Use common Man's
language
Sir,
This has reference
to a letter "Sham Secularism" DE April
26, 2002 by Dr. R L Shant. Though the overall
outcome of Dr. R L Bhat's words which he has been
showering in his column "Yours
Randomly" emit sense of maturity, depth,
hold but I totally disagree with Mr. Shant when
he says "His style speaks for his
knowledgeably and hold over the living media of
journalism that makes every stark and unpleasant
facts pleasantly readable".
The Shakespearean
English of Dr. R L Bhat may soothe highly
literary nerves of personalities like Dr. R L
Shant but every reader is not a Shakespeare or
Wordsworth to understand the language that does
not fit in the periphery of modern journalism.
Actually today language of journalism should be
of that mould which is understandable to a common
reader.
Today's newspapers
are mostly read in running buses or on dining
tables because of the shortage of time and hence
one cannot afford to spill the time in seeking
the meaning of dictionary words. A true
journalist today writes in simple English without
using puns and knots. Using simple and straight
forward expression is an art which appeals a
common man. To write what is known as the
language of the common man is the right
journalistic approach but Dr. R L Bhat is lacking
the same. Temptation to use cliches, well worn
out phrase, inflating the style and dramatising
the story now-a-days are outside the domain of
journalism. Yes, the language of M L Kotru, Dr.
Jitendra Singh and Shyam Koul is strictly
according to the norms of a language known as
language of a common man.
Yours etc...
Darsh Ajit
Raghunath Pora,
Udhampur.
|