EDITORIAL
Promises
to keep
and break
What a relief? Mr Dilip
Singh Judeo must be saying this to himself. He can very
happily and proudly twist and twirl his moustache. His
kingly symbol is not only safe but has also become his
flagship. Yes, the same Mr Judeo who was caught on tape
accepting cash from some alleged wheeler-dealer. In fact,
the adverse publicity surrounding this incident had
further strengthened his faith in his moustache. This had
only led him to affirm more than once what he had said
earlier. Publicly he had announced that he would shave
off this emblem of his royal lineage were his political
outfit, Bharatiya Janata Party, to lose in Chhattisgarh.
No wonder, his moustache had become popular long before
the cash-on-camera scandal had been televised. Right in
the beginning of the electioneering, he had betted on his
prized possession. To help him retain his look, his party
had shown him flying around in a helicopter among his
former subjects. After all, he is a former ruler. He can
do no wrong in the eyes of his erstwhile subjects. How
will the loyal masses let him down? No way, no way. It is
not known who gave Mr Judeo the idea of announcing that
he should opt for a clean face. How is that possible for
a modern-day politician who has to meet excessively high
expenditure on his elections? It is good for him that he
stands vindicated in the end. He doesnt have to
part with his formidable asset......more
|
|
Peoples
verdict
against the Congress
By K.N. Pandita
Four States went to
assembly polls. Three have fall in the lap of BJP and
only one goes.......more
Ranjit
Dev, an
enlightened king of Jammu
By Prof Jigar Mohammed
The modern Jammu region
was divided into twenty two states during the......more
Cease-fire
and after
TALES OF TRAVESTY
By Dr. Jitendra Singh
If one is to believe the
dictum "well begun is half done", the outcome
of the recently......more
Keep
the flag high
By Brig (Retd) K Jagmohan Singh
Horrors of war are well
known. Proxy war is still worst, being an act of stabbing
.....more
Wanted
a better male partner
By Sweta Patwardhan
The concept of
reproductive health has a lot to do with gender
relations. This concept is no.....more
|
EDITORIAL
Promises to keep and
break
What a relief? Mr Dilip
Singh Judeo must be saying this to himself. He can very
happily and proudly twist and twirl his moustache. His
kingly symbol is not only safe but has also become his
flagship. Yes, the same Mr Judeo who was caught on tape
accepting cash from some alleged wheeler-dealer. In fact,
the adverse publicity surrounding this incident had
further strengthened his faith in his moustache. This had
only led him to affirm more than once what he had said
earlier. Publicly he had announced that he would shave
off this emblem of his royal lineage were his political
outfit, Bharatiya Janata Party, to lose in Chhattisgarh.
No wonder, his moustache had become popular long before
the cash-on-camera scandal had been televised. Right in
the beginning of the electioneering, he had betted on his
prized possession. To help him retain his look, his party
had shown him flying around in a helicopter among his
former subjects. After all, he is a former ruler. He can
do no wrong in the eyes of his erstwhile subjects. How
will the loyal masses let him down? No way, no way. It is
not known who gave Mr Judeo the idea of announcing that
he should opt for a clean face. How is that possible for
a modern-day politician who has to meet excessively high
expenditure on his elections? It is good for him that he
stands vindicated in the end. He doesnt have to
part with his formidable asset. One is unable to
understand why Madhya Pradesh, of which Chhattisgarh was
a part not very long ago, should make all the interesting
news. If one hears of a Sadhvi taking over as the
Chief Minister of a state and a ruler opting for sanyas,
it is again in MP. The saffron-clad Uma Bharati would be
the new boss of MP. Her immediate predecessor Digvijay
Singh, who has a royal background, has already stated
that he would not opt for any position for ten years if
the Congress was defeated in the Assembly elections. He
has again said, now that the party under his leadership
has been decisively routed, that he would continue to
work as an ordinary worker. He would not contest the next
Lok Sabha and Assembly elections also. Why should
politicians make such noises? One is unable to appreciate
their plight. Why should one make promises befitting
those entering a wresting arena? There is no physical
combat that is involved in political field. Politics is a
battle of ideas. Of brain. And, certainly not that of
brawn. Therefore, one does not find an Ashok Gehlot or a
Madan Lal Khurana making a promise they cant keep.
