EDITORIAL

Promises to keep
and break

What a relief? Mr Dilip Singh Judeo must be saying this to himself. He can very happily and proudly twist and twirl his moustache. His kingly symbol is not only safe but has also become his flagship. Yes, the same Mr Judeo who was caught on tape accepting cash from some alleged wheeler-dealer. In fact, the adverse publicity surrounding this incident had further strengthened his faith in his moustache. This had only led him to affirm more than once what he had said earlier. Publicly he had announced that he would shave off this emblem of his royal lineage were his political outfit, Bharatiya Janata Party, to lose in Chhattisgarh. No wonder, his moustache had become popular long before the cash-on-camera scandal had been televised. Right in the beginning of the electioneering, he had betted on his prized possession. To help him retain his look, his party had shown him flying around in a helicopter among his former subjects. After all, he is a former ruler. He can do no wrong in the eyes of his erstwhile subjects. How will the loyal masses let him down? No way, no way. It is not known who gave Mr Judeo the idea of announcing that he should opt for a clean face. How is that possible for a modern-day politician who has to meet excessively high expenditure on his elections? It is good for him that he stands vindicated in the end. He doesn’t have to part with his formidable asset......more

People’s verdict
against the Congress

By K.N. Pandita

Four States went to assembly polls. Three have fall in the lap of BJP and only one goes.......more

Ranjit Dev, an
enlightened king of Jammu

By Prof Jigar Mohammed

The modern Jammu region was divided into twenty two states during the......more

Cease-fire and after
TALES OF TRAVESTY

By Dr. Jitendra Singh

If one is to believe the dictum "well begun is half done", the outcome of the recently......more

Keep the flag high

By Brig (Retd) K Jagmohan Singh

Horrors of war are well known. Proxy war is still worst, being an act of stabbing .....more

Wanted a better male partner

By Sweta Patwardhan

The concept of reproductive health has a lot to do with gender relations. This concept is no.....more

EDITORIAL

Promises to keep and break

What a relief? Mr Dilip Singh Judeo must be saying this to himself. He can very happily and proudly twist and twirl his moustache. His kingly symbol is not only safe but has also become his flagship. Yes, the same Mr Judeo who was caught on tape accepting cash from some alleged wheeler-dealer. In fact, the adverse publicity surrounding this incident had further strengthened his faith in his moustache. This had only led him to affirm more than once what he had said earlier. Publicly he had announced that he would shave off this emblem of his royal lineage were his political outfit, Bharatiya Janata Party, to lose in Chhattisgarh. No wonder, his moustache had become popular long before the cash-on-camera scandal had been televised. Right in the beginning of the electioneering, he had betted on his prized possession. To help him retain his look, his party had shown him flying around in a helicopter among his former subjects. After all, he is a former ruler. He can do no wrong in the eyes of his erstwhile subjects. How will the loyal masses let him down? No way, no way. It is not known who gave Mr Judeo the idea of announcing that he should opt for a clean face. How is that possible for a modern-day politician who has to meet excessively high expenditure on his elections? It is good for him that he stands vindicated in the end. He doesn’t have to part with his formidable asset. One is unable to understand why Madhya Pradesh, of which Chhattisgarh was a part not very long ago, should make all the interesting news. If one hears of a Sadhvi taking over as the Chief Minister of a state and a ruler opting for sanyas, it is again in MP. The saffron-clad Uma Bharati would be the new boss of MP. Her immediate predecessor Digvijay Singh, who has a royal background, has already stated that he would not opt for any position for ten years if the Congress was defeated in the Assembly elections. He has again said, now that the party under his leadership has been decisively routed, that he would continue to work as an ordinary worker. He would not contest the next Lok Sabha and Assembly elections also. Why should politicians make such noises? One is unable to appreciate their plight. Why should one make promises befitting those entering a wresting arena? There is no physical combat that is involved in political field. Politics is a battle of ideas. Of brain. And, certainly not that of brawn. Therefore, one does not find an Ashok Gehlot or a Madan Lal Khurana making a promise they can’t keep. Neither of them has talked of retirement. Both of them have been in public life since their early ages and know its stresses and strains. It is only Mr Ajit Jogi who has said he would opt out of political life two years later when he would be 60. Not many may be aware that Mr Jogi would have in any case retired from active life on the completion of six decades of his life. That is the age on the completion of which a bureaucrat should retire. For those who don’t recall, the defeated Chhattisgarh Chief Minister had begun his career as a bureaucrat. Our own Ghulam Nabi Azad can teach them a few things. When he was in charge of the campaign of his party chief Sonia Gandhi in a Karnataka Lok Sabha election, Mr Azad had openly said that he would give up his position in the Congress if his party president did not win by more than one lakh votes. As it had happened, Ms Gandhi’s victory margin had fallen short of his expectations. On being reminded of his promise by Ms Sushma Swaraj, who had opposed Ms Gandhi in that election, in a televised encounter, Mr Azad has just laughed it off remarking some thing like ‘his sister’ was merely diverting the subject that was under discussion at that time. That is the stuff the real politicians are made of. What do these inheritors of royal largesse know about making promises?

