanctuaries. They were particularly infuriated over the fact that in one of the hit and run raids of December last, a serving officer of the Pakistani security officers was involved. But, the Pentagon and the State Department have been exercising considerable restraint on them lest their over-reactions destabilise Gen. Pervez Musharraf.

At the same time, senior officials of the Bush Administration have been exercising considerable pressure on Musharraf to destroy the terrorist infrastructure in the whole of FATA in general and in Waziristan in particular.

Since there has been no improvement in the situation despite continuing pressure from the US and the Hamid Karzai Government in Kabul on Musharraf to wipe out the terrorists operating from the FATA and their infrastructure. On the contrary, the anger of the junior and middle level US and Afghan troops was exacerbated when it was found recently that three of the hit and run raiders caught in Afghan territory were serving Pakistani army officers who had trained the Taliban before 9/11.

It is said that the matter was strongly taken up by President Bush with Musharraf when the latter met him in New York last month. According to a disclosure made by Richard Boucher, spokesman of the US State Department, after the return of Musharraf to Pakistan, the two countries signed a Letter of Agreement on September 23, 2003, to undertake the following:

*Strengthen Pakistan's control over frontier areas bordering Afghanistan;

* Continue the construction of roads in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas;

* Support law enforcement reform; and

* Provide training and equipment to develop police capacity, including the creation of a border security coordination center."

According to Boucher, this Letter of Agreement was reaffirmed on October 2 when Secretary of State Colin Powell called on Pakistan's Prime Minister Mir Zafarullah Khan Jamali in Washington.

On the eve of a visit to Afghanistan and Pakistan by Richard Armitage, US Deputy Secretary of State, and Christina Rocca, Assistant Secretary of State, the Pakistan Army, which had been sluggish in its actions against the terrorists and their sanctuaries, went into sudden action against suspected hide-outs of the Al Qaeda and the Taliban in the Waziristan area and a hide-out of the Harkat-ul-Mujahideen (HUM) in the Northern Areas (Gilgit and Baltistan) bordering India's Jammu and Kashmir (J&K), starting from October 2. Foreign and Pakistani media representatives were reportedly invited to watch the operation, which was billed as the largest operation undertaken by the Pakistan Army against the Al Qaeda and the Taliban.

However, after an independent investigation, The News reported as follows: "Majority of the captured suspected terrorists in the Operation Mizan, launched by Pakistan armed forces in South Waziristan Agency, are reportedly Pakistanis and Afghans while seven among the killed are believed to be foreigners.

"Sources informed The News from Wana, headquarters of South Waziristan Agency, that five among the dead were Chechens while one of them has been identified as Algerian and another as Turkish. Identity of the remaining ones, who were killed in the daylong operation, could not be ascertained. However, some official sources said all those killed in Bagharh area of Birmal district were foreign nationals and had sneaked into Pakistani territory from Afghanistan.

"Sources in the political administration said hardly two of the 18 captured persons are believed to be Arabs while the rest are either from Punjab, South Waziristan Agency and Afghanistan. ‘No big fish has been identified either among the killed persons or the arrested ones. We were expecting some thing big,’ an official said asking not to be named.

"Arab sources, however, claimed that these foreign nationals were affiliated with Muslim militant groups but had no links with Al Qaeda, as majority of them are believed to be from the hardliner Takfiree Group, which was always at loggerheads with Osama bin Laden and his supporters."

Takfir wal Hijra means Repentance and Flight, in other words, "repent your sins and flee the sinful world." This ideology was first propagated in Egypt in the early 1970s by a violent offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood. Since then, this ideology has spread to Algeria, Libya, Sudan, Jordan and Pakistan. The groups practising this ideology, even if they have other names, are generally referred to as the Takfirees.

In Pakistan, the Takfirees operate under the name the Jamaatul Muslimeen, but the locals refer to them as Takfirees. The Arab Takfirees first arrived in Pakistan in the 1980s to participate in the jihad against the Soviet troops.

Even though some analysts treat the Takfirees as no different from the Al Qaeda, religious sources in Pakistan say that it is one of the very few jihadi groups in the Pakistan-Afghanistan region which has refused to accept the leadership and the modus operandi of Osama bin Laden and his Al Qaeda According to them, it had unsuccessfully tried to assassinate him when he was living in the Sudan before the middle of 1996 when he shifted to Afghanistan. It had also reportedly issued a fatwa in 1999 calling for his assassination.

