EDITORIAL

Fear Laloo, ye Pak!

The recent trip to Pakistan has proved a dag-dag-ujala for all the members sans one. What ever their achievements for peace, brotherhood, friendship and everything else, one and all of the twenty four have lost quite a bit of their personas-to Laloo Yadav, of course. It would have been okay by them to call this tour Laloo’s personal triumph, but it has turned out to be their definitive loss. And that is something none of them are ready to concede. Well, ‘ready to concede’ is not correct. It wasn’t theirs to concede and it has already been taken. And they are not happy about it all. Some are sore, others aboil, while many, in the graphic Indian phrase, ‘are burning’. Indeed, Laloo himself asked why they-the MP’s-were jealous of him. Some refused to be seen with him, others refused to travel with him while a few actually whined about the attentions paid to Laloo. For his part Laloo enjoyed every bit of the attentions as well as Pakistan. Except its non-veg dishes. But with his sattu supply that wasn’t a problem.

Indeed, so hard are the intra-parliamentarian feelings on the issue that you can be sure no other delegation would agree to travel there with Laloo. Well, that just isn’t the question. It is whether Pakistan would accept another Laloo trip. And, survive it! Except that non-veg thing, the leader from Bihar has found Pakistan no different from Bihar. He did not say whether Pakistanis were any different from Biharis, but, seeing the popularity he commanded, the spontaneous responses ....more

Hizbul Mujahideen and
the Pandits

By K.N. Pandita

In a statement appearing recently in national newspapers, militant outfit Hizbul Mujahideen. ....more

You get the Coke
you deserve!
TALES OF TRAVESTY

By Dr. Jitendra Singh

Urea in milk, pesticide in Coke. This in a nutshell sums up not only the nation's .....more

Is laconic Sonia as Indira reincarnate?

By Aditya Nath Dar

The dowager empress of the Congress Party is in search of the right .......more

Hurriyat conference is looking for an agenda

By Ghazanfar Butt

The All Party Hurriyat Conference is desperately looking for an agenda for itself.........more

HERE & THERE
She had sex with 1,000 men

By B L Kak

Astrologers, palmists and sooth sayers—yes, fortune tellers, to be precise—exist......more

EDITORIAL

Fear Laloo, ye Pak!

The recent trip to Pakistan has proved a dag-dag-ujala for all the members sans one. What ever their achievements for peace, brotherhood, friendship and everything else, one and all of the twenty four have lost quite a bit of their personas-to Laloo Yadav, of course. It would have been okay by them to call this tour Laloo’s personal triumph, but it has turned out to be their definitive loss. And that is something none of them are ready to concede. Well, ‘ready to concede’ is not correct. It wasn’t theirs to concede and it has already been taken. And they are not happy about it all. Some are sore, others aboil, while many, in the graphic Indian phrase, ‘are burning’. Indeed, Laloo himself asked why they-the MP’s-were jealous of him. Some refused to be seen with him, others refused to travel with him while a few actually whined about the attentions paid to Laloo. For his part Laloo enjoyed every bit of the attentions as well as Pakistan. Except its non-veg dishes. But with his sattu supply that wasn’t a problem.

Indeed, so hard are the intra-parliamentarian feelings on the issue that you can be sure no other delegation would agree to travel there with Laloo. Well, that just isn’t the question. It is whether Pakistan would accept another Laloo trip. And, survive it! Except that non-veg thing, the leader from Bihar has found Pakistan no different from Bihar. He did not say whether Pakistanis were any different from Biharis, but, seeing the popularity he commanded, the spontaneous responses he got, the easy familiarity he struck there, it looks that they can’t be vastly different. And that is a direct threat for everybody there, from Musharraf downwards. Laloo could easily surpass the five percent vote Musharraf got in his referendum. He can reduplicate Jamali’s majority…nay better it, on any weekend day. And, once he has ‘translated’ and ‘understood’ Fazal-ur Rehman’s speech, which he has carried back home, one can see the qaid of Taliban and Al Qaida running for cover against the maverick Laloo if he really takes a fancy for Pakistan.

