EDITORIAL

Bereft of rationale

Anybody sincerely expecting that Pakistan would show greater wisdom and maturity in mending fences with India is bound to feel let down. In the recent days, one has seen the neighbouring country delaying its response to twelve confidence-building measures (CBMs) proposed by India. In the process, it has killed the well-meaning idea of the reopening of the road between Uri in Kashmir and Muzaffarabad, which is the capital of the occupied territory. If any country had ..........more

Terror has no religion

A report from Riyadh in Saudi Arabia that Al Qaeda militants are planning to kill the pilgrims in the holy city of Mecca during Ramzan underlines the grim reality that the terrorists do not have respect for any religion. No less a senior person than Saudi Arabia’s Interior Minister Prince Nayef bin Abdul Aziz has been quoted as having said that the plot has surfaced with his country foiling a militant attack in Mecca last Monday. Two Muslim militants were killed before they could carry out, what the Saudi minister has rightly described, an ‘evil aim’. One of the holiest places on the earth has not been spared by those who claim to be carrying out a jihad in the name ...more

US sees a terrorist
in Dawood

Men, Matters & Memories
By M L Kotru

It's over a month since the Americans finally discovered that Dawood Ibrahim, the underworld don is a terrorist. ........more

Guru Nanak Dev Ji's
vision of God

By Inder Jeet S. 'Prince'

Guru Nanak Dev Ji, the first Guru of Sikhism came to this world (1469-1539) at a time when there was considerable.....more

'Talk shop' talks. And, how!.....

Yours Randomly,
By Dr. R. L. Bhat

The NAM summit , denounced by the American president as a 'talk shop' has just.........more

Pak credibility is in doubt

Men and Matters
By B.L. Kak

New Delhi has thrown cold water over Islamabad's gameplan aimed at pressurising .....more

EDITORIAL

Bereft of rationale

Anybody sincerely expecting that Pakistan would show greater wisdom and maturity in mending fences with India is bound to feel let down. In the recent days, one has seen the neighbouring country delaying its response to twelve confidence-building measures (CBMs) proposed by India. In the process, it has killed the well-meaning idea of the reopening of the road between Uri in Kashmir and Muzaffarabad, which is the capital of the occupied territory. If any country had some valid reason for saying no to this proposal, it should have been India. Muzaffarabad has the dubious reputation of being the base camp of the militant outfits operating in Jammu and Kashmir. Exact locations of arms training camps of the militants in the PoK as a whole and its capital city in particular have been identified time and again. Yet, New Delhi had taken a broader view for the benefit of people in the State in particular. Had the road link been restored, thousands of people on either side of the Line of Control would have met easily and frequently. Presently they have to make a detour via Wagah (which is shut down at the moment) in Punjab or going all the way to Delhi or Lahore to catch the bus. Before that they have to contend with tough visa restrictions. There was thus a possibility that their fast contact and inter-action would have slowly and gradually worked to the advantage of both India and Pakistan. This has altogether disappeared with Pakistan insisting upon the United Nations’ control of the road. There is no doubt that even the global forum would have detested taking over such an undesirable role which is anathema to the basic objective of strengthening the bilateral relations. Hardly has the dust settled down on Pakistan’s illogical response to the CBMs that it has made yet another move which is bereft of any rationale. It has announced the establishment of a 26-member committee of its National Assembly members to mobilise opinion around the world in favour of its stand on Kashmir. Undoubtedly, this nasty measure shows that Pakistan is in no mood to settle for peace in the sub-continent. On the face of it, there is, arguably, nothing new in Pakistan’s latest step. Such committees have been set up in the past as well. What is disturbing at this juncture is the timing of the announcement. It is jarring when the entire world is yearning for peace.

Clearly it is a decision in the wrong direction and totally offensive to India’s sensibilities. By this, Pakistan’s ruling leaders have declared that they will not stop interference in the internal affairs of this country. For instance, the terms of reference of the panel, as approved by the neighbouring country’s National Assembly, envisage that it would monitor the ‘violations of human rights’ in J&K. It has been reiterated that Pakistan will solicit and provide ‘moral, political and diplomatic’ support to the people of Kashmir. Besides, of course, the panel would mobilise the global community for its support to ‘the right of self-determination of the Kashmiris’. One notices a calculated bid to present a picture of unity. All opposition parties get representation in the panel, varying from diehard fundamentalists to the liberals. However, the irony is that while claiming the right to speak on behalf of the people of another country, Pakistan has ruthlessly trampled upon the freedom of its own citizens. The Opposition has not at all been consulted about its inclusion in the committee. This is amusing. The fact is that opposition leaders have been boycotting parliament in protest against the continuation of Gen Pervez Musharraf as the President of their country.