Even though its religious ideology is as extreme as that of bin Laden, if not more extreme, its modus operandi differs in the sense that it believes that before getting involved in a head-on confrontation with the US one should get rid of all US surrogates in the Islamic countries through targetted assassinations. It feels that bin Laden weakened the cause of the jihad against the US by prematurely taking the US head-on on 9/11 without first eliminating its surrogates in Pakistan and other countries of the Islamic world.

Going by the reports from the police officers of the NWFP, what the army seems to have done was to catch hold of some Takfirees, eliminate them and then show them as killed during a massive anti-Al Qaeda operation.

Why is the Army killing the Arabs? Because, the police officers say, it was worried that if they were interrogated by the FBI, the truth would come out.

Why it did not consider it necessary to kill the Pakistanis and Afghans? Because it is confident they would not compromise the army, if interrogated by the FBI. (adni)

Ozone hole growing alarmingly

By G. V. Joshi

Ozone, a gas, whose molecule contains three atoms of oxygen, was first discovered in 1839 by German scientist Christian Friedrich Schonbein. It is pale blue, relatively unstable gas. The name ozone is derived from the Greek word 'ozein' which means, "to smell". This is also called trioxygen.

The Earth is surrounded by a relatively thin blanket of air, consisting a mixture of gases, primarily nitrogen (77 per cent) and oxygen (21 per cent). This gaseous envelope, commonly called the air, also contains much smaller amounts of gases such as argon, carbon dioxide, methane, ozone and water vapour, alongwith minute solid and liquid particles in suspension.

The stratosphere lies above the troposphere and extends to an altitude of about 50 kilometres. The temperature in this layer increases with altitude.

Ultraviolet (UV) radiation or rays are an invisible form of light. They lie just beyond the violet end of the visible spectrum. The sun is the major natural source of UV rays. UV rays in sunlight split oxygen molecules in the stratosphere into two separate atoms. Some of these free atoms join with oxygen molecules to form ozone.

Above the relatively warm stratosphere is mesosphere, in which temperatures again decline with altitude, reaching roughly -85 C at the top of mesosphere. Temperatures then rise with increasing height through the overlying layer known as the thermosphere. Above about 100 kilometres, lies ionosphere.

Depending on where it resides, ozone can harm or protect human animal and plant life on earth.

Strong sunlight and hot weather cause ground-level ozone to form in harmful concentrations in the air. Many cities tend to have high levels of ozone. Near the Earth's surface, ozone is a harmful pollutant that causes damage to lung tissue and plants. Ozone is a major constituent of smog. Smog kills more people than car accidents.

Most of the ozone is formed over the equator and the tropics, because of sunlight and, therefore, UV radiation is strongest there. The process is continuous.

As ozone is produced, stratospheric winds drive it from the tropics towards Polar Regions. In the stratosphere, where 90 per cent of Earth's ozone resides, it does a remarkable good job of absorbing (UV) radiation and acts as a shield to protect Earth's surface from the sun's harmful UV radiation.

In the absence of this gaseous shield in the upper atmosphere, the harmful UV radiation in the sunlight has a perfect window through which to strike earth. The sun's UV rays are particularly harmful to living things. Overexposure to these rays can cause painful irritation on inflammation of the eyes.

High-quality sunglasses protect the eyes. Overexposure to UV rays also can cause a painful burn.

Exposure to the Sun's UV rays over a long period can cause skin cancer and other genetic changes in human cells.

An area where ozone has been significantly depleted - for example, over the North or South Pole - is sometimes called a "Ozone Hole". However, this beneficial ozone is gradually being destroyed by manmade chemicals like Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), which are a family of chemical compounds developed way back in the 1930's as safe, non-toxic, non-flammable alternative to dangerous substances like ammonia for purposes of refrigeration and spray can propellants.

Their usage grew enormously over the years. One of the elements that make up CFCs is chlorine. Very little chlorine exists naturally in the atmosphere. However, it turns out that CFCs are an excellent way of introducing chlorine into the atmosphere and its various layers.

