.


EDITORIAL

A new beginning?

The best thing about the new Government is that it is new. That single factor gives hope that new beginning could be made and the desired corrections put in place. The slim ministry that was sworn at the weekend in Srinagar is a fine thing. Commentators have, wondered why this State of a mere crore population and four-score legislators needs three-dozen ministers. It is not only the substantial saving on the ministers and ministries but also the spirit that matters; a small and compact ministry would send the right signals for curbing expenditures all through. It could also reduce the role of unholy liaisons and influence-peddlers who multiply in direct proportion to the strength of the ministries. Today people need governance not contacts that in the final reckoning are little more that corruption-channels. Accordingly, people from all over the State have commanded the compact ministry and its proportionate representation, the good men there. But all know that it is just a symbolic thing, sworn in to take charge.

That it is to get bigger, .........more


Indian in Search of aleader

By P.R. Gupte

The contemporary politics is beset with a desire to be equal to the leaders of the bygone era in the mould of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, lovingly called the Iron Man of India. Among the top runners are the Deputy Prime Minister,.......more

Healing touch with caution

By Omkar Dattatray

God himself is the great healer. But as they say that Lord helps those who exert themselves. So Mufti Mohammad the Chief Minister of the trouble torn State cannot be faulted for advocacy of his theory of healing touch to the ......more

Ceasefire within the parivar

By P N G Subramanian

The store- house of Chinese historical evidence is vast and evidentially strong and has made Chinese task easy in referring constantly to and learning from historical lessons- in the nature of benchmarks..........more


EDITORIAL

A new beginning?

The best thing about the new Government is that it is new. That single factor gives hope that new beginning could be made and the desired corrections put in place. The slim ministry that was sworn at the weekend in Srinagar is a fine thing. Commentators have, wondered why this State of a mere crore population and four-score legislators needs three-dozen ministers. It is not only the substantial saving on the ministers and ministries but also the spirit that matters; a small and compact ministry would send the right signals for curbing expenditures all through. It could also reduce the role of unholy liaisons and influence-peddlers who multiply in direct proportion to the strength of the ministries. Today people need governance not contacts that in the final reckoning are little more that corruption-channels. Accordingly, people from all over the State have commanded the compact ministry and its proportionate representation, the good men there. But all know that it is just a symbolic thing, sworn in to take charge.

That it is to get bigger, fatter till it would be a little Appu frolicking on the State expense. Indeed, if the National Conference, which had no need to balance interests, never thought of slim and strong ministries, the coalition is ill placed to restrict the number of their ministerial lordships who in due course of time can be expected to put an extra, if not overbearing, pressure on this fragile State, its governance and its funds. It is notable that the only efficient and praiseworthy period in the 27-year NC rule as the 2-year stint when Sheikh Abdullah had a miniscule ministry. Thereafter the ministries began to get bigger and administration became lax till it finally disappeared in the jumbo ministry that has just been voted out. Possibly, the people who have fought the election on the slogan of efficiency would remember whence all the inefficiency, corruption, sycophancy and ill-rule come. But is more probable that they would seek the loaves and fishes of the office and take their pounds of flesh. Would they still prevent further denudation of the state body and exchequer? It would be a miracle if they can achieve both ends.

Yet, it can be well nigh expected that the others may refuse to join in the jamboree and would sit back to see that their agendas are implemented, that the high promise of an honest rule is implemented and that all the regions of the State get a balanced treatment. The new Chief Minister appeared to hold out that promise as a Diwali gift for this region. As he admitted, ever since 1947, the people of this region have not got a just and equal treatment. That is a candid statement for the head of the State to make. But then, people expect this Government to speak true, decide truly and remain true in implementing their promises and decisions. As it is many people, many, sections of the State population have been widely discriminated against over the past. Unnecessarily, too for, it is not the people who want others to be discriminated against, or to prosper at the cost of others. They want to live in harmony and peace, in equality and brotherhood for they know that they cannot prosper without one another, or at the cost of one another. That, a lopsided development is helpful only to the exploiters of the sentiments, to the people who want to build their own careers at the cost of the people.

