Teach Kashmiri in schools

Sir,

Being out of my State (Kashmir) for a considerable time now, I am in touch with what's going on there through your paper. For this reason, I would like to express my views regarding the usage of Kashmiri language in our motherland, which,in my opinion, happens to be under threat.

To start with any Kashmiri youth would want to ask a question to their leaders, why isn't Kashmiri taught in our school?

Urdu is not close to the Kashmiri language, so why it happens to become our official language? Just because Urdu happens to be the language of Muslims in India and Pakistan does not necessarily bind us to sacrifice our precious heritage.

I, as a youth from Kashmir have an outsider's view of what is going on in my motherland. My heart bleeds at how our leaders all along have allowed our culture, identity language to be raped by outsiders.

As the authors of various columns on this subject had pointed out, there have been similar cases in other parts of the world. And it's no secret that countries all over the world impose strict penalties if their language rules are violated. Take the case of Quebec in Canada, even though the rest of Canada is English speaking, Quebec Province is French speaking. All their schooling and business is carried out in French. Everyone all around Canada respects the wish of the people of Quebec to maintain their identity.

On the other hand, take the case of Kashmir, no one sought the wishes of the people while deciding what the medium of instruction should be in our schools. Even the history what we are taught has no mention of Kashmiri history, yet we are taught about kings in south India who probably never even heard of a country called Kashmir at the time; How many school kids in Kashmir know of Budshah, Lal Ded, Yusuf Shah Chak and so on? How may school kids know what our history was for the last 600 hundred years?

If the medium of instruction were Kashmiri, the literacy rate in Kashmir would have been outstanding. This is because when a child enters school, and is suddenly facing a teacher, teaching a subject in a foreign language, he/she is bound to get discouraged and eventually drop out of school.

In my opinion all primary classes should be conducted in Kashmiri. And English should be taught as a second language because it is a Universal language. After primary schooling, all subject can then be taught either in Kashmiri or English depending upon the choice of the student. This is the democratic way of any schooling, anywhere in the world. Instead of thrusting upon a foreign language upon the people of Kashmir, the leaders should work towards making Kashmiri language an integral part of our heritage.

Yours etc....
Hyder Ali
<hyder_ally@hot.mail.com>

American stand on Kosovo crisis

Sir,

This is what Hitlerite Bill Clinton does. In his address to the US Military Academy in Washington on May 13 Bill Clinton Justified NATO airstrikes at Yugoslavia on pernicious doctrine of "human intervention" As his address progressed he was heard saying that Kosovo was of immense strategic importance to the USA. At other place he said that he wanted to see a prosperous united Europe. Whatever the intentions of Bill Clinton the fact remains that the NATO strikes at Yugoslavia are intrinsically illegal and blatant defiance of the United Nation which in its Resolution 1199 adopted on September 23, 1998 had specifically stated that if President Slobodan Milosevic does not take measures, the council has urged, it would meet again "to consider further action and additional measures to maintain or restore peace and stability in the region." It never empowered the NATO either explicitly or implicitly to take the law into its own hands.

Right from the beginning the language used by the NATO's Supreme Commander was portentious and bristling with uncompromising aggression. General Wesley Clark gave out. "The bombardment would systematically and progressively attack, disrupt, degrade, devastate and ultimately destroy Milosevic's armed forces if he does not comply with the American drafted peace plan for rebellious province of Kosovo."

It is worth mentioning that with the cessation of the cold war the NATO had lost its relevance as the Warsaw Pact had disintegrated and the Russians and the US stepped up the strategic arms limitation and restriction dialogue and Europe moved towards a single economic entity burying its past discord. But after events went the other way. NATO sought to expand itself by incorporating the erstwhile Soviet satellite countries: Poland, Hungry and Czechosolovia. In this way the NATO came at the doorsteps of the mainland Russia.

Justifying the NATO attacks, President Bill Clinton outlined in his speech that NATO forces were to assure the territorial integrity and political independence of its member states. Serbia is not a NATO member and the Kosovar Albanians have launched a secessionist movement. Therefore, strictly according to political grammar it is an internal problem of Serbia and NATO has no role in it.

What exactly is Kosovo crisis? The struggle of the Kosovar Albanians was for independence from Serbia. Enforcement of old ethnic identities has splintered Yugoslavia which was among the three original champions of the doctrine of non-alignment with India and Egypt. Thepresent moth-eaten Yugoslavia led by President Milosevic is expectedly totally opposed to any more dismemberment of the country. In a bid to subdue the Kosovar Albanians, the Serba began the infamous ethnic cleansing causing untold miseries, loss of lives and uprooting humanity. As nobody can support dismemberment of an independent sovereign country, nobody can also support ruthless ethnic cleaning as a means of maintaining the integrity of the country. But these are humanitarian issues and there are specific ways and means of effective response through acknowledged international agencies and mechanisms. The NATO intervention has aggravated the situation. Civilians are killed in cold blood, Embassy is bombarded, civilian areas are destroyed. Is this humanitarian intervention or proving American hegemony? That is great risk to the entire world. We cannot forget history that Balkan region has already triggered the two world wars. Complex issues of race, language, religion, territoriality and past memories are involved and the NATO strike has opened up old wounds which has serious potentialities for destabilising the post cold war global framework.

Yours etc....
Predhuman K Joseph Dhar
Indian Catholic Press Association
Jammu- Tawi.

 
 



|
home | state | national | business | editorial | advertisement | sports |
|
international | weather | mailbag | suggestions | search |
subscribe | send mail |