No leader of any substance from the occupied territory finds a place in the committee. This was only to be expected given Pakistan’s lack of trust in the people of this area. Some time back Pakistan had set up a Kashmir committee under the leadership of Sardar Abdul Qayum Khan, a formidable leader of the PoK. He was gradually marginalised. So harassed had he felt that he had threatened to wind up his exercise which got some initial publicity because of his trip to the United States. In any case, this committee has not been heard of for a long time. It is doubtful whether it exists at all. What is only too well known that the Sardar has never been in the good books of the present ruling establishment in Pakistan. A pro-Pakistan leader for a long time, he has of late been pleading for a dialogue among people of different regions of the undivided State as it had existed in 1947. Pakistan is averse to any such idea; its resistance to reopening the Uri-Muzaffarabad road explains all this. It is strange that Pakistan’s decision to appoint the committee has coincided with Gen Musharraf’s assertion in Beijing that his country will deal with India on the basis of ‘sovereign equality’. On no occasion has India challenged the status of Pakistan as an independent and sovereign nation. Why should Gen Musharraf nurse any doubt about this? Unless, of course, there is the fear lurking in his mind that his provocative measures will boomerang one day with a deadly effect.

Terror has no religion

A report from Riyadh in Saudi Arabia that Al Qaeda militants are planning to kill the pilgrims in the holy city of Mecca during Ramzan underlines the grim reality that the terrorists do not have respect for any religion. No less a senior person than Saudi Arabia’s Interior Minister Prince Nayef bin Abdul Aziz has been quoted as having said that the plot has surfaced with his country foiling a militant attack in Mecca last Monday. Two Muslim militants were killed before they could carry out, what the Saudi minister has rightly described, an ‘evil aim’. One of the holiest places on the earth has not been spared by those who claim to be carrying out a jihad in the name of Islam. That, too, during a month when every day the Muslims fast from dawn to dusk. For quite some time, there have been warning signals in Saudi Arabia. They were, however, mainly about the militants planning to hit the Western establishments in the kingdom which had been shaken by a series of suicide attacks in May. Few thought that they would go to such a dastardly length. This reaffirms the truth that gun-totting marauders are actually an affront to the human conscience. It is disgusting that they should have thought of naming their cell of the Al Qaeda network after such a pious name as Mecca. Six members of the cell have been arrested. It is being ascertained whether any of them is among the 19 extremists wanted in Saudi Arabia. Nearer home, one notices an almost identical phenomenon. When terrorism had raised its ugly head in Punjab, the majority of its victims were the members of the Sikh community. In J&K, it is true the so-called jihadis have indulged in the massacres of the members of the minority Hindu community at several places in the State. What can’t be denied at the same time is that the members of the majority Muslim community have been no less sufferers. Many of them have been eliminated. Even women have been abducted and subjected to brutalities, along with children, as witnessed in Rajouri district not very long ago. The perpetrators of such terror deserve no leniency. More so, when they bring bad name to one religion or the other.

US sees a terrorist in Dawood

Men, Matters & Memories
By M L Kotru

It's over a month since the Americans finally discovered that Dawood Ibrahim, the underworld don is a terrorist. And they acted with usual alacrity in enforcing their writ. The Americans decided to confiscate his assets, though their quantum in the US must remain a matter of conjecture. Going by Dawood's record even the Americans may find it difficult to locate his assets including his bank accounts and investments. The Pakistanis who have played host to Dawood for a number of years have quickly denied his existence in Pakistan. His many aliases, some of these reflected in his numerous travel documents, provide convenient enough cover for Islamabad to deny his existence. Or so they believe.

US Secretary of Treasury John Snow did travel to Pakistan to provide damaging evidence of Dawood's connections with the terror networks including Al Qaeda and the Lashkar-e-Toiba. The last-named, though officially banned, continues to thrive, running its madrassas just as Maulana Azhar Masud, the founder of the banned terrorist outfit, continues to collect funds in the name of the Jihad in Kashmir and equally glaringly he does it in full public view with friendly elements of the Pakistan Army including the ISI looking on with obvious admiration.

