EDITORIAL
Bereft
of rationale
Anybody sincerely
expecting that Pakistan would show greater wisdom and
maturity in mending fences with India is bound to feel
let down. In the recent days, one has seen the
neighbouring country delaying its response to twelve
confidence-building measures (CBMs) proposed by India. In
the process, it has killed the well-meaning idea of the
reopening of the road between Uri in Kashmir and
Muzaffarabad, which is the capital of the occupied
territory. If any country had ..........more
Terror
has no religion
A report from Riyadh in
Saudi Arabia that Al Qaeda militants are planning to kill
the pilgrims in the holy city of Mecca during Ramzan
underlines the grim reality that the terrorists do not
have respect for any religion. No less a senior person
than Saudi Arabias Interior Minister Prince Nayef
bin Abdul Aziz has been quoted as having said that the
plot has surfaced with his country foiling a militant
attack in Mecca last Monday. Two Muslim militants were
killed before they could carry out, what the Saudi
minister has rightly described, an evil aim.
One of the holiest places on the earth has not been
spared by those who claim to be carrying out a jihad
in the name ...more
|
|
US
sees a terrorist
in Dawood
Men, Matters & Memories
By M L Kotru
It's over a month since
the Americans finally discovered that Dawood Ibrahim, the
underworld don is a terrorist. ........more
Guru
Nanak Dev Ji's
vision of God
By Inder Jeet S. 'Prince'
Guru Nanak Dev Ji, the
first Guru of Sikhism came to this world (1469-1539) at a
time when there was considerable.....more
'Talk shop' talks. And,
how!.....
Yours Randomly,
By Dr. R. L. Bhat
The NAM summit , denounced
by the American president as a 'talk shop' has
just.........more
Pak
credibility is in doubt
Men and Matters
By B.L. Kak
New Delhi has thrown cold
water over Islamabad's gameplan aimed at pressurising
.....more
|
EDITORIAL
Bereft of rationale
Anybody sincerely
expecting that Pakistan would show greater wisdom and
maturity in mending fences with India is bound to feel
let down. In the recent days, one has seen the
neighbouring country delaying its response to twelve
confidence-building measures (CBMs) proposed by India. In
the process, it has killed the well-meaning idea of the
reopening of the road between Uri in Kashmir and
Muzaffarabad, which is the capital of the occupied
territory. If any country had some valid reason for
saying no to this proposal, it should have been India.
Muzaffarabad has the dubious reputation of being the base
camp of the militant outfits operating in Jammu and
Kashmir. Exact locations of arms training camps of the
militants in the PoK as a whole and its capital city in
particular have been identified time and again. Yet, New
Delhi had taken a broader view for the benefit of people
in the State in particular. Had the road link been
restored, thousands of people on either side of the Line
of Control would have met easily and frequently.
Presently they have to make a detour via Wagah (which is
shut down at the moment) in Punjab or going all the way
to Delhi or Lahore to catch the bus. Before that they
have to contend with tough visa restrictions. There was
thus a possibility that their fast contact and
inter-action would have slowly and gradually worked to
the advantage of both India and Pakistan. This has
altogether disappeared with Pakistan insisting upon the
United Nations control of the road. There is no
doubt that even the global forum would have detested
taking over such an undesirable role which is anathema to
the basic objective of strengthening the bilateral
relations. Hardly has the dust settled down on
Pakistans illogical response to the CBMs that it
has made yet another move which is bereft of any
rationale. It has announced the establishment of a
26-member committee of its National Assembly members to
mobilise opinion around the world in favour of its stand
on Kashmir. Undoubtedly, this nasty measure shows that
Pakistan is in no mood to settle for peace in the
sub-continent. On the face of it, there is, arguably,
nothing new in Pakistans latest step. Such
committees have been set up in the past as well. What is
disturbing at this juncture is the timing of the
announcement. It is jarring when the entire world is
yearning for peace.
