|
| Allegation of
cheating in Bofors case is fallicious: Hindujas NEW DELHI, Oct 9: The Europe-based Hindujas brothers today termed CBIs allegation of cheating......more BSF reinforcement SHILLONG, Oct 9: The Border Security Force (BSF) in the North East should be reinforced in the .....more SC: self-defence plea NEW DELHI, Oct 9: Veracity of right to self-defence plea taken by a person in committing an offence .....more Yamuna stretch under NEW DELHI, Oct 9: The 25-km stretch of the Yamuna river, extending from Wazirabad to Okhla, .....more |
|
Women sculptors
fashion Durga, break male bastion KOLKATA, Oct 9: They are the daughters of mother earth standing tall among their male......more NEW DELHI, Oct 9: And you thought you were born with an unchangeable destiny. Hard work and dedication combined with the mystic science of Vaastu can see you through the hurdles in life, says a noted Vaastu expert........more Prisoners play NEW DELHI, Oct 9: A four-day Ram Lila festival has started in Tihar central jail here with some of ......more Separate cases NEW DELHI, Oct 9: Overruling two of its previous orders, a three-judge bench of the Supreme......more |
Director throws light on nexus of Bollywood with underworld ...... Naik directs BG chief to settle operatorship issue by Oct 31 ........ |
Allegation
of cheating in Bofors case is NEW DELHI, Oct 9: The Europe-based Hindujas brothers today termed CBIs allegation of cheating in the Rs 1437.72 crore Bofors deal as "fallacious" saying the Government could not have cheated itself as accused Rajiv Gandhi only represented the Government. "Under the allocation of business rules Prime Minister only represents the Government. And if CBIs allegation is true then the Government cheated the Government. It cannot be the case," Hindujas counsel Ram Jethmalani told special judge Prem Kumar during arguments on the point of charge. Citing the Supreme Court judgment in the Capt Satish Sharma case in which the apex court reversed its earlier order directing the former Petroleum Minister to pay a fine of Rs 50 lakh, Jethmalani said "the Government could not have paid damages to itself." He further said CBIs allegation that Bofors made a false representation to Rajiv Gandhi and the then Defence Secretary S K Bhatnagar cannot sustain with the charge of conspiracy. "If the public servants (Rajiv and Bhatnagar) were party to the alleged criminal conspiracy, then they must have known that Bofors had engaged agents in the deal. And if they knew about it, then the representation cannot be said to be a deceptive one," he told the court. Hinduja brothers - Srichand, Gopichand and Prakashchand -have been chargesheeted by CBI for allegedly taking an illegal commission of about Rs 16 crore from bofors in the Howitzer gun deal signed in March 1986. Jethmalani said the court should see the material collected by CBI during the investigation and ascertain if it could be translated into legally admissible evidence. If the court came to the conclusion that a prima facie case was made out, it could go ahead with the framing of charges, he said. "But in case the court thinks that the material collected by the investigating agency could not be translated into `legally admissible evidence and the trial would necessarily result in acquittal, the court must discharge the accused, Jethmalani submitted before the court. Giving his own assessment of the evidence collected by CBI, Jethmalani said "conducting trial on the basis of this material would be a waste of public time." Yesterday, he had requested the court to discharge the accused Hinduja brothers claiming the charge of criminal conspiracy was not made out against them. Claiming that there was nothing in the two chargesheets filed by CBI to substantiate the conspiracy charge against the Hindujas, he said "before you prove it, you must allege that they (Hindujas) entered into a conspiracy with the other accused. But that is not there in any of the chargesheets." Citing several supreme court rulings on the law of criminal conspiracy, Jethmalani said prosecution has to prove not only the place and time of the alleged conspiracy but also the manner in which it was hatched. "It is not there in the chargesheets nor any witness has made any such statement," he said and requested the court to discharge the accused brothers as no prima facie case of conspiracy was made out against them. (PTI) |