Neither of them has talked of retirement. Both of them
have been in public life since their early ages and know
its stresses and strains. It is only Mr Ajit Jogi who has
said he would opt out of political life two years later
when he would be 60. Not many may be aware that Mr Jogi
would have in any case retired from active life on the
completion of six decades of his life. That is the age on
the completion of which a bureaucrat should retire. For
those who dont recall, the defeated Chhattisgarh
Chief Minister had begun his career as a bureaucrat. Our
own Ghulam Nabi Azad can teach them a few things. When he
was in charge of the campaign of his party chief Sonia
Gandhi in a Karnataka Lok Sabha election, Mr Azad had
openly said that he would give up his position in the
Congress if his party president did not win by more than
one lakh votes. As it had happened, Ms Gandhis
victory margin had fallen short of his expectations. On
being reminded of his promise by Ms Sushma Swaraj, who
had opposed Ms Gandhi in that election, in a televised
encounter, Mr Azad has just laughed it off remarking some
thing like his sister was merely diverting
the subject that was under discussion at that time. That
is the stuff the real politicians are made of. What do
these inheritors of royal largesse know about making
promises?
|
Peoples
verdict against the Congress
By K.N.
Pandita
Four
States went to assembly polls. Three have
fall in the lap of BJP and only one goes
Congress. BJP has won with a thumping
majority.
Before we
proceed to analyze the result of these
elections, we generally and the
contesting parties particularly forget
that winning or loosing the elections is
not as important as the purpose for which
elections are held.
Our
political culture seldom understands that
loosing the elections does not mean
rejection for all times to come. It also
does not mean lessening the burden of
responsibility and commitment for the
winning group. Winning the election is
not a passport for indulging in vulgar
excitement.
The
Congress party has to learn many unsavory
lessons. It can no more cash on its past
history, idealism and rhetoric. It has to
come out of that cocoon and behave in a
pragmatic manner.
Surely, it
has outplayed the card of Hindu
communalism attributable to the BJP. The
generation to which the Congress sold the
commodity for several decades is gone but
the hollow slogan has remained. The
tantrum is unintelligible to the
contemporary youth.
Ever since
the BJP led NDA government at the
center and BJP governments in some states
came to power, the Congress has been
ritually reciting the mantra of
BJPs Hindutav agenda, BJP as the
communalist party and BJP as the spoiler
etc. This one-point agenda like that of
Pakistans one-point agenda on
Kashmir, has boomeranged on it. This is
one of the biggest caused of Congress
debacle. Yet the diehards in the party
would not concede the truth.
Congress
must try to feel the pulse of the people.
Te verdict of the people is that of
outright rejection of the above stated
one-point agenda. Congress must realize
that BJP and its coalition partners are
as genuine nationalist parties as is
theirs. It has to learn to respect the
status and popularity of the BJP. In
doing so it will be respecting the Indian
electorate, from which the ultimate power
flows.
The
incumbency phenomenon is no more tenable.
It was at one point of time. But things
have changed. Essentially, the voter has
matured and is more responsive to social
responsibilities. Incumbency is an alibi
that the Congress and for that matter all
big nationalist political parties should
put in cold storage.
In
ultimate analysis it is the concrete
contribution to the raising of the level
of life that counts and that the
electorate considers as the test of the
person it would be voting for.
Another
serious flaw of which Congress is a
chronic patient is the blind observance
of and faith in the cult of personality.
Those legendary personalities are
confined to the pages of the books of
history. Their replicas will never be
produced. Therefore, Congress echelons
should learn to be original, discreet and
have an integrity that carries weight.
Discipline is all right but it does not
mean compromising with originality,
discretion and integrity.
During
past four years of NDA rule, Congress
has, by and large, behaved like a
quarrelsome urchin. It has learnt to
oppose everything at every place and
every occasion. Essentially what Congress
needs to learn and to teach its cadres is
the culture of responsible opposition.