Yet that is what they have been told to root for, to vote for, to support and struggle for. The people of this State, have been divided, and polarized over grievances and shares. Without imputing blames, one must add that the inequalities inflicted upon this State remain seething wounds on the body of this State, which have been threatening to tear it asunder. The new Government has been talking of healing touches. The greatest healing would be to remove the inequality and imbalances imposed upon the people and regions. It would be a yeoman’s service to this State if the Government can make a beginning in the direction and bring all people on an even keel. It would need a fair and unbiased assessment of the realities, populations and allocations in the State, the works their quality and distribution, the needs as well as the deprivations various people have been made to suffer. All that calls for a just distribution of the cake as well as the commitments. A mechanism would have to be evolved whereby no people are ignored, no section is slighted, no part overburdened, no group made into favourites.

Here, a mere representation in the ministries to different sections and regions does not help, unless they can influence the policies in favour to that region or section. As the Chief Minister said it is the decision making that matters. That decision- making has been a monopoly-holding. It would have to be spread out, to incorporate the different peoples and regions, their needs and perceptions. That would not be done by inducting loyal pallbearers into cabinet from the aggrieved groups or sections but by addressing the grievances in a balanced and unbiased manner. So far one has heard all the right noises. The point is converting them into policy perspectives. That would begin to show as the new Government sits down to business. The elections have seen different sentiments and feeling aired rather openly. Probably, that was all needed because the slants have grown quite obvious as well as injurious. So have the misuses and exploitations. Even the parties that are partners today rode on that sentiment to an extent. All that would have to be put behind if this State is to be put on the tract, if the brotherhood and oneness is to be fostered, if the bonds of unity are to be strengthened not sundered. A clean breast, a balanced vision and a sincere urge to remove all irritants and not to cash on them can go a long way in healing the raw wounds.

Indian in Search of aleader

By P.R. Gupte

The contemporary politics is beset with a desire to be equal to the leaders of the bygone era in the mould of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, lovingly called the Iron Man of India. Among the top runners are the Deputy Prime Minister, Lalkrishna Advani, and the acting Chief Minister of Gujarat, Mr. Narendra Modi. Admirers of Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee also, at times, compare him with Jawaharlal Nehru. Sycophancy has become the hallmark of Indian politics. The weakness of the Indian intelligentsia as well as of the laity is their piteous yearning for a leader. They want him so that they might be assured o a life of ease, security, and mediocre well-being as a gift from him and therefore without any effort of their own. The cry for a leader was heard as soon as British rule disappeared from India. Whenever I have spoken about unsatisfactory political, social, or economic conditions in India during the last 30-syears or so I have got the stereotyped reply : "We have no leaders," or its alternative, "We need a dictator." Nehru was not accepted as one.

Since his death the yearning has taken a more deluded form, which makes the intelligentsia see a leader in anyone who has a little more energy, assertiveness, obstinacy, or even perversity than they possess. These men forget that India did have men who could be regarded as leaders by any standards adopted for them, for instance – to mention only three – Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharalal Nehru, and Subhas Chandra Bose. Even they have made no difference to the course of Indian history or the conditions of the Indian people after independence. The criterion of leadership is becoming progressively lower. While Indira Gandhi was a despot her son, Rajiv instead of a leader turned out to be a prince charming. Mr. Atal Behari Vajpayee is trying to be an odd combination of everything put together. In the process, he is neither a leader nor a layman. That is probably his personal as well as national tragedy. Disappointment after disappointment does not weaken Indians’ desire for a leader and the hope of his emergence as if by a miracle.

This is not, of course, the apocalyptic faith many people had in the past in the appearance of an Avatar, or Messiah, or Imam Mahdi. That faith was based on a religious eschatology and inspired by trust in an omnipotent and loving God. Although put in the super-natural order, the expectation sprang from the idealism and moral strength of the community which held to it. As a result, it made the community which nursed the expectation capable of effort, endurance, and, above all, self-criticism. The current yearning for a leader has not instilled one of these qualities in the Indian intelligentsia. Their wailing for him is like the cry of a child for its mother when it is hungry or frightened. But a child always has a mother. Nations do not get leaders unless they deserve them. If God sends a leader to India today he will have to be capable of working miracles like giving sight to the blind, making the lame walk, and raising from the dead.

The truth is that educated Indians of today have no understanding of the phenomenon of leadership, because, on the one hand, they have ceased to be the raw material out of which leaders may emerge, and, on the other, become incapable of providing the following needed by all leaders. I have always thought of leadership among men in terms of a chemical phenomenon, that of crystallisation. Crystals can form only in a highly saturated solution in water of the material of which they are made. In the same way, the qualities which are present in a concentrated form in the leaders, have to be present in a diluted form in the whole population. Without this co-relation there can be no leaders.