It can't be unknown to the Americans that the Lashkar leadership and Masud even as they may have given new names to their outfits indeed continue to pursue their chosen path of terrorism. One of the top leaders of a Pakistani terrorist outfit went on record only last week asserting that they would continue to work in tandem with the Afghan Taliban which alone according to him was capable of administering Afghanistan. He did not hesitate to mention what has been obvious to everyone bar the Americans that President Hamid Karzi's writ does not run beyond the capital Kabul and that for the rest the warlords and their ever burgeoning treasure troves (thanks to an abundance of narcotics) hold sway over the rest of that blighted country.

Pakistan again is not willing to accept that it continues, covertly and overtly, to play host to terrorist outfits whose involvement in the destablisation of the Afghan regime and the ongoing Pak-inspired terrorist activities in Jammu and Kashmir is well-known. If only the other day three Pakistani military personnel in uniform are caught alongwith Al Qaeda terrorists in Afghanistan it hardly seems to make a difference to Gen Pervez Musharraf, the Commando-turned-Chief Executive of Pakistan. ''The presence of Pak soldiers among Al Qaeda men must be an aberration; just look at the number of Al Qaeda activists we have made over to the US authorities'', the General says self righteously. And the Americans do not have much of a choice.

Given George Bush's maniac obsessions he is willing to look only at ''friend and ally'' Musharraf's ''positives''.

And thus even if the US may have declared Dawood a most wanted terrorist having ignored earlier Indian concerns in this regard the underworld king and his hosts in Pakistan need have no fears. The General has told Bush that no one by the name of Dawood Ibrahim lives in Pakistan. And he may not be lying, for all you know. Because a leading Pakistani Journal had more than a year ago exposed the presence of Dawood in Karachi as also the fact that he owned huge properties under various names in the Pakistani megapolis. Or could it be that even the Americans, after having virtually accepted the Indan view of Dawood Ibrahim and his activities, still share at least some of the Pakistani concerns on the issue. After all the Indians had for long proclaimed that Dawood was operating from Dubai ?

Home Minister L K Advani during last visit to the US presented ''clinching'' evidence against Dawood's presence in Pakistan. And many believe that the noose was finally tightened round Dawood's neck as a consequence of the Advani dossier. The US declaration confirmed that feeling. But we obviously had reckoned without the American dilemma over Pakistan. Many voices have been heard from very responsible American quarters raising questions about ''Is Pakistan a friend or foe?'' The US establishment regardless is willing to look the other way even when the ''friend or foe'' thought may have been entertained by some within the set-up. Musharraf continues to occupy a special place in the heart and mind of George Bush. George Bush, recently stated that God asked him to seek election as President to save the US; Musharraf similarly believes that he was sent by the Gods to save Pakistan from its politicians.

Having blamed everyone else for what is turning out to be a flop show. I' affair Dawood- it might do us some good to look at our own failures which to my lay mind are monumental. And to buttress this view I am falling back on the contents of an article which appeared in a weekly recently. The article points out that Dawood was a terrorist, an extortionist, smuggler etc long before 9/11, the American benchmark for the emergence of international terrorism. One part- a significant one-of Dawood's operations has been the hawala operation. When hawala network serves terrorists, Dawood gets drawn into terrorist activity. Narcotics create money for terrorism. Hawala distributes the money. It follows that to fight terrorism the money trail must be busted.

Dawood's network, the author argues, had distributed money to India's leading politicians as well as to Kashmiri militants. Dawood, shrewd operator of the under world kind, saw himself as a provided of service through hawala. When hawala network provided a service to the terrorist and the politician alike, security concerns of a nation are breached. The Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front, which dominated the separatist movement in the State before the Jain Hawala case burst into the open, was one of the beneficiaries of the hawala terrorist nexus. Salahuddin, a recipient of hawala money was an unknown entity then. The money had come to him through the Dawood network. Within a few years Salahuddin rose to lead the Hizbul Mujahideen.

The article, I have alluded to, appeared in the form of an open letter to President George Bush. It most tellingly beings out the pusilaminity of the Indian authorities when it urges George Bush that to make sure that if Dawood is captured he is not handed over to Indian authorities. ''If handed over to India, he might either escape or be shot dead. Remember Abu Salem? Interpol presented him to India on a platter. India did not present the necesary documents. Now Indian Government is enacting a soap opera, trying 'vainly' to extradite him. When you get hold of Dawood, Mr President, induce him to sing. Ask him to sing about the airline company in which a senior (Indian) politicians relatives were his partners....Ask him to sing about politicians in Mumbai from both sides who collaborated with him in land scams in the early days... Ask him to sing about the politicians he lavishly hosted in Dubai. Ask him to sing about politicians and journalists who regularly enjoyed hospitality of his henchman Romesh Sharma at his Delhi farmhouse...''