Indeed, the days of Pak military, non-military and religious establishment would be numbered if Laloo chooses to ride back. And, he verily may! He already has turned Togadia of Trishul-fame out of Bihar. His popularity with the Muslim masses of Bihar has never waned since that arrest of Advani’s ratha a decade ago. And, he has enough reasons to seek a place out of an India brimming with nosy investigators and independent judiciary. Not that they have made any difference to Laloo, within or outside Bihar. But it is a bother, all the same. In Pakistan nobody may mind his browsing among fodders. They would understand that, given his dislike for the non-veg, he could do little else. And, with Bengalis having separated out, there’d be no Biswases around to pester him. Why he could even get the Bihari Muslims stranded in Bangladesh to Pakistan and consolidate his hold for all times to come. So Laloo’s grumbling team-mates may rest their fears, while the Pak establishment can begin fearing him. If it hasn’t already done so, that is!

Hizbul Mujahideen and the Pandits

By K.N. Pandita

In a statement appearing recently in national newspapers, militant outfit Hizbul Mujahideen says that it will allow the Kashmiri Pandits to return to their homes in the Valley if they join the anti-India separatist movement and fight against the Indian troops side by side with the Hizbul cadres.

We may remind our readers that following the gunning down of BOP leader Tikalal Taploo on September 14, 1989 by the Jammu Kashmir Liberation Front gunmen in front of his house in Srinagar, this writer published a letter in The Kashmir Times asking the JKLF leadership to spell out its policy towards the Pandit minority of Kashmir.

In its response in the same paper, the Secretary of JKLF had said that its policy towards the Pandits was clear. If the Pandits wanted to save their culture and identity, they should join the movement for freedom of Kashmir, it said.

By the end of 1990, JKLF terrorists selectively gunned down more than a thousand Pandits. At the end of the day, they claimed they were secularists and that Governor Jagmohan was responsible for the exodus of the Pandits.

Those who wage a freedom struggle are expected to be well-versed in the history of their land. It is in fitness of things to remind these communal forces - turned - terrorists that the movement for liberating Kashmir from autocratic rule was launched by the Kashmiri Pandits in Lahore in about 1920.

Kashmiri Pandits studying in colleges and university in Lahore at that time and the Kashmiri Pandit diaspora in that metropolitan city combined to initiate the movement. Of course, as happens with all freedom movements, Kashmir freedom movement began with ideological and intellectual input. It was premature to take to the streets. First ideological ground had to be prepared.

At that point of time, Shiekh Abdullah was not in the picture. He must have been a student in the school in Srinagar. The regime in Srinagar approached the British Indian Government in Lahore to keep a strict eye on the political ambitions of Kashmiri Pandit students and their organizations.

Kashmiri Pandit diaspora in Lahore was in close liaison with well-known Pandit families that had settled in other parts of the country especially in Allahabad, Lucknow, Jaipur and Amritsar. There was regular exchange of notes between the two wings of Kashmiri Pandit diaspora in regard to the intellectual exercise for freedom of Kashmir. The British Resident in Srinagar was regularly posted with information on this count.

When the Muslim Conference was formed, the Pandits in Lahore and elsewhere in India refused to cooperate with it. Its ideology was communal in content. But the ideology of the Pandit diaspora was secular. It was self explanatory and did not need a certificate from anybody.

That the Muslim Conference was communal in content and generally towed a parochial line, the Kashmiri Muslims were feeling rather uneasy with them. Then appeared Shiekh Abdullah on the scene. As long as the Shiekh towed the communal line of the Muslim Conference, the Pandits refused to be part of the movement although the Muslim Conference, too, had the same agenda as that of the Pandits diaspora in Lahore. The problem was of ideology. The Pandits could not stomach communal approach.

But with Shiekh Abdullah parting ways with Muslim Conference in 1929 and forming the National Conference, the approach of the Pandits whether in the valley or in Lahore witnessed a change. They joined the NC and became its active members.