Studies undertaken by various scientists like Dr Rowland, Dr Molina and Dr Paul Crutzen during the 1970s revealed that CFCs released into the atmosphere accumulate in the stratosphere.

In the stratosphere, UV radiation from the sun breaks CFCs into their component elements of chlorine, fluorine and carbon. There, each chlorine atom is capable of destroying about 100,00 ozone molecules before becoming inactive. This has been observed especially over Antarctica.

CFCs have a lifetime in the atmosphere of about 20 to 100 years, and consequently one free chlorine atom from a CFC molecule can do a lot of damage, destroying ozone molecules for a long time, and creating ozone holes.

Ozone hole of 2003 has made its appearance, but is smaller. According to scientists studying the ozone hole, this year's ozone hole over Antarctica is the second largest ever observed.

The size of this year's hole reached nearly 28 million square kilometres on September 11, 2003. It was slightly larger than the North American continent, but smaller than the largest hole ever recorded on September 10, 2000, when it covered 29 million square kilometres.

In the mid-1950s, scientists began monitoring the atmosphere in Antarctica. Their studies intensified after 1982, and each spring (September-October in Southern Hemisphere) they detected a loss of ozone. Data from satellites, balloons and aircraft confirmed their findings.

In some regions of the stratosphere, at an altitude of about 18 km, the ozone all but vanishes during the Antarctic spring. The loss of ozone is most serious above the Antarctic, but is spreading towards Arctic. Environmental scientists analysed more than 12 years' data from the Nimbus - 7 satellite and found that in some places at certain times of the year and the northern hemisphere also loses about 6 per cent of its ozone shield.

The loss is gradually replaced, but for part of the summer, we risk greater exposure to dangerous UV rays. Without the ozone layer, UV rays would probably destroy most plant and animal life.

The ozone layer is measured in Dobson units. A Dobson unit is related to the physical thickness of the ozone layer if it could be brought down to the Earth's surface. The global average ozone layer thickness is 300 Dobson units, which equals about 3mm.

In contrast, the ozone layer thickness in the Antarctic ozone hole is about 100 Dobson units, which is one mm.

Further confirmation on their work came in the mid-1980s with the discovery of the so-called hole in the ozone shield over Antarctica.

As a result of this path-breaking research, Dr Rowland and Dr Molina shared the 1995 Nobel Prize for Chemistry with Dr Paul Crutzen, a Dutch Chemist who also worked on dangers faced by the ozone layer.

The citation accompanying the Nobel Prize said that Dr Rowland, Dr Molina and Dr Crutzen, the three winners, "contributed to our salvation from a global problem that could have catastrophic consequences."

Although emissions of CFCs from the developed world largely ceased due to international control agreements, the damage to the stratospheric ozone layer will continue to well into the 21st century.

PTI Feature

Modi loses credibility amgost Gujarat Hindus too

By Allabaksh

Despite all the protests and noises being made by the BJP and its entire Sangh Parivar about a 'conspiracy' to defame Gujarat, reports from the state do not suggest that the Narendra Modi administration has particularly distinguished itself in ensuring dispensation of justice and fair play as well as safety of the minority community. Some of the recent events lend strength to the belief that the Modi administration has been glossing over its culpability in crimes against a section of its own people. The State Government's self-righteousness and the outcry against 'pseudo-secularists' by Modi and the Sang Parivar looks increasingly out of place in the face of these developments.

For Modi and the Sangh Parivar the latest blow has come not from Muslims, 'pseudo secularists' and sundry other imaginary 'ememies' of Gujarat but members of the Hindu community. Four relatives of the Godhra train carnage of February 2002 (all Hindus and Gujaratis) have publicly said that they want the case transferred to outside the State (Gujarat) preferably 'in the vicinity of the Supreme Court', so that peope could speak out about the tragedy without any fear or hindrance. The demand is that the Nanavati Commission, which is looking into the post-Godhra violence, should be shifted out of the State because it is not possible for the witnesses to depose before it fearlessly as long as the hearings take place in Gujarat.