The historical junctures in which leaders appear, and appear at a very young age, are political or social revolutions in a country. Thus every such revolution has seen men of exceptional ability who are also young, ranged in a hierarchy. The leader of this crops of leaders might be very gifted, but he is to a greater or lesser degree only the primus inter pares the first among equals. I shall illustrate the correlation of revolution, leadership, and youth by giving some examples, beginning with Napoleonic France.

When in 1800 Napoleon as first Consul, became the dictator of France, he was 30. He had with him 22 soldiers who became his active Marshals. None of them were above 50; only four were between 40 and 50, the one was 26. Only two of them were of noble birth, the others came from the middle-class, and even the working class. All of them rose by virtue of their talent, and never by patronage. They did not have to be groomed for their position.

At the time of the Meiji Revolution in Japan, the Emperor (Mutshuhito) was only 16; the leaders of the revolution were young: Okubo was 38, Itagaki 31, Okuma 30, and Ito, the most active and energetic of them, only 27.

In China, Sun Yat-sen emerged as a leader before he was 30; Chiang Kai-shek became the dictator of his country when 41; and Mao emerged as a leader when he was 27.Coming now to the Russian Revolution of 1917, one finds that Lenin was then 47, Kalinin 42, Stalin 38, Trotsky 38, Kamenev 34, Zinoview 34, and Bukharin 29.

Last of all, in Turkey Mustafa Kemal restored the position of his country after the defeat in the first World War when he was 41. But he had already established his reputation as a military leader at the age of 34 when he commanded in the Gallipoli Peninsula and contributed to the Turkish victory overt the British in 1915. Ismet who became the leader in Turkey after Kemal, was only 38 when he won the decisive battle of Afiyon Karahisar in 1922.

It might also be added that all the Indians who attained to the position of leaders in the nationalist movement had emerged as such between the ages of twenty five and thirty, talent being precocious in India. But no upsurge of young men was seen in 1947, when it should have occurred. So, Nehru, himself nearly 58, had to form his Government with men who were even older than he. The only man who was below 50 was Sardar Baldev Singh, and everybody knows why he was included. About the men with whom he had to run the Government of independent India from 1947 Nehru had already written in 1939, when many of them were at the head of the Congress governments formed in the provinces under the Act of 1935: "They are worn out in mind and body and their troubles from all directions tend to increase. I would hate to have their job.:" I myself have the original of this letter. In addition, many of his senior colleagues suffered from incurable cardiac trouble. In the 50-years (and more) which have followed not one man of exceptional political ability has appeared in India.

This is a human situation of ominous significance. It would be foolish to dogmatise about the absence of talent in contemporary India. Genetic, social, and cultural factors in combination may be responsible for it. In any case, nothing can be done about it by conscious effort. Genius bloweth where it listeth. But men of ordinary stature can do something: they can work hard to make up by joint, average effort a part at least of what can be accomplished by leaders of genius. But even this response to the challenge before India is not coming from the generation below 50, not to speak of 30. INAV

Healing touch with caution

By Omkar Dattatray

God himself is the great healer. But as they say that Lord helps those who exert themselves. So Mufti Mohammad the Chief Minister of the trouble torn State cannot be faulted for advocacy of his theory of healing touch to the people J&K State. However, Indian Government has been consistantly trying to heal the hurt sentiments of Kashmiris. Yes the hearts and minds of people have to be won but not at the cost of national security. During the last 55 years of self rule and freedom Delhi has failed to win the hearts of Kashmiris and now it is to be seen, how will the new Chief Minister heal the wounds of Kashmiris. It is also to be seen as to how will he try to fulfill the aspirations of Kashmiris. Otherwise, there is nothing new in his theory and perception of healing touch theme. But then the healing touch should be with utmost care and caution. Terrorism in J&K is more foreign sponsored and less of indigenous character. It is the foreign mercenaries in a great numbers who are indulging in mayhem in the name of so-called Jehad. This foreign dimension of militancy should be taken into view in practising healing touch prescription. Or else we will be losing gaining battle against terrorism. The job of managing the coalition is cumbersome and formidable given the varied perceptions even among coalition partners though they have agreed on a common minium agenda of governance. So the common minimum programme should be implemented with due care and caution. The coalition Government and its alliance partners must come upto the hopes and expectations of the people and try to relieve them from misery and deprivations.