I need not mention the names of all the Pandits who made substantial contribution to the freedom movement through the instrument of National Conference. That is not the point.

The point is that as long as a movement in Kashmir stuck to secular principle and ideology, the Pandits welcomed it. Thus the Pandits represented not only their faith in secularism but also gave recognition to the Kashmirian ethos of coexistence and tolerance, the qualities of which every Kashmiri feels proud.

This shows that the Pandits did not oppose the freedom movement in Kashmir but were its sharp instruments.

This position was reversed when the JKLF gunmen desired of Pandits to join their anti-India movement in its armed uprising in 1990 if they wanted to preserve their existence and culture. This was not a veiled but an open threat. No such threat was ever handed down by the Muslim Conference or the National Conference to the Pandits. No such threat had ever been handed out by the Pandit organizations to the Muslim population of Kashmir.

Evidently, the armed uprising in Kashmir had abandoned the history of freedom movement of Kashmir and had agreed to pursue an agenda, which not their compatriots but their Pakistani masters had chalked out for them. The agenda, obviously and without an iota of doubt, tended to serve the interests of its originators and not its implementing agency.

In other words what the JKLF was pursuing at that time and what its re-christened model, the HUM is pursuing today, is a betrayal of the Kashmiris irrespective of the fact whether they are Muslims or Hindus.

It is the result of this arch betrayal that more than sixty thousand Kashmiri Muslims have been sent to their cold and silent graves. This all has been done in the name of religion. The long drawn Kashmir freedom movement spearheaded by the National Conference never resorted to the slogan of Islam. But it respected all religions by agreeing to accept secularism as the guiding principle.

The JKLF is in shambles. It broke down not because it met with stiff physical resistance from security forces but more because it was an ideological flop.

The same is going to be the fate of HUM. It is a matter of time.

It should be clear to the Hizbul Mujahideen terrorist outfit that the Pandits are not supporting India in Kashmir because India is a Hindu country and the Pandits are looking for religious identity. Not in the least. The Pandits, like millions of Muslims in Kashmir, are pro-India because India promises democracy, secularism, plurality and peaceful coexistence.

If the HUM thinks that Pandits should join their anti-India movement and fight side by side with them, what has it to say about the millions of Muslims of the valley who have rejected the gun, taken part in democratic process and are engaged in building Kashmir of their dreams. Are the HUM terrorists planning to massacre them one and all in the name of religion?

HUM and its affiliated outfits would do well to understand that the age of religious fanaticism and communal hatred has lost its ground. There is a big conflict within the Islamic society itself because of the compulsions of modern scientific and technologicaladvancement. There has been a split in the HUM. Schism has crept into it and the indigenous cadres are having more realization of the imperative of their identity.

There should be no doubt with anybody that these terrorist outfits are counting their last breaths. Any sensible analyst can tell them how self-defeating their adventure proved by extirpating the small Pandit religious minority from Kashmir.

Before we close this write-up, one more thing needs to be made clear to the HUM. If they think that the gun is to decide the fate of Kashmir, then Kashmir will remain part of India till eternity. If a dialogue is to decide the fate of Kashmir, she will remain a part of India till eternity. If a proxy war is to decide the fate of Kashmir, she will remain a part of India till eternity. And as such, the Pandits and Muslims of Kashmir shall remain integral parts of India till eternity.

You get the Coke you deserve!
TALES OF TRAVESTY

By Dr. Jitendra Singh

Urea in milk, pesticide in Coke. This in a nutshell sums up not only the nation's nutritional status but also reflects the adulteration which has crept into the Indian society's work ethics. The lethal contamination of food products is truly the outcome of a fatal contamination of 21st century India's dangerously confused character.

