|
EDITORIAL When the American strikes on the Taliban began, nobody had thought that the first casualities to be reported wide from the Taliban strongholds would those of Pakistani nationals. The talk of body bags always conjured up images of American soldiers being killed in operations there. There was also high alarm that the start of the arrival of body bags would be a determinative factor in shaping up the American popular....more The Union Finance Minister has again pointed out that the country needs to get realistic on the front of economic reforms if it aims to garner the benefits of the market economy. And, rightly so. India as he says, was the last major country in the world to embark on the market economy. Though China has been only recently admitted to the new world trading....more |
Will
America be the By O P Modi By Umashankar Phadnis Vijay
Tendulkar : By Ashok K. Choudhury |
|||||||||||
EDITORIAL When the American strikes on the Taliban began, nobody had thought that the first casualities to be reported wide from the Taliban strongholds would those of Pakistani nationals. The talk of body bags always conjured up images of American soldiers being killed in operations there. There was also high alarm that the start of the arrival of body bags would be a determinative factor in shaping up the American popular opinions in America, which might lead to a turnabout in the actual proceedings of the war. Pakistani nationals succumbing to the bombings and being brought home, all sewn up in bags, was not an easily imaginable scenario. Yet, it is surprising that the eventuality was not visualized. As the original prompter, promoter of and participator in the terrorist activities, Pak nationals should have been expected to be killed all around. Perhaps the US propaganda that Pakistan was the 'front fighter' in the 'war on terrorism' caught the world in its wrap so well that its role in the whole game got conveniently camouflaged. But then can you ever escape the fruit of your karma? The results of your actions would always haunt your wake, says the Gita. How Pakistan is witnessing those truisms in slow replay! They saw it in Kargil. They see it in the 'battlefield' they have turned the once peaceful Valley of Kashmir into; they see it daily in the high mountains of Jammu as the security men and the people rise to better them out. They rarely acknowledge it, however. Pakistan refused to accept the body bags from Kargil, and many of the soldiers fighting for their evil causes had to be buried here. They never accept the ones from the State who are invariably buried as unclaimed bodies. To escape its being found out head over heals in the game of terrorism. Pakistan has invariably refused to acknowledge the return parcels of the men it sends out to wage unholy wars as a well meditated plan. Though the world easily sees through this ploy, it has generally helped Pakistan in wriggling out of any diplomatic cornering on the count. At times, it has also 'helped' its fond 'allies' in maintaining a straight face about the involvement of Pakistan in acts of high terrorism. In line with that plan they even refused to accept the newest body bags, now coming from their beloved Afghanistan initially, but had finally to accept them, probably, under popular pressure. Or was it because the US was involved? Indeed, the double standards of the American strategy are coming to light quite fast in this war on terrorism. Half a century ago, the WW II had given the lie to the British assertion that she was fighting a 'war for freedom' when it was widely shown that the Empire was the major trampler of right to freedom of peoples all over the globe. Though it did silence the initial plain speak of Eisenhower, especially the one about the Indian subjugation, the UK had finally to accept the unrelenting logic of that charge and the illogic of its practices. American here is faced with a like contradiction. Its 'ally' in the war on terrorism is the first suspect here. It is inconveniently the first one to have its nationals hit there. Fighting Pakistani terrorists with the Pak aid and assistance from the bases in Pakistan may be a good strategy but it is bad in logic and truth. It is an inconsistency in the American stand that it must correct sooner or later. And, sooner it does the better it would be for the Americans as well as the world, which is geared up for a total war on terrorism, not avenging the American wrongs alone. The Union Finance Minister has again pointed out that the country needs to get realistic on the front of economic reforms if it aims to garner the benefits of the market economy. And, rightly so. India as he says, was the last major country in the world to embark on the market economy. Though China has been only recently admitted to the new world trading regime, she has been practicing the principles of the capitalist economy for the last twenty years. Yet Marxist ideologues, politicians and economists -- they are all of one shade and slant, there - in this country continue to confuse the people and the industry about the role and relevance of the protectionism, conveniently forgetting that this last bastion of communism adopted the policies of capitalist economy when Soviet Union was alive and kicking. Deng's Modernizations are capitalism in its most brazen form. The practices that they have been following would shame even the most heartless capitalist. For one he would not have a heart, or the ability, to underpay his workers and undersell the goods in single-minded pursuit to earn dollars. Yet that is what the Chinese have been doing. And thereby, subjecting the Indian and other economies to the devil of dumping. The industrialists here would not be allowed to lay off millions of workers without even as much as a 'thank you', as they are doing there in China. Back in India, people who still are enamoured of the Chinese revolution would not allow the inclusion of the 'exit' clause to enable the industry to trim its labour force. Of course, touching the PSUs is high sacrilege here. The nation must keep paying for inefficiency and corruption, it must continue supporting these white elephants whether in road-transport, power or heavy industry, even when the undertaking have lost all meaning, social and economical. The hula-hoo whipped up in the wake of the Starlite sale is just one instance. There are hundreds of these white elephants riding on the backs of the State and Central Governments and eating into the hard resources. In fact, the whole liberalization debate is being resurrected through backdoors here, for purely political, thoroughly uneconomical reasons. To qote the Finance Minister again, ten years after the liberalization we are still debating the pros and cons when we should have been doing some hard economic thinking. And taking some apt decisions. On PSUs for one. On subsidies for another. On instituting labour laws for a third. And many more to reorient the nation towards growth. That fiscal disciplining in of the whole mindsets is well nigh needed. |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||