People’s verdict against the Congress

By K.N. Pandita

Four States went to assembly polls. Three have fall in the lap of BJP and only one goes Congress. BJP has won with a thumping majority.

Before we proceed to analyze the result of these elections, we generally and the contesting parties particularly forget that winning or loosing the elections is not as important as the purpose for which elections are held.

Our political culture seldom understands that loosing the elections does not mean rejection for all times to come. It also does not mean lessening the burden of responsibility and commitment for the winning group. Winning the election is not a passport for indulging in vulgar excitement.

The Congress party has to learn many unsavory lessons. It can no more cash on its past history, idealism and rhetoric. It has to come out of that cocoon and behave in a pragmatic manner.

Surely, it has outplayed the card of Hindu communalism attributable to the BJP. The generation to which the Congress sold the commodity for several decades is gone but the hollow slogan has remained. The tantrum is unintelligible to the contemporary youth.

Ever since the BJP – led NDA government at the center and BJP governments in some states came to power, the Congress has been ritually reciting the mantra of BJP’s Hindutav agenda, BJP as the communalist party and BJP as the spoiler etc. This one-point agenda like that of Pakistan’s one-point agenda on Kashmir, has boomeranged on it. This is one of the biggest caused of Congress debacle. Yet the diehards in the party would not concede the truth.

Congress must try to feel the pulse of the people. Te verdict of the people is that of outright rejection of the above stated one-point agenda. Congress must realize that BJP and its coalition partners are as genuine nationalist parties as is theirs. It has to learn to respect the status and popularity of the BJP. In doing so it will be respecting the Indian electorate, from which the ultimate power flows.

The incumbency phenomenon is no more tenable. It was at one point of time. But things have changed. Essentially, the voter has matured and is more responsive to social responsibilities. Incumbency is an alibi that the Congress and for that matter all big nationalist political parties should put in cold storage.

In ultimate analysis it is the concrete contribution to the raising of the level of life that counts and that the electorate considers as the test of the person it would be voting for.

Another serious flaw of which Congress is a chronic patient is the blind observance of and faith in the cult of personality. Those legendary personalities are confined to the pages of the books of history. Their replicas will never be produced. Therefore, Congress echelons should learn to be original, discreet and have an integrity that carries weight. Discipline is all right but it does not mean compromising with originality, discretion and integrity.

During past four years of NDA rule, Congress has, by and large, behaved like a quarrelsome urchin. It has learnt to oppose everything at every place and every occasion. Essentially what Congress needs to learn and to teach its cadres is the culture of responsible opposition.

Generally Congress leaders have been reaping the harvest sown by their illustrious predecessors. We have seen how they created rowdy scenes during the sessions of the Parliament. We have seen how they staged walkouts when crucial bills were debated: how they obstructed the treasury benches from replying their allegations. In short we have seen them behaving as if they were in the battlefield arrayed against an enemy whom they must vanquish with all the weapons in their stockpile. This would include defamation, disinformation, calumny, blackmail and proxying.

In true sense of the term the loser from this negative politics is the nation in the long run. It is extremely disappointing that the Congress stalwarts while analyzing their defeat at the polls try to tell the audience in muffled voice that the BJP played the communal card with the voter.

Lastly, the minority vote bank strategy has begun to fail. It’s failing symptoms been visible in the previous Lok Sabha elections. But now it has become crystal clear to all and especially to the Congress, which has been projecting itself the sole protector of the minorities, that vote bank strategy has not only failed but is likely to become counter productive. The common Indian voter including the members of the minority community, have given ample proof of this healthy change. If the Congress wants to recover from the present onslaught, it must publicly say that it will seek votes on the basis of more important priorities than on so-called protection of minorities. Country’s politico-social system is now strong and dependable enough to provide protection to the minorities and all other sections.