Incidentally, among those whose products have been found "tainted" by the tests conducted by the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) are the two biggest players of India's 1.2 billion dollar aerated beverage segment, Coca Cola and Pepsi Cola. If this is the state of affairs with Coke and Pepsi, what about the smaller players in the field of beverages and in other fields too? And, if one is to believe the international management authorities of both Coke and Pepsi that they conform to the best world standards, then the onus for this pesticide infiltration into the bottle obviously falls on the local franchise holders and bottling plants within India which have willingly or unwillingly failed to ensure the hygiene of the "potable" water that makes up 90 percent of a soft drink? Worse still is the case of "wise" marketeers who have mastered the skill of using urea, shampoo, oil and what not in order to ensure an unlimited supply of "apparently" rich milk!

While inquiry committees have been announced to probe into the scientific evidence of these reports, the contemporary Indian society would do well to shake itself out of its morbid slumber and look beyond the narrow myopic objective of making a fast buck or manipulating an overnight fortune. Mahatma Gandhi always reiterated that means were as important as ends. Much of what is being witnessed today is because we have developed a sort of collective indifference --- infact a collective contempt ---- for Gandhi's time-tested teachings. And, the bottle of contaminated cold drink or urea ridden milk becomes a symbol of money becoming an end in itself with total disregard for the means applied. A whole generation of Indians in the age group of 30s, 40s and beyond has grown up in the blind pursuit of material ends quite unmindful of the means. Our children have watched us practising these topsy turvy values and they too have got subconsciously groomed into pervert practitioners of the same topsy turvy values. Unfortunately now, the time has come to pay the price for what we taught our children and the price these innocent childen pay is by way of inadvertantly exposing themselves to a diet adulterated with our trickery and chicanery.

Mind you! This is just the beginning. The worse is still to come. The health sector in this country has been drastically ignored by the Government as wall as non-Government agencies. Today India has the highest Diabetes population in the world. Same is the case about Coronary Heart Disease. AIDS and tuberculosis are on a rapid rise. There is no prospective planning either in the field of health /disease control or in the field of medical education. In the next few years, the Indian society is going to be flooded with substandard doctors and professionals who acquire their medical degrees not on the basis of aptitude, merit or skill but simply by paying huge donations in the fast mushrooming chain of ill-equipped under-staffed private medical colleges. God alone an save such a society and its health!

Meanwhile, unless each of the 110 crores living in this country regains his lost conscience, you will continue to get the Coke you deserve. The common man is doomed to suffer for his own misdoings. Umapathy is doomed to cry for redemption when there is nothing left to redeem for, a La "Mahkhaane Se Tauba Kar Baithe Jab Kuchh Na Raha Mahkhaane Mein!"

Is laconic Sonia as Indira reincarnate?

By Aditya Nath Dar

The dowager empress of the Congress Party is in search of the right credentials to be the Prime Minister of India as she feels she has inherited the legacy of the Nehru-Gandhi family. Ms. Sonia Gandhi is a new kid on the block. One still, to gain the trust of sizeable sections of Indian society–and, given the decidedly glacial response to her call for a grand alliance, even the political class. One still to open herself to the country’s people. Once still to welcome media interrogation of her self-proclaimed credentials for nothing less than the nation’s top job. One still to get off the Olympian high ground where she evades the common man’s questioning gaze that every Raisina Hill aspirant must hold and stare down. And one who exhibits such morbid aversion to the heat and dust of the public arena and political battle-ring that it seems prime ministership is her feudal birthright, not a trophy to be won in a democratic contest.

Will voters be told on D-Day that they must choose to gamble on a mystery and journey blind with an enigma? The problem with Ms. Gandhi is, even if one accepts her "Indianness", she still somehow resembles a stranger. In 1999, the Delhi Pradesh Congress installed a hoarding near the AICC office, bearing a picture of Congress chief Sonia Gandhi. This was in the nature of a plea to the lady to remain the boss despite the painful interlude of the Sharad Pawar-led revolt. It carried a pretty nifty slogan:

"Yeh Sonia nahin aandhi hai, doosri Indira Gandhi hai!" In no time, the Indira Gandhi-incarnate in party cadres’ eyes was pitched as a claimant for the Prime Ministerial diadem. In 2002, at an AICC meeting at the Talkatora Stadium–rechristened Sadbhavna Nagar for the occasion–the cries that rent the air threw down the gauntlet to the ruling BJP: "Jaat pe na paat pe, Sonia ki baat pe, mohar lagegi haath pe!"