A few days earlier when the survivors of the Best Bakery carnage in Vadodara sought transfer of their case to outside Gujarat, the entire Sangh Parivar had alleged that it was yet another instance of efforts to 'tarnish' the image of Gujarat b 'pseudo-secularists' and their ilk and a slur on the judiciary in the State. Yet, the plea for transfer was widely supported because it had become apparent that the families of the victims could not expect a fair trial as the witness after witness had been turning hostile for reasons which are not difficult to deduce-threats from the perpetrators of the crime and their well-connected political patrons. The fast track court in Vadodara has already set free all those arrested in connection with the gruesome crime in which a frenzied mob had burnt alive 14 persons working in a bakery.

A spanking from the Supreme Court brought out the fact that the prosecution in the Best Bakery case appeared to be more keen to bail out the accused instead of seeking justice for the victims of the gruesome crime. A whole lot of witnesses in a case that had attracted international attention disowned their evidence and the prosecution did not think it proper to question them why it was happening. The threats to witnesses were being issued almost openly, but the State apparatus claimed to be unaware of it.

Then, there was another rap from the Supreme Court which wanted the Gujarat administration to instruct the State police to stay away from the woman who was gang raped during last year's riots in Ahmedabad. Naturally, the woman belonged to the minority community.

The acquittal of all the accused in the Best Bakery case shocked the nation with the exception of the Sangh Parivar which greeted it with much glee. When the matter was raised before it, the apex court was horrifed to learn that intimidation of witnesses was the basis for the acquittal. The 'star' witness in the case admitted outside the court that she was asked to change her original statement or else... She even named some politicians who were threatening witnesses with dire consequences if they stuck to their original statements.

It was perhaps more shocking when the State police's director general told the Supreme Court in an affidavit that the police did not act when witnesses were being 'won over' by the accused. Wasn't this an admission that the law and order protectors of the State had willingly acquiesced in the intimidation of the witnesses? In fact, the director general also admitted that the Vadodara police commissioner had informed him about the tactics being used to 'win over' the witnesses. Clearly, the Gujarat Police had failed to live up to the assurance they had given to the National Human Rights Commission on providing protection to the witnesses.

This is not the conduct one would expect of a professional police force. But then under Narendra Modi, the entire Gujarat administration, including the police, seems to have been 'saffronised', geared to work for the Sangh Parivar which hardly hides its dislike for the minority community. Many independent accounts of the Gujarat riots speak of the State police and the administration deliberately allowing riots to spread as it were aimed at one particular community.

But the move by the four relatives of the Godhra carnage suggests something even more sinister, the State administration does not care for all the 'five crore people of Gujarat', as Modi is fond of saying at every opportunity. The father of the former Home Minister in the State, Hiren Pandya, who was slain in a public park in a better part of Ahmedabad, has been openly accusing Chief Minister Modi, of complicity in the murder of his son who was, ironically, a highly respected member of the BJP. But for some reason, Modi took a dislike for Pandya, a factor that in the eyes of Modi nullified the merit of Pandya's strong BJP credentials.

The Congress in Gujarat might have 'used' Pandya's father by inviting him to unfurl the national flag at a function organised by the Party, but the senior Pandya maintained that he was still a BJP supporter. When such a person points an accusing finger at a party bigwig like Narendra Modi, how can he (Modi) blame only a section of the community (Muslims and 'pseudo secularists') for criticising his administration? He forgets that the Supreme Court had to remind him what the Prime Minister had told him once at a rally after the riots: stick to Raj Dharma which entails fair and equal treatment of all communities.

But chances of Modi heeding that advice look slim as he continues to be contemptuous of pleas to him to give up his hard 'Hindutva' politics for the sake of good governance. Modi shows an incredibly cavalier manner in treating any complaint against his style of politics and governance. He is said to be elated after the success of a show designed to attract investments to his State. Several thousand crore rupees worth of investments are said to have been promsied, though it is common knowledge that hardly 10 percent of 'promised' made on such occasions materialise.

But if Gujarat becomes a sort of permanent laboratory for Hindutva, the investments would be even lesser. The BJP and the Sangh Parivar may gain from their politics based on hate and communalism but ultimately it is the nation which will have to pay a heavy price for it. At a time when certain nations are trying desperately to come out of their religiously fanatical moorings that recall medieval times, the BJP and the Sangh Parivar is pushing the country precisely in that reprehensible direction.

(Syndicate Features)

 
 



|
home | state | national | business | editorial | advertisement | sports |
|
international | weather | mailbag | suggestions | search |
subscribe | send mail |