EDITORIAL
Late
though right
The latest US
confirmation, in the address of the American
ambassador to India at Mumbai that the terrorism,
or militancy as some still cal it, is all foreign
(Pakistan) based, supported and sustained is a
very late admission of a fact that has been well
known to at least the US since its very
inception. Its intelligence knew how and where
the terrorists were being trained, probably, even
how many were, and are, being sent over in
how-big batches. And, other logistics of the most
devilish operation that the greatest democracy of
the world silently saw being imposed upon the
largest democracy on the globe. And quietly
suffered a whole people being subjected to the
greatest subversion in the history of the modern
world. One may not call it criminal, but it is
difficult to find another description for this
violation of the basic humanitarian concern that
even civil society must possess. But, then, it
cannot be ignored that there are lobbies and
forces within the country, not at all unpatriotic
in the strict sense of the term, which also have
refused to see the truth because it did not go
well with their momentary interest.
There are others
who, though seized of the situation still refused
to acknowledge it, in the mistaken belief that
telling the truth would not be 'good'. Then,
there are people who even after knowing all,
seeing all, sometimes speaking about it still
would not do anything about it. In that backdrop
it may not be quite right to blame America. After
all defense is a personal responsibility and the
people who are not ready to defend themselves,
cannot expect others to fight their wars. One,
however, does wonder what do the high
advancements, all achievements of mind and
victories over matter mean to people- collective
and individual. Those who have gone through the
latest revelations about the Kissinger-Chou en
lai talks in the seventies, either in part or
whole, cannot but ask that question. What exactly
is the Harvard professor that Kissiger was,
telling this Chinese counterpart? That they have
to forge a stinking alliance against the people's
and nations of the world to keep them duly
subdued, properly yoked and firmly away from
freedom. Was that the promise that the American
Declaration of Rights and held out to the people
?
When Indira Gandhi
pointed to this very promise with a clear mention
of the Declaration in her letter to Nixon on the
eve of Bangladesh's independence, the American
President had no eye for it, because he 'had to
support Yahya Khan' in Pakistan! Now it is not
the question of India-Pakistan or Bangladesh but
the broader question of an intellectual integrity
and personal honesty that matters here. At least
two generations of the world have grown awed by
the 'greatness' of Nixon's secretary of state in
political and academic fields. They have looked
to him as a contemporary giant, modeled their
outlooks upon his dictums and now he turns out to
be a petty manipulator, with an intrigue for
outlook and vision, and a vast resource and
machinery at his command. Is this what the height
of human intellect and integrity aspires to? What
exactly does the world, expect of America apart
from the fact that they can sed out Daisy Cutters
and B-52 bombers in a jiffy? If it is not truth
and honesty, it is nothing !
Kaha
to tha !
It is inherently
wrong to pit one part of the State against
another, as Jammu and Kashmir are being pitted.
If it is one State here, one people, there is no
priming this and pumping that region, no
positioning this part against that one. None is
exclusive, none can seek predominance, none must
be told that it is a part and people apart. All
the peoples of this State are equal; all have
equal rights to live in any part, to work in any
part and to lead the whole State. But while the
people believe in that essential equality, the
politicians have rarely practiced that
evenhandedness of approach. Had they been fair,
there would not have been any discrimination, any
imbalances, any grouses between the regions and
peoples. All the parts of the State depend on
others, acknowledge each other's rights and live
accepting each other's equality. Till, that is,
the politicians swoop down upon them and start
telling them apart, fanning their fears and
raising expectations. They pit them against one
another and get them to do their bidding. And,
once that end has been attained, they tell them
to live as brothers.
Chief Ministership
for Jammu has been one such issue. It was not an
issue at the polls, but was made into one. Nobody
had asked for it but then nobody had suspected
that a Jammu Chief Minister is per se not
acceptable. When that came out, in a naked manner
it could not but move people who helplessly
asked; yes, why not? Nobody had asked Congress to
promise it, but it did add it on to its gathering
list of indictments for the NC in this part of
the State. So did JKNPP. It smelt a chance to get
the post for this region, and put its weight
around it. And made it out as a hot thing it
could warm its votaries with. Today they may like
to wash their hands off any hint of ever having
alluded to the thing, but that would not be
truth. That would also not be fair. People just
are not game, though the politicians usually take
them to be mere, helpless pawns on their wish
board. They use them, exploit their fears and
saddle them with grievances, to sit their designs
upon. But that situation is changing. People are
learning democracy. They are learning that it is
the politicians not the administrators or the
official machinery who must be accountable for
all they do, say and promise. That, they must
deliver on their promises, or not make them in
the first place. Of course, that is the first
premise of democracy but it is only now that
people are realizing it. Someday they'd sit to
call tall promises to account
|
 |
Re-emerging
contours of Islamic terror
By N.B.