Clearly it is a decision
in the wrong direction and totally offensive to
Indias sensibilities. By this, Pakistans
ruling leaders have declared that they will not stop
interference in the internal affairs of this country. For
instance, the terms of reference of the panel, as
approved by the neighbouring countrys National
Assembly, envisage that it would monitor the
violations of human rights in J&K. It has
been reiterated that Pakistan will solicit and provide
moral, political and diplomatic support to
the people of Kashmir. Besides, of course, the panel
would mobilise the global community for its support to
the right of self-determination of the
Kashmiris. One notices a calculated bid to present
a picture of unity. All opposition parties get
representation in the panel, varying from diehard
fundamentalists to the liberals. However, the irony is
that while claiming the right to speak on behalf of the
people of another country, Pakistan has ruthlessly
trampled upon the freedom of its own citizens. The
Opposition has not at all been consulted about its
inclusion in the committee. This is amusing. The fact is
that opposition leaders have been boycotting parliament
in protest against the continuation of Gen Pervez
Musharraf as the President of their country.
No leader of any substance
from the occupied territory finds a place in the
committee. This was only to be expected given
Pakistans lack of trust in the people of this area.
Some time back Pakistan had set up a Kashmir committee
under the leadership of Sardar Abdul Qayum Khan, a
formidable leader of the PoK. He was gradually
marginalised. So harassed had he felt that he had
threatened to wind up his exercise which got some initial
publicity because of his trip to the United States. In
any case, this committee has not been heard of for a long
time. It is doubtful whether it exists at all. What is
only too well known that the Sardar has never been in the
good books of the present ruling establishment in
Pakistan. A pro-Pakistan leader for a long time, he has
of late been pleading for a dialogue among people of
different regions of the undivided State as it had
existed in 1947. Pakistan is averse to any such idea; its
resistance to reopening the Uri-Muzaffarabad road
explains all this. It is strange that Pakistans
decision to appoint the committee has coincided with Gen
Musharrafs assertion in Beijing that his country
will deal with India on the basis of sovereign
equality. On no occasion has India challenged the
status of Pakistan as an independent and sovereign
nation. Why should Gen Musharraf nurse any doubt about
this? Unless, of course, there is the fear lurking in his
mind that his provocative measures will boomerang one day
with a deadly effect.
Terror has no religion
A report from Riyadh in
Saudi Arabia that Al Qaeda militants are planning to kill
the pilgrims in the holy city of Mecca during Ramzan
underlines the grim reality that the terrorists do not
have respect for any religion. No less a senior person
than Saudi Arabias Interior Minister Prince Nayef
bin Abdul Aziz has been quoted as having said that the
plot has surfaced with his country foiling a militant
attack in Mecca last Monday. Two Muslim militants were
killed before they could carry out, what the Saudi
minister has rightly described, an evil aim.
One of the holiest places on the earth has not been
spared by those who claim to be carrying out a jihad
in the name of Islam. That, too, during a month when
every day the Muslims fast from dawn to dusk. For quite
some time, there have been warning signals in Saudi
Arabia. They were, however, mainly about the militants
planning to hit the Western establishments in the kingdom
which had been shaken by a series of suicide attacks in
May. Few thought that they would go to such a dastardly
length. This reaffirms the truth that gun-totting
marauders are actually an affront to the human
conscience. It is disgusting that they should have
thought of naming their cell of the Al Qaeda network
after such a pious name as Mecca. Six members of the cell
have been arrested. It is being ascertained whether any
of them is among the 19 extremists wanted in Saudi
Arabia. Nearer home, one notices an almost identical
phenomenon. When terrorism had raised its ugly head in
Punjab, the majority of its victims were the members of
the Sikh community. In J&K, it is true the so-called jihadis
have indulged in the massacres of the members of the
minority Hindu community at several places in the State.
What cant be denied at the same time is that the
members of the majority Muslim community have been no
less sufferers. Many of them have been eliminated. Even
women have been abducted and subjected to brutalities,
along with children, as witnessed in Rajouri district not
very long ago. The perpetrators of such terror deserve no
leniency. More so, when they bring bad name to one
religion or the other.
|
US
sees a terrorist in Dawood
Men,
Matters & Memories
By M L Kotru
It's over
a month since the Americans finally
discovered that Dawood Ibrahim, the
underworld don is a terrorist. And they
acted with usual alacrity in enforcing
their writ. The Americans decided to
confiscate his assets, though their
quantum in the US must remain a matter of
conjecture. Going by Dawood's record even
the Americans may find it difficult to
locate his assets including his bank
accounts and investments. The Pakistanis
who have played host to Dawood for a
number of years have quickly denied his
existence in Pakistan. His many aliases,
some of these reflected in his numerous
travel documents, provide convenient
enough cover for Islamabad to deny his
existence. Or so they believe.