BSF reinforcement in NE mooted SHILLONG, Oct 9: The Border Security Force (BSF) in the North East should be reinforced in the wake of the proposed strengthening of Bangladesh Rifles along the Indo-Bangla border, experts at a seminar on border management recommended. The two-day seminar, organised by the BSF, urged the Bangladesh Government to take action against fundamentalists in the country and dismantle camps of rebel groups. Other recommendations in the seminar, which concluded here yesterday, included a comprehensive study on the process leading to large scale influx from neighbouring countries. It also stressed on the need for a studying strategic manoeuvering of the ISI specially in the North East. The experts stated that urgent measures should be taken to analyse crucial developments in the neighbouring country. Speeding up of fencing projects, issuing of identity cards in all North East states, development of border areas through existing projects and repealing of IMDT Act were other recommendations that figured at the session. The meeting stressed on better coordination between the BSF and the police, besides a greater interaction between the security forces and the media. The media should play a constructive role in educating the public about problems of border management, experts felt. In the concluding session, Assam Governor Lt Gen (retd) S K Sinha expressed concern over the large scale illegal immigration from Bangladesh. He said besides the support of the people in the border areas, setting up of barbed wire combined with active surveillance of the Indo-Bangla border could reduce the flow of infiltrators. The Centre should also find out ways and means to "monitor" madrassas in the country so that they impart education, meeting the requirements of modern age to serve the interests of the minority community. Former DG BSF Prakash Singh said efforts made so far to check infiltration from Bangladesh were half-hearted. The border management task force report, prepared by former Home Secretary Madhav Godbole, should be made public as it contained important recommendations concerning checking illegal immigration, he said. The report was submitted to the Government in April, 2000, which said every year three lakh illegal immigrants reach India and 850 people enter per day. Mr Singh criticised the Bangladesh Government for allegedly sheltering insurgent groups of the North East and allowing the ISI to operate from its soil. He also expressed concern over the report that Al-Qaeda was active in Bangladesh. Quoting the report, Mr Singh said massive immigration from Bangladesh was posing a threat to the countrys security besides affecting social harmony and economy.(UNI) |
| SC: self-defence plea of an accused
depends on evidence NEW DELHI, Oct 9: Veracity of right to self-defence plea taken by a person in committing an offence should be tested on the basis of factors relating to injuries received and inflicted by him, the threat perception and whether he had time to intimate public authorities for his safety. "In order to find whether right of private defence is available or not, the injuries received by the accused, the imminence of threat to his safety, the injuries caused by the accused and the circumstances whether the accused had time to have recourse to public authorities are all relevant factors to be considered," the court said in a recent judgement. The case related to a village in Tamil Nadu where a sheep damaged the crops belonging to one Palaniswamy. When he tied the sheep and protested to its owner, Sekar, there was exchange of hot words leading to assaulting and death of Palinswamy. Sekar took the plea of right to self-defence. Section 96 of the Indian Penal Code provided that nothing is an offence which is done in exercise of the right of private defence. Rejecting the plea of self-defence raised by Sekar, a bench comprising Justice Arijit Pasayat and Justice S B Sinha, said "it cannot be stated as a universal rule that whenever the injuries are on the body of the accused persons, a presumption must necessarily be raised that the accused persons had caused injuries in exercise of their right of private defence." Writing the judgement for the bench, Justice Pasayat said non-explanation of the injuries on the accused persons by the prosecution was a very important circumstance but it might not affect the prosecution case in all cases. "In order to find whether the right of private defence is available to an accused, the entire incident must be examined with care and viewed in proper setting," he said. To claim a right of private defence extending to voluntary causing of death, the accused must be able to show that there were circumstances giving rise to reasonable grounds for apprehending that death or greivous hurt would be caused to him," Justice Pasayat said. However, the bench noticed that there was an altercation between the accused and the deceased and that there was no pre-meditation and the assualts were given by the accused during the course of the sudden quarrel. "This appears to be a case of accused exceeding the right of private defence. The appropriate conviction would, therefore, be under section 304 part I, IPC and custodial sentence of 10 years would meet the ends of justice," it said. The bench said "while awarding the sentence, one factor which has weighed with us is that two rustic villagers fought over a sheep which led to the death of one. "Their financial condition can be well gauged from the fact that they fought over a sheep and the minimal damage done by it to the crops. There is no previous enemity. This is certainly a relevant factor to be taken note of while awarding the sentence," it said. (PTI) |
|