Menon
If the
hostage-taking drama at a southern Moscow
theatre, the Palace of Culture of the
Podshipnikov Zavod, proves anything, it
is the internal contradictions of the
international war against terrorism.
Possibly the most audacious terrorist
action executed by over 30 Chechen
separatists since the Pakistan-sponsored
terrorist strike on the Indian Parliament
on December 13, 2001, the unfolding
crisis in Moscow once again exposes the
dangers of granting intellectual
legitimacy to terror as the expression of
political grievances.
The risks
of such rationalisation are even greater
when Al Qaeda-Taliban fugitives are
running free, following
Afghanistans cleansing, spreading
their tentacles through disaffected and
hence manipulable sections of society the
world over. That Al Qaeda men were said
to have been spotted in Georgia
Pankisi Gorge is a Chechen sanctuary the
way Pakistan is to Kashmir-bound leaves
no room for doubt on this score. In a
world recovering from the World Trade
Centre destruction a year ago,
hair-splitting over the many faces
profiled in terms of so-called
"causes" of
death-dealers is a self-defeating evasion
of an obvious reality: The ends
whether a Palestinian state, a Chechen
haven, Kashmir, Akshardhams
"revenge" killings, or a
Bali-type dress rehearsal for an
anti-capitalist clash of civilisations
do not justify the means. And
more, these ends are increasingly being
conflated with a larger purpose: The
assault of Islamic radicalism on the free
world.
Admittedly,
Moscows hostage crisis must assume
global centrestage for the glaring
reality that terrorism is truly on an
international roam, only the context, the
"cause", the destination, the
origin, the people vary. Be it Al Qaeda
operatives in the United States, Chechen
rebels in Russia, "freedom
fighters" in Jammu and Kashmir, or
Palestinian suicide bombers in Israel, al
adhere to an identical script of terror,
wedded not to any cause
ideological, political or religious
but to a mindless game of death.
However,
before turning to the debate that the
Moscow crisis has once again forced upon
the world, one thought it in order,
albeit from the narrow professional prism
of a journalist, to dwell on the
treatment the crisis received on its
first day in the electronic medium in
India. In brief, it was nothing short of
appalling. On a day the world was served
a gruesome reminder of ever-expanding
international terrorism that got the US
on September 11, 2001, nearly got India
on December 13 the same year, and hit
Bali on October 12 this year, Indian TV
news channels thought it more expedient
to track the machinations of the
Mayawatis and Amar Singhs through the
day. This is not to suggest that domestic
politics, especially events relating to
the nerve-centre of Indian politics do
not deserve close watch. Unacceptable,
however, was the fact that Moscow was
pushed to a footnote, the crisis
featuring in the world affairs,
videshse-samachar, section of most news
bulletins. Late into the night, news
channels debated on end the fate of the
Mayawati Government in UP, issuing a
token acknowledgment of the fact that
Russia was in the throes of a major
terror attack. With little realisation
that it was one that could well become an
Indian story, another time, in another
place.
Indeed,
one can hardly fault CNN or BBC for their
obsessive concern with the snipers
latest move, the Moscow crisis only a
second lead on both channels. Americans,
known to be an insular race, were being
natural to their instinct in keeping
track of the latest on the sniper story
800-1000 odd hostages held by
mindless Chechen terrorists in far-off
Moscow a distant call for a nation that
sets the highest premium on American
lives in America.
BBC once
again was being only natural in according
priority to Americas dilemma over
one of Russias worst hostage crises
in history. What was puzzling however was
the fact that for a country that has been
cohabiting with terrorism for nearly two
decades and has thrust terrorism as a
priority item both on the foreign and
domestic policy agenda, its electronic
medium appeared to have either ignored,
or worse, missed the implication of the
hostage-taking in Moscow.