US
Secretary of Treasury John Snow did
travel to Pakistan to provide damaging
evidence of Dawood's connections with the
terror networks including Al Qaeda and
the Lashkar-e-Toiba. The last-named,
though officially banned, continues to
thrive, running its madrassas just as
Maulana Azhar Masud, the founder of the
banned terrorist outfit, continues to
collect funds in the name of the Jihad in
Kashmir and equally glaringly he does it
in full public view with friendly
elements of the Pakistan Army including
the ISI looking on with obvious
admiration.
It can't
be unknown to the Americans that the
Lashkar leadership and Masud even as they
may have given new names to their outfits
indeed continue to pursue their chosen
path of terrorism. One of the top leaders
of a Pakistani terrorist outfit went on
record only last week asserting that they
would continue to work in tandem with the
Afghan Taliban which alone according to
him was capable of administering
Afghanistan. He did not hesitate to
mention what has been obvious to everyone
bar the Americans that President Hamid
Karzi's writ does not run beyond the
capital Kabul and that for the rest the
warlords and their ever burgeoning
treasure troves (thanks to an abundance
of narcotics) hold sway over the rest of
that blighted country.
Pakistan
again is not willing to accept that it
continues, covertly and overtly, to play
host to terrorist outfits whose
involvement in the destablisation of the
Afghan regime and the ongoing
Pak-inspired terrorist activities in
Jammu and Kashmir is well-known. If only
the other day three Pakistani military
personnel in uniform are caught alongwith
Al Qaeda terrorists in Afghanistan it
hardly seems to make a difference to Gen
Pervez Musharraf, the
Commando-turned-Chief Executive of
Pakistan. ''The presence of Pak soldiers
among Al Qaeda men must be an aberration;
just look at the number of Al Qaeda
activists we have made over to the US
authorities'', the General says self
righteously. And the Americans do not
have much of a choice.
Given
George Bush's maniac obsessions he is
willing to look only at ''friend and
ally'' Musharraf's ''positives''.
And thus
even if the US may have declared Dawood a
most wanted terrorist having ignored
earlier Indian concerns in this regard
the underworld king and his hosts in
Pakistan need have no fears. The General
has told Bush that no one by the name of
Dawood Ibrahim lives in Pakistan. And he
may not be lying, for all you know.
Because a leading Pakistani Journal had
more than a year ago exposed the presence
of Dawood in Karachi as also the fact
that he owned huge properties under
various names in the Pakistani megapolis.
Or could it be that even the Americans,
after having virtually accepted the Indan
view of Dawood Ibrahim and his
activities, still share at least some of
the Pakistani concerns on the issue.
After all the Indians had for long
proclaimed that Dawood was operating from
Dubai ?
Home
Minister L K Advani during last visit to
the US presented ''clinching'' evidence
against Dawood's presence in Pakistan.
And many believe that the noose was
finally tightened round Dawood's neck as
a consequence of the Advani dossier. The
US declaration confirmed that feeling.
But we obviously had reckoned without the
American dilemma over Pakistan. Many
voices have been heard from very
responsible American quarters raising
questions about ''Is Pakistan a friend or
foe?'' The US establishment regardless is
willing to look the other way even when
the ''friend or foe'' thought may have
been entertained by some within the
set-up. Musharraf continues to occupy a
special place in the heart and mind of
George Bush. George Bush, recently stated
that God asked him to seek election as
President to save the US; Musharraf
similarly believes that he was sent by
the Gods to save Pakistan from its
politicians.