The people of Jammu, Kashmir and Ladakh have suffered gravely during all these years of terrorism. Children, young, old infirm and innocent people have keen killed. Even women and babies have not been spared. Industry, trade, economy and infrastructure has been damaged. People are ground between the bullets of terrorists and security personnel and it is the people of all the three regions of the State who have borne the brunt of the excesses of militants. However, the greatest damage has been caused to the Sofi culture, ethos; Kashmiriyat and the inter religious harmony through ethnic cleansing of Kashmiris Pandits and other Hindu minorities from Kashmir. While as Kashmiris stand alienated the Jammuites and Ladakhis stand brazenly discriminated against by the successive State and Central establishments. Therefore, the genuine aspirations of Kashmiris, Jammuites and Ladakhis have to be fulfilled for the long term peace and prosperity of the State. The alienation and the distrust among Kashmiris should be removed and the feeling of discrimination, neglect and the step motherly attitude towards Jammu and Ladakh regions should also be addressed to and efforts made to eliminate such bias against Jammu and Ladakh. The coalition Government and its alliance partners individually have a great responsibility to see that no such hasty decision is taken which will give a moral boost to militancy in J&K. At the same time there is no denying that the new dispensation should try to wipe out tears from every eye. So, the need is to provide a responsive, responsible, transparent corruption free and accessible Government to the suffering masses. Not that the State Government does not have the necessary autonomy and powers to redress the problem of the people. Nor is finance any constraint in the State Development. Huge amounts of money have been pumped to the State right from the days of the so-called popular rule. The money had not been properly spent on the development activities and the betterment of the people. So every penny needs to be spent on the welfare and development of masses. Money should not be pocketed by the elite few. The people of Jammu & Kashmir are their own masters and they can shape and reshape things for themselves. The only thing is that they should be made to feel so.

No laxity and softness should be shown with those who have committed serious crimes like killings, rapes and loot of public property during the years of terrorism. However, those who are not involved in any serious crime may be let off after proper screening. But the pressure on the terrorists and foreign mercenaries should continue with redoubled effort. The new rulers should see the writing on the wall that when Surjeet Singh Barnala the then Chief Minister of Punjab freed militants and terrorists after the assumption of office, the terrorism there reached an all times high record and it brought the State back for the brink of disaster even after elections.

Thus necessary guard and precaution has to be taken by the coalition Government at every step. Urgent task brings the State back to peace and normalcy but it cannot be done in a short span. However, the efforts in this direction should be earnestly persued. People of the State are fed up with the terrorism and dance of death and they like to live in peace. So development and dignity of the masses should be ensured. Economy of the State has come to a grinding halt due to Pak sponsored terrorism during last twelve years. Therefore, transparent and honest employment policy is the need of the hour. Here also no populist and impractical policies need to be persued. But pragmatic employment generation schemes both at Governmental level and industrial level should be launched to eradicate poverty in the strife torn State. Public distribution system needs to be strengthened and basic services like water, health, transport, electricity and schooling of children needs a top priority attention. Neglect of Jammu and Ladakh regions needs to be removed by attaching top most priority to these hitherto neglected areas by initiating developmental schemes at par with Kashmir. Similarly the alienation of Kashmiris needs to be addressed to by ensuring their full participation in governance through Panchayat Raj system. Quick redressal and delivery mechanism needs an urgent attention. All said and done the minimum programme of governance of the coalition partners should not have regional and sectarian overtones and it should in no way be at variance with national security. Non-application or repeal of POTA, disbanding or merger of special operation group with State police, and such other schemes have the stink of an appeasement policy which may be counter productive in the long run. There is need to probe any genuine human rights violation, if any, at the hands of security forces who have been performing their duty of protecting life and property of the people. At the same time the rulers cannot shut their eyes towards the human rights violations of very severe nature at the hands of terrorists. Have the innocent people of State and those ousted from their homes and hearths no human rights at all. Probe into human right violations should not be partial or lop-sided. People need safety of their life limb property and want to live a dignified life. The hopes that Mufti Mohd Sayeed's statement of giving a healing touch to the people of the State will restore the confidence of the masses in the new dispensation. Yes, the problem in Kashmir must be addressed through the prism of Insaniyat. Thus human approach with a psychological treatment is needed to heal the wounds of the people of Jammu, Kashmir and Ladakh but the New Government will have to tread the path with care and caution.