The election has shown that the real plank for success would be the ability of the political parties to provide good governance. During the period of the NDA, many mega scams have been uncovered that have had roots deep and widespread. This is one facet of good governance. However, it does not mean that the NDA has been able to stem the rot and that there is nothing more to be done. Far from it. But at least accountability process has started. Being a democratic country run by the law, one cannot be impatient with the wheel of justice moving slowly but surely and at its own pace.

Parliamentary elections are round the corner. Both of the major political parties of national standing will now gear up to the parliamentary polls. Congress’s path is strewn with thorns. There is in fighting in the party, the legacy carried from generation to generation. There is, unfortunately, great dearth of great minds and intellectuals in this party to think big and act big. The minions and sycophants, the self-servers and flatterers hanging round the top leadership are the rot that needs scalpel. We do not know whether the party leadership has the vision and the strength to act drastically. The situation as one perceives it today is that the top leadership is shaky and its vision is blurred. Only a supernatural force can guide the beleaguered second rung leadership, which must now come out of its cocoon and act swiftly.

This does not mean that the NDA and more particularly BJP are out of woods. This party must do something to shut the mouth of loose talkers and brow beaters. It must chalk out the roadmap for true and genuine secularism – not to be produced through appeasement, blackmail or flattery. The minority, in whatever form and shape it is, shall be served fine if it is made to share political power and decision-making process. This principle should have universal and not selective application. It should become central to a process of good governance.

I think the winning party should be extremely modest and humble because the people of India have reposed trust in it, and given them an opportunity not to loot the country but to serve the nation. Any sincere servant of the people should have the humility to fulfill the promises he or she has made.

Ranjit Dev, an enlightened king of Jammu

By Prof Jigar Mohammed

The modern Jammu region was divided into twenty two states during the medieval period. Almost all the twenty two states were ruled by the Rajput dynasties. Jammu, Jasrota, Bilaur, Kishtwar, Rajouri, Bhimber were the important states of the region. Jammu as a state occupied the dominant position in the region. The rulers of Jammu not only enjoyed respect and power at local level, but they established close contacts with the Sultans and Mughal emperors of Delhi. The Mughal emperor Jahangir (1605-27) was very much impressed by the administrative qualities of Raja Sangram of Jammu. In his autobiography, entitled Tuzuk-i-Jahangiri, Jahangir mentions Raja Sangram as one of his important commanders. Similarly Raja Hari Dev (1658-1707) of Jammu acted as one of the prominent commanders of the Mughal emperor Aurangzeb (1658-1707). However, Jammu became one of the dominant states of the north India during the reign of Maharaja Ranjit Dev (1733-82), During his reign Jammu witnessed substantial changes in its socio-political and economic life.

Before the accession of Ranjit Dev several social evils existed in Jammu. The people not only practised them, but they also legitimized them with their conservative arguments and ideas. The existed social evils such as Sari system, girl infanticide, adultery, interest demand (sud) and certain other superstitious practices narrowed the socio-economic and political developments of Jammu region. When Maharaja Ranjit Dev ascended the throne he decided not only to work for the removal of the anti-social practices from Jammu, but he also planned to accelerate the economic and political developments of his State.

To check the sati system Maharaja Ranjit Dev first decided to restrict his own family members to follow the practice. He asked his sons, chiefs, courtiers and other relations that no woman was to be allowed to perform sati with him after his death. Despite the people's arguments and requests that sati system was part of the prestige and honour of the king and his family, he did not approve it. In favour of the continuation of the sati system people tried to exploit the sentiments of the Maharaja saying that a sati woman was source and medium of the heaven for the deceased king. The Maharaja replied them that if he has to take the help of a sati woman to go to heaven, he did not want to go to heaven. Finally, the Maharaja succeeded in convincing at least the people of his own surroundings that sati was a social evil and not a tradition. The impact of the Maharaja's efforts for the eradication of sati system may be estimated from the fact that after his death no women performed sati with him.