Having
blamed everyone else for what is turning
out to be a flop show. I' affair Dawood-
it might do us some good to look at our
own failures which to my lay mind are
monumental. And to buttress this view I
am falling back on the contents of an
article which appeared in a weekly
recently. The article points out that
Dawood was a terrorist, an extortionist,
smuggler etc long before 9/11, the
American benchmark for the emergence of
international terrorism. One part- a
significant one-of Dawood's operations
has been the hawala operation. When
hawala network serves terrorists, Dawood
gets drawn into terrorist activity.
Narcotics create money for terrorism.
Hawala distributes the money. It follows
that to fight terrorism the money trail
must be busted.
Dawood's
network, the author argues, had
distributed money to India's leading
politicians as well as to Kashmiri
militants. Dawood, shrewd operator of the
under world kind, saw himself as a
provided of service through hawala. When
hawala network provided a service to the
terrorist and the politician alike,
security concerns of a nation are
breached. The Jammu and Kashmir
Liberation Front, which dominated the
separatist movement in the State before
the Jain Hawala case burst into the open,
was one of the beneficiaries of the
hawala terrorist nexus. Salahuddin, a
recipient of hawala money was an unknown
entity then. The money had come to him
through the Dawood network. Within a few
years Salahuddin rose to lead the Hizbul
Mujahideen.
The
article, I have alluded to, appeared in
the form of an open letter to President
George Bush. It most tellingly beings out
the pusilaminity of the Indian
authorities when it urges George Bush
that to make sure that if Dawood is
captured he is not handed over to Indian
authorities. ''If handed over to India,
he might either escape or be shot dead.
Remember Abu Salem? Interpol presented
him to India on a platter. India did not
present the necesary documents. Now
Indian Government is enacting a soap
opera, trying 'vainly' to extradite him.
When you get hold of Dawood, Mr
President, induce him to sing. Ask him to
sing about the airline company in which a
senior (Indian) politicians relatives
were his partners....Ask him to sing
about politicians in Mumbai from both
sides who collaborated with him in land
scams in the early days... Ask him to
sing about the politicians he lavishly
hosted in Dubai. Ask him to sing about
politicians and journalists who regularly
enjoyed hospitality of his henchman
Romesh Sharma at his Delhi farmhouse...''
To this
list I might add the fact that in the
great Maratha bastion called Mumbai there
have been no buyers for some of the
Dawood properties ordered to be auctioned
off by courts of law. And it is not
unknown that Dawood even today owns huge
business, residential complexes in
Mumbai. And that his gang continues to
cater to his every whim and fancy not
only in Mumbai but in other parts of the
country as well. Mr Advani could well
look into his own back yard before
accusing others of being soft on
terrorists, extortionists, smugglers et
al.
|
 |
Guru
Nanak Dev Ji's vision of God
By Inder
Jeet S. 'Prince'
Guru Nanak
Dev Ji, the first Guru of Sikhism came to
this world (1469-1539) at a time when
there was considerable strife between the
main religions of India. The poor and
innocent people were being butchered and
plundered in the name of God. The rulers
had become ravenous and love and amity
had taken to wings. Vision of God was
blurred and its place was taken by futile
rituals and ceremonies. In other words,
it was a time of complete darkness and
the ignorant masses were struggling to
get out of this mess, created due to lack
of true knowledge and guidance. Guru
Nanak's coming to this world has been
described as under:-
Sat Guru
Nanak Pargatya Miti Dhund Jag - Chanan
Hoya."
Guru Nank
Dev Ji felt the need to get rid of futile
rituals to lessen miseries of the people.
Guru Nanak Dev Ji in order to take the
society out of the darkness of ignorance
decided to stress on the oneness and
unity of God to correct the malady.
Before
embarking on his mission, the first and
significant pronouncement made by Guru
Nanak Dev Ji was to recite the "Mool
Mantra" in the praise of God. It is
the most precise and definite definition
of God. In each of its eight words both
the transcendental and immanent aspect of
God, is given. Mool Mantra appears as an
epilogue to Guru Granth Sahib and is
repeated frequently throughout its text
in full or abbreviated forms to stress
its importance. "Ek Oangkar" -
The first letter in the Mool Mantra is
the numeral I (one): This has been placed
to stress the one-ness of the entire
cosmos. By this two ideas are expressed
that of singleness and that of unity .