Generally
Congress leaders have been reaping the
harvest sown by their illustrious
predecessors. We have seen how they
created rowdy scenes during the sessions
of the Parliament. We have seen how they
staged walkouts when crucial bills were
debated: how they obstructed the treasury
benches from replying their allegations.
In short we have seen them behaving as if
they were in the battlefield arrayed
against an enemy whom they must vanquish
with all the weapons in their stockpile.
This would include defamation,
disinformation, calumny, blackmail and
proxying.
In true
sense of the term the loser from this
negative politics is the nation in the
long run. It is extremely disappointing
that the Congress stalwarts while
analyzing their defeat at the polls try
to tell the audience in muffled voice
that the BJP played the communal card
with the voter.
Lastly,
the minority vote bank strategy has begun
to fail. Its failing symptoms been
visible in the previous Lok Sabha
elections. But now it has become crystal
clear to all and especially to the
Congress, which has been projecting
itself the sole protector of the
minorities, that vote bank strategy has
not only failed but is likely to become
counter productive. The common Indian
voter including the members of the
minority community, have given ample
proof of this healthy change. If the
Congress wants to recover from the
present onslaught, it must publicly say
that it will seek votes on the basis of
more important priorities than on
so-called protection of minorities.
Countrys politico-social system is
now strong and dependable enough to
provide protection to the minorities and
all other sections.
The
election has shown that the real plank
for success would be the ability of the
political parties to provide good
governance. During the period of the NDA,
many mega scams have been uncovered that
have had roots deep and widespread. This
is one facet of good governance. However,
it does not mean that the NDA has been
able to stem the rot and that there is
nothing more to be done. Far from it. But
at least accountability process has
started. Being a democratic country run
by the law, one cannot be impatient with
the wheel of justice moving slowly but
surely and at its own pace.
Parliamentary
elections are round the corner. Both of
the major political parties of national
standing will now gear up to the
parliamentary polls. Congresss path
is strewn with thorns. There is in
fighting in the party, the legacy carried
from generation to generation. There is,
unfortunately, great dearth of great
minds and intellectuals in this party to
think big and act big. The minions and
sycophants, the self-servers and
flatterers hanging round the top
leadership are the rot that needs
scalpel. We do not know whether the party
leadership has the vision and the
strength to act drastically. The
situation as one perceives it today is
that the top leadership is shaky and its
vision is blurred. Only a supernatural
force can guide the beleaguered second
rung leadership, which must now come out
of its cocoon and act swiftly.
This does
not mean that the NDA and more
particularly BJP are out of woods. This
party must do something to shut the mouth
of loose talkers and brow beaters. It
must chalk out the roadmap for true and
genuine secularism not to be
produced through appeasement, blackmail
or flattery. The minority, in whatever
form and shape it is, shall be served
fine if it is made to share political
power and decision-making process. This
principle should have universal and not
selective application. It should become
central to a process of good governance.
I think
the winning party should be extremely
modest and humble because the people of
India have reposed trust in it, and given
them an opportunity not to loot the
country but to serve the nation. Any
sincere servant of the people should have
the humility to fulfill the promises he
or she has made.
|
 |
Ranjit
Dev, an enlightened king of Jammu
By Prof
Jigar Mohammed
The modern
Jammu region was divided into twenty two
states during the medieval period. Almost
all the twenty two states were ruled by
the Rajput dynasties. Jammu, Jasrota,
Bilaur, Kishtwar, Rajouri, Bhimber were
the important states of the region. Jammu
as a state occupied the dominant position
in the region. The rulers of Jammu not
only enjoyed respect and power at local
level, but they established close
contacts with the Sultans and Mughal
emperors of Delhi. The Mughal emperor
Jahangir (1605-27) was very much
impressed by the administrative qualities
of Raja Sangram of Jammu. In his
autobiography, entitled
Tuzuk-i-Jahangiri, Jahangir mentions Raja
Sangram as one of his important
commanders. Similarly Raja Hari Dev
(1658-1707) of Jammu acted as one of the
prominent commanders of the Mughal
emperor Aurangzeb (1658-1707). However,
Jammu became one of the dominant states
of the north India during the reign of
Maharaja Ranjit Dev (1733-82), During his
reign Jammu witnessed substantial changes
in its socio-political and economic life.