Prisoners play role in Ram Lila inside Tihar jail NEW DELHI, Oct 9: A four-day Ram Lila festival has started in Tihar central jail here with some of the roles in the popular dance-drama being enacted by the prisoners themselves. DIG (Prison) Mukesh Prasad inaugurated the festival in jail no. 3 last evening. The event is organised by the Ramlakhan Religious Sabha of Pitampura. Sabha general secretary Rakesh Gupta said the three prisoners taking part in the Ramlila were Ajay Kumar Bansal, an undertrial in a dowry death case, Vinod Kumar and Dildar, undertrials in murder case. All of them enacted the role of the kings who unsuccessfully tried to break the Shiv Dhanush (the bow of Lord Shiva) in the Sita Swayamwar episode. He said last year, the Ram Lila was only for one day but following a positive response from the prisoners, it was extended to four days this year. Mr Gupta said the inmates had also performed in another play, Muwavaja staged at the Kamani auditorium here on November 29 last year. The three prisoners said they were trained by artistes from the national school of drama. Delhi Chief Minister Sheila Dikshit, Civil Aviation Minister Shahnawaz Hussain, Labour Minister Sahib Singh Verma and BJP Delhi unit chief Madanlal Khurana would attend the performances in the coming days. (UNI) |
Separate cases against a person
not to NEW DELHI, Oct 9: Overruling two of its previous orders, a three-judge bench of the Supreme Court has held that separate offences committed by a person against others, even though flowing from similar transactions, should not be clubbed together and transferred to one place for trial. The ruling was handed down by a bench comprising Chief Justice B N Kirpal, Justice K G Balalkrishnan and Justice Arijit Pasayat on a petition filed by a former Director of Golden Forest (India) Ltd, who had been accused of defrauding people of their monies. The company had collected crores of rupees from the general public for purchasing the land and promised that the amount would be returned after expiry of the maturity period fixed through cheques. When monies were not returned and complaints were received by the Punjab Government, the Vigilance Department registered FIRs against the director, Rajesh Sayal, as a co-accused in the cases registered against the company. The accused moved the high court seeking clubbing of the cases together for trial at one place and the high court relying on a judgement of the apex court allowed the plea. On an appeal being preferred before the apex court by the State Government, the three-judge bench asked the accused as to what was the provision of law under which the cases against him could be heard together. Counsel for the accused contended that under sections 218 and 220 of the criminal procedure code, such an order could be passed by the high court. Rejecting the contention, the bench said "in our opinion provison to section 218 would apply only in cases where the distinct offences for which the accused is charged are being tried before the same magistrate. "In the instant case, offences were being tried before different magistrates and proviso to section 218 cannot give any single magistrate the power to order transfer of cases to him from different magistrates or courts," it added. The court said even section 220 did not help the respondent as that applied where any one series of acts were so connected together as to form the same transaction and where more than one offence was committed, there could be a joint trial. In the present case, different people have alleged to have been defrauded by the respondent and the company and therefore each offence was a distinct one and could not be regarded as constituting a single series of facts/transaction, the apex court said. Terming the two earlier decisions of the court permitting the accused in those cases to make applications for clubbing cases against them together as bad law, the bench over-ruled those decisions. The bench allowed separate trial to go on and set aside the high court order while observing that this order would not prejudice the respondent in the trial of the cases. (PTI) Director throws light on nexus of Bollywood with underworld MUMBAI, Oct 9: Throwing light on the alleged nexus of Bollywood with underworld, a well known Director today informed a special court here that he had received a telephone call from notorious gangster Abu Salem two years ago to direct his film. Deposing before designated Judge A P Bhangale, Director Abbas of Abbas-Mastan fame said Abu Salem had asked him on telephone to direct his venture because he had favoured rival gangster Chhota Shakeel by directing his movie. Abbas said he had declined Salems offer of directing his film because he and Mastan already had some films on hand. The evidence of Abbas was recorded in camera by the Judge on a plea made by prosecutor Rohini Salian. His deposition assumes significance amidst police allegations that mafia had a grip on Bollywood and that film "Chori Chori Chupke Chupke" was made by producer Nasim Rizvi and financier Bharat Shah at the instance