The unity of God implies the one and only
God, the one without a second, the one of
complete supremacy, the one unopposed,
the one unequalled, the one who is
omnipresent and omnipotent and the one
who is absolute in all respects.
The figure
I (one) proceeds with 'Om' modified with
the addition of a sign 'Kar' and is spelt
as Oangkar. It expresses his 'Nirgun
(formless) and Sargun (with form)
identity. As Nirgun He has no form,
colour, shape or creed. Whatever is
visible is his 'Sargun' personality. He
is not sitting somewhere in the heavens
and watching over us, but in Him we live,
move and have our being. He is in His
creation and yet outside and above it.
'Ek-Oangkar' expresses that God is one,
transcendental, immanent, omnipresent,
limitless and incomprehensible. 'Sat-Nam
God cannot be given a name as he is above
our conception. However, if He is to be
given one, He is 'True' (Satya) i.e. He
alone is permanent, all else is fleeting.
This aspect of truism is different from
truthfulness which refers to our conduct.
He was true before His creation, was true
in the beginning of the universe, is true
now and shall remain true for all the
times. He is an existing reality and not
an abstract idea.
'Nam' is
God. It is that undefinable wave, ray and
invisible string by which we can know
Him, preceive Him and obtain his
blessings. 'Nam' is the way to achieve
salvation. The whole Gurbani is replete
with this word enjoying human beings to
constantly remember and sing His praises
all the times.
'Karta
- Purakh - Karta means creator and
Purakh is person not an ordinary person
but a male personified entity who is the
creator of the world. Unlike a potter who
having made a pot sets the same aside for
sale and having sold it forgets about it.
He besides being a Creator, is also
Nourisher, Provisioner, Benefactor and
Destroyer of everything that he has
created. He is all in all. There is
nothing which is not under His order or
will. The entire Universe functions in
perfect harmony and Unison under his
divine law.
'Nir
Bhau' - He is without fear. He is
neither afraid or any one nor does he
instill fear in his creatures.
'Nir-Vair'
- He is without enmity. There is no
different Gods for Sikhs, Hindus and
Muslims but there is one God. He loves
all and does not care for the artificial
boundaries of caste, colour and creed set
up by man.
'Akal
Moorat - Akal implies the God is not
limited by time and space. He is also
known as 'Akal Purakh' - the everlasting
and infinite being. The word 'Moorat'
means picture or idol made of clay or
metal used for worship, Guru Nanak Dev's
conception of God is a living and
existing reality which cannot be confined
or limited to any one particular place or
object.
'Ajuni
-Sebhang' - He has no birth and is self
existent. Under this expression no one
who comes in the orbit of death can be
called or equated with God. How can he be
born or die when he is without form or
feathers ('Sebhang' - Independently self
existent).
Gur
Parsad - Guru is the preceptor and
the divine enlightener who dispels
darkness of illusion. Gurus are beacon
lights sent by the Lord form time to time
to lead human beings to righteous and
virtuous path. They infuse spiritual
life, inspire devotion and unite men with
God.
'Prasad'
is a wide term meaning that God is
Bestower of all the blessings. He is
benefactor, bountiful, kind and merciful.
Grace is His biggest gift.
According
to Guru Nank Dev Ji, the Supreme being
can be attained by the grace of the Guru
only. Guru is the conglomeration of
righteous thoughts, behaviour and action
and a holy spirit that inspires us to
remember God and ultimately help us to
unite with him.
The 'Mool
Mantra' of Guru Nanak Dev Ji ends with
'Gur Prasad'. The next word is 'Jap'.
This is the heading of the prime Gurbani
'Japji' which the Sikhs are enjoined to
recite every morning.
In short,
'Mool Mantra' defines His (God's)
qualities, identity and personality in
most precise and definite terms. Any
body, who recites this 'Mantra' with
devotion, love and faith shall inherit
all those Godly qualities.