Before the
accession of Ranjit Dev several social
evils existed in Jammu. The people not
only practised them, but they also
legitimized them with their conservative
arguments and ideas. The existed social
evils such as Sari system, girl
infanticide, adultery, interest demand
(sud) and certain other superstitious
practices narrowed the socio-economic and
political developments of Jammu region.
When Maharaja Ranjit Dev ascended the
throne he decided not only to work for
the removal of the anti-social practices
from Jammu, but he also planned to
accelerate the economic and political
developments of his State.
To check
the sati system Maharaja Ranjit Dev first
decided to restrict his own family
members to follow the practice. He asked
his sons, chiefs, courtiers and other
relations that no woman was to be allowed
to perform sati with him after his death.
Despite the people's arguments and
requests that sati system was part of the
prestige and honour of the king and his
family, he did not approve it. In favour
of the continuation of the sati system
people tried to exploit the sentiments of
the Maharaja saying that a sati woman was
source and medium of the heaven for the
deceased king. The Maharaja replied them
that if he has to take the help of a sati
woman to go to heaven, he did not want to
go to heaven. Finally, the Maharaja
succeeded in convincing at least the
people of his own surroundings that sati
was a social evil and not a tradition.
The impact of the Maharaja's efforts for
the eradication of sati system may be
estimated from the fact that after his
death no women performed sati with him.
To stop
the girl infanticide he spread the
message that birth of a daughter was not
against the prestige of the Rajputs. He
himself established an example of it.
Despite having two sons he sought the
blessing of the faqirs and prayed to the
God for getting a daughter. Ultimately a
queen of the Maharaja gave birth to a
daughter. He named the daughter Bua
Bodhan and brought up her with all care.
He did not make any distinction between
the sons and daughter in terms of
affection. He asked the people to follow
him in this regard. It is said that most
of the Rajputs followed the suggestions
of the Raja and welcomed the birth of
daughters during the Maharaja's period.
During the
Maharaja's period the kaftar was an other
social evil which caused great harassment
to the women. The kaftar practice was an
illegal source of the income of some
people. According to this practice, if
any child of a particular area suffered
from any serious disease or died. The
people made a woman responsible for the
death of the child. They levelled a
charge against her that she ate the lever
of the child. Through the divala, the
performer of the Kaftar they publicly
declared the woman as liver eater.
Afterwards the Government officials
imprisoned her and imposed fine on her.
If she failed to pay the fine, she was
humiliated through different ways such as
shaving her head, blackening her face and
seating her on an ass. Maharaja Ranjit
Dev put a ban on the kaftar practice.
Maharaja
Ranjit Dev was a very liberal and
enlightened king of Jammu in terms of
formulating state policies. He extended
large favour to the Muslims. George
Forster, an English traveller, visited
Jammu in second half of the eighteenth
century. He was very much impressed with
the broad religious policy of the
Maharaja. According to him, the Maharaja
provided allotted a large number of
houses to the Muslims and named that
locality Maghalpura. He built a mosque
for the Muslims. The Maharaja respected
the sentiments of the Muslims very much.
Whenever he passed through the areas of
the Muslims during their prayer, he came
down from his house and did not move till
the priest continued the rituals. George
Forster records that once some Hindus
complained the Maharaja that the public
wells of the town were defiled by the
pots of the Muslims. Therefore, the
Muslims were to be stopped for fetching
water from the wells and they were to be
restricted to the water of the river. The
Maharaja dismissed the complaint and
declared it irreasonable. He told them
that water was a pure element, designed
for the general use of mankind, and could
not be polluted by the touch of any kind
of people.