This year, at the Ram Lila grounds in the Capital, one heard a few more interesting variations on the theme. When Ms. Gandhi appeared at the venue to launch her ‘Desh Bachao’ andolan that sunny Sunday in March, she was met with full-throated cheering: "Sonia Gandhi karo taiyaari; fail ho gaye hain Atal Bihari!" and "Chalegi Sonia, udegi dhul; na rahega NDA, na rahega phool!"

The phool was the BJP lotus, to be plucked and mangled by the Sonia Congress’s hand’.One also vaguely recalls that ‘Mother India’ nugget: "Desh ki amma kaisi ho? Sonia Gandhi Jaisi ho!"

My personal favourite–the declamation to beat all declamations–was coined after Priyanka Vadera–Gandhi gave birth to a baby boy. On that happy occasion, Youth Congress posters appeared, spreading congratulations and jubilations: "Sonia Gandhi bani hai naani, aur ham baney hain maama!" As in the days of yore, this quaint humanisation of Dynasty as Everyman’s Family–and of sphinx-like Sonia as homely grandma–afforded the humblest mortal a vicarious partaking in palace celebrations. The liveried Congressman’s ability to sing paeans to the blue-blooded leading lights of the day had come a long-baroque-like–way. Recall one-time AICC chief Debkanta Barooah’s ingratiating but memorably minimalist "Indira is India".

That Congress rank and file should be carried away by rhetorical ingenuity, lungpower and what Indira Gandhi once called "Oriental excess" is not to be grudged. The poetic fruits of some of their labour would be laughed out of court if they weren’t so endearing. In many ways, they express the poignant umbilical attachment of ordinary Congress workers to a remarkable family that guided the party’s destiny since its inception. Their idolatry is perhaps as natural as the sycophancy that became a trademark of Congress culture from the days of the deified Indira Gandhi, whose formidable persona somehow lent it to being inflated to Amazonian proportions.

However, senior and senior most leaders of today’s Congress at least are not expected to blur the lines between their current helmswoman’s real and projected image. Try as they may to supplant it with self-fulfilling prophecies, the party’s future hinges on the issue of its leadership. When you don’t have an Iron Lady at the top and yet refuse to admit that between the slogan and the reality falls the shadow. You have a big problem. And it’s called bankruptcy.

A leading news magazine recently sampled some of the flattery coming Ms. Sonia Gandhi’s way on the sidelines of the Vichar Manthan Shivir in Shimla. One was: "Indiraji is the role model for Soniaji… After all, Indiraji is even today the mother for poor". The other: "Soniaji’s recent aggressive attack on the BJP reminds me of the combative Indiraji." And yet another: "Yes, Indiraji is surely the biggest inspiration for Sonia."

The aspects of the Indira legacy being appropriated were as clear as their contextual slide was crafty: Indira’s Garibi Hatao would be Sonia’s Congress ka haath garib ke saath; Indira’s 1971 triumph would be Sonia’s supposed wresting of the national security card from the BJP; Indira’s "inspiration" would be Sonia’s USP: The way one had outwitted the Jana Sangh, the other would do with the BJP.

No, the people quoted weren’t ordinary karyakarta, whose very distance in the hierarchical ladder from the object of their adulation would create the optical illusion required to conceal any leadership’s warts. The speakers were, respectively, Chattisgarh Chief Minister Ajit Jogi, CWC member Arjun Singh and Delhi Chief Minister Sheila Dikshit. One will be wrong to think the packaging of Sonia, as an avatar of her larger-than-life political ancestor was a freelance venture not blessed by the party chief. The astonishing thing is Ms. Gandhi herself does not seem the least bit embarrassed by the comparison.