In
essence, we as an image and spirit of His
divine light are also divine. But because
of the limitations of our individuality
and ego, we are separated from Him. Once
this wall of egoism falls by our constant
remembrance and surrender to Him, we
shall be able to perceive Him and thereby
obtain bliss and peace which we all
cherish.
Guru Nanak
Dev Ji travelled from Punjab (Nankana
Sahib) to Assam, from the Himalayas to
Ceylon and even to Mecca - Madina in the
middle east to spread the message of
one-ness and unity of God. And Guru Nank
Dev Ji succeeded in creating an awakening
of the public consciousness against the
prevalent futile religious rituals,
tyranny and exploitation.
|
|
'Talk
shop' talks. And, how!.....
Yours Randomly,
By Dr. R. L. Bhat
The NAM summit ,
denounced by the American president as a 'talk
shop' has just ended talking quite a mouthful
over, what the whole world is right now talking,
Iraq. It has been quite categorical that there
should be no invasion of Iraq save with the
approval of Security Council. That, of course, is
the language most of the member states, and
almost all the nations of the world except USA
and Britain, have been talking in. NAM with six
of its members in the present Security Council,
which would vote on the US-British resolution
demanding war, has ample opportunities to have
its writ taken into notice. It, indeed, has a
rare chance to tell the world that it is not a
mere talk shop but a body which can take
decisions and have them enforced. That vote would
be crucial because after the latest vote and
resolution in the British parliament, even Tony
Blair has stated that whatever is done would be
with the approval of UN Security Council.
But somehow a kink
seems to have been introduced in this rare
material stand of the NAM if not the actual
hijacking of a wholesome issue to lands and
issues inimical to the general agreed positions
of the world. The elaborate address by Mahatir
Mohammad the prime minister of Malaysia, hosting
the summit and to be the new chairman of NAM set
the tune of the summit towards that frequency.
While the movement needs to make its presence
felt and its utterings noticed, needs to regain
the position and clout it enjoyed in its initial
years, it would not be done with a sectarian
posturing. Nor does it need to be so. Iraq issue
has enough support among the non aligned nations
without the new chairman making it an Islamic
case. Yet, though Mahatir Mohammad did not
categorically say so, the burnt his arguments
revolved on that point. His elaboration of the
Israel-Palestine conflict, replete with the
invocation of 'Zionist' terrorism cannot but be
interpreted as bearing out Osama's latest
diatribe against Kafirs.
Now all the
countries that have been subject to irrational
terrorism at the hands of fundamentalist
terrorists know that it is not exactly correct.
While every extenuation of the
jihadi-fundamentalist terrorism to the
Israel-Palestinian question is neither logical
nor accurate, it carries a built-in justification
for the terrorism which is most sinister for
peace in the world. For, there is a terrorism and
Malaysia is itself being used a base for much of
it. That terrorism has no justification in
Palestinian, or in any other question. Just as
Osama jumped on the Iraq wagon to make a re-entry
into a 'legitimacy how so fake, the west Asia has
been used a convenient excuse by jihadis of
different hues to camouflage their dark features.
There, the expectation of NAM as a level headed
body that can rise above the sectarian interests
and intents is in the danger of being belied.
Iraq interests unallied people more than the
religionists or Osama's brotherhood of Islam.
those protestors in Europe, the Americans who
have deluged the Capitol Hill with e-mails are
more active here, more concerned, than the Muslim
brotherhood that is only now allying itself with
the cause of Iraq and that too not so forcefully
as other democratic and freedom loving people of
the world.
There, the
rhetoric from Kuala Lumpur has not been very
rational nor convincing, nor even impartial. That
an informal OIC-meet was held on the sidelines
further complicates the picture. It carries the
portent of derailing the world alignment on
terrorism, of confusing the clarity that has been
achieved after WTC and giving the terrorists a
new lease of life. That cannot be the position
of, or to the benefit, of the 116 countries that
NAM represents. More than that it makes NAM
something of an apologist for the senseless
violence that has been inflicted upon the world,
including Muslim countries, by jihadi terrorists.
the impact these kinked utterances shall have on
these issues which are very pressing for more
than half of the world and much of NAM can't be
ignored, especially in view of the fact that
Malaysia as the new chairman shall be the
practical mouthpiece of the 116 nations. At the
very least a reiteration of support for Iraq
should have also carried an explicit rejection of
the terrorism and not been accompanied by a
deferment of a 'definition' of terrorism.