The
liberal and tolerant policies of the
Maharaja Ranjit Dev made Jammu state as
one of the most secured and powerful
states of the enghteenth century north
India. A large number of merchants came
to Jammu from the neighbouring states and
contributed to the flourishment of trade
and commerce in the region. According to
Ganeshdas Badehara, a historian of the
nineteenth century and author of
Rajdarshani,"...on account of the
fame of the justice and equity, high
morality and virtues of Raja Ranjit Dev
merchants and respectable persons from
all around came of the Chakla of Jammu
and settled there; wealthy people came in
so large numbers that heaps of uncovered
ashrafis were seen in shops but no body
dared to look at them with covetous eyes,
and women bedecked in ornament travelled
alone on deserted roads and through
jungles without fear. Every body lived in
his days in peace and pleasure. It is
said that about ten thousand shops were
strewn in the bazaar of Jammu spreading
from Dhaunthali to the site below Gumat.
A number of famous Punjabi Khatris like
Lala Pindi Das, Jwala Nath, Bal Hira
Nand, Jog Das, Shahzada Mal, Kunj Lal
Manh, Milkhi Shah, and father of Bahar
Singh Bedehra, and others, who were men
of lakhs lived in Jammu. What to speak of
the Dogra merchants, Brahmans and
Mahajans, whose description is beyond the
scope of this brief accound."
Ganeshdas Badehra describes Jammu as
Darul Aman (Abode of Peace) under Ranjit
Dev.
It may be
mentioned that eighteenth century was the
period in which most part of the north
India were facing socio-economic and
political crisis. Most part of the north
India were affected from the foreign
invasions of Nader Shah and Ahmed Shah
Abdali. But it was Maharaja Ranjit Dev of
Jammu who kept Jammu socio-economically
safe and strong with his liberal and
broad policies.
Thus
Maharaha Ranjit Dev did many things for
the welfare of his people for which many
states of India are struggling during
modern period. Maharaja Ranjit Dev
established that only the enlightenment
and reason could be basis of the progress
of humanity. Through his policies he not
only established himself as just and wise
ruler, but more importantly he also gave
a right direction to his people for
progress and peace.
|
|
Cease-fire
and after
TALES OF TRAVESTY
By Dr. Jitendra Singh
If one is to
believe the dictum "well begun is half
done", the outcome of the recently announced
Indo-Pak cease-fire is "so far so
good". What follows in the days, weeks and
months to come will, however, make all the
difference.
History bears
testimony that wars have always been fought in
the bid to bring peace. If that is so, it is high
time the two countries realised that it is not
worth engaging in another war before ushering in
an era of peace. Nevertheless, this might sound
too idealistic a proposition not taking into
account the covert proxy war which Pakistan's ISI
has incessantly launched against India for the
past several years and which is now gradually
slipping out of the control of President Parvez
Musharraf who in the past made no effort to
contain the various terrorist groups operating
from Pakistan as long as they caused nuisance for
India. It is this fact precisely contributing to
a considerable degree of sceptism in the Indian
mind regarding the sincerity and seriousness of
Pakistan's commitment to its cease-fire
declaration.
The popular
belief is that Islamabad's cease-fire decision
has been taken under mounting pressure from
Washington. Even if this is true, it angurs well
for the people of both India and Pakistan. On the
one hand, Musharraf is losing the domestic
mandate for continuance of his dictatorial
regime. On the other hand, a whole new generation
of young Pakistanis has grown aspiring for the
enormous benefits of global hi-tech
revolution-cum-economic breakthroughs not
available within their own country but readily
available at an affordable price in their own
vicinity in neighbouring India. These youngsters
may be nursing a feeling of competitive rivalry
with their Indian counterparts in fields ranging
from technology to economy or from cricket to
cinema but they are not much impressed by the
Hurriyat rhetoric of "independence" or
the Musharraf "cry" over Kashmir.
Even as
diplomatic initiatives like declaration of
cease-fire are important for giving a positive
direction to Indo-Pak relations, it is the
honesty behind such an initiative which would
determine its ultimate outcome. Justice, they
say, should not only be done, it should also
appear to have been done. For any viable peace
between the two countries, the powers-that-be in
Islamabad would not only have to stop clandestine
support to militancy in Jammu and Kashmir as well
as in other parts of India but would also
convincingly appear to have done so. That alone
can restore confidence or credibility of any
overtly declared Pak initiative for peace.