Indeed, for all her insistence that the congregation was to discuss "issues" and not "individuals", Ms. Gandhi used the Sankalp to personally float the Sonia-as-PM balloon. She took credit for turning a down-at-heel party into one ruling 15 States (never mind the fact State polls are won by local factors or by default, and the Congress’s Lok Sabha showing in 1999 was little short of a debacle). Gratuitously stressing the "affection" she enjoyed from the rank and file, she played Indira Gandhi by claiming to be undisputed boss, from whom all "decisions" flowed. And she advertised her knockout political savvy: Her resolve to back Kashmir’s PDP-led regime was proof that sufficed! (One would have thought that, when the Mufti refused to blink in his eyeball-to eyeball contest with 10 Janpath, the lady had little choice in the matter.)

One can sympathise with the Congress chief. Trying to make herself acceptable to every section of even her own party since 1998 could not have been easy going. Given the oaths of loyalty sworn to her up and down the party hierarchy, this is one task she seems to have managed well – the catapulting fact of being a Nehru-Gandhi bahu helped, of course.

But that Congress presidentship should translate into her automatic Prime Ministerial eligibility will continue to be debated. And not only on account of her foreign origins. For one thing, the Congress is biting off more than it can chew by projecting the laconic Sonia as Indira reincarnated. For another, assuming it is aware of its leadership’s limitations, the party should know the inevitable Atal-versus-Sonia contest would be a tough call. The very fact Ms. Gandhi has to dress up as Indira reborn exposes her inauthentic challenge. She cannot pit her own untested mettle and inarticulated vision against India’s most popular politician and statesman – she needs borrowed feathers.

But these feathers will not sit easy. Indira Gandhi – the goongi gudiya who crushed the Syndicate, hijacked Opposition planks of both the Right and Left, and told the superpower where to get off–still has countless admirers, however contested her bequest may be. Like Nehru, she ploughed a lonely furrow, even as she struck roots in the hearts of the teeming millions. Her successes and her failures, her charisma and her ruthlessness, her strengths and her insecurities, her flickering greatness and her lowly guile, her apotheosis and her fall from grace – all emanated from within were all her own. She was the indefatigable people’s messiah, forgiven in countless metaphorical Chikmagalurs till luck ran out. The jury is still out on this goddess with clay feet, perhaps the most complex and tempestuous personality to have led the nation for 15-years. Loved, feared and, in the end, despised, Mrs. Gandhi could hardly be denied her one true possession: Tragic stature. INAV

Hurriyat conference is looking for an agenda

By Ghazanfar Butt

The All Party Hurriyat Conference is desperately looking for an agenda for itself. Its prime mover for many years, Syed Ali Shah Geelani, has parted company with the Conference, and trying to explore the possibility of starting a party of its own.

The newly elected Chairman of the APHC, Moulvi Abbas Ansari, is trying to prove himself. A Shia, he is a hardliner among the softliners. He would like to meet someone from the Central Government-- someone ‘important’. Preferably it should be the Prime Minister of India, failing which it could be his deputy, Mr Lal Krishna Advani.

The Hurriyat Conference would not like the ‘pro-India’ tag attached to it. To prove that it has no ‘master’ the leaders of the Conference visited New Delhi and called on the Pakistan Ambassador, and anyone else in the diplomatic community willing to receive them. The Government of India did not rush to embrace them.

The Hurriyat leaders are aware that the major expectation of the people of Jammu and Kashmir is for the return of peace to the State. As many of them would like to say, it should be peace with ‘dignity’. Who has the keys to peace? Those who engineer violence, of course. Moulvi Abbas Ansari has said that he is optimistic that ‘New Delhi will allow him to visit Pakistan and he will use such a trip to persuade rebels to drop the gun’. "Rebels" could be Kashmiri ‘militants’ who have been living in Pakistan and are deployed as pathfinders for Pakistani mercenaries to cross the border. Such a visit would add to the credibility of the Hurriyat Conference, which has suffered in image since its refusal to participate in the Assembly Elections last year.

