Musharraf's
alternative
Sir,
It is
somewhat gratifying to see that there is
now a greater convergence of views
between India and the US on the real
dimensions of the ISI sponsored terrorism
emanating from Pakistan.
American
eyes and ears are now opening though not
yet fully and rapidly as one should have
expected. Before January 2002, India's
repeated arguments that what is being
witnessed for the last thirteen years in
Jammu and Kashmir is not indigenous
Kashmiri militancy, but purely Pakistan
sponsored terrorism, used to fell on deaf
ears. One is heard now attentively,
patiently, and with lot better
understanding. Both electronic and paper
media provide a perceptible coverage to
what is actually happening in that part
of the world. One could sense a
realisation, though still hesitant, that
Jammu and Kashmir State in general and
Kashmiri Pandit community in particular
is and has been the victim of terrorism
of the most brutal kind from the
fundamental Islamic zealots of Pakistan
trained and indoctrinated in the
terrorist camps mushroomed all over its
territory.
It is
quite gratifying to note that by a
willingness, though not yet
whole-hearted, to admit in discussions,
that the war against terrorism cannot be
decisively won unless and until the
terrorist infrastructure in Pakistani
territory and of course elsewhere,
whether directed against India, USA,
Israel, or any other part of the world,
is literally and permanently destroyed,
and not in a make-believe manner as
General Musharraf did after his January
address on PTV. All the same it is
noticeably presumed that despite all his
higgledy-piggledy President Musharraf is
still the best horse available to US. Any
alternative to Musharraf at this stage
can or will prove worse.
Yours
etc...
Prof.P.L.Bakhshi
On -e-mail.
|