At the
risk of sounding prejudiced, one must
submit that the coverage the Indian print
medium reserved for the Moscow crisis
Friday morning more than made up for the
inexplicable indifference of the
electronic medium. With most newspapers
carrying the hostage crisis as lead, one
was relieved to see the incident placed
in due perspective, a moment that will be
registered as yet another link in the
endless chain of terrorist violence
running round the globe, India one of its
prime victims.
On another
note, the Moscow theatre siege also
suggests that some serious sociological
and psychological enquiry needs to be
made post-haste into what ails the Muslim
psyche, what it is that makes an Osama
bin Laden declare jihad in the name of
Islam, why "freedom fighters"
from Muslim majority regions across the
world delight in taking lives,
particularly their own. Freedom struggle
and independence are not unfamiliar words
to a majority of nations across the
world. Virtually the whole of Africa and
Asia as much as parts of Europe and
America have known what foreign
domination is. And, independence from
foreign occupation has not been bloodless
for most. Why then do these stories of
independence struggles read so
differently from the ones that are being
scripted by Muslims in different parts of
the world today? Why do Muslim-led
freedom struggles across the globe target
unsuspecting civilians more than the
concerned establishments?
Granted
for a while that Kashmiris, Chechens,
Uighurs or Palestinians have a just cause
for freedom. Whether or not global
capitals arrive at a consensus on any of
these "struggles", they can
little ignore the fact that killing of
innocent civilians has become a
pathological compulsion in all these
struggles . Admittedly, the world has
done well to stay away from the
"clash of civilizations"
theory, aware of the saner elements in
the Islamic world with whom business must
be conducted. However something is going
very dangerously wrong in sections of the
Muslim world, a disturbing trend of death
and destruction that must be attended to
if the world ever hopes to end the
scourge of terrorism. The insanity of
acts like the attack on the WTC, endless
killings in the Kashmir valley,
near-daily violence across Israel and now
the Moscow hostage-taking only suggest
that the "Muslim freedom
fighter" is in need of immediate
psychological assistance.
Apparently
Chechen Muslims trace their ties with
Islam to the time of Caliph Omar when
Arab missionaries spread Islam in the
Caucasus and are said to be devout
Muslims. Yet, they have no qualms about
wrapping a theatre-ful of unsuspecting
innocents with explosives. Osama bin
Laden is a devout Muslim, yet in the name
of Islam he smiles as the twin towers
crumble to a heap in far-off New York.
Palestinians have a grouse against
Israel, therefore militant Hamas
followers continue to blow themselves up
along with Israelis aboard buses, in
marketplaces and nightclubs. Successful
elections in Jammu and Kashmir
notwithstanding, innocent civilians must
continue to die for the
"self-determination" of the
Kashmiri people. While each has a
region-specific context, the modus
operandi and psychological make-up of the
freedom fighter has assumed uniform
shape, the link to which must be found in
the centres that train and develop such
mindsets.
The
obvious similarities in terror attacks
across the globe in recent times,
especially in the past year, point to the
fact that if at all the world community
is seriously concerned over global
terrorism, it must work together, beyond
narrow political compulsions, to identify
countries responsible for the export of
terror, as also their compulsions to do
so. Russian President Vladimiar Putin has
said those in control of the Moscow
theatre have been trained in
"foreign centres". New Delhi,
itself a victim of Pakistan-sponsored
terrorism, was quick to identify
"outside forces" as the
mischief-makers in the current siege. The
world has a common enemy today, one that
can attack anytime, anywhere. It is
therefore incumbent on global leaders
starting with the United States, to
undertake a genuine review of countries
exporting terror, in order that a
September 11 does not come re-visiting.
INAV
|
Internet
piracy: A flourishing business in India
By
Arvinder Kaur
Software
giant Microsoft has won its maiden.
Internet piracy suit in India, which is
also the first ever action in India for
the sale of pirated computer software
over the Internet. The Delhi High Court
passed this order last week, restraining
one person from selling pirated software
over internet or infringing
Microsofts right in any other
manner. This say experts, should help
deter pirates as also brave up companies
to initiate criminal action against such
thefts.
Software
piracy is one of the biggest concerns of
many global and local software vendors in
India. Piracy leads to use of the
intellectual property of the vendors
without paying any price. According to
estimates made by International Data
Corporation (IDC), the money lost in 2001
from pirated software in India was around
245 million US dollars, which is almost
half of the legal packaged software
market.
The losses
last year were mainly due to piracy by
unauthorised copying and selling and
unauthorised bundling with hardware,
which together accounted for 65 per cent
of the total loss.