For the rest, the
NAM has said nothing new. It has restated its
known concern about the debt, its skepticism of
market economy, and the low levels of the
official development assistance that have not
seen much improvement despite an endorsement of
the full UNO. The NAM has been crying over these
things for the last two decades but has made no
headway. Indeed, over the last decade the focus
has shifted from assistance to collaboration.
Nation after nation in the developing world has
been going in for the market reforms and reaping
good harvests unless the illogic of the nations
themselves has stood in their way. With China
opting for the markets in a big way, the case for
the 'assistance' and 'equity' of the
nineteen-seventies has been practically knocked
out in its bottom. NAM has to be more innovative
than rehashing the lost mantras, of a quarter
century past, if it means to invigorate the
economy of its nations. Today's is a
participatory world, which would not be
sympathetic to the calls that have lost their
logic and force years ago.
And, of course,
the greatest hurdle in that call and clamor, even
as it lasted, had been the reluctance of the
nonaligned nations to look within, to look to
their fellows. Had they done the needful there,
the others, including the developed world, would
have been forced to fall in line. It is their
penchant to be clients to the developed world
that has actually made the South-South
Cooperation a practical nonstarter. Without that
push the hope for North-South equity cannot
become a reality. So, has the talk-shop been
rather too talkative with a lighter touch of
practicality of approach or clarity of
perception? Probably.
|
Pak
credibility is in doubt
Men and Matters
By B.L. Kak
New Delhi has
thrown cold water over Islamabad's gameplan aimed
at pressurising India to allow human rights
groups and international media to monitor human
rights record in Kashmir. The Vajpayee Government
has, once again, let it be known that it will not
allow any change in its position on the status of
Jammu and Kashmir.
India's Foreign
Office is of the opinion that Pakistan's
'fixation' on Kashmir as the 'central issue'' is
bedeviling relations between the two countries.
India may be inclined to prioritize discussions
on Jammu and Kashmir only if Islamabad takes
meaningful action to counter terrorism.
New Delhi has
conveyed to Washington that thinning down of
troops can be considered only after Pakistan
takes 'decisive' and 'definite' steps to stop
infiltration and act on the list of 20 fugitives
sent by India not long ago, New Delhi's focus is
mainly on cross-border infiltration and
cross-border terrorism. This has again been
highlighted by a person none other than the Prime
Minister, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, himself.
At a time when
Gen. Parvez Musharraf chose to presuade the US
President, George W Bush, to play a more active
role in urging India to reduce the tension on the
borders and to resume the stalled talks with
Islamabad, Pakistan was classified as the source
of large quantities of weapons in Kashmir.
According to a US report, weapons and materials
used in Jammu and Kashmir are ''increasingly
identified to those provided by the ISI to the
Afghan Mujahideen''.
The report has
been prepared by the task force set up by the US
House Republican Research Committee. It says that
although the flow of weapons and explosives into
'Indian Kashmir' is attributed by Islamabad to
their availability in the open market in
Peshawar, Derra and some other places, weapons
currently used in J&K are ''increasingly of
unique types available only from states and, in
the case of Kashmiri Islamists, could not have
come from any other source but the ISI''.
There is no
denying that social importance of Islamabad's
long-term plan is the reliability of highly
professional and tightly controlled core of
terrorist operatives. Towards establishing such a
core the ISI has established a well-knit agency
to give subversive training to Kashmiri militants
in Pakistan occupied Kashmir (PoK) and to carry
out clandestine and subversive operations on
behalf of Islamabad. The US report states that
for ''truly sensitive and audacious, though
deniable, operations inside India'', the ISI
established and runs its own Kashmiri
organizations.
The most important
among these is the Hizbe Islami, which consists
of former Kashmiri Mujahideen who are trained by
the ISI and then fought with Gulbed in
Hekmatiyar's organisation in Afghanistan. Also,
there is Harkat-ul-Jihad, another highly
professional terrorist groups created in
Pakistan.