To stop the girl infanticide he spread the message that birth of a daughter was not against the prestige of the Rajputs. He himself established an example of it. Despite having two sons he sought the blessing of the faqirs and prayed to the God for getting a daughter. Ultimately a queen of the Maharaja gave birth to a daughter. He named the daughter Bua Bodhan and brought up her with all care. He did not make any distinction between the sons and daughter in terms of affection. He asked the people to follow him in this regard. It is said that most of the Rajputs followed the suggestions of the Raja and welcomed the birth of daughters during the Maharaja's period.

During the Maharaja's period the kaftar was an other social evil which caused great harassment to the women. The kaftar practice was an illegal source of the income of some people. According to this practice, if any child of a particular area suffered from any serious disease or died. The people made a woman responsible for the death of the child. They levelled a charge against her that she ate the lever of the child. Through the divala, the performer of the Kaftar they publicly declared the woman as liver eater. Afterwards the Government officials imprisoned her and imposed fine on her. If she failed to pay the fine, she was humiliated through different ways such as shaving her head, blackening her face and seating her on an ass. Maharaja Ranjit Dev put a ban on the kaftar practice.

Maharaja Ranjit Dev was a very liberal and enlightened king of Jammu in terms of formulating state policies. He extended large favour to the Muslims. George Forster, an English traveller, visited Jammu in second half of the eighteenth century. He was very much impressed with the broad religious policy of the Maharaja. According to him, the Maharaja provided allotted a large number of houses to the Muslims and named that locality Maghalpura. He built a mosque for the Muslims. The Maharaja respected the sentiments of the Muslims very much. Whenever he passed through the areas of the Muslims during their prayer, he came down from his house and did not move till the priest continued the rituals. George Forster records that once some Hindus complained the Maharaja that the public wells of the town were defiled by the pots of the Muslims. Therefore, the Muslims were to be stopped for fetching water from the wells and they were to be restricted to the water of the river. The Maharaja dismissed the complaint and declared it irreasonable. He told them that water was a pure element, designed for the general use of mankind, and could not be polluted by the touch of any kind of people.

The liberal and tolerant policies of the Maharaja Ranjit Dev made Jammu state as one of the most secured and powerful states of the enghteenth century north India. A large number of merchants came to Jammu from the neighbouring states and contributed to the flourishment of trade and commerce in the region. According to Ganeshdas Badehara, a historian of the nineteenth century and author of Rajdarshani,"...on account of the fame of the justice and equity, high morality and virtues of Raja Ranjit Dev merchants and respectable persons from all around came of the Chakla of Jammu and settled there; wealthy people came in so large numbers that heaps of uncovered ashrafis were seen in shops but no body dared to look at them with covetous eyes, and women bedecked in ornament travelled alone on deserted roads and through jungles without fear. Every body lived in his days in peace and pleasure. It is said that about ten thousand shops were strewn in the bazaar of Jammu spreading from Dhaunthali to the site below Gumat. A number of famous Punjabi Khatris like Lala Pindi Das, Jwala Nath, Bal Hira Nand, Jog Das, Shahzada Mal, Kunj Lal Manh, Milkhi Shah, and father of Bahar Singh Bedehra, and others, who were men of lakhs lived in Jammu. What to speak of the Dogra merchants, Brahmans and Mahajans, whose description is beyond the scope of this brief accound." Ganeshdas Badehra describes Jammu as Darul Aman (Abode of Peace) under Ranjit Dev.

It may be mentioned that eighteenth century was the period in which most part of the north India were facing socio-economic and political crisis. Most part of the north India were affected from the foreign invasions of Nader Shah and Ahmed Shah Abdali. But it was Maharaja Ranjit Dev of Jammu who kept Jammu socio-economically safe and strong with his liberal and broad policies.

Thus Maharaha Ranjit Dev did many things for the welfare of his people for which many states of India are struggling during modern period. Maharaja Ranjit Dev established that only the enlightenment and reason could be basis of the progress of humanity. Through his policies he not only established himself as just and wise ruler, but more importantly he also gave a right direction to his people for progress and peace.

Cease-fire and after
TALES OF TRAVESTY

By Dr. Jitendra Singh

If one is to believe the dictum "well begun is half done", the outcome of the recently announced Indo-Pak cease-fire is "so far so good". What follows in the days, weeks and months to come will, however, make all the difference.