While each passing
day since the announcement of the cease-fire is
being watched with guarded optimism by people on
the two sides of International Border, it is
actually the common man on both sides who
religiously prays for the cessation of continuing
hostility between the two countries. Umapathy's
heartfelt appeal finds echo in a couplet by
contemporary Pakistan poetess Zohra Nigah "Meri
Zameen Bhi Tumhaari Zameen Se Milti Hai;
Deed-a-Peer-e-Hasti, Be-basi Bhi Ek Si Hai"
|
Keep
the flag high
By Brig (Retd) K Jagmohan
Singh
Horrors of war are
well known. Proxy war is still worst, being an
act of stabbing in the back. This leaves behind a
trail of destruction and death, letting loose
tales of woes, misery, eternally bleeding sores
and sorrows. Both victor and vanquished have
wounds to lick, the left overs disabled, widows,
orphans, old and infirm yearning just to exist.
These are un-deniably, to its maximum remain the
burden of nations, involving a gigantic task of
their rehabilitation.
Be that as it may,
after independence, India has been forced into
five regular wars including Kargil and militancy
in J&K. On the other hand J&K perhaps is
one State in the country which feeds 100 per cent
three regiments i.e J&K Rifles, JAKLI and
Ladakh Scouts, in addition to a substantial
subscription to some other regiments like Dogras,
Punjab, Grenadiers Armed Corps, Artillery,
Engineers, Signals and the Services. It also
subscribes to other two services Navy and Air
Force.
To add, soldiers
from J&K have earned maximum Gallantry Awards
so much so even the very first Gallantary Award
MVC of the Independent India was won by none
other than a State subject Late Brig Rajinder
Singh. Besides others, even in last Kargil
operations, 13 JAK Rifles, won the maximum number
of highest awards. Thus the State Subjects as
soldiers have earned by their supreme sacrifices,
unique laurels and done proud to the State as no
other organ has put the State at such a higher
pedestal.
In J&K alone
Indian Army has been fighting terrorism for the
last more than 12 years- upright without any
grouse or grievances or hesitation.
During this period
of terrorism let loose by Pakistan, more than a
clossal number of 70,000 innocent civilians, Army
men and Security Forces men have been killed.
Though it is said that terrorism is an
international phenomenon yet no other country has
suffered such colossal losses and its Armed
Forces, Security Forces are subjected to such
severe strains that a lesser being would have
cracked by now.
Then there is the
problem of their rehabilitation including old and
infirm having lost their young ones to look after
them, are to fend for a helping hand for their
remaining years. It is a stupenduous task
demanding stupendous resources. No State however
affluent can afford to meet this contingency in
full. That is where peoples participation and
helping hand assumes significance and stress.
Problems
Particularly after
Kargil operations, the Government has sanctioned
liberal grants for the war casualities. This has
divided the problem into two different categories
:-
Category-I
Present casuality
receives grants amounting to several lakhs. This
has created a problem of plenty with our present
society en-mashed in materialism, some of widows,
orphans, even the old and infirms are herassed
and deprived of their grant money.
Though suggestion
has been made, depending upon the age and
requirement of the recepient, Govt may consider
issue of time bound bonds, but these can also be
brokened. This also includes deprivation of their
share of ancestral land and other properties.
Thus they require protection against such selfish
people. Then there should be a provision for
their safe living. Assistance to old and infirm,
settlement of their children etc. The alternative
in such cases may be to establish, call them
Rehabilitation Homes, funded by the affected
partly, state and common man. Planned to fulfil
the said needs 26 Inf. Div. has constructed a
complex for widows and orphans at Jammu. But
these would require substantial resources and can
be undertaken in a phased, manner priority/area
wise.