In the meantime, the Hurriyat leaders are keeping themselves occupied meeting members of the Kashmir Committee, led by Ram Jethmalani. No one knows in New Delhi whom does Ram Jethmalani represent. But he surely is getting a lot of newspaper space for himself, and provides a feeling of relevance for the Hurriyat leaders.

Maulvi Abbas Ansari gave expression to the dilemma of the Hurriyat Conference in a newspaper interview: "India has often been accusing us of being stooges of Pakistan and now the Pakistan Prime Minister has said that there is some nexus between us and New Delhi regarding the issue of inviting third party mediation on Kashmir. This proves we are somewhere on neutral ground." Moulvi Abbas Ansari said that the APHC was basically a well-wisher of both India and Pakistan as it was only possible through closing of ranks between the two South Asian countries that a lasting and permanent resolution of Kashmir dispute founded in the aspiration of people was possible. He was not against American role, but he wants the country to behave as a friend not as a mediator. "India and Pakistan need friends not mediators. There is a difference between friends and mediators. Let friends intervene, but if someone (US) comes with his own road map, it is not acceptable"(Kashmir Images 6/8). The fact is that the US has withdrawn its road map ever since the Hurriyat leaders refused to participate in the Assembly elections last year. As of now, the road being treaded by the Hurriyat Conference does not seem to lead anywhere.

Meanwhile, there are a lot of ‘give and take’ statements being issued by leaders from both sides of the Line of Control. To start with Pakistan Prime Minister Mr. Zafarullah Khan Jamali said that India being the bigger country should ‘give’ or make "concessions". Speaking to the BBC in London on August 3, he said while both countries would have to make "sacrifices", India would need to be more generous. When the 52-member delegation of Indian Parliamentarians, strategic experts and journalists visited Islamabad, the Pakistan Prime Minister underlined the need for a compromise. The mood generated in the sub-continent following the visit of Maulana Fazal-ur-Rehman to India and the Indian delegation to Pakistan was infectious. Laloo Prasad Yadav epitomized how earthy an elected Parliamentarian could be, and in all his utterances the former Bihar Chief Minister emphasized how people of India and Pakistan were ‘one people’.

Prime Minister Vajpayee told in his message to the conclave in Islamabad that the world situation was changing and it was time we realized that we cannot deny ‘our people their right to peaceful and cooperative economic development'. He said: "We can live together only if we let each other live". President Musharraf, in contrast, said at a Press Conference when the Indian delegation was in Pakistan that "he wanted to solve the problems with India peacefully through dialogue but everyone should be clear in their minds that ‘core’ issue is Kashmir."

Musharraf wanted to sound a little more ‘candid’ during his meeting with the Indian delegation. He was out to impress the Indian Parliamentarians and journalists and made a grand gesture by offering a cease-fire along the Line of Control. The more he expanded on his offer, the more he exposed his true self. He said : "If India stops atrocities, human rights violations, releases political prisoners and creates an atmosphere, then, may be, we can facilitate a cease-fire". He said there was a "freedom struggle" in Kashmir that was not under Islamabad’s control. "We don’t have a whistle which we blow from here and things start happening in Kashmir". It was more of a repeat performance of his last visit to India for the Agra summit. It did not take much time for the Government of India to say that there was nothing new in the suggestions made by General Musharraf and that "they have not been proved effective in the past because Pakistan has continued to sponsor terrorism directed against India and provided support to cross-border infiltration." Should India ignore that rhetoric and go ahead with its policy of extending the hand of friendship towards Pakistan?

Commenting on the events in Islamabad, the Kashmir Images (9/8) wrote: "It is essential that the hawkish forces are kept at a safe distance so that they are not able to poke their noses to vitiate the atmosphere that has encouraged all to dream about a peaceful sub-continent. Peace is really not a choice for either India or Pakistan. It is the only option and wisdom demands that both the countries who have so far always tried to outplay each other in trading hatred must now try to take a lead in opting for the option of peace."

The Hizbul Mujahideen which has split into factions is also singing peace tunes. The latest is its appeal to Kashmiri Pandits to return to their homes in the Kashmir valley which they abandoned in 1990. The Pandits have been assured of their safety.