History bears testimony that wars have always been fought in the bid to bring peace. If that is so, it is high time the two countries realised that it is not worth engaging in another war before ushering in an era of peace. Nevertheless, this might sound too idealistic a proposition not taking into account the covert proxy war which Pakistan's ISI has incessantly launched against India for the past several years and which is now gradually slipping out of the control of President Parvez Musharraf who in the past made no effort to contain the various terrorist groups operating from Pakistan as long as they caused nuisance for India. It is this fact precisely contributing to a considerable degree of sceptism in the Indian mind regarding the sincerity and seriousness of Pakistan's commitment to its cease-fire declaration.

The popular belief is that Islamabad's cease-fire decision has been taken under mounting pressure from Washington. Even if this is true, it angurs well for the people of both India and Pakistan. On the one hand, Musharraf is losing the domestic mandate for continuance of his dictatorial regime. On the other hand, a whole new generation of young Pakistanis has grown aspiring for the enormous benefits of global hi-tech revolution-cum-economic breakthroughs not available within their own country but readily available at an affordable price in their own vicinity in neighbouring India. These youngsters may be nursing a feeling of competitive rivalry with their Indian counterparts in fields ranging from technology to economy or from cricket to cinema but they are not much impressed by the Hurriyat rhetoric of "independence" or the Musharraf "cry" over Kashmir.

Even as diplomatic initiatives like declaration of cease-fire are important for giving a positive direction to Indo-Pak relations, it is the honesty behind such an initiative which would determine its ultimate outcome. Justice, they say, should not only be done, it should also appear to have been done. For any viable peace between the two countries, the powers-that-be in Islamabad would not only have to stop clandestine support to militancy in Jammu and Kashmir as well as in other parts of India but would also convincingly appear to have done so. That alone can restore confidence or credibility of any overtly declared Pak initiative for peace.

While each passing day since the announcement of the cease-fire is being watched with guarded optimism by people on the two sides of International Border, it is actually the common man on both sides who religiously prays for the cessation of continuing hostility between the two countries. Umapathy's heartfelt appeal finds echo in a couplet by contemporary Pakistan poetess Zohra Nigah "Meri Zameen Bhi Tumhaari Zameen Se Milti Hai; Deed-a-Peer-e-Hasti, Be-basi Bhi Ek Si Hai"

Keep the flag high

By Brig (Retd) K Jagmohan Singh

Horrors of war are well known. Proxy war is still worst, being an act of stabbing in the back. This leaves behind a trail of destruction and death, letting loose tales of woes, misery, eternally bleeding sores and sorrows. Both victor and vanquished have wounds to lick, the left overs disabled, widows, orphans, old and infirm yearning just to exist. These are un-deniably, to its maximum remain the burden of nations, involving a gigantic task of their rehabilitation.

Be that as it may, after independence, India has been forced into five regular wars including Kargil and militancy in J&K. On the other hand J&K perhaps is one State in the country which feeds 100 per cent three regiments i.e J&K Rifles, JAKLI and Ladakh Scouts, in addition to a substantial subscription to some other regiments like Dogras, Punjab, Grenadiers Armed Corps, Artillery, Engineers, Signals and the Services. It also subscribes to other two services Navy and Air Force.

To add, soldiers from J&K have earned maximum Gallantry Awards so much so even the very first Gallantary Award MVC of the Independent India was won by none other than a State subject Late Brig Rajinder Singh. Besides others, even in last Kargil operations, 13 JAK Rifles, won the maximum number of highest awards. Thus the State Subjects as soldiers have earned by their supreme sacrifices, unique laurels and done proud to the State as no other organ has put the State at such a higher pedestal.

In J&K alone Indian Army has been fighting terrorism for the last more than 12 years- upright without any grouse or grievances or hesitation.

During this period of terrorism let loose by Pakistan, more than a clossal number of 70,000 innocent civilians, Army men and Security Forces men have been killed. Though it is said that terrorism is an international phenomenon yet no other country has suffered such colossal losses and its Armed Forces, Security Forces are subjected to such severe strains that a lesser being would have cracked by now.

Then there is the problem of their rehabilitation including old and infirm having lost their young ones to look after them, are to fend for a helping hand for their remaining years. It is a stupenduous task demanding stupendous resources. No State however affluent can afford to meet this contingency in full. That is where peoples participation and helping hand assumes significance and stress.