Category-II
However all such
casualities since 1947 till 1987, had been
comparatively very poorly awarded. These are the
cases which require financial assistance for
marriage of their daughters, repair of old
houses, medical treatment including medicines for
serious ailments and so on. Requirements are as
numerous as human demands. In some cases
financial assistance is required even for their
very sustenance and existence. They are the bulk
of requirement today that is where Armed Forces Flag
Day Fund remains more important.
This is
exclusively to mitigate sufferings of war
casualities and very needy ex-servicemen. Each
case is scrutinised before the award. Fund is
managed by a committee under the chairmanship of
the Governor of the State.
Donations are
collected for a Priceless token flag because
there is no amount fixed as a price of one flag.
These are undertaken by Sainik Welfare Deptt.
Ambphalla on 07 Dec and continue till 31 March
next year. Donations can also be deposited with
the said Department against a proper receipt.
Donations are exempted from Income Tax under
section 15-B of Income Tax Act, 1961.
There was a time
when the collections of J&K State, as a whole
did not exceed Rs 30,000/- yearly viz-a-viz
Crores collected by some other States. Then State
participation and assistance was arranged and
State Govt constituted District Level Committees
under respective DCs. Awards were also introduced
as an incentive for those exceeding in amounts
collected.
Last year a total
sum of Rs 7,35,097/- only has been collected.
Though D C Udhampur and ZSWO, Jammu continue to
maintain the lead, yet the effort is asking for
an improvement.
APPEAL
Look at the men
holding the Flag high. They have old parents,
wife and children back home most anxiously
waiting for them. But for them life and death is
a matter of moment. They are bearing our burdens,
so it is incumbent for the people to share their
burdens. Therefore let us all buy the token Flag,
so much so that all the stocks get exhausted.
For it is now your
turn to keep the Flag High.
|
 |
Wanted
a better male partner
By Sweta Patwardhan
The concept of
reproductive health has a lot to do with gender
relations. This concept is no more confined to
just family planning and contraception but also
embraces satisfying and safe sex life as an
integral part of reproductive span of life.
The ability of men
and women to achieve and maintain sexual health
and manage their reproductive lives free from
coercion and fear depends upon the kind of
relationship they share. If egalitarian
relationships between men and women are absent,
women not only have disproportionate
responsibility of bearing, nurturing, restricting
and regulating the number of children, but also
to protect themselves from unwanted pregnancy and
unsafe sex without really being equipped to do
so.
We now have
considerable evidence to show that mens
attitude and behaviour profoundly affect
womens ability to exercise choice and
attain positive health outcomes.
In the West,
single parenting by women is a common phenomenon
and men are fast losing their traditional
bread-earners role. Although in India the
loss of traditional roles for men is not an issue
as yet, but women are carving out wider niches
for themselves.
Also, womens
expectations from marriage are changing. While
men still want to have a traditional all-in-one
woman as wives, more and more women are looking
for companions and soul mates and meaningful
associations to flourish as individuals as well
as to grow together.
This sociological
change is, in a way, threatening and confusing
for most men. This coupled with increasing
urbanisation and nuclear families require that
men become sensitive in a manner that will help
them handle changing idioms in gender
relationships in a better way.
Despite
stereotypes, avenues for women are expanding and
their roles are constantly being defined and
redefined even if largely within the orbit of
domesticity and family. Unfortunately, however,
whereas women have received support in their
struggle, very little support is available to
men. Although it sounds absurd as well as
counter-productive, helping men get out of the
gender stereotypes in which they have been
entrapped for much too long will be empowering
for them.
Empowerment for
them is to be personally and collectively able to
resist social constraints and pressures in
transgressing the limits of traditionally defined
model of masculinity and get rid of the whole
baggage of burdens that goes with it. Yet, while
it is politically correct and desirable to talk
of womens empowerment, voices for
mens empowerment are either absent or
indistinct to say the least.
The approach paper
to the Tenth Five Year Plan acknowledged the need
for mens participation in Planned
Parenthood movement by sensitising them towards
their responsibility in reproductive and sexual
health so that they can be supportive partners to
their counterparts in achieving their sexual
happiness and reproductive goals together.