To start with is it possible for the Government of India to ‘give’ and ask a senior Indian political leader to commence a dialogue with the Hurriyat Conference? (ADNI)

HERE & THERE
She had sex with 1,000 men

By B L Kak

Astrologers, palmists and sooth sayers—yes, fortune tellers, to be precise—exist everywhere in the world. Did you ever hear that fortune of a man can be predicted through sex?

Believe it or not—a woman in Japan has an answer to this question. She claims to be able to tell a man’s future by having sex with him.

Kaho is the woman, a media report says. And mind-boggling claim made by Kaho: She predicted the fortune of 1,000 men in the year 2002 after having sex with them.

‘Oops’! It is ‘bottom booms, furtune zooms’ story, making one to ask: Is this woman in Japan possessing bottomless reserves of energy ?

Her biological experiments, first of their kind, if gone into methodically, will turn a new leaf in the history of the prevalent sources of fortune telling.

Her sex experiments with 1,000 men in a year also calls for some attention from the men and agencies engaged in the battle against the spread of AIDS not only in Japan but also in the rest of the world.

Be that as it may, Kaho has been reported to have stated that she had foreseen life events for many men, even helped one to win a vast amount of money at the race-course.

Does a body part of German dictator, Adolf Hitler, still exist ? ‘Yes’ is the answer from a man from Moscow. The man, Ivan Zudropov, has claimed to be in the possession of Hitler’s mummified penis.

According to a British publication, The Sun, Ivan Zudropov is all set to sell what he claims is German dictator’s mummified penis for 12,000 pounds.

He has been quoted as saying that his ex-Red Army soldier father hacked it off as a souvenir after storming the tyrant’s Berlin bunker where he committed suicide in 1945.

Historians say that Hitler was cremated. But Ivan Zudropov wants DNA tests on the "relic" (penis) to prove his point.

Frostbite in heatwave ? Here is an interesting piece of information, confirming the occurrence of frostbite in heatwave. The Guardian, a British publication, has reported that a motorist was diagnosed with the condition after driving with his toes too close to air conditioning vent on the 250-mile journey from London to Manchester.

One of his toes started to turn black and another went blue. The motorist, Mike Ball by name, told the British publication: "I slipped off my shoe and sock because my car is an automatic and I don’t need to use by left foot. I didn’t realise anything was wrong until the next day when my foot was extremely painful".

The media report let it be known: The heatwave, which has claimed dozens of sunburn and heat exhaustion victims, has now produced its first case of frostbite.

Have you ever heard that a man in Cambodia hasn’t taken a bath for 60 years ? Answer to this question has been provided by Cambodian police, who recently detained a self-styled Buddhist guru.

His fault: Notorious for not bathing for 60 years and for dashing off a funny letter to King Norodom Sihanouk. Media reports revealed that 81-year-old Kampuchea was not arrested but detained for two days when police questioned him over the letter that told King Sihanouk that key to peace was in resolving the border dispute.

And when asked as to why he didn’t take a single bath for 60 years, his reply as reported by the English language Cambodia Daily was: His devotion to Buddhism means water is not allowed to touch his skin or his long matted dreadlocks.

Back home (in India) Atal Behari Vajpayee sometimes amuses his countrymen with a faux pas here a faux pas there. During his recent reply in Rajya Sabha over discussion on his previous statement on his visit abroad, Vajpayee could not control himself in committing a couple of faux pas, much to the amusement of the House.

While referring to Minister of External Affairs, Yashwant Sinha’s speech, Vajpayee once pronounced him as Yashwant Singh, replacing ‘Sinha’ from his name.

Similarly, while referring to the Prime Minister/ President of China and Russia during his speech, Vajpayee referred the head of states of those countries as ‘mukhiya mantri’ (Chief Minister) instead of calling them Prime Minister or President.



|
home | state | national | business | editorial | advertisement | sports |
|
international | weather | mailbag | suggestions | search |
subscribe | send mail |