In case, the Mufti Mohd Sayeed's coalition Government succeeds in containing the militancy and removal of partiality and discrimination in this State, it will win the elections even after the expiry of 6 years period of the present elected Government, without any doubt.

Ceasefire within the parivar

By P N G Subramanian

The store- house of Chinese historical evidence is vast and evidentially strong and has made Chinese task easy in referring constantly to and learning from historical lessons- in the nature of benchmarks.

The Heavy Industries sector grew mainly based on indegenous technology, but borrowed from, and patterned on, the erstwhile Soviet Union and further developed to suit local conditions. China became a country with a totalitarian economy ruled by a Communist autocracy, to call it simplistically.

Since its abandoning of Class War and the Adoption in December 1978 of Socialism with Chinese characteristics, that is labelled as Economic Capitalism and Political Socialism, China's has been one of export-led development.

Chinese progress towards accession to the WTO was guided as much by historical sense as by realistic pragmatism.

Compact and efficient management has been possible in Chinese Society. As unsurprisingly, an overwhelming majority of the Chinese welcome this strictness in governance for the sake of the greater glory of China.

China has abundant natural resources for industrial and all round development. In terms of growth and also in terms of exports, China has many benefits in terms of availability of basic raw materials, cheap energy and cheap and efficient transportation (road and sea), increasingly higher productivity.

Since the 1990s, the educational system has been continually restructured, with an accent on technical and vocational education. Formal education is supplemented by training in specialized industrial training institutes to produce qualified craftsmen, and technicians. The Chinese success in industrial growth is related to the combination of technological, organizational, institutional and human capabilities.

Economic growth has been seen by the Chinese to have speeded up in the recent years from 1992 with enhanced comprehensive strength. Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of the year 2000 was up by 8.0 percent over the previous year at comparable prices. Investment in fixed assets too went up. The important point here is the investments in fixed assets have come out mostly from domestic savings. Overseas Chinese who have any way provided a substantial proportion (some figures suggest 80%) of the total investments of US$ 300 million pledged and nearly US$ 250 billion accrued.

The key economic issues that the Chinese leadership faces today is the question of liberalization of the economy without undue destruction of the State sector- the State-owned enterprises, the SOEs.

China with total foreign trade of almost US$ 500 billion is world's 10th or the 9th largest trading nation. The integration of such a large entity, with gigantic natural resources, into the world's economy demanded by the foremost multilateral trading body, the WTO, has impacted on all other countries- big and small. This presents India with both opportunities and challenges. India has been slow to wake up to it.

Anti - Competitive Practices : China continues to struggle with many economic inefficiencies.

There are investment disincentives created by local protectionism, predatory pricing, preservation of industry-wide monopolies, and monopolistic practices designed to protect the state-owned sector, existing laws are ineffective to prevent this, despite adherence to WTO stipulations.

China restricts imports through a variety of means, including high tariffs and taxes, non-tariff measures, trading rights restrictions, and other barriers. Prohibitively high tariffs, in combination with taxes and other import restrictions, block many imports.

A large number of factors enable successful mainland Chinese interactions with the US and the West indeed at many different levels possible, despite the fact the Chinese grasp of English remains inadequate, qualitatively and quantitavely. Chinese cost of labour is still cheap; Labour laws are geared to export-led development. Cost of money is cheaper too. Electricity is cheaper. Water is almost free; Land costs are negligible.

The spectacular Chinese economic development despite having world's largest population, poses for us and many other countries a challenge of immeasurable magnitude.

The major focus of Indian policy initiative should be on enhancing the role of education, suitable to a system of production being driven by skills, knowledge, technology and networking.

India and China are in many ways competitors in the marketing of industrial output but there are areas they will be complementary and will have synergism in cooperation. So there is a big scope for exploiting each other's market taking advantage of each other's merits and handicaps. Combined together the market is vast and it needs careful planning and identification of trade off areas between the two countries.

Initially it could be purely import/export of industrial output, rather than direct investment. Then identify the owners of the most important technologies and invest accordingly to share the market. This could be possible in many areas.Some areas require immediate attention for development with a view to embarking upon opening up opportunities for Indian industry immediately. These are : Agriculture, Minerals, Building Material, Chemicals, Pharmaceuticals, Computer software, Hotel Industry, Professional services and audio-visual.

(The Author is former consul General of India in Shanghai)

 
 



|
home | state | national | business | editorial | advertisement | sports |
|
international | weather | mailbag | suggestions | search |
subscribe | send mail |