of Pakistan-based gangster Chhota Shakeel. Abbas said he had come across media reports about Chhota Shakeel financing the movie "Chori Chori Chupke Chupke", directed by him and Mastan. However, Abbas said he and his partner were paid Rs 80 lakh by producer Rizvi to direct this film and total expenses incurred on the venture were to the tune of Rs 10 crore. To a question, Abbas said Salman Khan received Rs 1.5 crore for his role in the film while actress Preity Zinta was paid Rs 25 lakh. "I and Mastan directed film "Chori Chori Chupke Chupke" because Salman Khan had recommended our names to producer Nasim Rizvi, Abbas told the court. Director Abbas said he would be able to identify Rizvi but he was not present in the court. However, Abbas identified co-accused and Rizvis assistant Abdul Rahim Allah Baksh, sitting in the dock. Abbas said Abdul Rahim used to serve food and production articles to the staff of the films unit and that he had seen him on the sets earlier. During cross examination, the witness told defence lawyer Majeed Memon that he had signed confirmation letter for direction of film "Chori Chori Chupke Chupke" on the recommendation of actor Salman Khan. "In Bollywood, stars often recommend the names of Directors to the producers", he said in reply to a question. Abbas agreed with defence lawyer Majeed Memon that in the film industry all means were adopted to promote the publicity of a venture. "When I heard adverse news about film "Chori Chori Chupke Chupke" in the media, I also believed that it could be a publicity stunt", the witness said. Abbas said when police was recording his statement he had mentioned that Abdul Rahim used to serve food and production articles to the staff of the films unit. However, he could not attribute any reason why this had not been recorded in the statements recorded by police. Abbas refuted allegations that he was falsely deposing at the instance of police and that producer Nasim Rizvi and co-accused Abdul Rahim Allah Baksh had no connections. He denied having been tutored by police to give false evidence. He was also cross-examined by defence lawyers Srikant Shivde, S M Chimade and Vibhav Krishna.(PTI) Naik directs BG chief to settle operatorship issue by Oct 31 NEW DELHI, Oct 9: Petroleum Minister Ram Naik today directed British Gas chairman Richard Giordano to amicably settle the issue of Panna-Mukta oilfields operatorship with its other partners, ONGC and Reliance, saying that the Government does not want to intervene at this stage since the entire issue involves commercial activities . However, we are keen that the operatorship issue should be settled at the earliest so that the gas production from the fields could be increased to 14 million metric standard cubic metres per day (mmscmd) from 8 mmscmd, the Minister told the BG chief, who came to India to discuss the issue with its other partners as well as sought the Governments intervention. Mr Naik specifically told Mr Giordano that the operatorship issue should be settled by October-end. Talking to mediapersons after his 45-minute meeting with Mr Giordano at his chamber, Mr Naik said the BG chief again reiterated the companys demand of continuing as the operator of the field. When asked what action the Ministry proposes, if the issue was not settled by October 31, Mr Naik refused to comment. However, both other partners are opposed to the British firms demand. The three JV partners have been at loggerheads ever since British Gas claimed operational control after buying Enrons 30 per cent stake in the fields for 350 million dollars in January. ONGC and Reliance, who hold 40 and 30 per cent equity respectively, had rejected the management model suggested by British Gas to operate the Panna-Mukta and Tapti oil and gas fields as it deviated from the March Memorandum of Understanding, signed by the three partners to equally share responsibility in the field. BG had proposed that there would be one "boss" running the show and partners (ONGC and RIL) involved in the macro-level planning. The Indian partners had also suggested their operatorship model to jointly manage the Panna-Mukta and Tapti oil and gas fields. According to their model, ONGC would appoint the Chief Executive Officer, Reliance would appoint the Chief Financial Officer while BG would appoint the Chief Operating Officer in the proposed joint operatorship. But, BG was not in favor of the idea of giving ONGC the coveted post of CEO. The BG chairman will meet its partners tomorrow to find a solution to the problem, which has been affecting the investment proposal. Mr Naik said he clearly told the BG chief that he was interested that gas production should be enhanced, which works out to around ten per cent of the countrys gas production. The Panna-Mukta and Tapti oilfields are also producing around 27,000 barrel crude oil every day. After emerging out from his meeting with Mr Naik, Mr Giordano said he was keen to settle the operatorship issue at the earliest.(UNI) |
||
|
||
| home | state | national | business| editorial | advertisement | sports | |