To this list I might add the fact that in the great Maratha bastion called Mumbai there have been no buyers for some of the Dawood properties ordered to be auctioned off by courts of law. And it is not unknown that Dawood even today owns huge business, residential complexes in Mumbai. And that his gang continues to cater to his every whim and fancy not only in Mumbai but in other parts of the country as well. Mr Advani could well look into his own back yard before accusing others of being soft on terrorists, extortionists, smugglers et al.

Guru Nanak Dev Ji's vision of God

By Inder Jeet S. 'Prince'

Guru Nanak Dev Ji, the first Guru of Sikhism came to this world (1469-1539) at a time when there was considerable strife between the main religions of India. The poor and innocent people were being butchered and plundered in the name of God. The rulers had become ravenous and love and amity had taken to wings. Vision of God was blurred and its place was taken by futile rituals and ceremonies. In other words, it was a time of complete darkness and the ignorant masses were struggling to get out of this mess, created due to lack of true knowledge and guidance. Guru Nanak's coming to this world has been described as under:-

Sat Guru Nanak Pargatya Miti Dhund Jag - Chanan Hoya."

Guru Nank Dev Ji felt the need to get rid of futile rituals to lessen miseries of the people. Guru Nanak Dev Ji in order to take the society out of the darkness of ignorance decided to stress on the oneness and unity of God to correct the malady.

Before embarking on his mission, the first and significant pronouncement made by Guru Nanak Dev Ji was to recite the "Mool Mantra" in the praise of God. It is the most precise and definite definition of God. In each of its eight words both the transcendental and immanent aspect of God, is given. Mool Mantra appears as an epilogue to Guru Granth Sahib and is repeated frequently throughout its text in full or abbreviated forms to stress its importance. "Ek Oangkar" - The first letter in the Mool Mantra is the numeral I (one): This has been placed to stress the one-ness of the entire cosmos. By this two ideas are expressed that of singleness and that of unity . The unity of God implies the one and only God, the one without a second, the one of complete supremacy, the one unopposed, the one unequalled, the one who is omnipresent and omnipotent and the one who is absolute in all respects.

The figure I (one) proceeds with 'Om' modified with the addition of a sign 'Kar' and is spelt as Oangkar. It expresses his 'Nirgun (formless) and Sargun (with form) identity. As Nirgun He has no form, colour, shape or creed. Whatever is visible is his 'Sargun' personality. He is not sitting somewhere in the heavens and watching over us, but in Him we live, move and have our being. He is in His creation and yet outside and above it. 'Ek-Oangkar' expresses that God is one, transcendental, immanent, omnipresent, limitless and incomprehensible. 'Sat-Nam God cannot be given a name as he is above our conception. However, if He is to be given one, He is 'True' (Satya) i.e. He alone is permanent, all else is fleeting. This aspect of truism is different from truthfulness which refers to our conduct. He was true before His creation, was true in the beginning of the universe, is true now and shall remain true for all the times. He is an existing reality and not an abstract idea.

'Nam' is God. It is that undefinable wave, ray and invisible string by which we can know Him, preceive Him and obtain his blessings. 'Nam' is the way to achieve salvation. The whole Gurbani is replete with this word enjoying human beings to constantly remember and sing His praises all the times.

'Karta - Purakh - Karta means creator and Purakh is person not an ordinary person but a male personified entity who is the creator of the world. Unlike a potter who having made a pot sets the same aside for sale and having sold it forgets about it. He besides being a Creator, is also Nourisher, Provisioner, Benefactor and Destroyer of everything that he has created. He is all in all. There is nothing which is not under His order or will. The entire Universe functions in perfect harmony and Unison under his divine law.

'Nir Bhau' - He is without fear. He is neither afraid or any one nor does he instill fear in his creatures.

'Nir-Vair' - He is without enmity. There is no different Gods for Sikhs, Hindus and Muslims but there is one God. He loves all and does not care for the artificial boundaries of caste, colour and creed set up by man.