In
unauthorised copying and selling, a
software application is simply replicated
into large batches of CDs and then
distributed through an underground
distribution network at a fraction of
price. Similar procedure is followed in
unauthorised bundling with hardware - a
software application is copied and
installed onto the assembled machines and
is sold along with the hardware.
These two
types of piracy are easier to detect and
prevent than other forms like end-user
piracy but they are still a major
contributor to the revenue loss. This is
due to a lack of proper legal framework
and implementation of existing laws.
There is also little realisation of the
intensity of piracy problem among
enforcement agencies and hence there is
no drive to curb it. As a result piracy
is still very rampant in India,"
according to an IDC study.
In general
the developing economies have higher
rates of piracy. However, the Indian
track record is relatively better as
compared to other countries in the
Asia-Pacific region like China, Vietnam,
Indonesia and Pakistan.
Software
piracy, infact, can be called a global
phenomenon. According to one estimate, a
staggering 12-15 billion dollar are lost
annually to this illegal activity. It is
rampant all over the world and ranges
from an incredible 98 per cent in China
and Commonwealth states to 35 per cent in
US.
Software
piracy is well above 55 per cent in most
European countries, while in Pakistan,
the incidence is as high as 96 per cent.
In absolute terms, the largest losses
accued in the US, followed by Japan,
Germany, France, Brazil and UK.
In India,
the major driving force for the use of
pirated software is huge availability of
the pirated software, high pricing of the
original software and burgeoning market
of assembled computers.
A large
portion of the PC users are not aware of
the Intellectual Property (IPR) laws and
think it is legal to copy software. The
Indian Copyright Act, 1957 covers the
piracy issues. It was amended in 1995 to
make it stranger. But despite a strict
legislation in place, piracy continues
unabated.
However,
legal experts say though anti-piracy laws
are well written, they need to be
consistent, effective and properly
implemented at all levels by both
Government and private agencies.
According to IDC, to reduce software
piracy, there is need to initiate
enforcement efforts as also organise
awareness campaigns by both the
Government and industry.
There is
also need for end-user education,
specific piracy law formation and making
prices more competitive. Though efforts
by the industry alliances like NASSCOM
(National Association of Software and
Service Companies) and the Government
have helped check the crime, it is still
at a very high level.
Most of
the independent softwares like Microsoft,
Oracle and Adobe are fighting through
NASSCOM and other industry alliances but
much needs to be done in areas of system
level software, authoring applications,
accounting and HR applications, office
applications, anti-virus tools &
utilities.
Karnataka
did a commendable job last year, when it
took the first step towards becoming
"Zero Piracy Organisation" with
the issuing of a Government order urging
all its departments to use genuine
software and laying down a detailed
process for checking the use of legal
software within the Government.
Karnataka
has been one of the pioneer states in the
country to announce an IT policy. The
step towards zero piracy state would
encourage development of the domestic
software market with a greater thrust an
intellectual property development.
NASSCOM,
along with the Economic Offences Wing of
the Delhi Police, conducts raids from
time to time. In one of the largest
piracy raids in the country in May, this
year, pirated software worth Rs 15 crore
was seized from five dealers in the
national capital. In another raid
conducted earlier in March, pirated
software worth Rs 11.74 crore was seized.
Experts
say due to the easy availability of
internet, piracy business is growing
rapidly and has the potential to harm
consumer confidence in conducting
legitimate business online. Ultimately,
it is the consumers who would need to
exercise caution and shop a little
smartly to avoid pirated software. The
official agencies too need to tackle it
on a war footing.
PTI
FEATURE
|
Novels
of Dalip Kaur Tiwana focus on women
By Ashok
K Choudhury
While
reviewing the contributions made by women
in Punjabi literature, one comes across a
long list of women novelists from the
periods before and after the partition in
1947. The foremost of them is Amrita
Pritam who is now a world-known figure
for fiction and poetry. Dalip Kaur Tiwana
and Ajeet Kaur are the next in the line.
In the words of eminent Punjabi writer,
Kartar Singh Duggal, "Dr Tiwana is
the counterpart of poetess Amrita Pritam
in Punjabi Letters. What Amrita Pritam
says in verse, Tiwana depicts eminently
in fiction, as much is short stories as
in novels."
Dr Tiwana
is primarily concerned with the psychic
reality of the faminine characters. The
characters in her novels are the
downtrodden and the innocent rural folk
with suppressed wants and desires.