Men can be
addressed in several ways. At the conceptual
level, the way to address men will be to place
them within a wider framework of gender relations
and to bring out systematically gender as an
analytical category in reproductive health in
such a way that the differential treatment of
women and men become self-evident without being
offensive or confrontational.
The process of
gender sensitisation has to go hand in hand with
structural support at the operational level
through programmes that focus on men through
service provision, innovative and sensitive
education/training and communication in
preventive as well as promotional reproductive
health activities.
Men can be helped
to unlearn the societal myths and misconceptions
woven around their reproductive behaviour and the
site of that behaviour, the body. For example, it
is important for men to know that women often
acquire STDs from men and that they tend to be
biologically at higher risk of transmission of
the disease than vice versa.
It is important
for them to know that they have the deciding
chromosome as far as the sex of the unborn child
is concerned. It is important for them to know
that women undergo the same trauma and labour
pains whether the child is a boy or girl, alive
or dead and require the same care instead of
differential treatment based on the sex of the
newborn.
In order to alter
male behaviour, it is not enough to work at the
individual level only. The collective societal
norms need change. For example, field experiences
of non-governmental organisations do indicate
that innovative interventions result in increased
gender awareness and attitudinal change, but
translating them into actual behaviour is far
more difficult unless that behaviour is socially
sanctioned.
A classic example
would more be that of a husband who helps his
wife in the kitchen or in changing a babys
diaper when they are alone, but refuses to come
anywhere close to the kitchen when parents or
other members of the family are around. A recent
newspaper report from Sweden on men taking
parental leave had one man explaining why it was
easier for him to take that leave because
everybody else was doing it and it was a
done thing.
Apart from the
social justice objective of gender equity, there
is a real practical need to address men. Research
shows that men know very little about their own
bodies and that they have their own fears and
apprehensions, worries and sexual anxieties
revolving round sexual myths and misconceptions
of all sorts that continue to be perpetuated
without any rectification through informed
knowledge or services.
One myth having a
crucial bearing on male reproductive behaviour
can be cited at this juncture. The Sanskrit term
for semen is virya, which has been associated
with masculinity and strength (in the Vedic
period and in numerous mythological texts, a
common form of blessings to men used to be:
viryavan bhav which translates as be strong
and masculine). Indian literature on male
sterilisation is full of references where
vasectomy is believed to result in loss or
deterioration of the quality of semen and because
of its classical association, in masculine
strength. These misconceptions are deeply
ingrained and become real for those who believe
in them. Unless these are dealt with, nothing
much can be achieved even with the most modern
methods.
How reproductive
health needs are posited within the wider
concerns of health is crucial for them to become
acceptable to men. It is, therefore important to
establish the linkages between more readily
identifiable health risks with what may still be
perceived as exceptional or distant.
Again, it is
crucial to know that the susceptibility to HIV
infection increases as much as nine fold in the
presence of preventable and treatable sexually
transmitted infections (STIs). Research in
Tanzania has confirmed that treatment of STIs can
reduce HIV transmission by more than 40 per cent.
One of the widely
expressed concerns, which is probably a
legitimate one, is that involving men in
reproductive health matters should not be at the
expense of appropriating of womens domain
and their limited rights of privacy and control
of their bodies by men. This concern arises
because men who are generally better equipped and
more articulate may highjack womens agenda
by usurping what has traditionally been
womens territory. However, this argument
should not be used as a stalking horse to retain
and reinforce persisting unequal responsibilities
ascribed to women and men in reproductive
matters. Because domain identification itself is
an outcome of age-old social conditioning about
behaviours that are understood as "typically
female or typically male".
One may ask
whether delineation of domains is not
characterised by a proper mix of responsibilities
and decision-making powers and if not, whether in
the ultimate analysis keeping men out from
specific domain may, in fact amount to
maintaining the status quo?
The point is who
charts the territories of the set domains and
should these territories remain fixed or
continuously evolve and change to keep pace with
changing social structure? Moreover, if the
demand to involve men comes from women themselves
and if men are involved in accordance with their
wishes, as is the case in many non-governmental
efforts, men involvement may actually expand
womens choices. INAV
|
 |
|