'Akal Moorat - Akal implies the God is not limited by time and space. He is also known as 'Akal Purakh' - the everlasting and infinite being. The word 'Moorat' means picture or idol made of clay or metal used for worship, Guru Nanak Dev's conception of God is a living and existing reality which cannot be confined or limited to any one particular place or object.

'Ajuni -Sebhang' - He has no birth and is self existent. Under this expression no one who comes in the orbit of death can be called or equated with God. How can he be born or die when he is without form or feathers ('Sebhang' - Independently self existent).

Gur Parsad - Guru is the preceptor and the divine enlightener who dispels darkness of illusion. Gurus are beacon lights sent by the Lord form time to time to lead human beings to righteous and virtuous path. They infuse spiritual life, inspire devotion and unite men with God.

'Prasad' is a wide term meaning that God is Bestower of all the blessings. He is benefactor, bountiful, kind and merciful. Grace is His biggest gift.

According to Guru Nank Dev Ji, the Supreme being can be attained by the grace of the Guru only. Guru is the conglomeration of righteous thoughts, behaviour and action and a holy spirit that inspires us to remember God and ultimately help us to unite with him.

The 'Mool Mantra' of Guru Nanak Dev Ji ends with 'Gur Prasad'. The next word is 'Jap'. This is the heading of the prime Gurbani 'Japji' which the Sikhs are enjoined to recite every morning.

In short, 'Mool Mantra' defines His (God's) qualities, identity and personality in most precise and definite terms. Any body, who recites this 'Mantra' with devotion, love and faith shall inherit all those Godly qualities.

In essence, we as an image and spirit of His divine light are also divine. But because of the limitations of our individuality and ego, we are separated from Him. Once this wall of egoism falls by our constant remembrance and surrender to Him, we shall be able to perceive Him and thereby obtain bliss and peace which we all cherish.

Guru Nanak Dev Ji travelled from Punjab (Nankana Sahib) to Assam, from the Himalayas to Ceylon and even to Mecca - Madina in the middle east to spread the message of one-ness and unity of God. And Guru Nank Dev Ji succeeded in creating an awakening of the public consciousness against the prevalent futile religious rituals, tyranny and exploitation.

'Talk shop' talks. And, how!.....

Yours Randomly,
By Dr. R. L. Bhat

The NAM summit , denounced by the American president as a 'talk shop' has just ended talking quite a mouthful over, what the whole world is right now talking, Iraq. It has been quite categorical that there should be no invasion of Iraq save with the approval of Security Council. That, of course, is the language most of the member states, and almost all the nations of the world except USA and Britain, have been talking in. NAM with six of its members in the present Security Council, which would vote on the US-British resolution demanding war, has ample opportunities to have its writ taken into notice. It, indeed, has a rare chance to tell the world that it is not a mere talk shop but a body which can take decisions and have them enforced. That vote would be crucial because after the latest vote and resolution in the British parliament, even Tony Blair has stated that whatever is done would be with the approval of UN Security Council.

But somehow a kink seems to have been introduced in this rare material stand of the NAM if not the actual hijacking of a wholesome issue to lands and issues inimical to the general agreed positions of the world. The elaborate address by Mahatir Mohammad the prime minister of Malaysia, hosting the summit and to be the new chairman of NAM set the tune of the summit towards that frequency. While the movement needs to make its presence felt and its utterings noticed, needs to regain the position and clout it enjoyed in its initial years, it would not be done with a sectarian posturing. Nor does it need to be so. Iraq issue has enough support among the non aligned nations without the new chairman making it an Islamic case. Yet, though Mahatir Mohammad did not categorically say so, the burnt his arguments revolved on that point. His elaboration of the Israel-Palestine conflict, replete with the invocation of 'Zionist' terrorism cannot but be interpreted as bearing out Osama's latest diatribe against Kafirs.

Now all the countries that have been subject to irrational terrorism at the hands of fundamentalist terrorists know that it is not exactly correct. While every extenuation of the jihadi-fundamentalist terrorism to the Israel-Palestinian question is neither logical nor accurate, it carries a built-in justification for the terrorism which is most sinister for peace in the world. For, there is a terrorism and Malaysia is itself being used a base for much of it. That terrorism has no justification in Palestinian, or in any other question. Just as Osama jumped on the Iraq wagon to make a re-entry into a 'legitimacy how so fake, the west Asia has been used a convenient excuse by jihadis of different hues to camouflage their dark features. There, the expectation of NAM as a level headed body that can rise above the sectarian interests and intents is in the danger of being belied. Iraq interests unallied people more than the religionists or Osama's brotherhood of Islam. those protestors in Europe, the Americans who have deluged the Capitol Hill with e-mails are more active here, more concerned, than the Muslim brotherhood that is only now allying itself with the cause of Iraq and that too not so forcefully as other democratic and freedom loving people of the world.