Problems

Particularly after Kargil operations, the Government has sanctioned liberal grants for the war casualities. This has divided the problem into two different categories :-

Category-I

Present casuality receives grants amounting to several lakhs. This has created a problem of plenty with our present society en-mashed in materialism, some of widows, orphans, even the old and infirms are herassed and deprived of their grant money.

Though suggestion has been made, depending upon the age and requirement of the recepient, Govt may consider issue of time bound bonds, but these can also be brokened. This also includes deprivation of their share of ancestral land and other properties. Thus they require protection against such selfish people. Then there should be a provision for their safe living. Assistance to old and infirm, settlement of their children etc. The alternative in such cases may be to establish, call them Rehabilitation Homes, funded by the affected partly, state and common man. Planned to fulfil the said needs 26 Inf. Div. has constructed a complex for widows and orphans at Jammu. But these would require substantial resources and can be undertaken in a phased, manner priority/area wise.

Category-II

However all such casualities since 1947 till 1987, had been comparatively very poorly awarded. These are the cases which require financial assistance for marriage of their daughters, repair of old houses, medical treatment including medicines for serious ailments and so on. Requirements are as numerous as human demands. In some cases financial assistance is required even for their very sustenance and existence. They are the bulk of requirement today that is where Armed Forces Flag Day Fund remains more important.

This is exclusively to mitigate sufferings of war casualities and very needy ex-servicemen. Each case is scrutinised before the award. Fund is managed by a committee under the chairmanship of the Governor of the State.

Donations are collected for a Priceless token flag because there is no amount fixed as a price of one flag. These are undertaken by Sainik Welfare Deptt. Ambphalla on 07 Dec and continue till 31 March next year. Donations can also be deposited with the said Department against a proper receipt. Donations are exempted from Income Tax under section 15-B of Income Tax Act, 1961.

There was a time when the collections of J&K State, as a whole did not exceed Rs 30,000/- yearly viz-a-viz Crores collected by some other States. Then State participation and assistance was arranged and State Govt constituted District Level Committees under respective DCs. Awards were also introduced as an incentive for those exceeding in amounts collected.

Last year a total sum of Rs 7,35,097/- only has been collected. Though D C Udhampur and ZSWO, Jammu continue to maintain the lead, yet the effort is asking for an improvement.

APPEAL

Look at the men holding the Flag high. They have old parents, wife and children back home most anxiously waiting for them. But for them life and death is a matter of moment. They are bearing our burdens, so it is incumbent for the people to share their burdens. Therefore let us all buy the token Flag, so much so that all the stocks get exhausted.

For it is now your turn to keep the Flag High.

Wanted a better male partner

By Sweta Patwardhan

The concept of reproductive health has a lot to do with gender relations. This concept is no more confined to just family planning and contraception but also embraces satisfying and safe sex life as an integral part of reproductive span of life.

The ability of men and women to achieve and maintain sexual health and manage their reproductive lives free from coercion and fear depends upon the kind of relationship they share. If egalitarian relationships between men and women are absent, women not only have disproportionate responsibility of bearing, nurturing, restricting and regulating the number of children, but also to protect themselves from unwanted pregnancy and unsafe sex without really being equipped to do so.

We now have considerable evidence to show that men’s attitude and behaviour profoundly affect women’s ability to exercise choice and attain positive health outcomes.

In the West, single parenting by women is a common phenomenon and men are fast losing their traditional bread-earners’ role. Although in India the loss of traditional roles for men is not an issue as yet, but women are carving out wider niches for themselves.

Also, women’s expectations from marriage are changing. While men still want to have a traditional all-in-one woman as wives, more and more women are looking for companions and soul mates and meaningful associations to flourish as individuals as well as to grow together.

This sociological change is, in a way, threatening and confusing for most men. This coupled with increasing urbanisation and nuclear families require that men become sensitive in a manner that will help them handle changing idioms in gender relationships in a better way.

Despite stereotypes, avenues for women are expanding and their roles are constantly being defined and redefined even if largely within the orbit of domesticity and family. Unfortunately, however, whereas women have received support in their struggle, very little support is available to men. Although it sounds absurd as well as counter-productive, helping men get out of the gender stereotypes in which they have been entrapped for much too long will be empowering for them.

Empowerment for them is to be personally and collectively able to resist social constraints and pressures in transgressing the limits of traditionally defined model of masculinity and get rid of the whole baggage of burdens that goes with it. Yet, while it is politically correct and desirable to talk of women’s empowerment, voices for men’s empowerment are either absent or indistinct to say the least.