''In the space of
a few short years'', the US report has noted,
''there was a marked erosion of the secular
Kashmiri personality and a Muslim identity with
fundamentalists overtones started emerging
rapidly''. The report says : Therefore, it also
became imperative for the merging separatist
leaders to give the struggle a Pan-Islamic
character and extra-territorial dimensions''.
This transformation, the rpeort insists, was
assisted and reinforced by an ''active ISI
programme''.
Instead of using
the Afghan-support infrastructure in Pakistan to
support Kashmiri militants, Pakistan provided
assistance in the training and arming of Kashmiri
terrorists as well as sanctuaries to Kashmiri
insurgents across the border. The US report says
that whole there are well over 30 militants
groups in Kashmir, as many as 29 subversive
groups have been receiving assistance and shelter
in Pakistan.
If the report is
any guide, the ISI has further increased its
direct involvement in the training and supporting
of Kashmiri Islamist terrorists, while the Pak
Army has increased the 'secrecy of the terrorist
support operation and has upgraded the basic
training provided to the Kashmiris'. The ISI is
operating 13 permanent, 18 temporary and 8 joint
training camps for Kashmiris. The report has
revealed that nearly 3,700 'Kashmiri fighters'
are located in these camps, including terrorists
who cross over from 'Indian Kashmir' for
relatively brief training prior to returning to
Kashmir.
Pakistan is on the
scanner. The US President's repeated description
of Pakistan as a ''stalwart ally''
notwithstanding, Islamabad is treated, in several
foreign capitals, including Washington itself, as
an several foreign capitals, including Washington
itself, as an entity willing to accommodate, to
aid, to abet and to export Islamic terrorism.
Close links
between Islamic Republic of Pakistan and World's
surviving communist giant, China, have already
been acknowledged and accepted the world over.
And both Beijing and Islamabad have, from time to
time, chosen for obvious political and strategic
reasons to highlight the durability, desirability
and efficacy of the Sino-Pak cooperation and
collaboration.
Significantly,
however, Beijing made it clear to Gen Parvez
Musharraf during his latest trip to China that
China cannot be expected to allow covert and
overt attempts by some jihadi outfits in Pakistan
and PoK to incite and instigate the Muslim
population in the Chinese province of Xingjiang,
formerly known as Sinkiang. Beijing may not
openly toe pro-India line on Kashmir. But China
hasn't been supportive of the idea for
'independence' to Kashmir.
Perhaps,
Pakistan's credibility wouldn't have been in
doubt, as it is today, if that country had
definitely and decisively acted against terrorist
outfits and the machinery, which even now oils
the jihadi muscle and machine. The international
community, the US in particular, is not prepared
to see or manipulate ouster of the regime led by
Gen Musharraf at a time when he is required in
the current battle, initiated by the Bush
administration, against global terrorism. But the
fact that Islamabad is losing, gradually though,
the international market for its Kashmir policy,
has become too evident to be missed in recent
times.
Caught in intense
provincial conflict between Punjab and Sind over
water at present, Pakistan has been warned to get
ready for an alarming crisis by 2010. The warning
is contained in a report, which is said to be a
culmination of 12 years of research on Pakistan.
Titled The Future
of Pakistan the report has been prepared by
Sundeep Waslekar of the International Centre for
Peace Initiatives and the Strategic Foresight
Group. And if the report is any guide, India,
too, will have by 2010 ground water levels in the
border States of Punjab, Rajasthan and Gujarat.
By the end of the
decade, the report the forecast, the water crisis
will intensify and may drag India and Pakistan to
the warfront. Waslekar has pointed out that
another dimension of tension is going to be
witnessed between the two countries---one that
will revolve around a water crisis in the border
areas of the two neighbours.
The report says
that every year, after 2004, the deteriation in
the situation in Pakistan will multiply. Pakistan
might also seek a consolidation of its policies
and economy by taking a stricter stand towards
India. Waslekar's report does not foresee a
bright future for Pakistan in the field of water
availability and management in the years to come.
By 2004 or 2005, the situation, according to the
document, will further deteriorate.
|
 |
| |
 |
|