There, the rhetoric from Kuala Lumpur has not been very rational nor convincing, nor even impartial. That an informal OIC-meet was held on the sidelines further complicates the picture. It carries the portent of derailing the world alignment on terrorism, of confusing the clarity that has been achieved after WTC and giving the terrorists a new lease of life. That cannot be the position of, or to the benefit, of the 116 countries that NAM represents. More than that it makes NAM something of an apologist for the senseless violence that has been inflicted upon the world, including Muslim countries, by jihadi terrorists. the impact these kinked utterances shall have on these issues which are very pressing for more than half of the world and much of NAM can't be ignored, especially in view of the fact that Malaysia as the new chairman shall be the practical mouthpiece of the 116 nations. At the very least a reiteration of support for Iraq should have also carried an explicit rejection of the terrorism and not been accompanied by a deferment of a 'definition' of terrorism.

For the rest, the NAM has said nothing new. It has restated its known concern about the debt, its skepticism of market economy, and the low levels of the official development assistance that have not seen much improvement despite an endorsement of the full UNO. The NAM has been crying over these things for the last two decades but has made no headway. Indeed, over the last decade the focus has shifted from assistance to collaboration. Nation after nation in the developing world has been going in for the market reforms and reaping good harvests unless the illogic of the nations themselves has stood in their way. With China opting for the markets in a big way, the case for the 'assistance' and 'equity' of the nineteen-seventies has been practically knocked out in its bottom. NAM has to be more innovative than rehashing the lost mantras, of a quarter century past, if it means to invigorate the economy of its nations. Today's is a participatory world, which would not be sympathetic to the calls that have lost their logic and force years ago.

And, of course, the greatest hurdle in that call and clamor, even as it lasted, had been the reluctance of the nonaligned nations to look within, to look to their fellows. Had they done the needful there, the others, including the developed world, would have been forced to fall in line. It is their penchant to be clients to the developed world that has actually made the South-South Cooperation a practical nonstarter. Without that push the hope for North-South equity cannot become a reality. So, has the talk-shop been rather too talkative with a lighter touch of practicality of approach or clarity of perception? Probably.

Pak credibility is in doubt

Men and Matters
By B.L. Kak

New Delhi has thrown cold water over Islamabad's gameplan aimed at pressurising India to allow human rights groups and international media to monitor human rights record in Kashmir. The Vajpayee Government has, once again, let it be known that it will not allow any change in its position on the status of Jammu and Kashmir.

India's Foreign Office is of the opinion that Pakistan's 'fixation' on Kashmir as the 'central issue'' is bedeviling relations between the two countries. India may be inclined to prioritize discussions on Jammu and Kashmir only if Islamabad takes meaningful action to counter terrorism.

New Delhi has conveyed to Washington that thinning down of troops can be considered only after Pakistan takes 'decisive' and 'definite' steps to stop infiltration and act on the list of 20 fugitives sent by India not long ago, New Delhi's focus is mainly on cross-border infiltration and cross-border terrorism. This has again been highlighted by a person none other than the Prime Minister, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, himself.

At a time when Gen. Parvez Musharraf chose to presuade the US President, George W Bush, to play a more active role in urging India to reduce the tension on the borders and to resume the stalled talks with Islamabad, Pakistan was classified as the source of large quantities of weapons in Kashmir. According to a US report, weapons and materials used in Jammu and Kashmir are ''increasingly identified to those provided by the ISI to the Afghan Mujahideen''.

The report has been prepared by the task force set up by the US House Republican Research Committee. It says that although the flow of weapons and explosives into 'Indian Kashmir' is attributed by Islamabad to their availability in the open market in Peshawar, Derra and some other places, weapons currently used in J&K are ''increasingly of unique types available only from states and, in the case of Kashmiri Islamists, could not have come from any other source but the ISI''.

There is no denying that social importance of Islamabad's long-term plan is the reliability of highly professional and tightly controlled core of terrorist operatives. Towards establishing such a core the ISI has established a well-knit agency to give subversive training to Kashmiri militants in Pakistan occupied Kashmir (PoK) and to carry out clandestine and subversive operations on behalf of Islamabad. The US report states that for ''truly sensitive and audacious, though deniable, operations inside India'', the ISI established and runs its own Kashmiri organizations.