Tragedy and irony mark the main elements
of her fiction. Complex inner duality of
the female psyche is the chief theme of
Tiwana. In her short stores, she is
remarkable in the art of depiction of
local colour, and she portrays faithfully
the anguish and agony of a separated
woman.
"Tiwana
is one of the foremost novelists in
contemporary Punjabi literature. She has
mostly written about the mindscape of the
downtrodden woman and her secondary
position in society. Even if some of the
women in her novels are educated and
economically independent, they are unable
to assert their identities as equal human
beings. Nor do they demand equal status
in the family and in the society, for
fear of what is at stake", says
Ajeet Kaur, a Punjabi literary critic.
Dr Tiwana
is the winner of the 11th Saraswati
Samman, instituted by K K Birla
Foundation, for the year 2002, given for
an outstanding literacy work in an Indian
language, for the novel Katha Kaho
Urvashi (Urvashi, Narrate the Story). The
Samman comprising a cash prize of Rs.
five lakhs was conferred on her last
August. Katha Kaho Urvashi, published in
1999, is a saga of three generations and
comprises five sections spread over 600
pages, encompasses the religious didactic
tale, fable, the oral tradition, the
monologue, the journal and the dialogic
form. Viewed as a composite picture of
reality, the novel breaks new ground and
projects a broken world in which there
are no black and white divisions, no
saints or villains but human beings who
are victims of their own impulses and
frailties.
The
Central theme of the novel lies in the
complexities of life and the cultural
structures, as they strive to salvage the
best in themselves. It does not have any
protagonist in a conventional sense. The
listener's presence is important all
through, but within the range, and the
reader-narrator relationship is altered
in each section. "The novel is the
pinnacle of Tiwana's long literary
journey. All renowned litterateurs and
critics of Punjabi literature have
greatly appreciated this novel.
Prior to
Saraswati Samman, Dr Tiwana got the
coveted Sahitya Akademi Award in 1972 for
her second novel Eho-Hamara Jiwana (Such
is Our Life, 1968), the story of a woman,
Bhano, who lived the life of a destitute.
She loses her husband very shortly after
marriage and is thrown out of her
husband's house after his death. His
memories haunts Bhano and she decides to
commit suicide but is saved by an opium
addict Narain, who later accepts Bhano as
his spouse. Bhano accepts Narain, who is
a good for nothing fellow only having a
house and a piece of land in a village.
She adjusts herself to her new social
surroundings rather well. Since she was
barren, Narain marries Bhagwati and
becomes the father of a male child. Now
he does not need Bhano and asks her to
leave home. Narain poses as if he is
doing a big favour by sending her to
another place for the sake of her
happiness.
Since the
publication of Eho Hamara Jiwana, she
does not seem to have looked back. A
chain of novels, a spontaneous flow of
creativity, followed. The novels of Dr
Tiwana are basically heroine-oriented and
deal with the themes regarding the women
situation in their socio-cultural
context. The slow awakening for their
rights seems to develop through a
self-analysis of the leading characters.
They journey towards the question of
their existence and are directly in
confrontation with society and themselves
simultaneously.
Whereas
the heroine in Teeli Da Nishan comes to
terms with her situation of being a
widows, the leading woman in Doorsi Sita
when raped by the village landlord could
not go back to her in-laws' house and
hence ends her hopes by suicide. In
Hastakshar, Seema suffers at the hands of
her husband Amar, who was her beloved
earlier. She dies in labour after giving
birth to a female child. Her death is
considered a form of her rejection of the
world.
Seema in
her second birth in the novel Paricha
becomes Simran who is the reincarnation
of her mother. She has inherited the pain
of the her mother's failure. Simran does
not want to forget her own independence
in the form of marriage.
Her finest
work, Langh Gaya Darya, Dr Tiwana emerges
as a stunningly powerful narrator of the
decadent society in the erstwhile
princely State of Patiala reflected in
the day-to-day life of those connected
with royalty. It is different from her
other novels as no individual vision is
allowed to emerge and no individual life
placed centre-stage. "In its
depiction of culture of the princely
State, it offers itself for comparison
with other similar novels, like Manohar
Malgonkar's The Princes and Nayantara
Sehgal's Mistaken Identity", says
Jasbir Jain.