The approach paper to the Tenth Five Year Plan acknowledged the need for men’s participation in Planned Parenthood movement by sensitising them towards their responsibility in reproductive and sexual health so that they can be supportive partners to their counterparts in achieving their sexual happiness and reproductive goals together.

Men can be addressed in several ways. At the conceptual level, the way to address men will be to place them within a wider framework of gender relations and to bring out systematically gender as an analytical category in reproductive health in such a way that the differential treatment of women and men become self-evident without being offensive or confrontational.

The process of gender sensitisation has to go hand in hand with structural support at the operational level through programmes that focus on men through service provision, innovative and sensitive education/training and communication in preventive as well as promotional reproductive health activities.

Men can be helped to unlearn the societal myths and misconceptions woven around their reproductive behaviour and the site of that behaviour, the body. For example, it is important for men to know that women often acquire STDs from men and that they tend to be biologically at higher risk of transmission of the disease than vice versa.

It is important for them to know that they have the deciding chromosome as far as the sex of the unborn child is concerned. It is important for them to know that women undergo the same trauma and labour pains whether the child is a boy or girl, alive or dead and require the same care instead of differential treatment based on the sex of the newborn.

In order to alter male behaviour, it is not enough to work at the individual level only. The collective societal norms need change. For example, field experiences of non-governmental organisations do indicate that innovative interventions result in increased gender awareness and attitudinal change, but translating them into actual behaviour is far more difficult unless that behaviour is socially sanctioned.

A classic example would more be that of a husband who helps his wife in the kitchen or in changing a baby’s diaper when they are alone, but refuses to come anywhere close to the kitchen when parents or other members of the family are around. A recent newspaper report from Sweden on men taking parental leave had one man explaining why it was easier for him to take that leave because everybody else was doing it and it was a ‘done thing’.

Apart from the social justice objective of gender equity, there is a real practical need to address men. Research shows that men know very little about their own bodies and that they have their own fears and apprehensions, worries and sexual anxieties revolving round sexual myths and misconceptions of all sorts that continue to be perpetuated without any rectification through informed knowledge or services.

One myth having a crucial bearing on male reproductive behaviour can be cited at this juncture. The Sanskrit term for semen is virya, which has been associated with masculinity and strength (in the Vedic period and in numerous mythological texts, a common form of blessings to men used to be: viryavan bhav which translates as ‘be strong and masculine’). Indian literature on male sterilisation is full of references where vasectomy is believed to result in loss or deterioration of the quality of semen and because of its classical association, in masculine strength. These misconceptions are deeply ingrained and become real for those who believe in them. Unless these are dealt with, nothing much can be achieved even with the most modern methods.

How reproductive health needs are posited within the wider concerns of health is crucial for them to become acceptable to men. It is, therefore important to establish the linkages between more readily identifiable health risks with what may still be perceived as exceptional or distant.

Again, it is crucial to know that the susceptibility to HIV infection increases as much as nine fold in the presence of preventable and treatable sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Research in Tanzania has confirmed that treatment of STIs can reduce HIV transmission by more than 40 per cent.

One of the widely expressed concerns, which is probably a legitimate one, is that involving men in reproductive health matters should not be at the expense of appropriating of women’s domain and their limited rights of privacy and control of their bodies by men. This concern arises because men who are generally better equipped and more articulate may highjack women’s agenda by usurping what has traditionally been women’s territory. However, this argument should not be used as a stalking horse to retain and reinforce persisting unequal responsibilities ascribed to women and men in reproductive matters. Because domain identification itself is an outcome of age-old social conditioning about behaviours that are understood as "typically female or typically male".

One may ask whether delineation of domains is not characterised by a proper mix of responsibilities and decision-making powers and if not, whether in the ultimate analysis keeping men out from specific domain may, in fact amount to maintaining the status quo?

The point is who charts the territories of the set domains and should these territories remain fixed or continuously evolve and change to keep pace with changing social structure? Moreover, if the demand to involve men comes from women themselves and if men are involved in accordance with their wishes, as is the case in many non-governmental efforts, men involvement may actually expand women’s choices. INAV



|
home | state | national | business | editorial | advertisement | sports |
|
international | weather | mailbag | suggestions | search |
subscribe | send mail |