The most important among these is the Hizbe Islami, which consists of former Kashmiri Mujahideen who are trained by the ISI and then fought with Gulbed in Hekmatiyar's organisation in Afghanistan. Also, there is Harkat-ul-Jihad, another highly professional terrorist groups created in Pakistan.

''In the space of a few short years'', the US report has noted, ''there was a marked erosion of the secular Kashmiri personality and a Muslim identity with fundamentalists overtones started emerging rapidly''. The report says : Therefore, it also became imperative for the merging separatist leaders to give the struggle a Pan-Islamic character and extra-territorial dimensions''. This transformation, the rpeort insists, was assisted and reinforced by an ''active ISI programme''.

Instead of using the Afghan-support infrastructure in Pakistan to support Kashmiri militants, Pakistan provided assistance in the training and arming of Kashmiri terrorists as well as sanctuaries to Kashmiri insurgents across the border. The US report says that whole there are well over 30 militants groups in Kashmir, as many as 29 subversive groups have been receiving assistance and shelter in Pakistan.

If the report is any guide, the ISI has further increased its direct involvement in the training and supporting of Kashmiri Islamist terrorists, while the Pak Army has increased the 'secrecy of the terrorist support operation and has upgraded the basic training provided to the Kashmiris'. The ISI is operating 13 permanent, 18 temporary and 8 joint training camps for Kashmiris. The report has revealed that nearly 3,700 'Kashmiri fighters' are located in these camps, including terrorists who cross over from 'Indian Kashmir' for relatively brief training prior to returning to Kashmir.

Pakistan is on the scanner. The US President's repeated description of Pakistan as a ''stalwart ally'' notwithstanding, Islamabad is treated, in several foreign capitals, including Washington itself, as an several foreign capitals, including Washington itself, as an entity willing to accommodate, to aid, to abet and to export Islamic terrorism.

Close links between Islamic Republic of Pakistan and World's surviving communist giant, China, have already been acknowledged and accepted the world over. And both Beijing and Islamabad have, from time to time, chosen for obvious political and strategic reasons to highlight the durability, desirability and efficacy of the Sino-Pak cooperation and collaboration.

Significantly, however, Beijing made it clear to Gen Parvez Musharraf during his latest trip to China that China cannot be expected to allow covert and overt attempts by some jihadi outfits in Pakistan and PoK to incite and instigate the Muslim population in the Chinese province of Xingjiang, formerly known as Sinkiang. Beijing may not openly toe pro-India line on Kashmir. But China hasn't been supportive of the idea for 'independence' to Kashmir.

Perhaps, Pakistan's credibility wouldn't have been in doubt, as it is today, if that country had definitely and decisively acted against terrorist outfits and the machinery, which even now oils the jihadi muscle and machine. The international community, the US in particular, is not prepared to see or manipulate ouster of the regime led by Gen Musharraf at a time when he is required in the current battle, initiated by the Bush administration, against global terrorism. But the fact that Islamabad is losing, gradually though, the international market for its Kashmir policy, has become too evident to be missed in recent times.

Caught in intense provincial conflict between Punjab and Sind over water at present, Pakistan has been warned to get ready for an alarming crisis by 2010. The warning is contained in a report, which is said to be a culmination of 12 years of research on Pakistan.

Titled The Future of Pakistan the report has been prepared by Sundeep Waslekar of the International Centre for Peace Initiatives and the Strategic Foresight Group. And if the report is any guide, India, too, will have by 2010 ground water levels in the border States of Punjab, Rajasthan and Gujarat.

By the end of the decade, the report the forecast, the water crisis will intensify and may drag India and Pakistan to the warfront. Waslekar has pointed out that another dimension of tension is going to be witnessed between the two countries---one that will revolve around a water crisis in the border areas of the two neighbours.

The report says that every year, after 2004, the deteriation in the situation in Pakistan will multiply. Pakistan might also seek a consolidation of its policies and economy by taking a stricter stand towards India. Waslekar's report does not foresee a bright future for Pakistan in the field of water availability and management in the years to come. By 2004 or 2005, the situation, according to the document, will further deteriorate.

 



|
home | state | national | business | editorial | advertisement | sports |
|
international | weather | mailbag | suggestions | search |
subscribe | send mail |