Most of
her well-known novels are deeply rooted
in the socio-cultural ethos of the
erstwhile princely State of Patiala, but
going beyond its confines to address
questions of loneliness and rootlessness,
cultural alienation and existential
anguish, the individuals need to accept
change and the inability to cope with its
dynamics, and above all the unrecognised
longing for an anchoring in the stability
of past. She is not interested in
projecting the sublimity of love
relations through her mute heroines.
Tiwana
exposes the women of conventional
thinking who are traditionally
suppressed. She depicted, in her earlier
novels, the helplessness of conventional
and rather illiterate women, but her
later novels are about the woman who is
highly educated and fully conscious. Her
novels reflect the reality of a woman's
life against different caste and economic
backgrounds, nomadic, uprooted, compelled
to live within the system of polygamy or
bigamy, inhibited by her singleness,
marginalized because of her barrenness,
controlled and famed by the patriarchal
structure. They leave one with a feeling
of sadness. Yet these women are strong
and at times they surprise one by their
boldness. The character emerges as a
strong category in itself.
Dr Tiwana,
author of 27 novels, has also to her
credit over 100 stories published in a
number of volumes. Sadhana
(Endeavour), Yatra (Pilgrimage), Kise
Di Dhee (Someone's Daughter), Ik
Kuri (A Girl), Tun Bharin Hungara
(Please Respond), Malan (The
Florist), Tera Kamra Mera Kamra
(Your Room My Room) are the anthologies
of her stories. She excels in narrating
the woeful tale of deserted woman. Most
of her stories have been translated into
English, Hindi and Urdu published in
various journals.
Besides
novels and short stories, Dr Tiwana has
written a few sensitive autobiographical
accounts - Nange Pairan Da Safar (A
Journey on Bare Feet, 1980) and Puchhde
Ho To Suno (Listen, if You Ask,
1993). Together these two reflect her
dominant concern for social change and
aesthetic values. Nange Pairan Da
Safar got and the Gurmukh Singh
Musafir Award in 1982. The
autobiographical piece is a personal and
deeply moving account of woman's struggle
towards intellectual and emotional
self-realisation in a hostile
environment. It is a testament of faith
born of deep a convictions.
Apart from
fiction, short stories, autobiographical
account, Dr Tiwana has written ten books
on literary criticism. Her writings gave
the reader special insight into Punjab
and its people. She confines her canvas
to the areas of Malwa and Majha that lie
around and downstream the Sutlej. She
writes about there, their failures and
their fortunes. But she has captured
their spirit through a woman's
sensibility, gives a different dimension
and colouring to her writing.
A
sensitive and prolific writer, Dr Tiwana
was born on 4 May 1935 in Unchi Rabbon
village of Ludhiana district, Punjab.
Doing a Master's degree and a Ph.d. On
the Technique and Development of the
Short Story in Punjabi's from Punjab
University, she joined there as lecturer.
Dr Tiwana retired as Professor of
Punjabi, and Dean, Faculty of Languages.
Presently she is the Life Fellow of the
university. She has been associated with
a number of literary bodies, including
the Sahitya Akademi, New Delhi (1988-92),
as member of the General Council and the
Advisory Board for Punjabi.
She has
been the receipting of four State awards,
two national awards, and one
international award, for her literary
pursuits. Besides, Saraswati Samman and
Sahitya Akademi Award, she received: Govt
of Punjab Award (1961); Nanak Singh
Puraskar (1988); Shriomani Sahitkar Award
(1982); Best Novelist of the Decade Award
(1989-90) from Punjabi Academy, Delhi;
Canadian International Association of
Punjabi Authors and Artists Award (1985).
In the
words of Amrita Pritam "Tiwana
captivates and enthrals" not the way
a female pop singer does, but just the
way the fragrance does to entire
earth". In all her work it is the
agony of being or becoming a woman in all
possible incarnations - as a daughter, as
a wife, as a mother, as a sister or as a
lover."
K S Duggal
says, both Amrita Pritam and Tiwana are
given to talking about the plight of the
weaker sex in the man-made society around
us. The only difference is what while
Amrita's milieu is mainly urban, at times
even universal, Tiwana is rooted in the
soil, her own tradition and folklore,
economic exploitation of the social curbs
inflicted upon the other sex in society
in Punjab". However, critics have
considered the women depicted in her
novels suffer because of her emotional
attitude towards life. - CNF
|
|
 |
| |
 |
|